Reversed eating of cotton candy.

#3 - hjokdi

Reply +14 123456789123345869

(05/13/2014) [-]

Does the original gif even exist?

#4 to #3 - nexdemise

Reply +76 123456789123345869

(05/13/2014) [-]

Created by reversing the reversed one.

#11 to #4 - HarvietheDinkle

Reply +15 123456789123345869

(05/13/2014) [-]

IT'S NOT THE SAME

#12 to #4 - twondai

Reply +1 123456789123345869

(05/13/2014) [-]

reverse it two more times...

#13 to #12 - nexdemise

Reply +1 123456789123345869

(05/13/2014) [-]

As you wish.

#14 to #13 - twondai

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(05/13/2014) [-]

its the same

#16 to #14 - nexdemise

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(05/13/2014) [-]

No ****.

#18 to #16 - twondai

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(05/13/2014) [-]

i thought it would different. what the **** am i doing?

#19 to #18 - nexdemise

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(05/13/2014) [-]

You reverse something twice you'll just get the original...

#20 to #19 - twondai

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(05/13/2014) [-]

i thought it would be different, because like harviethedinkle pointed out "IT'S NOT THE SAME so i assumed that the distortions would become clearer.

#21 to #20 - nexdemise

Reply +2 123456789123345869

(05/13/2014) [-]

In all reality I just gave you the same gif again, I really don't think there are any distortions, considering that only thing being done is that the frames are being reversed.
Only difference being the tiny watermark on the corner. Also the fact that it is in fact reverse-engineered by reversing a reversed gif pretty much makes it not the original, but close enough.

#22 to #21 - twondai

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(05/13/2014) [-]

you...you lied to me?

#23 to #22 - nexdemise

Reply +2 123456789123345869

(05/13/2014) [-]