Upload
Login or register
x

Comments(92):

Leave a comment Refresh Comments Show GIFs
Top Rated Controversial Best Lowest Rated Newest
Anonymous comments allowed.
92 comments displayed.
Reply
+62
#25 - anon (01/08/2016) [-]
cant we just dress our soldiers with holy words/qurans whatever the **** they find holy and noone has to die
Reply
0
#65 to #25 - anon (01/08/2016) [-]
As crazy fun as that sounds, it probably wouldn't work. Neither would bullets in pigs blood. It's war, not some episode of a cartoon show.
Reply
0
#72 to #25 - anon (01/08/2016) [-]
Reply
+7
User avatar #37 to #25 - gevaudan (01/08/2016) [-]
As fantastic that would be, it would probably be considered a violation of the Geneva convention or some sort of violation of ethics.
For example: a few months ago some soldiers were coating their bullets in pigs blood. I'm sure that we're all aware of what this entails.
Word eventually got around and most militants in the area ran for their lives/souls.
A bunch a heavily armed Western soldiers that were originally going to grant a "glorious" death in battle now became Tour-guides to Hell.
Sadly, it was disproved by Command.
Reply
+4
User avatar #42 to #37 - blackmageewizardt ONLINE (01/08/2016) [-]
Can i be honest short?

Why? Why would you: as Commander, forbid this?

It has shown effectivness, it works, it makes the enemy retreat and you could give General less **** . It´s ******* war, if i have to decide between risking my man in an "fair" fight, and risking my man when they have an psychological Advantage, i would Chose the psychological Advantage everyday. The US ****** up there so hard already, why not just going full **** and use every variable possible? At the end of the day the results are: "less of my man are dead, who i had to send anyway into an fight, because i used psychologcial warfare."

FFS, it´s no biological weapon, no chemical one, it´s no weapon of mass destruction. Psychological warfare got used in EVERY war in humankind so far, why make here an difference?
Reply
+2
#46 to #42 - anon (01/08/2016) [-]
tl;dr: we're better than those sand ******* in every conceivable way. Doing something that can be considered "cruel" would give ammunition to the people who disagree with our actions.

For a similar case of applied cruelty versus serious backlash, look at the occupation of India and how that turned out when word got out that the British were the bad guys.
Reply
-3
User avatar #47 to #42 - manofparody ONLINE (01/08/2016) [-]
There has to be a line in war, otherwise all hell would break loose. Just because they use cheap tactics and aren't afraid to kill innocent people, doesn't mean we should too.
Reply
+3
User avatar #48 to #47 - blackmageewizardt ONLINE (01/08/2016) [-]
Yeah there are lines:

- Not attacking civilians.
- not using WMD´s
- not mowing them down when they give up.
- not creating mass camps to kill them silently off.
- unnecesary torturing prisoners of war.

Psycological warfare though? That´s part of the risk if you grap an weapon and scream you are soldier, alone to say you are soldier means you are constantly open for attacks which is already psychological damaging. Beeing 24/7 in an fight is psychological damaging. War alone is PSYCHOLOGICAL WARFARE, it IS part of war, the Goal of war is to break your enemy and make him submit, which NEEDS psychological warfare.

So really? If blasting them 24/7 with 185 dz of Justin Biebers newest hits would Show results on them and i could make sure my own soldiers don´t get affected through this, i would just put it up and blast their position with it until they surrender.
Reply
0
User avatar #71 to #48 - bucketofhurt (01/08/2016) [-]
WMD's are actually not a part of the convention. It's taboo to mention that.
Reply
0
#57 to #48 - zandersave ONLINE (01/08/2016) [-]
It would breed more hatred for the cruel America, and (maybe not immediately) result in more militants and a worse image for the United States in those areas.
Reply
+1
User avatar #59 to #57 - blackmageewizardt ONLINE (01/08/2016) [-]
Why? Because they made People that worsen their lives give up with nothing but psychological Tortur? If even just half of the **** that is out is true, most People who have to live under ISIS hate them.

US is the master of Propaganda, just buy some high priest figures and let them spread that every ISIS member deserves to go to hell through getting punctuaited with pig blood bullets. They have dirten the Name of Allah and dared to call for war and brought destructions to many, surely it´s not so hard to find passanges that would justefy such an Thing.

The locals would think then 3 times if they would want to join Groups that would get them to hell, the Groups would get paniked (if they are even deeply religious and not just rebelious anarchists) and Saudi can´t say much against this, unless they want to suddenly justefy why they think that terrorists don´t deserve hell.

Sometimes you have to headbutt the enemy on their Level to get the Job done.
Reply
0
#56 to #37 - gigabowzer (01/08/2016) [-]
I read the conventions, or summaries of them, and there was nothing that would be violated by applying pigs blood on bullets besides the fact that the insurgents would be willfully surrendering from a fight, which then the soldiers would be found war criminals for firing on these soldiers.
Reply
0
User avatar #67 to #56 - fuzzyballs (01/08/2016) [-]
oh well I guess that would make you the expert, reading small parts of the convention
Reply
0
User avatar #79 to #73 - fuzzyballs (01/08/2016) [-]
how is that supposed to change my mind? anyone can link a wikipedia page
I still think you're one of those people who like to comment about stuff they know barely anything about
Reply
-1
#80 to #79 - gigabowzer (01/08/2016) [-]
Would you like to make a rebuttal?
Reply
+8
User avatar #36 to #25 - fyaq (01/08/2016) [-]
Jesus you just gave us the ultimate defense against sand ******* .



Give this man a nobel peace prize. Obama gets it for being black, this guy should get like 4 or 5 in that case.
Reply
+10
#31 to #25 - valkooo (01/08/2016) [-]
you should be minister of defence man
Reply
+10
User avatar #32 to #25 - roflstorm (01/08/2016) [-]
That might be stupid enough to work



Reply
+108
User avatar #2 - pyjamadog (01/07/2016) [-]
Yesterday they raped a ******* of German women
Reply
-2
User avatar #30 to #2 - rifee ONLINE (01/08/2016) [-]
Wait, I've seen the news, but nowhere did they mention it was migrants. Source?
Reply
+5
User avatar #39 to #30 - AnomynousUser (01/08/2016) [-]
The majority of news stations are left-leaning and/or pushing pro-refugee agendas, so they'd rather just focus on Trump and Clinton having arguments that elementary school kids would find petty or misrepresentations of other events. That's the case in the US, at least. There were tons of women being raped/assaulted in Germany during New Years, and it'll probably happen the next time there's a big celebration (I think there's one in February).
Reply
0
User avatar #49 to #43 - rifee ONLINE (01/08/2016) [-]
Link please?
Reply
+1
User avatar #62 to #49 - lejunkyfaceman ONLINE (01/08/2016) [-]
that really happened. it's on the newspaper everyday now (although you hav to mention that it took them 3 or 4 days to cover this in the first place, so you could ask why it took them so long)
but they don't know if they were really all immigrants. most likely they were people already living in germany, but i don't know and i guess they won't tell.
Reply
0
User avatar #90 to #30 - rifee ONLINE (01/09/2016) [-]
didn't know I could get downvoted for asking for sources...jesus...
Reply
-65
#16 to #2 - sylaz (01/07/2016) [-]
No they dind't infact only one women, were outright raped.
The rest were simply mugged and groped..

Reply
+173
User avatar #21 to #16 - kiaserzerg (01/08/2016) [-]
oh that makes it all better, just one was raped and the rest where sexually assaulted, guess nothing bad happened.
Reply
+47
User avatar #23 to #21 - Riukanojutsu (01/08/2016) [-]
Stricly speaking, getting mugged is a good alternative to being raped.

So yea, it does make it all better. Not good, but better.
Reply
+7
User avatar #26 to #23 - kiaserzerg (01/08/2016) [-]
true, but in sylaz's context sentence, the structure of it basically denotes that since only one woman was raped by sand ******* , nothing bad at all happened.
Reply
0
#77 to #26 - sylaz (01/08/2016) [-]
Not at all, infact if you had bothered to check out the original comment before making your response. It would have made perfect sense, but you dind't cause you were to busy being relied up, like a SJW.

Reply
+5
User avatar #40 to #21 - captainprincess ONLINE (01/08/2016) [-]
well there's a difference between " ******** of people just got raped"
and "one person was raped and some others were groped"


It's the difference between "theres a bit of a bug going around, someone even died"
and "there's a deadly epidemic were all going to die!"
Reply
0
User avatar #55 to #40 - bandoslootshare (01/08/2016) [-]
you were making a lot of sense when I read

well there's a difference between " ******** of people just got raped"
and "one person was raped and some others were groped"

It seemed very sarcastic and ironic because you were trying to prove a point. Point made.
Reply
0
#50 to #40 - pyjamadog (01/08/2016) [-]
Guys calm. I'm just dog
Reply
0
#51 to #50 - captainprincess ONLINE (01/08/2016) [-]
hi dog
am cat
Reply
0
#52 to #51 - pyjamadog (01/08/2016) [-]
Hi cat.
you like the birds?
Reply
0
#53 to #52 - captainprincess ONLINE (01/08/2016) [-]
birbs are neat
Reply
+2
#60 to #21 - givemethesalt ONLINE (01/08/2016) [-]
He didn't say it's better he just called him out on ******** . I'm not a fan of immigrants either, but to say " ******* " makes it sound as if it were hundreds, which is obviously a lie.
Reply
0
#76 to #21 - sylaz (01/08/2016) [-]
That's nice, only one problem though. I havn't stated anything remotely like that.
I was merely calling the retard out on his **** ..
But apparently you were to dense, to realize this.
Reply
0
#61 to #21 - araell (01/08/2016) [-]
In fact yes, it makes it all better you ******* .
Reply
-7
User avatar #38 to #21 - reloadedhamster ONLINE (01/08/2016) [-]
Chicks get raped or molested all over the world every day of the week, what makes Germany so special????
Reply
+1
User avatar #27 to #2 - lankou (01/08/2016) [-]
I'm out of date in my refugee news, whats happening or can you link an article?
Reply
+1
User avatar #66 to #2 - rassamdul (01/08/2016) [-]
it happened new years eve you scrub
Reply
+1
User avatar #74 to #2 - scorcho (01/08/2016) [-]
don't lump in iranians with the refugees.
they may be governed by arabs, but the people are different.
also, there was just one reported case of rape.
no need to tell half truths to make it seem more dramatic, it was bad enough as is.
Reply
+2
User avatar #54 to #2 - huszti (01/08/2016) [-]
wasnt that on new years or did they do it again?

also that finally made it socially acceptable to complain about the refugees without being called a nazi
Reply
+7
User avatar #20 to #2 - greyhoundfd (01/08/2016) [-]
Iranians =/= Arabs. Iranians actually have a very long history of sexual tolerance, and even in Iran, though their social policies are conservative, the people themselves are very tolerant and relatively open.

I mean, they're one of the few countries where when they burn the American flag, their reason is very much understandable and agreeable. We placed a dictator into power who brutally oppressed their people, and since then have treated their country like **** and continuously dropped sanctions on it.
Reply
-5
#33 to #20 - anon (01/08/2016) [-]
>"Iranians = Arabs"
Kek, that is where I stopped reading, nice joke though.
Reply
+1
#34 to #33 - anon (01/08/2016) [-]
Pic related, average Iranian.
Reply
0
User avatar #83 to #34 - greyhoundfd (01/08/2016) [-]
There's bait, and then there's stuff that is so ridiculously nonsensical that not only is it obvious that they're writing it just for attention and anger, but it's also obvious that the user is at least partially retarded because they're not even trying.
Reply
+20
User avatar #6 to #2 - kacem (01/07/2016) [-]
they were soviet and it was 1945
Reply
+23
User avatar #3 to #2 - kristovsky (01/07/2016) [-]
Those were "Syrian refugees" (load of sand ******* and regular ******* from all over north africa) not Iranians.
Reply
+1
User avatar #4 to #3 - pyjamadog (01/07/2016) [-]
Oooh
Reply
-10
#15 to #3 - sylaz (01/07/2016) [-]
No it wasn't, it was north africans and arab looking folks.
But hey, don't let anything as simple as facts stop your fearmongering..
Reply
+6
#17 to #15 - kristovsky (01/07/2016) [-]
>Clearly state in my comment it arabs i.e. sand ******* and people from north africa
>"No it was people from North africa and arabs you're wrong and ignorant"

K den
Reply
0
#78 to #17 - sylaz (01/08/2016) [-]
Now that's funny! You clearly stated? Not even close, you called them Sand ******* and regular ******* , which could be interpreted as almost all of the people in the middle east and Africa. Also i didn't call you ignorant, hell not even close.
Infact i didn't call you anything other then wrong.
Maybe use your reading glasses, the next time. So you don't come up with all these sort of things.
Reply
0
#84 to #78 - kristovsky (01/08/2016) [-]
You're back? ******* hell you don't know know when to quit.

Arabs = sand *******
North africans = sand ******* + regular *******

It's not hard.....
Reply
0
User avatar #70 to #15 - bucketofhurt (01/08/2016) [-]
According to die welt the majority of the arrested were Syrians and Afghans, but quite a few Africans as well.
Reply
0
#35 to #3 - anon (01/08/2016) [-]
Iranians are still *********** you uneducated dune...
Reply
0
User avatar #86 to #35 - kristovsky (01/08/2016) [-]
not all *********** sandnignog to an equal degree.
Reply
+14
User avatar #5 to #2 - melwach ONLINE (01/07/2016) [-]
Yesterday = New Years eve
Reply
-8
User avatar #8 - heartlessrobot (01/07/2016) [-]
Yeah but who gives a **** ? It's not like it's the flag of an important country.
Reply
+17
User avatar #9 to #8 - selongb (01/07/2016) [-]
Bruh...

Do you even Middle Eastern geopolitics?
Reply
-7
User avatar #10 to #9 - heartlessrobot (01/07/2016) [-]
It's the Middle East, none of it's important.
Reply
-3
User avatar #12 to #11 - heartlessrobot (01/07/2016) [-]
Well yeah, they aren't even needed for oil, we get that **** outta Canada, Scandinavia, and I'm pretty sure they found 7 Imperial Assloads of it someone in the United States.
Reply
+2
#28 to #12 - ninjaflapjack (01/08/2016) [-]
The oil in the US and pretty much everywhere else is a lot more expensive to produce. Saudi arabia is important because it has **** tons of cheap oil
Reply
+2
User avatar #13 to #12 - selongb (01/07/2016) [-]
Be that as it may, the Middle East still has a huge effect on global politics.

For example a civil war in one Middle Eastern state has caused the "Refugee Crisis" that has lead to European states re-evaluating and even changing their border policies, policies the the EU spent years to establish.
Reply
-3
User avatar #14 to #13 - heartlessrobot (01/07/2016) [-]
Well, it was their dumbass fault for letting so many people into their countries.
Reply
0
#22 to #14 - anon (01/08/2016) [-]
When you have no borders it's hard to stop a what basically amounts to an invasion. It's like the crusades but backwards.
Reply
0
#29 to #22 - miasaki (01/08/2016) [-]
Does that make it any less their fault though? Most know why it happened, and what is currently happening because of it. The EU brought it upon themselves by neglecting **** that they should have gotten under wraps long ago.
Reply
0
#58 to #12 - zandersave ONLINE (01/08/2016) [-]
These organizations have the potential to kill YOU. Wherever you are sucking dicks. Have you heard what happened in France? 9/11? To say theyre not important is just retarded.
Reply
0
User avatar #82 to #58 - heartlessrobot (01/08/2016) [-]
They're dangerous, not important. So, carpet bomb them next time they pull **** .
Reply
0
#91 to #82 - zandersave ONLINE (01/09/2016) [-]
but theyre already in your cities
Reply
0
User avatar #92 to #91 - heartlessrobot (01/09/2016) [-]
There's barely over 3,000 people in my town, I can tell you they're not.
Reply
+8
#18 to #10 - anon (01/07/2016) [-]
found the redneck
Reply
-7
User avatar #19 to #18 - heartlessrobot (01/07/2016) [-]
Farthest from redneck you could be.
Lower class gayboy.
Redneck is usually around middle class, and usually straight.
Reply
0
#64 to #19 - hongkonglongdong (01/08/2016) [-]
>Redneck is usually around middle class
No. It is usually petite-bourgeois, but sometimes legit working class. The stereotype is definitely not middle class.
Reply
0
User avatar #81 to #64 - heartlessrobot (01/08/2016) [-]
Working class IS middle class here.
Reply
0
#85 to #81 - hongkonglongdong (01/08/2016) [-]
That is literally impossible.

Although I understand that you are being metaphorical. What do you mean exactly?
Reply
0
User avatar #87 to #85 - heartlessrobot (01/09/2016) [-]
People like farmers and factory workers are middle class, alongside most desk jockeys. Burger flippers, single income families, and welfare leeches are considered lower class. Doctors and CEOs and **** are upper class.
Reply
0
#88 to #87 - hongkonglongdong (01/09/2016) [-]
I think we're just going by different definitions. You're using the term in the general cultural term, while I was using it in the economic term. That's where those who produce are the working class. Those who own the means of production are middle class. Those who do a bit of both are petty middle class.

Which is why I said rednecks are working class or petit-bourg (petty middle class). Factory workers are prole, as are burger flippers, and some farmers (mostly farmhands). Some farmers are petty middle class (some of them very middle class), doctors are middle class and CEOs are very middle class.
Reply
0
User avatar #89 to #88 - heartlessrobot (01/09/2016) [-]
I was going by income.
Reply
+1
User avatar #44 to #10 - castereleven (01/08/2016) [-]
Don't politics ever. You are very clueless.
Reply
0
#41 to #10 - suborbital (01/08/2016) [-]
Found the person who has never left their continent of birth.
Reply
+1
User avatar #1 - melwach ONLINE (01/07/2016) [-]
When they're done, they can burn my ugly green bedsheets aswell.
Reply
0
#68 - theoldfritz (01/08/2016) [-]
You burn only the words
Reply
0
#63 - anon (01/08/2016) [-]
GIF
**anonymous used "*roll picture*"**
**anonymous rolled image**
 
Leave a comment

Top Content in 24 Hours

No entries found.
<
>
 Friends (0)