Upload
Login or register
x

Comments(283):

Leave a comment Refresh Comments Show GIFs
12345>
[ 283 comments ]
Top Rated Controversial Best Lowest Rated Newest
Anonymous comments allowed.
172 comments displayed.
Reply
+258
#43 - noobpeller (12/12/2015) [-]
> walk up to stand
> "hi, is this the place where cisgendered, straight white men get slaps for free?"
> "yes, this is the place"
> "great"
> slap both of them and walk away
-2
#99 to #43 - sgtmajjohnson has deleted their comment [-]
Reply
+2
User avatar #94 to #43 - trolljunkusa (12/12/2015) [-]
I'd honestly just pour a drink on them
Reply
+30
#88 to #43 - umbrage (12/12/2015) [-]
their face when
Reply
-1
#249 to #88 - anon (12/13/2015) [-]
Pretty sure that would not be their "fw". I'm rather certain they would put their drama classes to good use and scream and roll around on the ground about how you assaulted them and try to have you arrested.
Reply
0
#280 to #249 - umbrage (12/13/2015) [-]
"OFFICER OFFICER SOMEONE ASSAULTED ME"

"You look fine. This sign though, I'm pretty sure that's illegal."

"DAMN YOU PATRIARCHY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!"
Reply
+43
#64 to #43 - willindor (12/12/2015) [-]
>Become jewish
>Ask for a slap
>Say that you thought that slap means something else
>Call Jerusalem and claim that they try to start another Shoah
>Wait for the Mossad to show up and pull an Eichmann on them
Reply
+6
User avatar #71 to #64 - vexille (12/12/2015) [-]
Why is this the jew theme?

"insert obligatory 'my sides' post here"
Reply
+5
#83 to #71 - jimkid (12/12/2015) [-]
apparently jews are really bouncy
Reply
+2
User avatar #231 to #71 - internetexplain (12/12/2015) [-]
because actual jewish music sounds like that
Reply
+1
User avatar #135 to #71 - kristovsky (12/12/2015) [-]
sounds kikish
Reply
0
User avatar #266 to #64 - gimmyjibbs (12/13/2015) [-]
Most of FunnyJunk may know this already, but to people who don't:
www.youtube.com/watch?v=sVXnoanopzA
Maybe in due time I'll learn how to post the video directly as well.
Reply
0
User avatar #268 to #266 - nigeltheoutlaw (12/13/2015) [-]
Try the Youtube button right above where you write your comment, breh.
Reply
0
User avatar #270 to #268 - gimmyjibbs (12/13/2015) [-]
Today has been a long day, thank you.
Reply
0
User avatar #260 to #64 - nigeltheoutlaw (12/13/2015) [-]
I'm not sure if that's a Hebrew song or something, but it's pretty ******* catchy.
Reply
0
User avatar #261 to #260 - willindor (12/13/2015) [-]
It's called Item bounce from Kirby's air ride
Reply
0
User avatar #267 to #261 - nigeltheoutlaw (12/13/2015) [-]
Thanks bruh.
Reply
+21
#107 to #43 - anon (12/12/2015) [-]
> Ring police
> ''Hello, there's a couple of women threatening GBH against men on [street], they're just sitting at a table saying that they will attack men''.
> Police show up
> Women arrested for inciting/threatening violence and for having an unlicensed stall.
Reply
+22
User avatar #145 to #43 - fyaq (12/12/2015) [-]
You're on a college campus you dumb ******


You'll get your life ruined by the LGBTQRSTUVWXYZ center calling the swat team on an attempted double rape homicide, you'll ruin the lives of all the men there because the crybabys you hit will bring a bill to congress banning white men from safe space University, then they'll go on to ban guns and vote Hillary into office.


Pay a black chick 100$ to beat the **** out of them, they'll probably do it.
Reply
+8
User avatar #186 to #145 - elenalkarnur (12/12/2015) [-]
It's LBJBBQGTA5 you cissexist, heterosexist, and other words I made up moron!
Reply
0
User avatar #199 to #145 - havockwzy (12/12/2015) [-]
its okay you just say that you're a pre-op transexual homosexual.
Reply
0
User avatar #279 to #199 - fyaq (12/13/2015) [-]
What? I don't get the joke. Or was it even a joke?
Reply
+21
#151 to #43 - xauntmanax (12/12/2015) [-]
>have cop friend hidden from SJWs
>get slapped
>have them arrested for assault and rape
>???
>profit
Reply
0
User avatar #281 to #151 - bigbeaufort ONLINE (12/13/2015) [-]
I've seen this one before. They had contracts or something that you had to sign. I believe
Reply
+21
User avatar #181 to #43 - Javapenguin (12/12/2015) [-]
>smile politely
>get slapped
>punch one in the face

self defence
ive got witnesses
Reply
0
#252 to #181 - anon (12/13/2015) [-]
This exactly.

If one of them slapped me, for being me.
I'd knock her teeth in.

Wtf is CIS **** anyways. Means nothing to me.
Reply
0
#264 to #252 - rollfourexplain (12/13/2015) [-]
"cis" exists as an opposite of "trans". Until the recent debacle it was primarily only said by scientists and such.

It's similar to hetro- and homo-
Reply
+25
#124 to #43 - Thundergod (12/12/2015) [-]
I'd let them slap me, then afterwards, look them dead in the eye with a smile on my face and a bulge in my pants, the horror creeping up on them as they realize what they've just done.




I'm a masochist.
Reply
+6
#237 to #124 - anon (12/12/2015) [-]
And then whisper "harder"
Reply
+3
#238 to #237 - anon (12/12/2015) [-]
"You slut"
Reply
+25
User avatar #132 to #43 - leorio (12/12/2015) [-]
>get slapped
>smile creeps along my face
>"I'm gay. You hate gay people. You're a bully"
>No! we didn't mean-"
>"You did it. Now I'm going home and killing myself"
>"Please, we didn't know you were one of us"
>"The only way to stop it is for you to kill yourself out of gay bullying guilt"
>They Sudoku on the spot

Problem solved
Reply
+3
User avatar #149 to #132 - tarabostes ONLINE (12/12/2015) [-]
Kurapica is totes str8 bro don't worry
Reply
+2
#203 to #201 - tarabostes ONLINE (12/12/2015) [-]
Damn son I wouldn't mind getting bound in the Judgement Chain
Reply
+2
#204 to #203 - leorio (12/12/2015) [-]
Sometimes he likes to dress up
Reply
+1
#212 to #204 - tarabostes ONLINE (12/12/2015) [-]
Click to show spoiler
Oh I know.... The ride in the car was fun
Reply
+1
User avatar #218 to #132 - NutHut (12/12/2015) [-]
Thank you
Reply
+64
User avatar #48 to #43 - listerthepessimist (12/12/2015) [-]
>ask for slap
>withdraw consent just afterwards
>file assault charge
Reply
+50
User avatar #51 to #48 - Einsty (12/12/2015) [-]
>become gay for a second just before the slap hits
>now it's assault and homophobia
Reply
+44
User avatar #53 to #51 - miia ONLINE (12/12/2015) [-]
>accuse them of pandering to cisgendered straight identified white men because all others must pay to get slapped
>accuse them of kinkshaming when they say "but you shouldnt want to be slapped!"
Reply
+1
User avatar #158 to #53 - obanesforever (12/12/2015) [-]
IT"S FREAKING (Current Year) Discrimination like this makes me sick to my stomach
Reply
+3
#117 to #48 - fjlawyer (12/12/2015) [-]
GIF
Or, if you're in the UK

You can't consent to ABH or higher
Say you do (it's irrelevant) and they have no defence
So you have a legal right to hit them back
BANG
Easy profit
Reply
+274
#1 - psychotayto (12/12/2015) [-]
I feel pretty close to this one here. If you falsely accuse someone of rape without any evidence and get proven to be a lying sack of **** i believe you deserve to have your life ruined and get sent to jail the same intended amount for the person you accused.

It's ****** up that this woman feels the need assholes who make these false rape accusations
Reply
-2
User avatar #256 to #1 - ihateeverybodytoo (12/13/2015) [-]
I think they should be raped to make it even
Reply
0
User avatar #275 to #256 - moldybreadcrumb (12/13/2015) [-]
DEATH BY SNU SNU
Reply
+2
User avatar #207 to #1 - thumbfortrump (12/12/2015) [-]
This only goes to show that the Milo hype is stupid. This would most likely result in women who are actually raped not reporting the rape fearing going to jail.
A man with zero legal expertise coming with a suggestion this radical just proves that he is not very nuanced in his thinking.
Reply
0
User avatar #286 to #207 - sirrawrsalot (01/06/2016) [-]
I believe there is something called "countersueing" As someone with zero legal expertise, how is this different?
Reply
0
User avatar #287 to #286 - thumbfortrump (01/06/2016) [-]
What Milo is suggesting is a sort of double-sanction, meaning that either plaintiff or defendant goes to jail. Normal procedure is only defendant risking sanction.
Now, if someone countersues, the only sanction possible is compensation for damage. It is not possible for a civil person to open a criminal case against another, as it is only prosecutors who hold such powers. So the difference is actually pretty huge.
Reply
+2
#259 to #1 - rollfourexplain (12/13/2015) [-]
The best solution is really to be "innocent until proven guilty" like things should be in America.
Reply
+3
User avatar #217 to #1 - sloar (12/12/2015) [-]
Apart from the clear malicious intent, it also uses a lot of police and court time.

Seeing as criminals get reduced sentences for the exact reason of not wasting court time by pleading guilty, I think a proportionate and similar punishment should be given to know pujurors and people who pervert the course of justice
Reply
+11
User avatar #172 to #1 - admiralen ONLINE (12/12/2015) [-]
If you make it risky to go to court that would discourage many of the actual victims though
Its not a simple matter
Reply
+11
User avatar #176 to #172 - psychotayto (12/12/2015) [-]
well then you can thank people making false rape accusations for ruining it for actual rape victims.

Do you know how much the word "rape" has been played out?
It's gotten to the point where i find it hard to believe anybody who claims they were raped.
Reply
0
User avatar #177 to #176 - admiralen ONLINE (12/12/2015) [-]
Yeah dude, that is why there is the due process, but if you make it so that you need indisputable proof to be able to dare go to court there would probably be no women who tried to get their rapists convicted
Its not an easy thing to solve really, the false accusers should get the punishment and have to pay their victims lawyer fees plus a little extra, but discerning which is which is not easy
Imagine if you were raped and then tried to get the guy arrested only to get thrown into prison for it
Reply
0
User avatar #257 to #177 - ihateeverybodytoo (12/13/2015) [-]
what do you need to put a man in jail for rape? basically nothing.
Reply
0
User avatar #258 to #257 - admiralen ONLINE (12/13/2015) [-]
Depends on how much money the dude has, if hes got great lawyers hes got way better chances
Just look at the freak that got off easy from hitting a family with his car because he had "affluenza"
But again, the reason its hard is because jailing the victim would be ******* horrible
There is no easy solution
Reply
0
User avatar #179 to #177 - psychotayto (12/12/2015) [-]
Like i said, you can thank false accusers.
i sympathies with rape victims but i also sympathies with people thrown in jail and having their lives destroyed for crimes they didn't commit.

It's a sensitive topic but at the moment it seems like there's too much power in the hands of accusers and that needs to stop.
Reply
+1
User avatar #180 to #179 - admiralen ONLINE (12/12/2015) [-]
There is no easy solution and thus they havent changed anything big yet
Rape in itself is a very sensitive topic and is really hard to prove and is mostly gonna get judged based on opinion and pretty girls tend to be easier to sympathize with than boys
Reply
+2
#216 to #172 - anon (12/12/2015) [-]
The women should only be punished when it is proven beyond a reasonable doubt that they deliberately lied. Lack of conviction does not necessarily mean lying.
Reply
+23
User avatar #5 to #1 - platinumaltaria (12/12/2015) [-]
I've often thought that if you make a false accusation you should receive double the penalty.
Reply
+3
User avatar #14 to #5 - msrdotwozero (12/12/2015) [-]
What if the guilty person is rich and you knew that if you were to accuse them you would lose and get double the penalty? Equal penalty fine with me
Reply
+3
User avatar #125 to #14 - oharo (12/12/2015) [-]
Just because you'd lose the court case or the other person was found innocent doesn't mean you're automatically in **** . Only if you were found to be purposefully fabricating evidence and lying in a malicious manner to convict this person, would you be sentenced to the same punishments.

A courtroom shouldn't be a gladiatorial arena where two enter and one leaves. It should just be that if the prosecutor is found to be blatantly lying, that they can have it turned around on them for trying to abuse the court system for vengeance or whatever reason they have.
Reply
+3
User avatar #15 to #14 - platinumaltaria (12/12/2015) [-]
Well the whole point is that you need evidence...
Reply
+4
User avatar #16 to #15 - msrdotwozero (12/12/2015) [-]
all you need is for the police to make a tiny labeling mistake boom, youve got double penalty
Reply
+3
User avatar #18 to #16 - msrdotwozero (12/12/2015) [-]
its the double thats getting to me
Reply
+7
User avatar #20 to #18 - platinumaltaria (12/12/2015) [-]
WHY NOT GO TRIPLE THEN!
Reply
+7
User avatar #23 to #20 - msrdotwozero (12/12/2015) [-]
would that mean if you accuse someone of a feloney and its overturned boom straight to death row?
Reply
+3
User avatar #26 to #23 - platinumaltaria (12/12/2015) [-]
No, they would need evidence of intended malice.
Reply
+1
User avatar #49 to #26 - mrfinnt (12/12/2015) [-]
a person was raped but accused the wrong person the victim should not get punished but rather the false accused needs protection. like dont make it public in the first place. in the falsely accused lost the job because of it; force the (former) employer to rehire him ect.
Reply
0
User avatar #19 to #16 - platinumaltaria (12/12/2015) [-]
Meh, just **** everything.
Reply
0
User avatar #208 to #5 - thumbfortrump (12/12/2015) [-]
For what reason? What do you hope to achieve?
Reply
0
User avatar #214 to #208 - platinumaltaria (12/12/2015) [-]
To dissuade people from making false accusations. In the current state if a woman accuses a man of rape, for instance, his whole life is ruined just like that. It seems only fair that if she's lying she gets her life ruined too, right?
Reply
0
User avatar #222 to #214 - basalm (12/12/2015) [-]
I've always thought that if it happened to me I'd kill the accuser.
Presuming I got away without jail, of course.
Reply
0
User avatar #224 to #222 - platinumaltaria (12/12/2015) [-]
Well that's rather unfair, they should have to live with the ramifications too.
Reply
0
User avatar #226 to #224 - basalm (12/12/2015) [-]
Yes but, since they likely won't, and I'm much more likely to get away with murder than holding someone hostage for years upon years, it'd just be easier.
I o no, maybe I'd desecrate the corpse somehow.
Reply
0
User avatar #228 to #226 - platinumaltaria (12/12/2015) [-]
How does desecrating their corpse matter to them?
Reply
0
User avatar #230 to #228 - basalm (12/12/2015) [-]
I've always believed in some form of spirit world/afterlife, it'd be like a massive " **** YOU" to their spirit, basically.
And if that doesn't exist...makes me feel gud, up until the point that I I'm like "Oh **** I just killed someone."
Reply
0
User avatar #232 to #230 - platinumaltaria (12/12/2015) [-]
Well that's dumb.
Reply
0
#234 to #232 - basalm (12/12/2015) [-]
**basalm used "*roll picture*"**
**basalm rolled image**
Shrug.gif
0
#233 to #232 - basalm has deleted their comment [-]
Reply
-1
User avatar #146 to #5 - tarabostes ONLINE (12/12/2015) [-]
Good girl Altaria
Reply
+25
User avatar #74 to #1 - thesteenge (12/12/2015) [-]
I love how she says "Blame the victim"
I don't think she understands what a false accusation is.
Reply
+8
#85 to #74 - anon (12/12/2015) [-]
or what a victim is
Reply
+47
#69 - spookyexplain ONLINE (12/12/2015) [-]
Reply
+1
#272 to #69 - galadvin (12/13/2015) [-]
you beat me to it....
Reply
+71
#73 - osamacare (12/12/2015) [-]
Obligatory
Reply
+29
#2 - canichaikait (12/12/2015) [-]
Optimussum raped me.
Reply
+1
#183 to #2 - anon (12/12/2015) [-]
I honestly feel like it would have been hilarious if one of the comments suddenly accused Nicole of raping them. No proof required, "no matter the circumstances" amirite?
Reply
+6
User avatar #97 to #2 - thesoulseeker (12/12/2015) [-]
There is a kind of logic there.
If a person says they were raped and are in distress or shock, you should help them and not question them, that's for the police to do.

Now when it comes to police and investigating a crime, the feelings of the alleged victim are of little importance.
Reply
+42
User avatar #3 to #2 - optimussum [OP](12/12/2015) [-]
you wish
Reply
+3
User avatar #4 to #3 - WutsAtroll (12/12/2015) [-]
nobody wishes to be raped, stop perpetuating rape culture
Reply
+8
User avatar #6 to #4 - platinumaltaria (12/12/2015) [-]
But "rape fantasies" are some of the most common...
Reply
-2
User avatar #7 to #6 - WutsAtroll (12/12/2015) [-]
consensual sex under the guise of rape is not the same as actual rape...
Reply
+3
User avatar #8 to #7 - platinumaltaria (12/12/2015) [-]
No it isn't, but the point still stands. By definition rape is unwanted.
Reply
0
User avatar #9 to #8 - WutsAtroll (12/12/2015) [-]
then how does your point stand, i was the one saying that nobody wishes for rape
Reply
+1
User avatar #10 to #9 - platinumaltaria (12/12/2015) [-]
People do wish for rape, they just wish for rape from a super hot guy that they want to have sex with.
Reply
+2
User avatar #11 to #10 - WutsAtroll (12/12/2015) [-]
but they don't really wish for the act of forced sex from a stranger that they may or may not be attracted to. They just want to be tied up and ****** in a controlled environment without any actual danger
Reply
+3
#108 to #11 - anon (12/12/2015) [-]
As a female with rape fantasies you are correct.
It's just a wish for surprise, forceful sex.
Like I don't get a say in when or what my partner of choice does to me but I don't wish to actually be forcefully raped by a chimp in a gutter somewhere.
Reply
0
User avatar #12 to #11 - platinumaltaria (12/12/2015) [-]
Ok I concede
Reply
-5
User avatar #13 to #12 - WutsAtroll (12/12/2015) [-]
maybe you should never argue with me again because i'm always right and you're always wrong
Reply
+4
User avatar #17 to #13 - platinumaltaria (12/12/2015) [-]
>concedes argument out of disinterest
>"lolmao skooled u so hard get rekd skrub gg"
Reply
-2
User avatar #21 to #17 - WutsAtroll (12/12/2015) [-]
i would never say lolmao
but really were you expecting to concede and not be made fun of?
Reply
+1
User avatar #22 to #21 - platinumaltaria (12/12/2015) [-]
What's wrong with concession?
Reply
-4
User avatar #24 to #22 - WutsAtroll (12/12/2015) [-]
well it's the internet and you always pick fights with me and lose
Reply
+1
User avatar #25 to #24 - platinumaltaria (12/12/2015) [-]
******* kek. You are literally a troll.
Reply
-3
User avatar #27 to #25 - WutsAtroll (12/12/2015) [-]
what do you mean literally?
Reply
+1
User avatar #28 to #27 - platinumaltaria (12/12/2015) [-]
Surely you know the definition of the word.
Reply
-3
User avatar #29 to #28 - WutsAtroll (12/12/2015) [-]
yeah, but I don't think I am an actual troll
Reply
+2
#80 to #29 - anon (12/12/2015) [-]
The real troll's first defense is to call other people trolls.
It's guaranteed to confuse and piss off your opponent and direct the conversation into a petty tangent that will boil down to "nuh uh, uh huh" stuff.
The best solution is to not respond.

But neither of you are trolls; Altaria's an idiot and has proven that many times.
Reply
-2
User avatar #30 to #29 - platinumaltaria (12/12/2015) [-]
Sure you aren't.
-2
User avatar #31 to #30 - WutsAtroll (12/12/2015) [-]
why do you keep replying then
Reply
0
#113 to #13 - joppo (12/12/2015) [-]
BET YOU GOT ALOT OF FRIENDS
Reply
-2
User avatar #118 to #113 - WutsAtroll (12/12/2015) [-]
a lot*
But yeah i do i'm very likable
Reply
-1
User avatar #152 to #6 - tarabostes ONLINE (12/12/2015) [-]
I'd rape you ;))))
Reply
+133
#32 - hudis (12/12/2015) [-]
Not to play the devil's advocate, but I get where she's coming from. Hearing that would piss me the hell off. Especially if it was more than once. And I'm a guy.

That said, it's probably a waste to go to feminism to solve the problem.
Reply
-21
#50 to #32 - anon (12/12/2015) [-]
Not really sure why you would be pursuring a PhD in the first place. Most people with them nowadays say that bothering with it was a massive waste of time.

But if you're pretty... why the hell are you wasting your time on something [even related to your passion] when you can be getting more money with far less effort, particularly when money controls literally everything? That's just investing your time intelligently.

And you have tons of time to pursue a PhD, but won't be able be this attractive for very long. This is a short window of opportunity, and one should plan for their future by capitalizing on this investment opportunity that won't exist for very long.
Reply
+15
User avatar #54 to #50 - organiclead (12/12/2015) [-]
You answered your own question. Your window of opportunity for getting benefits for being pretty pretty much ends when you hit 35. So if you spend 10 years getting PhD from the age of 18 (because no one graduates on schedule), you have 7 years of building your career while you're younger and getting the benefits of a pretty face and a nice comfortable job when you start to get wrinkly.
Reply
+2
User avatar #111 to #54 - Shiny (12/12/2015) [-]
As Grace Hopper would know today, being pretty doesn't get a warship named after you.
Reply
+8
#91 to #50 - anon (12/12/2015) [-]
Going to answer the obvious troll seriously. You don't get a PhD to get fat cash money. You get a PhD because you love the subject material. Anything else is retarded, as you end up using so much of your lifetime getting it. I only went through to masters, as I couldn't find the subject material interesting enough to follow through with a PhD. Many of my friends thought differently.
Reply
-1
User avatar #62 to #32 - JonathanNowFuckYou (12/12/2015) [-]
it absolutely IS a waste of time to think feminism can solve this.

The way this gets solved is by walking up to the ONE person that would ever consider saying something as ******* autistic as that, and telling them that they're completely retarded.

I've never in my ******* life heard of anybody talk about trading in your PhD for good looks. Anybody who gives that advice is NOT QUALIFIED to give advice. Why the **** do women take these ridiculous comments so ******* seriously?! I'm not sure I even understand the ******* concept.
Reply
0
User avatar #122 to #62 - zeunfunnyguy (12/12/2015) [-]
the thing is that a lot of women (not just her) get illegitimized because they're pretty, like it was back in the day when women should be quiet and pretty while men did everything.

it's not as big of a deal as it used to be, but there's still sexism around this subject and I don't mind doing something about it on a larger scale to stop people from doing it.

Reply
0
User avatar #92 to #62 - emiyashirou ONLINE (12/12/2015) [-]
>>#50, There's one person that says it's a good idea.
Reply
-1
User avatar #156 to #32 - dreygur (12/12/2015) [-]
The thing is that I highly, highly doubt that only men say this, and the few people that do say it are basically socially retarded.
Reply
0
User avatar #171 to #32 - Funnel (12/12/2015) [-]
Bet your ass that 99% percent of the people telling her that are women tho. As if men dislike women who work hard...
Reply
0
User avatar #58 to #32 - graboidzero (12/12/2015) [-]
Yeah it would piss off anybody with a brain but I've literally never ehard anyone say even anything kinda close it... Feels more like a strawman argument on her behalf
Reply
+1
#121 to #32 - revelent (12/12/2015) [-]
Thing is, never in my life have I heard anyone saying such a thing. The only people I can picture doing it are the aunts who got abandoned the instant they got pregnant.
Reply
+1
#194 to #32 - msamnesia (12/12/2015) [-]
One thing that really pisses me off is when women give up on smart pursuits because they're pretty. I was reading an article of famous people with super high IQs. Apparently some supermodel has like... a 190 IQ and she was going to be a neuroscience but some modeling agency snatched her up and she gave up her science career.
LIKE WHAT THE **** .
SHE COULD OF CURED SOME **** . OR HELPED HUMANITY.
But no. She puts on underwear and **** instead. Like we don't have 10 million models already strutting around.
She's a great person, but it's just such a waste of a mind. Like... SERIOUSLY. I don't mind dumb models, but I can't stand smart ones because they are wasting a real gift, a brain.
Reply
+1
User avatar #196 to #32 - sanitarysan (12/12/2015) [-]
if girls came up to me and said your so handsome why go for a phd i would be stoked, but not everyone is the same
Reply
+1
User avatar #245 to #32 - strangesir (12/13/2015) [-]
Yeah, it's an actually offensive statement, basically saying, "Hey, you're hot, so you shouldn't try to be smart, just go **** dudes in a club brah."

Not something you need feminism for though. Maybe if there's a law saying men can/have to, or something, but otherwise, just deal with it.
Reply
+3
User avatar #87 to #32 - platinumdoodles (12/12/2015) [-]
I thought the same thing. I get what the post is trying to say, but telling a woman not to bother with actual goals when she can just be a trophy wife is exactly why original feminism started.
Reply
+5
User avatar #44 to #32 - mrleopardgecko (12/12/2015) [-]
thats because most problems are relative, comparing them is pointless. When someone has a legitimate problem and someone just states someone else has a worse problem, it achieves nothing.
Reply
+14
#120 - taniv (12/12/2015) [-]
Except this kind of makes sense as a satirical rebuttal. No matter what you are wearing, you don't deserve to become a victim of criminal behaviour or harassment to it. Remember how the site got up in arms because Matt Taylor was bullied to the point of tears during the Comet Landing for wearing his a custom designed gift from his friend? We can't have those same double standards that we complain about.
Reply
0
User avatar #236 to #120 - imostlyroll (12/12/2015) [-]
Two thumbs for you. I agree that no one is "asking for it" when they are dressed a certain way. However, if someone dresses provocatively then they shouldn't complain about being stared at. Now rape I would say is terrible and there is no excuse, but don't be too surprised if people flirt with you.
Reply
0
User avatar #283 to #236 - taniv (12/13/2015) [-]
I think the "don't be surprised" is alright, but not the "you deserve it" for just about anything. We have developed a great trait in society, which is to focus on how we can prevent bad **** from going down. The negative side is that we automatically assume that bad **** went down because someobdy didn't do enough to prevent it, and further that by not taking that step of prevention that they somehow "deserve" it as if it is not only their fault but it was some sort of moral righteousness that the act was done unto them.
THere are a number of problems with that. Iif locking your doors prevents 99% of break ins, 1% of people with locked doors will still get their house broken into, so assuming they didn't take a step to prevent is wrong. Even then, it is not their "fault" for the break in if they didn't lock their doors; while they are responsible for prevention methods and should have been wiser, the only people responsible for the crime are the perpetrators of a crime because whether or not those doors were locked, they only had to be locked because of someone else having malicious intent. The "morally righteous" part is the most disturbing, when people judge you for being the victim to something you had little control over; you can take methods of prevention, but they're by no means guarantees and they honestly just shouldn't be a necessity, I mean most people would agree, the ideal wouldn't be that everyone locked their doors but that no one had to, so someone taking that freedom shouldn't be judged as immoral just because they were a victim, judge them as immoral if you disagree with an act or don't because there's a plank in your eye bud but don't blame their misfortune on their immorality because bad **** happens to all people including good people.

tl;dr we can prevent **** , and we can expect higher likelihoods of events taking place if we don't prevent things, but the fault lies solely with the person who does the bad **** and not the person who had the bad **** done to them (although, blatant and intentional provocation can very reasonably weaken your case in a court of law)
Reply
+27
#34 - distortedflare (12/12/2015) [-]
I agree with this if a fat person suffers dreadfully with self image and self confidence then a piece of **** giving them a card calling them human garbage got make them just say **** it. If even strangers hate me, why should I ******* bother.
Reply
+1
User avatar #116 to #34 - Shiny (12/12/2015) [-]
If someone handed that to me I'd probably sock them one.
Reply
+2
User avatar #155 to #34 - tanitakavirius (12/12/2015) [-]
Hating and bullying people is bad. Who would believe!
Reply
+7
#173 to #34 - oliviliv (12/12/2015) [-]
I was hoping i'd find a comment about this, remember reading about it a while back
This is the card the people were handing out, and the woman was only a size 14 in UK sizes, which according to wiki is a size 10 in the US, It seems like a massive dick move by edgelords in my opinion.
Reply
+4
User avatar #35 - tenaciouslee (12/12/2015) [-]
I want to find one of those "Free slaps for Cisgendered heterosexual" booths, and slap them back, saying, "Oh, I'm doing a "Free slap for a cunt" today.
Reply
0
#36 to #35 - anon (12/12/2015) [-]
and get arrested? you'd be better off waiting for one to slap you then slapping them back while yelling "equality." at least then when the police come you can say she hit you so you defended yourself.
Reply
+1
User avatar #37 to #36 - tenaciouslee (12/12/2015) [-]
>Slap them back

I would wait for them to slap me first, you doof.
Reply
0
User avatar #38 to #35 - lotengo (12/12/2015) [-]
They probably can't deliver a proper punch.

Ask for a slap and when they give it act like its a fetish, like they have given you a sexual thrill.
Reply
+3
User avatar #39 to #38 - tenaciouslee (12/12/2015) [-]
Get a button-activated spring dildo, wear loose pants, when they slap, moan loudly and activate the dick.

Look at them seductively and say, "Do it again, baby.".

Win.
Reply
+2
User avatar #40 to #35 - kiaserzerg (12/12/2015) [-]
right before they swing, revoke slap consent and that they are now beating an otherkin dogkin. they have now abused you.
Reply
+9
User avatar #42 to #40 - bendingtimeisgood ONLINE (12/12/2015) [-]
"Hey, can I get one of those free slaps?"
*Slap*
"OH MY GOD, WHY WOULD YOU SLAP ME YOU HORRIBLE, VIOLENT SOCIOPATH?"
"You... you asked me to."
"ARE YOU SAYING I WAS ASKING FOR IT? VICTIM BLAMING! NEXT YOU'LL SAY IT'S BECAUSE OF MY CLOTHES!"
Reply
+1
User avatar #41 to #40 - tenaciouslee (12/12/2015) [-]
Revoking slap consent is probably the best.

*Slap* "OH MY GOD I REVOKED SLAP CONSENT BEFORE YOU DID THAT YOU SLAP-RAPPED ME I AM CALLING THE POLICE ON YOU."

Oh, I think I love ******* with people just a bit too much sometimes.
Reply
0
#248 to #106 - anon (12/13/2015) [-]
Got any sauce on the image?
Reply
0
#255 to #248 - anon (12/13/2015) [-]
Jitsu wa Watashi wa. It's okay.
Reply
+7
#79 - kaiserdjg (12/12/2015) [-]
blonde
Reply
+1
User avatar #137 to #79 - kristovsky (12/12/2015) [-]
*feminist
Reply
+6
#131 - thehistorylover (12/12/2015) [-]
I just want to say that handing out anti-fat people cards is a dick move. Seriously. Most fat people know they are fat. There is no need to point it out and degrade them over it. Quite a few fat people go to gyms in an attempt to try and not be fat. Also, while it's not as big a deal as truly oppressed women in the world, saying that it's a waste for pretty women to get PhDs is an insult. Like ... just because someone thinks you're pretty doesn't mean you shouldn't get an education. It doesn't mean that an education is wasted on you. It just means that someone happens to think you're pretty. It's still not as big a problem as ... well ... the obvious problems in the world ... but it is a bit of an insult. It reminds me of when my mother said that the whole point of finding a husband is so that I'll have a man to take care of me and spoil me. I was thinking to myself, "Wow, my mother's a stupid whore."
Reply
+5
#187 - botchtots (12/12/2015) [-]
when you realize a nuclear apocalypse isn't so bad after all...
Reply
+3
User avatar #185 - chuca ONLINE (12/12/2015) [-]
The first one is about how people think because she looks good she shouldn't go to college for a higher education and should just go model or something. Like if a guy who was athletic got told he shouldn't "waste" it getting a degree also.

Disagree with the feminism part or not, twisting words around to make them look worse is being just as bad as the feminazis you hate so much.
Reply
+10
#70 - anon (12/12/2015) [-]
In ****** reality.
In human reality his teeth were carved of ivory.
0
#168 to #70 - Ruspanic has deleted their comment [-]
Reply
+1
User avatar #162 to #70 - relvel (12/12/2015) [-]
Some of the teeth were actual human teeth, but not from slaves. I think there were some teeth from poor people who sold them for a bit of money. A lot of powdered wigs were made the same way. Lower-class folk needed money, so they sold their hair.
Reply
+3
#167 to #70 - iamthepapercut (12/12/2015) [-]
In reality.
You're both kind of wrong

www.mountvernon.org/george-washington/the-man-the-myth/the-trouble-with-teeth/

He used all kinds of **** in those things, bone, other human teeth, and, yes, ivory. And check number 6. He at the very least bought some teeth originating from some black people. Doesn't confirm he used them, but it wouldn't make much sense for him to have bought them if not. Only 9 though so it wasn't like it was a full set, and apparently it was common practice back then. Weird
Reply
0
User avatar #274 to #167 - galadvin (12/13/2015) [-]
wtf is this gif????
Reply
+2
#191 - xsap (12/12/2015) [-]
you guys gotta stop believing everything you see on the internet...
www.transadvocate.com/california-green-party-slaps-cisgendered-men_n_15337.htm
Reply
+2
User avatar #178 - baditch (12/12/2015) [-]
On the first one:

I can actually imagine it being frustrating if you work that hard to get a PHD and people still patronize you. I don't see what that has to do with feminism though, just respect between people.
Reply
+4
#103 - UnstoppableForce (12/12/2015) [-]
The concept of this is so dumb, you could apply this to any law in existence.

Do laws against white collar crimes prevent certain people from embezzling money? Absolutely not. Should we remove all of the laws because of those few people who don't follow them?

According to you people, yes.
Reply
+2
User avatar #115 to #103 - duelknight (12/12/2015) [-]
I think your misunderstanding this.
Reply
+4
User avatar #52 - dantemp (12/12/2015) [-]
I like how pro-gun activists seems to think that their possession of arms is the only reason america hasn't succumbed to lawless jungle.
Reply
+1
#75 to #52 - anon (12/12/2015) [-]
I like how anti-gun activists ignore that every time a terrible dictator comes to power the first thing they do is take away people's rights to defend themselves.
Reply
+2
User avatar #114 to #75 - dantemp (12/12/2015) [-]
Oh come on, you are living in a dictatorship now? I have a news for you - if the government wanted to **** you up, your small pistols and hunting rifles wouldn't be of much use. I never thought I'll get to use this argument, but "You are bringing guns to a drone fight"

www.youtube.com/watch?v=0rR9IaXH1M0
Reply
+1
#133 to #114 - anon (12/12/2015) [-]
you have to know a government will have to ******* think twice when every person on every corner could be armed
Reply
0
User avatar #285 to #133 - dantemp (12/13/2015) [-]
You are delusional. I like to see gun enthusiasts defending air strikes.
Reply
-1
#210 to #75 - jhgfsdkhgsaefuygs (12/12/2015) [-]
True in most cases... But and this is a big one!

Most safe and non-violent (And also least oppressive) countries do have very strict gun-control laws
12345>
[ 283 comments ]
Leave a comment
<
>
 Friends (0)