RoboCopy. . Is that all you got? What do you expect?. Just because it was PG-13, doesn't mean it didn't have it's share of disturbing scenes.
x
Click to expand

Comments(109):

[ 109 comments ]
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#21 - bababuey (07/07/2014) [-]
Comment Picture
#63 to #21 - reefteef ONLINE (07/07/2014) [-]
#79 to #63 - madmanransom (07/07/2014) [-]
Oh, the memories of that one episode.
Oh, the memories of that one episode.
#23 - kuntbag (07/07/2014) [-]
the last frame
#3 - Lewx (07/06/2014) [-]
Just because it was PG-13, doesn't mean it didn't have it's share of disturbing scenes.
User avatar #12 to #3 - azraelthemage (07/07/2014) [-]
And that, ladies and gentlemen, is why the MPAA is a ******** organization.
User avatar #18 to #3 - captainprincess ONLINE (07/07/2014) [-]
That's exactly what it means
User avatar #19 to #18 - rynkar (07/07/2014) [-]
then ignore the picture he posted.
oh wait, you are a step ahead.
User avatar #24 to #19 - captainprincess ONLINE (07/07/2014) [-]
That's disturbing?
On the same level as the **** seen in the originals?
Nowhere even near

I'm lookin' at that picture and I'm thinking "Yep, PG-13 is right. Anyone a day older than 14 is gonna see that and not give a **** ."
User avatar #105 to #24 - rynkar (07/08/2014) [-]
Yes. Its a personal opinion you know.
Sure,a guy getting turned into ground meat is nasty and disturbing, but I still think a guy being reduced to nothing but lungs,face, brain and hand and forced to see what he has become is just as bad, just more on a psychological level.
User avatar #106 to #105 - captainprincess ONLINE (07/08/2014) [-]
It's weak is what
#68 to #3 - anon (07/07/2014) [-]
#26 to #3 - dehumanizer (07/07/2014) [-]
thats lousy cgi, the old movie looked realistic, but this is just ass
User avatar #34 to #26 - lordtriggs (07/07/2014) [-]
no it didn't. The old movie was almost comically over the top
#35 to #34 - dehumanizer (07/07/2014) [-]
yeah it didnt try to take itself seriously like this pice of **** , thats why it worked so well
User avatar #43 to #35 - icewraith (07/07/2014) [-]
I didn't even see the new one ,but you strike me as the type of cunt that posts a 2500 word essay on why the prequels suck every time star wars is mentioned.
#45 to #43 - dehumanizer (07/07/2014) [-]
Its my duty.
#108 to #45 - anon (11/27/2014) [-]
I totally recognise the guy in this Picture.....BUT FROM WHERE?!
(Source please, if you would be so kind.)
#109 to #108 - dehumanizer (11/27/2014) [-]
powerpuff girls episode where they meet pic related who was obsessed by them and collected action figures/dolls
User avatar #11 to #3 - vampireinarm (07/07/2014) [-]
cgi lungs, because no one saw those in biology class
User avatar #13 to #3 - slandersalamander (07/07/2014) [-]
Was that movie any good?
User avatar #15 to #13 - sixty ONLINE (07/07/2014) [-]
Yes.
It's highly entertaining and fun to watch.

Not as good as the original, but fun.
#74 to #13 - deckbox (07/07/2014) [-]
standard popcorn fodder, nothing really interesting, action mediocre, just very meh overall but burns 90 minutes
User avatar #41 to #3 - rdangerdash ONLINE (07/07/2014) [-]
I don't think it is so much the image that is disturbing here, as much as it is the idea of actually being in that situation. Being him right there would be one of the worst things imaginable, even if it does mean that you get to be robocop.
User avatar #20 to #3 - mikoli (07/07/2014) [-]
WHAT ARE THEY SELLING?
#7 to #3 - bobthedilder (07/07/2014) [-]
k
k
#28 to #7 - grimmwaters ONLINE (07/07/2014) [-]
Comment Picture
User avatar #37 to #28 - konradkurze (07/07/2014) [-]
then later when they start shooting the **** out of him......

hes just standing there taking it all and screaming like hes ******** out mexican food

like 6 guys firing shotguns at him dont knock him back or anything
#14 to #7 - robocopftw (07/07/2014) [-]
I love how we doesn't look terrified that his hand just got shot off, but more like "oh come the **** on, really?"
#29 - grimmwaters ONLINE (07/07/2014) [-]
That ******* acid bath scene though.

The remake had a lot to live up to.
#78 to #29 - deckbox (07/07/2014) [-]
Death wish anyone ?? Death Wish V - Ending Scene/Closing Credits
#17 - phoenix grinder (07/07/2014) [-]
Comment Picture
#50 - anotheroneonearth ONLINE (07/07/2014) [-]
Comment Picture
User avatar #58 to #50 - seras ONLINE (07/07/2014) [-]
This show, oh god, this show. And that weird pseudo-german ending song.
#60 to #58 - anotheroneonearth ONLINE (07/07/2014) [-]
let's call it Jerman just like Engrish.   
that song never leaves my mind. at first I found it weird but now I love it.
let's call it Jerman just like Engrish.
that song never leaves my mind. at first I found it weird but now I love it.
User avatar #61 to #60 - seras ONLINE (07/07/2014) [-]
Wenn denkt ob ist Sabta, Dieb
Das was der Teufel
Entschuldigung.
Inferno Glas,
Polizei von der Hölle...
#4 - utburd (07/06/2014) [-]
You need to login to view this link
Best Robocop coming through
User avatar #6 to #4 - malcolmcz (07/06/2014) [-]
umm no
User avatar #5 to #4 - johnnygat (07/06/2014) [-]
I left after the dick shooting.
User avatar #39 to #5 - lyiat ONLINE (07/07/2014) [-]
Lasted a good 30 minutes longer than I did. ******* Muppets? Really?
User avatar #42 to #39 - johnnygat (07/07/2014) [-]
Yeah. It got pretty....cringe worthy.
#30 - nimithecat (07/07/2014) [-]
To be honest, you guys are focusing on the rating so much that you forge the importance of execution in these movies. Robocop's old self was stiff, barely mobile, and now looking back on it(I'm 22 and watched this when i was younger), I noticed that his suit was clunky and hard to move.   
   
Almost impractical in hand-to-hand combat, and his robot armor deserves more credit than he does or all of the fighting.    
   
The new movies enhance everything that there is to expect from an engineer's wet dream. Robocop's new body is modular, therefore it can be easily repaired with a simple part swap. The new interface is cleaner, and while the armor is cut down, it makes up for it by having a faster reaction speed, improved strength, and high speed pre-programmed reflexes that allow robocop to synchronize with the computer and function in parallel in the same way as a captain and a crew member would;   
   
Robocop's brain; "Target that guy"   
Robocop's body; "Targetting and ready to fire on your order"   
Robocop's brain; "Excellent work,fire."   
   
Of course, he had to override the system's programming with his will like the original movie,  but once he was in full control, he was able to take on a larger robot with his bare hands and quickly assessing his surroundings with a vast array of sensors.    
   
So yeah, I take the new robocop reboot over the old one any day.   
While your robocop is stumbling around like an autistic drunkard(I'm autistic myself and have been drunk before, so I would know), and my robocop can do what you see in this GIF.   
   
Your point in argument over the rating? Zero.
To be honest, you guys are focusing on the rating so much that you forge the importance of execution in these movies. Robocop's old self was stiff, barely mobile, and now looking back on it(I'm 22 and watched this when i was younger), I noticed that his suit was clunky and hard to move.

Almost impractical in hand-to-hand combat, and his robot armor deserves more credit than he does or all of the fighting.

The new movies enhance everything that there is to expect from an engineer's wet dream. Robocop's new body is modular, therefore it can be easily repaired with a simple part swap. The new interface is cleaner, and while the armor is cut down, it makes up for it by having a faster reaction speed, improved strength, and high speed pre-programmed reflexes that allow robocop to synchronize with the computer and function in parallel in the same way as a captain and a crew member would;

Robocop's brain; "Target that guy"
Robocop's body; "Targetting and ready to fire on your order"
Robocop's brain; "Excellent work,fire."

Of course, he had to override the system's programming with his will like the original movie, but once he was in full control, he was able to take on a larger robot with his bare hands and quickly assessing his surroundings with a vast array of sensors.

So yeah, I take the new robocop reboot over the old one any day.
While your robocop is stumbling around like an autistic drunkard(I'm autistic myself and have been drunk before, so I would know), and my robocop can do what you see in this GIF.

Your point in argument over the rating? Zero.
User avatar #65 to #30 - mckinkymcormic ONLINE (07/07/2014) [-]
still dont like robocop's ****** shoulders. he looks like a tin-can.
other than that, the movie was flawless. in my regard, with it was longer and had more examples of him fighting, or added more dystopia. i wanna see the next movie.
User avatar #71 to #30 - mrmystery (07/07/2014) [-]
The thing is, the bulkiness and fantastic staccato movements of Peter Weller is what helped to sell the robotic nature of RoboCop. Sure, it was part of a technical limitation, because originally Weller trained with a mime to have completely smooth legato movements. When Weller got IN the suit they were like "UH .... WELL THIS WONT WORK"

And that's why Robo moves as he does now. The new RoboCop is just a little to 'fantastic' to really feel like it suits the feel of Robo.
User avatar #84 to #30 - asasqw (07/07/2014) [-]
They forgot the crawl back to humanity (it being one of the best parts about the old one) and replaced it with hurdurdurdur human soul
User avatar #94 to #85 - nimithecat (07/07/2014) [-]
Well of course it's tactical to paint him black. It makes him run faster.

lol jk
User avatar #33 to #30 - lordtriggs (07/07/2014) [-]
I quite liked the remake

it wasnt an amazing movie but still good and they even put in the little easter egg of the original suit in the movie

plus his old suit was built like a tank. He was just able to walk forward and take whatever was thrown at him. The new suit had to be more mobile because heavier weapons are easier to come across. Look at the scene where he takes out the gun-runners in the warehouse. If he was built like the old robocop he would've been destroyed almost instantly
#48 to #33 - zukabazuka (07/07/2014) [-]
Then later in the movie he can take on 4 ******* mechs shooting the hell out of him and he just walk away. Yeah not built like a tank my ass. Not like it was few shots either. All in his back.
User avatar #76 to #48 - lordtriggs (07/07/2014) [-]
and he was nearly dead

plus I was more talking about the high-explosive rounds that were used in the factory

the ED's used anti-personnel rounds which tore him apart
User avatar #59 to #30 - testaburger (07/07/2014) [-]
"I'm autistic myself"
Opinion invalidated.
User avatar #93 to #59 - nimithecat (07/07/2014) [-]
Autiphobic much?
User avatar #69 to #59 - aulubear (07/07/2014) [-]
That just means he's probably smarter than you, but has a few social flaws.
User avatar #81 to #69 - testaburger (07/07/2014) [-]
Sounds like someone's afraid of autists.
User avatar #96 to #81 - aulubear (07/07/2014) [-]
Well, most instances of autism I've seen is kinda like savantism.

If I were afraid of autists, I wouldn't know any, would I?
User avatar #100 to #96 - testaburger (07/07/2014) [-]
They're two different and unrelated concepts.
Twat.
User avatar #101 to #100 - aulubear (07/07/2014) [-]
Jeeze. Callin names now.

If I didn't know any better, I'd say you're autistic.
User avatar #102 to #101 - testaburger (07/07/2014) [-]
Who's calling names now?
User avatar #67 to #30 - kotos (07/07/2014) [-]
I agree the new model is great but the story is horrendous. They took everything people loved about him and changed everything. Like when his wife and son left him and he was deeply depressed and his partner (Who was a women!) Helped him overcome his depression and learn to live as he is. There is none of that here no connection just some guy who became robocop with zero personality.
User avatar #87 to #30 - nigeltheoutlaw (07/07/2014) [-]
What sodaberg said: Robocop wasn't about having a cool robot cyborg dude, it was about the message it sent.
User avatar #32 to #30 - nimithecat (07/07/2014) [-]
Btw, before anyone fires at me about how robocop tells his AI to do, think about your nervous system first.
Your spinal chord does all the reflex work, you're just telling it what to do.
After training your spine well enough, it memorizes and runs reflexes for you, even without your permission sometimes.

Robocop has full control over the permission and denial system interface between his AI and his brain, much unlike us- which gives a faster response time and less risk of interference.
User avatar #62 to #30 - sodaberg (07/07/2014) [-]
the original robocop was good because it was about this corrupt corporation taking over policing and stuff. It was edgy when it came out. Cool robot suits have been done a gazillion times since in media
#44 - johnnygat (07/07/2014) [-]
There was an option to make the reboot Rated R, but if they chose that route the budget would have been SEVERELY cut down.
There was an option to make the reboot Rated R, but if they chose that route the budget would have been SEVERELY cut down.
User avatar #46 to #44 - avatardsucks (07/07/2014) [-]
or probably because pg13 sells more since theres less age restrictions which equals more sales.
User avatar #1 - katothepotato (07/06/2014) [-]
While the original was better. I did enjoy the reboot.
User avatar #73 - lesternygaard (07/07/2014) [-]
Yet no one gives a **** about Dredd. That film was amazing.
User avatar #89 to #73 - nigeltheoutlaw (07/07/2014) [-]
It's sad, isn't it? Fingers crossed for a sequel at least.
User avatar #75 to #73 - bjerneironbeard (07/07/2014) [-]
It was
User avatar #83 to #73 - darkotic (07/07/2014) [-]
I love that movie.
#88 to #73 - baitdoesnttalkback (07/07/2014) [-]
i always blame marketing for good movies going unnoticed
User avatar #47 - taokami ONLINE (07/07/2014) [-]
The remake had better graphics, that's pretty much all the good part about the new one.
#8 - zaggystirdust (07/07/2014) [-]
if you think that adding blood and gore makes a movie better then you probably have the mentality of a 13 year old
if you think that adding blood and gore makes a movie better then you probably have the mentality of a 13 year old
#99 to #8 - anon (07/07/2014) [-]
Apparently this post pissed off a lot of thirteen year olds.
User avatar #36 to #8 - TheHutchie (07/07/2014) [-]
I haven't seen either Robocop movie, but generally speaking, I agree with this comment.
User avatar #9 to #8 - Lambda (07/07/2014) [-]
But, man, you just DON'T remake Robocop.
User avatar #10 to #9 - zaggystirdust (07/07/2014) [-]
I'm a huge fan of the original Robo-cop movies, don't get me wrong, but I didn't see anything wrong with the remake either
#77 to #10 - deckbox (07/07/2014) [-]
there isnt really anything wrong with it, but in the age of television and movies we live in it is a very mediocre effort
User avatar #27 to #8 - bitchplzzz (07/07/2014) [-]
"look at ME! IM mature! Blaaah blaaah ******* blaah"
...
"Can I have some sex now?"
User avatar #55 to #8 - headbanginglegend (07/07/2014) [-]
It's actually ******* annoying when you watch an action movie with barely any blood or anything in them. It's just unrealistic, especially in movies where they use swords. When people get cut or shot but release no blood it just breaks the immersion straight away.
User avatar #22 to #8 - feelythefeel (07/07/2014) [-]
>implying it isn't about lending the creators of a film more creative control
User avatar #25 to #22 - kinginyellow (07/07/2014) [-]
I think he just means excessive gore won't help a bad movie, Robocop was good with the gore not because of it. Honestly I'm happier the new one was PG13 because I have this nagging feeling they would have gone over the top for shock value.
User avatar #40 to #25 - thatguyontheright (07/07/2014) [-]
The Die Hard trilogy didn't go over the top and it was rated R....then came Live Free or Die Hard which rated PG13 and it was lame in comparison. R doesn't mean it's going to be over the top...if they wanted over the top they could have just made the movie and not submitted it for rating.


Maybe I'm old fashioned, but I like my action movies Rated R. A nice balance between freedom and control.
User avatar #103 to #40 - kinginyellow (07/07/2014) [-]
I just meant this new Robocop in specific. Die Hard was at least an old trilogy making money by being a continuation rather than a remake, and the new Robocop felt like they were just going to indulge in every form of gore to "recapture" the original with no regards to what made it good.

I like mine R-rated too, I just get wary of remakes when it comes to movies like Robocop or (god forbid) they ever try a remake of Die Hard or Lethal Weapon. I just think they'd miss the mark by a lot with how to use the gore.
#16 to #8 - mudkipslayer (07/07/2014) [-]
ACTUALLY, for me at least the best part about original Robocop is the dialogue, which is so totally not cool for pg 13. The original is 			*******		 hilarious because of the language. The new one was very bland and hardly had the humor and biting satire of the original. It tried being dark but was hardly unsettling, unlike the old one.   
   
The violence just made everything even better, and accentuated the dialogue. It was the complete package.
ACTUALLY, for me at least the best part about original Robocop is the dialogue, which is so totally not cool for pg 13. The original is ******* hilarious because of the language. The new one was very bland and hardly had the humor and biting satire of the original. It tried being dark but was hardly unsettling, unlike the old one.

The violence just made everything even better, and accentuated the dialogue. It was the complete package.
User avatar #91 to #16 - venegal (07/07/2014) [-]
The characters in the new one did not feel like people at all. The scene where Murph returns to see his son and they have an awkward silence of like a minute...yeah I was sooooooo at the edge of my seat.
User avatar #95 to #91 - mudkipslayer (07/07/2014) [-]
Yea the focus on the family is what killed the movie. The scene when he goes back to his old house in the original and his family has moved on and he's left all alone gets me every time. In the new one he gets a new suit, his emotions back and his family and I'm like, the **** bro, so Robocop is just a dad in a suit?

Also, the fact that the movie is ultra politically correct. I think there are only 2 people in the entire movie that treat Murphy like the product he was designed to be, and not as a person: Michael Keaton (cuz hes bad guy) and his henchman (cuz also a bad guy), everyone else is like, "he's got emotions!" In a city that's supposedly full of crime and assholes, we hardly saw either.
User avatar #98 to #95 - venegal (07/07/2014) [-]
The environment also lacked a feeling of ' ***** the original had a perfect setting of hookers, gangs, and a lot of fire and chaos signifying how ****** the city was. This one felt clean and safe, I did not feel the vibe that I was looking at a dangerous city at all. And finally who was the bad guy here ? The original made it clear that Clarence and OCP worked together, here they were pointing at the mobsters then at OCP then just the CEO of OCP then that trigger-happy douchebag. All that pointing had me thinking: "Who the **** is the villain here ?" Micheal Keaton's character also did not feel like a villain, he felt like what he was, some dude trying to run a business.
#107 - anon (07/18/2014) [-]
Use Long Path Tool it works!
#92 - baitdoesnttalkback (07/07/2014) [-]
i think we can all agree
>original robocop: consistent in it's delivery from start to finish. love it or hate it
>remake: actually decent through all the training (but still didnt feel like a robocop movie) but once he actually got back to the city the movie took a complete and utter nose dive of epic porportions

Ultimately the biggest problem of the new robocop movie was that they made a script and saw a robot and thought "lets put robocops name on it to sell more tickets" If they had just made the movie a original movie i might of actually enjoyed it. But the fact they had to stick with a premise is what killed this movie
User avatar #86 - asasqw (07/07/2014) [-]
The new one used a stun gun A STUN GUN
User avatar #72 - wizardfist (07/07/2014) [-]
funny, i just turned on the robocop soundtrack....also **** the new robocop movie and robocop 3. the first one was a masterpiece.
User avatar #64 - mckinkymcormic ONLINE (07/07/2014) [-]
robocop did not have digestive organs in the new movie.
#90 to #64 - baitdoesnttalkback (07/07/2014) [-]
no baby food
#70 to #64 - Orc (07/07/2014) [-]
k
User avatar #49 - skaffanl (07/07/2014) [-]
I keep hoping RoboCop gets close in predicting the future. I mean, Detroit is already ****** so that's one thing they got right.
User avatar #38 - konradkurze (07/07/2014) [-]
yea the new movie made robocop more flexible and ready for combat but they made him human from the start.....the beauty of the original was he was emotionless and slowly regained his humanity and you kinda got feels for him doing that

the modern one is "honey im home, you'll never believe what happened to me today"
human from the start so kinda more in tune with the million dollar man than robocop

plus the old one was kinda "worst case scenario, what could happen if cops went to **** and usa needed one cop who wouldnt quit".......the new one is too much in line with the police state america theory that actually might happen
User avatar #51 to #38 - krobeles ONLINE (07/07/2014) [-]
Yeah. The old one was more sci-fi dystopia than action movie, really. I haven't watched the new one, mainly because I was afraid they were gonna make it a copy-paste action flick, with no self awareness what-so-ever, and too many explosions and **** .
How does the new movie pare up with regards to this?
User avatar #52 to #51 - konradkurze (07/07/2014) [-]
havent seen it all, just seen clips and a review....kinda doubtful of watching the new one and seeing robocop pissed on
User avatar #66 to #52 - paintt ONLINE (07/07/2014) [-]
Ive seen every robocop movie and this one is pretty good. It may not be perfect but it doesnt tarnish the original at all.
User avatar #97 to #66 - konradkurze (07/07/2014) [-]
well i may have yet to see it but im oldschool....the whole keeping him human fro mthe start kinda spoils is..and that "hey your arm is robotic but we put your human hand on it" is a wtf

plus kinda doubting the whole police state theme the trailer made it look like....too realistic like theyre putting the actual possible future of usa in a movie
User avatar #104 to #97 - paintt ONLINE (07/08/2014) [-]
The best thing about the new one for me was that he was more of what youd think when you hear "Robocop" he had more agility this time around.
User avatar #53 to #52 - krobeles ONLINE (07/07/2014) [-]
Indeed. Thats why I haven't watched it. I'd feel stupid "paying" for it, just to find out the movie annoys me.
User avatar #54 to #53 - konradkurze (07/07/2014) [-]
download it and see if its worth buying
User avatar #56 to #54 - krobeles ONLINE (07/07/2014) [-]
I take it you didn't quite catch my meaning with the "paying"-thing.
User avatar #57 to #56 - konradkurze (07/07/2014) [-]
did you mean 'pay' as in like eating mexican food then paying for it later when you poop
[ 109 comments ]
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)