Reality Vs feminism. . lata, women 24% women 7% women 20% women 84% women. Can be substituted for "racism" and "white people" and the joke is the same. Reality Vs feminism lata women 24% 7% 20% 84% Can be substituted for "racism" and "white people" the joke is same
Upload
Login or register
Hide Comments
Leave a comment Refresh Comments (141)
[ 141 comments ]
> hey anon, wanna give your opinion?
asd
#3 - Toshiro
Reply +38 123456789123345869
(10/17/2013) [-]
Can be substituted for "racism" and "white people" and the joke is the same.
User avatar #36 to #3 - indecisivejew
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/18/2013) [-]
You really think white people are the victims of homicide even close to as much as blacks are? Same goes for industrial and combat deaths. The only one on there that whites would have more of is suicide, and its not even close to as skewed as the examples given here.
User avatar #40 to #36 - Toshiro
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/18/2013) [-]
Not sure why thats relative to anything. Nobody is talking about black people or white people dying more on the job.
User avatar #45 to #40 - indecisivejew
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/18/2013) [-]
Oh, I thought you were saying that the charts in the content applied to whites the same way that they apply to men. I guess you were talking about substituting words in your picture. My bad.
User avatar #49 to #45 - Toshiro
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(10/18/2013) [-]
No worries
#39 to #36 - Toshiro
0 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
#27 - whereistherumgone
Reply -23 123456789123345869
(10/18/2013) [-]
How about everyone shuts the **** up and gets on with being whatever gender they are
#70 to #27 - jamesrustler
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/18/2013) [-]
>How about everyone shuts the **** up and gets on with being whatever gender they are   
>Posts image making men seem like we're born with get-out-of-jail-free cards for life issues and women alone have to face every hardship of life   
   
Conclusion: Jamboree Randler
>How about everyone shuts the **** up and gets on with being whatever gender they are
>Posts image making men seem like we're born with get-out-of-jail-free cards for life issues and women alone have to face every hardship of life

Conclusion: Jamboree Randler
User avatar #91 to #70 - whereistherumgone
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/18/2013) [-]
You've decided how you're going to take it no matter what my point is. That attitude is just as bad as feminism. You are part of the problem.
User avatar #136 to #91 - jamesrustler
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/18/2013) [-]
Then tell me what your point is, because my response is indicative of how it was conveyed in your first comment.
User avatar #137 to #136 - whereistherumgone
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/18/2013) [-]
Dude my point is written all over this thread. Did you really just reply the first thing that came to mind without reading the rest of an obviously long thread to gain any kind of context?
User avatar #138 to #137 - jamesrustler
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/18/2013) [-]
I don't really care that much about the whole argument, but I'll read the rest of the comments to get an idea of what you meant
User avatar #139 to #138 - whereistherumgone
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/18/2013) [-]
So why did you get involved
#71 to #27 - economic [OP]
+1 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #93 to #71 - whereistherumgone
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/18/2013) [-]
I'm sure you'd be less likely to commit suicide if women went topless about their daily lives
#95 to #93 - economic [OP]
0 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #97 to #95 - whereistherumgone
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/18/2013) [-]
But in all seriousness, none of that was the point I'm making. I'm not going to explain it no but I've explained down there (vvv) why I posted that image. Being able to take my top off is just something I've wished it was socially acceptable to do on a particularly hot day.
User avatar #96 to #95 - whereistherumgone
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/18/2013) [-]
I'm thinking if it were normalised you'd think of it they way you do about people's faces- ignore the ugly ******* but notice anyone with a pretty face. I think most with really disgusting tits wouldn't go topless out of embarrassment.
#29 to #27 - eating
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(10/18/2013) [-]
im gonna answer your picture with this picture
User avatar #38 to #29 - whereistherumgone
Reply -4 123456789123345869
(10/18/2013) [-]
Notice how that first one includes 7 things, and each one of those has countless sub-catagories; ones that have to be lived with, they aren't just death risks. Plus any fatalities that happen due to work, well in both combat and industrial careers there are more men workers, so obviously most of the deaths will be male. It's not exactly a privilege to not die doing a job it was your responsibility to choose whether or not to do as a career. No one has decided to let more men die in these situations . It's ridiculously biased, but anyway my point was, everyone has problems due to their gender. People need to stop getting pissy over things that cannot be controlled and hold no-one to fault, and get the **** on with life.
User avatar #42 to #38 - eating
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/18/2013) [-]
i believe that post was created just to counter those ridiculous feminazi points. and btw, people might not choose to do those hazardous jobs, but someone has to do them. i worked on construction site and i saw collegue falling from 4th floor, luckily enough he landed on sand that was there on site and he got away with couple of broken bones.. point is, someone has to do those jobs, and men are more likely to do these jobs, because its believed they are stronger and more durable then females. except in russia, females work on crazy jobs there.
User avatar #46 to #42 - whereistherumgone
Reply -4 123456789123345869
(10/18/2013) [-]
That's all well and true, but none of that make it a female privilege. One could argue how it might have a bigger impact on a man's wife and family than the man himself. Then that widow would have to raise the family on her own, deal with the fact she's lost her husband ect, ect. It goes on and on. There's so many ways these things can impact other people regardless of their gender, and there's countless arguments anyone could use to turn any situation around to favour someone else, to mean something different, to make it positive, negative, whatever. There's too many people in the world to make generalisations. There's no point in arguing what gender has it harder, because we don't live seperated by gender. We live in families and cities and go to work and school with both, we interact and live with both on a daily basis. Nothing only ever impacts one person. That's why this whole thing is stupid, petty and selfish. We live as a whole.
User avatar #47 to #46 - eating
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/18/2013) [-]
no one even said anything about female privilege, the post is all about to make fun of feminazi "male privililege" rumbling, how is male privilege this and that ( at least thats how i got it). dont get me wrong, i have nothing against feminism, and by feminism i mean REAL feminism, for women who fight for their rights in country where they dont have rights. but when some stupid bitch complains how males take too much space in subway, thats where most people draw the line.
and i agree, lets not fight, i dont like fighting on fj since it leads to nowhere anyway, and im pretty tired so i cant really think straight or watch my grammar
User avatar #48 to #47 - whereistherumgone
Reply -4 123456789123345869
(10/18/2013) [-]
So don't you think the feminazis would shut up a bit more if they didn't have constant antagonisation like this? Don't you think posts like these could convert more normal people to that kind of extreme? As a girl having spent a fair amount of time on FJ and other entertainment sites, I have to say after a while these jokes wear pretty thin. Obviously the best thing would be to ignore it but when there's a certain amount of bombardment I can totally see why so many needlessly turn to extreme feminism. Like Morgan Freeman once said when asked how he thought racism should be stopped. He said stop talking about it. It's exactly the same. **** like this winds them up and only makes them worse, which i think we'll all agree is counter-productive. That's why I get annoyed at the shear amount of posts like these, not because I think there's some huge gender inequality, but because it causes people to turn to one of two extremes on either side. If you guys hate femanazis so much, shut up about them, and any kind of gender inequality in the western world. They don't have grounds to complain if there's absolutely nothing to complain about.
User avatar #50 to #48 - eating
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/18/2013) [-]
but feminazis are the one who started bringing attention to themselves in first place. they are the ones who started seeking problems in moderm society wich are pretty much non-existant in western world. in these times we have equal rights already, we are equal as we can be. i dont really take seriously many of their ridiculous actions, but when they start doing **** like

<- this mras and feminists arguing at u of t mra event
and when so many people get accused of rapes when they are actually innocent just because some girl got drunk and later regret it, some men freak out on that. they have to think that jail is not a nice place and that jail ruins life
drunk sex =/= rape

dont get me wrong, i dont, in any way support rape, but people have to understand just because some men are raping girls, that not every ******* male in world is crazy rapist and that not every sex is ******* rape. like i said drunk sex =/= rape

if feminazis want to be taken seriously, they have to get their **** together and face the real problem.
User avatar #61 to #50 - flemsdfer
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(10/18/2013) [-]
I support rape in these ladies' circumstances.
User avatar #52 to #50 - whereistherumgone
Reply -3 123456789123345869
(10/18/2013) [-]
It's like looking after a kid. On occasion, if they have a really huge tantrum it's best to put them in their room and just not respond to anything they scream or cry in a fit of child-rage until they calm down. Infact it's the same if you're having an argument with someone with anger issues or something your own age. You just stop and let it calm down for a bit, because anything you say while you or they are angry is just going to be influenced by the emotions that are already in full swing, and nothing is going to get solved or thought of rationally, and it has a big potential to make things worse. This is what's happening but on a scale of millions of people. So yeah it's going to blow up pretty damn big, and it's also going to take quite some time to calm down as well. I think alot of people are confused between actual gender inequality and just plain difference that comes with gender because of the way society had pretty much always been until the last century or so. But like I said, this crap only contributes to make it worse. Things can be dealt with rationally, but right now any idiot with access to the internet can see a load of posts like this one, take it in the wrong way, not understand it, and suddenly decide anyone who defends anyone with a vagina is an evil feminazi, or vice versa, with no real reason. This post isn't going to help any dodgy rape case. Neither is millions of male anons going on about how this and that isn't fair, getting angry and swearing at people. I feel I'm rambling and repeating myself now and I also am quite tired, so like I said; everyone needs to shut the **** up and get on with something important. By all means fight for what's right, but **** man there's a right and a wrong way to go about it. Goodnight.
User avatar #94 to #52 - eating
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/18/2013) [-]
i suppose you are right in a way.i dont know who's thumbing you down. our argument was pretty rational, i bet they didnt even read it.
User avatar #98 to #94 - whereistherumgone
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/18/2013) [-]
Yeah I kinda expected the red thumbs, because most of the people thumbing me down are probably the people I'm talking about. People like causing unnecessary **** storms..
User avatar #30 to #27 - commontroll
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(10/18/2013) [-]
Texas as well as I believe 12 other states allow women to go topless if they choose. They don't choose to, but it's still an option.
User avatar #31 to #30 - whereistherumgone
Reply -4 123456789123345869
(10/18/2013) [-]
Yeah I think you can some places, but if someone complains, then legally you have to put 'em away.
User avatar #32 to #31 - commontroll
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(10/18/2013) [-]
Well, generally the issue is on private property, or cities have their own legislature on it. On private property, it's usually illegal according to businesses, and some cities and such ban it because of reasons. As for people not liking it, people don't like lots of things people can legally do, doesn't mean the cops have to come and stop it.
User avatar #43 to #32 - whereistherumgone
Reply -3 123456789123345869
(10/18/2013) [-]
True, but this is one of those things where they will come after you if someone complains.
User avatar #54 to #27 - truemox
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(10/18/2013) [-]
That's not nessicarily true. Many places allow women go be topless in public, especially in europe.
User avatar #92 to #54 - whereistherumgone
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/18/2013) [-]
I live in and have been all over Europe. That's not true.
User avatar #64 to #54 - cumbersome
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/18/2013) [-]
No. Beaches, maybe, but that's it.
User avatar #33 to #27 - ThpiderMan
Reply +26 123456789123345869
(10/18/2013) [-]
Yup, because walking around without a shirt on is totally equivalent to not getting custody of your children.
User avatar #34 to #33 - whereistherumgone
Reply -7 123456789123345869
(10/18/2013) [-]
I wasn't aware I said it was
User avatar #35 to #34 - ThpiderMan
Reply +7 123456789123345869
(10/18/2013) [-]
Well you posted 2 graphs, one has to do with a biological trait that is impossible to blame on the so called "patriarchy" or whatever feminists are using to blame men for everything and the other is just a non-issue. I argued against the non issue because the other isn't worth arguing over. It's worth noting that your actual comment I agree with. People should shut up and just be the gender they are and fight against the actual inequalities that do matter. You posted a picture that basically contradicted yourself.
User avatar #41 to #35 - whereistherumgone
Reply -5 123456789123345869
(10/18/2013) [-]
I posted a picture to point out I could make an equally biased image in ignoring any restrictions the other gender has. All the data shown in both the images is completely legit, but that doesn't mean any of the damn concept has any point when it comes to who's more privileged. Infact I commented on that very point and you still missed it and had something to object about, which makes me think you're another extreme-opposite feminazi and just as bad.
User avatar #1 - dabronydude
Reply -12 123456789123345869
(10/17/2013) [-]
really?
these seem a bit odd tbh,
women work in indusary and military too but 90% of men die? sounds fishy.
#2 to #1 - economic [OP]
0 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #19 to #1 - christheace
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/18/2013) [-]
All throughout history is accounted for.
User avatar #4 to #1 - Toshiro
Reply +26 123456789123345869
(10/17/2013) [-]
Umm excuse me? 100% of men die. -
#10 to #4 - teranin
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(10/17/2013) [-]
You sassy shinigami, you.
#37 to #10 - Toshiro
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/18/2013) [-]
Teraniiiiiiiiiin! Where's my noteboooooooook??
User avatar #13 to #4 - newwarden
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/17/2013) [-]
men get mostly combat roles.. until lately women were not allowed to be in combat. i think that has changed by now
User avatar #5 to #4 - dabronydude
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/17/2013) [-]
i meant in the work place...
you are telling me that in the industry 90% of all accidents and deaths are only male
and 10% are female? it just sounds weird.
User avatar #6 to #5 - Toshiro
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/17/2013) [-]
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occupational_fatality

Not exactly a grade A source, but it DOES verify his claim
#12 to #6 - economic [OP]
+2 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #7 to #6 - dabronydude
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(10/17/2013) [-]
i see and it does say the industry in question do take on men more then women so it
makes sense now.
User avatar #9 to #7 - Toshiro
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(10/17/2013) [-]
Oh I do have to mention, to be fair, I've also worked with women who worked harder than a lot of guys.
#11 to #9 - teranin
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(10/17/2013) [-]
That's part of the point, it's not that economic is saying women aren't capable members of the workforce, I've met plenty of women who ran circles around me at various jobs. It's just that the jobs they choose to do and tend to be best at don't usually involve much personal physical danger.
User avatar #8 to #7 - Toshiro
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(10/17/2013) [-]
I can personally back it up to a degree. Not so much death but injury. I've worked in various industrial areas and "most" women that worked there were given easy jobs, or simply refused to do harder/dangerous ones. Even got quite a few that would exploit their looks and pretend to be useless to keep their jobs. Wish men could pull THAT one off XD
#63 - bowler
Reply +11 123456789123345869
(10/18/2013) [-]
cant we all just agree that life kind of blows no matter who you are and just be nice to each other
#73 to #63 - economic [OP]
0 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #20 - dafiltafish
Reply +7 123456789123345869
(10/18/2013) [-]
Funnyjunk: fighting bias with more bias since forever!!!
#21 to #20 - economic [OP]
0 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #24 to #21 - dafiltafish
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(10/18/2013) [-]
Let me elaborate.

If you are too biased on certain subjects you are either going to be so empowered that you blindly agree and vote up or be too offended to continue giving it your time and vote down while leaving a nasty comment. In order to evoke this reaction, a post will be offensive to one group without any redeeming value and/or pander to the other.

What is wrong with this post? Seeing as about 80% of people on this site are male, it panders to the dominant group of users.

If there was at least some controversy, (like with Nazis and racism) then it would have some redeeming quality, but it just feels cheap that OP knows what the response is going to be.

I spent 20 minutes on that, hopefully it makes sense.
#74 to #24 - economic [OP]
0 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #100 to #74 - dafiltafish
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/18/2013) [-]
Also, have to point this out. Do not label people based on the actions of extremists. Not all Muslims are terrorists, not all devout whites are members of the KKK, not all members of the green party burn down mansions and destroy hummers/land rovers.

Not all feminists are trying to obtain female domination.
#101 to #100 - economic [OP]
0 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #102 to #101 - dafiltafish
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/18/2013) [-]
... try saying that again please. It is a bit hard to understand that middle sentence.
#104 to #102 - economic [OP]
0 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #106 to #104 - dafiltafish
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/18/2013) [-]
I agree with you about divorce courts, they are unfair. but that is not the entirety of western society and culture now is it?
#108 to #106 - economic [OP]
0 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #109 to #108 - dafiltafish
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/18/2013) [-]
Here is the problem. You and I are both talking in realms we do not have much experience in.

I do not know Europe like you do, and you do not know the U.S. like I do.


If it is as bad as you say it is, more power to your cause. I am all for gender equality.

My point is that this issue is so minor in the U.S. compared to things like immigration and healthcare. what I am a bit pissed about is how many Americans blindly agree when they are not facing the same issues. It is making me look like an idiot for trying to set the record straight.
#112 to #109 - economic [OP]
0 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #114 to #112 - dafiltafish
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/18/2013) [-]
Well... That offers all the explanation I need.

I sympathize with you if you have to deal with that ********. Any woman or man doing that on a bus here would be told to get off and if pressed further would be banned from public transportation. This is fair and equal in my mind.


What you have shown me is the difference in gender equality across first world nations.
#116 to #114 - economic [OP]
0 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
#120 to #116 - economic [OP]
0 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #117 to #116 - dafiltafish
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/18/2013) [-]
You would be mistaken.
#119 to #117 - economic [OP]
0 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
#118 to #117 - economic [OP]
0 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #121 to #118 - dafiltafish
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/18/2013) [-]
I don't know man, but it should happen sooner rather than later.
#122 to #121 - economic [OP]
0 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #123 to #122 - dafiltafish
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/18/2013) [-]
You do realize that I am a dude and do agree with you on almost all points, right?
#125 to #123 - economic [OP]
0 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
#129 to #125 - dafiltafish
0 123456789123345869
(10/18/2013) [-]
Have a cookie for your performance.
User avatar #127 to #125 - dafiltafish
0 123456789123345869
(10/18/2013) [-]
Not really. I was ******* with you for the most part.
#124 to #123 - economic [OP]
0 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #126 to #124 - dafiltafish
0 123456789123345869
(10/18/2013) [-]
I think that the classical definition for the word is in the right and I believe that the road to hell is paved with good intentions.
User avatar #99 to #74 - dafiltafish
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/18/2013) [-]
Sure, if it aint equal it aint equal, that goes for any race, sex, or ideology. If there is any favorabilty based on sex alone then there is a major problem that needs to addressed.

However, I disagree with you in saying that women have an advantage in society. White males still have the greatest advantage. granted, we are closer to equality then we were 50 years ago, but looking at leadership rolls of major institutions there is still work to be done for females and minorities.

That isnt to say the women do not have advantages in some areas. Custody and rape cases seem to favor females to an extremely high extent. What I am trying to draw attention to is that, at least in the U.S., white males have an easier time making money and getting what they want. The reason that this is an issue for so many people is that there have been extensive tests to show that individual humans are not that different in terms of mental capability, therefor why do the statistics regarding capital and power seem so skewed towards males? It is the idea that everyone should have a level playing field regardless of what they look like.

These posts seem like whining to me because, once again U.S., I do not feel oppressed, at least not to the point that blacks and Hispanics were. When I see a "women only" sign on a park bench, I'll be more agreeable, but as it stands right now I see no reason for all this anti-feminism nonsense.
#130 to #99 - economic [OP]
0 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #132 to #130 - dafiltafish
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/18/2013) [-]
I agree with you on most points. you are just viewing deviation as complete disagreement and assuming that everywhere is in the same situation.
#133 to #132 - economic [OP]
0 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #135 to #133 - dafiltafish
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/18/2013) [-]
So sure, call me what you will.

I have been called an enemy of the Ukraine revolution and a man without a country by your type before, this is just one more for the list.
User avatar #134 to #133 - dafiltafish
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/18/2013) [-]
Modern feminism, or at least how you view it, is depravity.

I am for equality, classical feminism.
#128 to #99 - economic [OP]
0 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #131 to #128 - dafiltafish
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/18/2013) [-]
Sinse you are an expert at reading, look at that last line. over half of this could have been avoided.
#103 to #99 - economic [OP]
0 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #105 to #103 - dafiltafish
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/18/2013) [-]
1- Politics. It isn't the individuals, it is the mindset of the voting majority. People have personal agendas, so logically, there is a more masculine agenda at the high end of the political system, i.e. men have more power to get what they want done. that isn't to say that what they want wont favor women, it is to say that they just have more power.

2- Segregated schools are slowly coming to an end, Western Washington University, for example, used to be an all girls school. now it isnt. in my town there also used to be an all girls high school, that was 45 years ago. They are a relic.

3- You mean like Curves? a gym founded on the idea that if someone feels uncomfortable in one setting, they can go somewhere else. I agree that there are some women who were being melodramatic about it, yeah, but it is either punish the meatheads who were also paying customers of the gym, or saying I'll make my own gym. In a modern setting this would have been handled a bit differently by actually punishing antagonists instead of saying "meh, whatever". (Confused? look up the gym name and find their history). Closing male bars? Not really a good comparison in my opinion, seeing as the reason for the establishment being there in the first place is completely different.

4- this is a point that I agree with you on, in fact there is a lot I would change in the scholarship system. It clearly favors minorities and women and should be more fair.

5- Thanks man, I love you too.
#110 to #105 - economic [OP]
0 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #111 to #110 - dafiltafish
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/18/2013) [-]
You guessed wrong bucko.

Find me a more credible source.
#113 to #111 - economic [OP]
0 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #115 to #113 - dafiltafish
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/18/2013) [-]
2 for 4, not bad!
#107 to #105 - economic [OP]
0 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
#22 to #21 - dafiltafish
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/18/2013) [-]
Well... the Hitler jokes would not be as funny if everyone got offended by them all the time.
User avatar #25 - chuffberry
Reply +6 123456789123345869
(10/18/2013) [-]
i'm not sure if the suicide stat should be included in this. it's not exactly a female privilege to not commit suicide, nor is it considered a male obligation. women tend to be more likely to seek professional help, while men are more likely to self-medicate, but i wouldn't exactly call this sexism.
#72 to #25 - economic [OP]
+1 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #55 to #25 - captainfuckitall
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(10/18/2013) [-]
It could be seen that way though, as from a young age, many boys are taught that they must solve things themselves, not ask people for help, and not show any real emotion lest they get called a pussy. Females do not have that happen to them, and are told that they should make themselves known MORE, while men should bottle it up.

Such stress could lead to suicide, as the relations of suicide victims often have no idea that the victim was actually going through hard times.
User avatar #79 - TheHitler
Reply -5 123456789123345869
(10/18/2013) [-]
How many men have died in childbirth?
#80 to #79 - Moosoulja
Reply +4 123456789123345869
(10/18/2013) [-]
Are.... Are you retarded? Clearly you must be because this is showing something based on our culture and perception of said culture not unavoidable biological procedures. It'd be like saying how many women have died from testicular cancer. It's completely retarded and misses the mark by so much all I can think of is how do you manage to dress yourself in the morning.
Are.... Are you retarded? Clearly you must be because this is showing something based on our culture and perception of said culture not unavoidable biological procedures. It'd be like saying how many women have died from testicular cancer. It's completely retarded and misses the mark by so much all I can think of is how do you manage to dress yourself in the morning.
User avatar #83 to #80 - TheHutchie
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(10/18/2013) [-]
He's called TheHitler.

Evidently he's a genius.
User avatar #84 to #83 - evidently
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/18/2013) [-]
thanks for letting me know
User avatar #85 to #84 - TheHutchie
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(10/18/2013) [-]
You are my new favourite person.
User avatar #86 to #85 - evidently
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/18/2013) [-]
why thank you, the feeling is mutual
User avatar #87 to #86 - TheHutchie
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/18/2013) [-]
Evidently.
#58 - scant
Reply +4 123456789123345869
(10/18/2013) [-]
This is the most moronic piece of anti-feminist content I have seen thus far.
"Look at all these things men have to put up with which they not only have no control over, but also are not even remotely affected by the social structures and bias that normal feminists are trying to overcome."
The only one that comes marginally close to being valid is the custody one.
User avatar #14 - weenieandthebutt
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(10/17/2013) [-]
You've forgotten that 95% homeless people are men
#15 to #14 - economic [OP]
0 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #16 to #15 - weenieandthebutt
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(10/17/2013) [-]
yeah, I think you're right but it still doesn't change the fact that these figures are absolutely staggering!
#17 to #16 - economic [OP]
0 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
#69 - darthacerbus
Reply -4 123456789123345869
(10/18/2013) [-]
Here's what OP wanted these statistics to say:   
&quot;Men get killed a lot more often than women, women are better off!&quot;   
But they're really saying:   
&quot;Men are more likely to commit suicide because they are men.&quot; (Oh wow, being male means you have to commit suicide if you're depressed)   
&quot;Men are more likely to die in combat because they are men.&quot; (Oh wow, male soldiers are targeted more than female soldiers, there aren't way more male soldiers than female soldiers)   
&quot;Men are more likely to get murdered because they are men.&quot; (Oh wow, murderers are targeting men, and men aren't more likely to fight back because society has taught them that giving up is weak and men can't be weak!, so they escalate a conflict to the point where a criminal will think it's easier to kill the man)   
&quot;Men are more likely to die in industrial accidents because they are men.&quot; (Oh wow, the big dangerous machinery and high-risk jobs are specifically targeting men, and that darn society hasn't assigned jobs to specific genders that skews the numbers of men and women in those jobs)   
When you phrase it like that, it's moronic.   
   
The only one that's a remotely valid statistic showing what you want it to show is the custody one, and it's not even related to the others.
Here's what OP wanted these statistics to say:
"Men get killed a lot more often than women, women are better off!"
But they're really saying:
"Men are more likely to commit suicide because they are men." (Oh wow, being male means you have to commit suicide if you're depressed)
"Men are more likely to die in combat because they are men." (Oh wow, male soldiers are targeted more than female soldiers, there aren't way more male soldiers than female soldiers)
"Men are more likely to get murdered because they are men." (Oh wow, murderers are targeting men, and men aren't more likely to fight back because society has taught them that giving up is weak and men can't be weak!, so they escalate a conflict to the point where a criminal will think it's easier to kill the man)
"Men are more likely to die in industrial accidents because they are men." (Oh wow, the big dangerous machinery and high-risk jobs are specifically targeting men, and that darn society hasn't assigned jobs to specific genders that skews the numbers of men and women in those jobs)
When you phrase it like that, it's moronic.

The only one that's a remotely valid statistic showing what you want it to show is the custody one, and it's not even related to the others.
#77 to #69 - economic [OP]
0 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
#78 to #77 - darthacerbus
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/18/2013) [-]
Getting murdered and accidental deaths are TOTALLY THE SAME THING as custody battles and are TOTALLY EVIDENCE of society's systemic injustice towards men.   
   
You wanna make an argument about how custody battles are sexist, go for it.  I'll even agree with you.  But if you try to tell me enemy combatants, murderers, and industrial accidents are specifically targeting men, I will tell you that is ******** and that you are a moron.
Getting murdered and accidental deaths are TOTALLY THE SAME THING as custody battles and are TOTALLY EVIDENCE of society's systemic injustice towards men.

You wanna make an argument about how custody battles are sexist, go for it. I'll even agree with you. But if you try to tell me enemy combatants, murderers, and industrial accidents are specifically targeting men, I will tell you that is ******** and that you are a moron.
#82 to #78 - shitflippingpattie
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(10/18/2013) [-]
I agree with you wholeheartedly. Its just male privileged to serve in combat and in dangerous combat jobs, and we need to give females an equal opportunity here.
User avatar #88 to #82 - darthacerbus
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/18/2013) [-]
So the idea that men must be strong and women must be weak is sexist and bad for both genders. Got it.