i disagree with your whole stance on genocide there,
but i gotta say that immigration policy sounds pretty awesome.
the sheer volume of refugees would make it mad expensive though.

We don't even have freedom of speech you cuck

idk if bait
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freedom_of_speech_in_Canada

"freedom of speech in Canada is not absolute"
Are you retarded or just willingly ignorant

No, after living in Canada for a long term.. Your immigration system is a joke. And if it weren't for the likes of Germany and Sweden, you guys would be the biggest contributor to left-wing liberals and also have the highest rate for migration. Quite Literally shovelling them in.

I even noticed it when I went over to see the family, how much had changed on the streets with regards to ethnic diversity. It was a joke.

YES, definitely, screening needs to take place, but the massive flaw in that is, like in Europe, the SN's don't carry with them correct documentation, now quiz me this, how can, when someone carries with them, ZERO documentation as to who they ACTUALLY are, how can screening be carried out, effectively.

ALSO, no, you're still doing it wrong, mass loans and housing and the rest for "Refugees" still isn't a fix. To start, they're not "Refugees" as you so eloquently put it... they never were, refugees, they're there to STAY. So whatever side of the political fence anyone stands on, they're not war refugees, escaping the war and conflict of their home land. They're there to STAY. I can't stress this enough. And no amount of loans, housing or political refuge will correct this.

But I'm not having a go at you, per'se. I'm stating a fact that Canada DOES NOT have it right either.

From what I can gather, 'Straya is doin' it right. But even the liberals at their end are raising their ugly heads. Luckily for now, from what my Friends and Family have told me from other there is that the government is culling them back. At least with 'Straya they're very much "Oh you don't like our rules? You don't think we should do that ? Oh you're offended!? **** off then you cunt" *Aussie Accent required*.

They're screening, but no documents, "Bye then".
Telling the .. majority of liberals to do one.
And they're very much with the ideaology of, break the rules, out you go.

for the sake of debate, let's dissect your argument.

1. Canadian immigration is tightly controlled, hell it's more waterproof than the U.S.
Americans still have the greencard after marriage, Canadians do not. but theres more reasons than just that. Read up, settlement.org/ontario/immigration-citizenship/citizenship/apply-for-canadian-citizenship/how-do-i-apply-for-canadian-citizenship/ , www.cic.gc.ca/english/citizenship/

2. If they don't have documentation or proof that they are a complete family unit of parents and children with birth certificates for the children and marriage certificates they don't get in. poorfag grubby sandnigs chasin after jobs and benefits would not have these papers, forgeries not accepted canadian currancy and documents are held to the Highest standards of anti-forgery, we are pretty good at spotting fakes in any document from anywhere. . also no unaacompanied single men allowed, www.cbc.ca/news/politics/canada-refugee-plan-women-children-families-1.3330185

3. There are no "mass loans" or "housing projects". did you not read my sources from before? we make most migrants pay for their transportation to Canada within a month of arrival. www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/refugee-loans-canada-1.3378573 they don't get their own damn houses, they live with Canadian families until they have jobs and buy places of their own. migrants aren't getting free handouts unless they qualify for them the same way a Canadian national would. **** we've been described as financially "cruel" to migrants. how much tighter on them could we be?

4.difference between european countries and canada is we actually have the SPACE to put these people in, and we're even still capping it off at 50k immigrants this year. put up against canada's population that is a 0.14% increase of migrants in canadas population. we actually have plans to put these migrants to work in private and public sector projects, we will actually PROFIT from their work as a nation. www.cic.gc.ca/english/refugees/welcome/overview.asp

Australia is a bro and has a good policy on if you **** up you're out, incidentally canada had a pretty famous law case concerning Islamic cultural honour killings and set the precedent on how we deal with it. read up en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shafia_family_murders , news.nationalpost.com/news/canada/shafia-parents-and-son-convicted-in-honour-killing-of-four-family-members-seek-new-trial

You're talking to someone who has studied national an international policies and politics for years now, hope i have been able to make you realize that you really need to construct a better argument by using research and logic.

Backed up with even more sources if you want to read more,
www.cic.gc.ca/english/refugees/welcome/overview.asp , www.cic.gc.ca/english/refugees/welcome/ , www.theglobeandmail.com/news/politics/canadas-refugee-resettlement-plan-remains-a-work-in-progress/article27488307/ ,

not-rekt
REKT

U.S. immigration

controlled

LOL we have millions of illegals FLOODING across the border every year. Our immigration system is awful. The only thing we have better is that Mexicans aren't radical muslims trying to kill Americans.

Why would they have a problem with only accepting identified individuals? Sounds like an extremist attitude.

How on this blue marble, do you expect to screen anyone if you can't establish their identity?

That's what I just said. If criminals are allowed in then everyone suffers, the native peoples and the asylum seekers that don't wish others harm.

Wait, what the **** ? You screen them out!?
The whole point of identifying who that particular person is, is so that you establish whether or not they have an affiliation with X and Y terror groups, or a history of crime etc. I never said ANYTHING about criminals being allowed in.

What the **** are you talking about.. Unless I missed something here, you're blatently confused.

I'm agreeing with you, christ, you're paranoid.

Ohhhh... Wait.. Your first comment was saying my point of view was extreme? Not paranoid. Just reading what you're saying as "Screening is an extremist attitude" To which I said how is it extreme? Then you starting exclaiming that "If criminals are allowed in, then everyone suffers" Which again, seemed as though you were grabbing the wrong end of the ********** .

I was just saying, screen the cunts, and keep those cunts out etc.

You read a little too much into what I said. I asked a question, it wasn't ambiguous. It seems like a lot of people on this post are too angry to make a rational decision, even if the media cannot be trusted.

I will migrate there when the time is right. Another cook in your country then.

yeah tht is also true, anyone who is gonna bother to come all the way across an ocean is going to try to go to the states first.

I would move to Canada
but **** your gun laws

Been there, done it, not a fan.

broh i feel you.

but also, check out this sweet new gun.