Upload
Login or register
x

Comments(19):

Leave a comment Refresh Comments Show GIFs
Anonymous comments allowed.
19 comments displayed.
#2 - solarisofcelestia ONLINE (01/05/2016) [-]
Too bad the Bohr-Rutherford model of the atom has been discredited for the newer quantum based theory.
User avatar #18 to #2 - platinumaltaria ONLINE (01/05/2016) [-]
Given the information they had at the time they got pretty damn close.
User avatar #15 to #2 - whiteusername ONLINE (01/05/2016) [-]
Too bad for Carlsberg brewery maybe. This ************ got a free beer house...
#17 to #2 - bann (01/05/2016) [-]
Nothing wrong with that, this paved the way for future science
User avatar #19 to #2 - ritzrules (01/05/2016) [-]
The Bohr-Rutherford model is still one of the most amazing discoveries of the atomic age. Prior to the gold foil experiment, the concept of the nucleus was unheard of. The nuclear model of the atom came forth as a result of this experiment, and while the nature of electron orbitals was not explained by the data collected, it did give rise to the general idea of negatively charged electrons in orbit around a central, positively charged nucleus. It paved the way for nuclear chemistry and physics and research into how electrons interact with each other to form chemical bonds.

For the information presented to him at the time, Niels and Ernest made huge ******* strides in the realm of atomic physics and chemistry. They got us out of the Plum Pudding Model. You ever tried to do atomic physics with the Plum Pudding Model? It sucks ass. Nothing works like it should. Niels and Ernest made my life easy.
#16 to #2 - anon (01/05/2016) [-]
>Too bad the Bohr-Rutherford model of the atom has been discredited for the newer quantum based theory.
That's not a bad thing. That's exactly how science works.
User avatar #4 to #2 - amalone ONLINE (01/05/2016) [-]
Yes, and both models are still taught in school. He made strides in chemistry and created the most accurate representation based on the most current information; what have YOU contributed?
#5 to #4 - stalini (01/05/2016) [-]
He's not a scientist, he is not supposed to contribute anything to science. That's a retarded comparison.
So now you can't dislike a movie because you have not taken any movies yourself?
User avatar #6 to #5 - amalone ONLINE (01/05/2016) [-]
I'm simply sick of overcritical asswipes ruining this website; sue me.
User avatar #8 to #6 - solarisofcelestia ONLINE (01/05/2016) [-]
I didn't mean to start trouble.
#7 to #6 - stalini (01/05/2016) [-]
then don't read the ******* comments you ******* retarded dog
User avatar #9 to #7 - amalone ONLINE (01/05/2016) [-]
Is retarded the only insult you know?
#10 to #9 - stalini (01/05/2016) [-]
but i also called you a dog
User avatar #11 to #10 - amalone ONLINE (01/05/2016) [-]
My profile pic is a dog. That's not an insult.
#12 to #11 - stalini (01/05/2016) [-]
that's why i called you that.. ok, i guess it does not count, let me think of something.. ermm.. you are a ******* .. cat.. YEAh, A ******* CAT
User avatar #13 to #12 - amalone ONLINE (01/05/2016) [-]
******* ...ouch man. Just...ouch.
#14 to #13 - stalini (01/05/2016) [-]
should not have talked ****
#1 - anon (01/04/2016) [-]
I will finish what you started.
 Friends (0)