posting deviantart crusader pics won't change **** .
beefcake ahmeds will still be ******* your women, and you 300pound neckbeard bronieswill still whine about it on fj.
stay mad, stay a loser.
just read up, its illegal to sell it in bookstores and stuff without comentary... not really needed in my opinion, book is retarded enough that no one would really follow it
There is a new edition where they tell you how to interpret it, point out all the illogic and gernerally tell you how to think themselves, and it is banned in some countries, but not most. You can always get the original and read for yourself from the internet. I just read that in the news myself a day or two ago, so I know where you're coming from
Mein Kampf is not being sold in germany, they will change that soon, but wherever they got it, not true, what they mean is maybe with comentary aka not really... its not a good book anyway
doesnt matter mein Kampf will not make new nazis, probably even stop some from becoming it...I have the normal version, my grand grand parents got it when they got married, never opened it once, i did it for the first time
It is technicly being sold , older versions or the ones bought outside of germany are completly legal to sell , buy and own. The only problem is that bavaria has a copyright on the book and by this way the printing and mass selling of the book has been prohibited.
Again because of some ridiciouless copyright claim.
I get it, there's scary **** happening and some people act like they know the solution.
There isn't a quick fix, don't follow whoever is shouting the most. Chances are they are just much more scared than you.
He's a better potential president than Sanders or Hillary, both of which will continue the US on it's current path. Hillary would literally be Obama part 2.
Trump with Cruz or Paul as the VP is the best possible decision we have.
Unfortunatly, we, Germany, will be viewed as the "evil side" who brought the refugees to Europe. For the fact that we were once a foreign-hating, evil side.
Whatever we do, it ***** us up. If our politicians followed the citizens' call for once and stop the refugee wave, we would be called Nazis. Again. If we continue the trend, we are the baddies who let them in. If we hadn't taken refugees in the first place to prevent this ********* ...that's right, we would have been called Nazis again!
There is a strong difference between a healthy human mind and politics, but unfortunatly, international politics works this way. Always use the past and propaganda to get the politicians' purse filled, and **** the people. Regardless which one.
"A man can only wish"? That is retarded. I am Western European and sure as hell think that:
1, I don't think that the situation in Europe isn't nearly close to Iraq and Afghanistan, one such attack (or even some more) don't turn one of the most civilized and safe areas in the world into those countries. Again, one isolated phenomenon doesn't mean all refugees/asylum seekers/migrants are bad, just kick the **** out of those that are caught red-handed and be done with it.
2, I do not want the US to invade Europe, and wishing for it is retarded. If we ever want to kick those migrants out, we will, we need no help from Trump, thanks (probably because he won't even win the election).
That being said, I realize that the opposite is your opinion and I respect that, I just think it is crazy talk or simply a recurring joke.
Merkel is literally changing the laws to expell them, and in my country a law has been in place for quite a long time by which a non-national that commits a crime can be kicked out, regardless of their refugee status and such.
I do not consider myself to be in a "high moral place", but I also think that considering all incoming refugees as people that "want to destroy and conquer" is flat out retarded. Go get a tinfoil hat and an AR-15, oh wait, you probably already do.
You sound like someone with the false hope that this kind of stuff is only happening in one of those places somewhere way beyond the stars and that it only happens once in a blue moon.
Obviously incidents are happening quite often...
We see most of the activity happening in Europe because guess what? They're rolling the red carpet for them.
Obviously not every Refugee is a "bad guy" only a retard would think that but how are you supposed to weed out good from bad? Wait till they do something bad then punish them right?
You're supposed to weed them out exactly like that. Or maybe have a more thorough background check system before you let them in, which some countries are hurrying to implement so they don't have to kick some of them out later.
I am not blind to the fact that those incidents do happen, but I also know that some of the migrants that have come from that area have been great assets to the countries they've gone to and have been respectable citizens, adding a great value to their communities, and I refuse to let go of all that because of a couple hundred retards that squirm in with them.
The sorting process will get better, and Europe will still be going business as usual, and in fact slightly stronger and richer because of the people that have brought good things here. At least that's my opinion, and you sure as hell can disagree with it. Good night, sir.
Ah, yes, I forgot, no good thing ever came out of an arab, right? Hell no.
Not only newspapers, companies and economistes have been saying they could benefit the country, but ok, if you don't want to admit so it's alright I guess.
WHAT WHAT??? among the hundreds of criminals, rapists and porch monkeys with utter zero respect for the very people that give them housing, food and new life comes a handful of civilized people?
Oh lowdy my bad... open the gates fully and roll the red carpets.
OH WAIT, just a while ago when I posted a video of one such respectable citizen you called that a "bias video" and ceased the conversation without even watching it
if the whole million of them (or even the majority) would all be criminals or rapists, the situation would look a little more bleak, don't you think?
i'm all for weeding out the scum, but i will not just put all of them under blanket suspicion.
that is not agreeable with the principles this republic was founded on and i denounce it.
You assume that most of them are criminals, rapists and porch monkeys, and that is why you're wrong. Those are in fact the minority. And I do not remember that video/post you are talking about, but most of the time I watch them, so if I said I thought it was biased, I probably thought it ******* was (which, seen your opinion on the matter, doesn't surprise me on the slightest). Consider this conversation ended, not because "I can't take disagreement", but rather because this will lead us nowhere and I don't really feel like wasting my time with you, I've already talked with another user in this same thread and don't feel like doing it again with a far less respectful one. Have a good night.
you assume most of them are not and that is the big problem.
They come from a culture where women are considered a second class citizens
They come from a culture where women have to be covered head to toe because the males can't suppress their animal instincts
They come from a culture where schooling of children mostly consists of memorizing the Quaran
They come from a culture that's been teaching them from early age to look down on infidels
They come from a culture where having 7-8 kids is the norm without caring about how to feed them.
Now we import these people in mass quantities (80% of them happen to be military aged men I should note) and we're supposed to think there is actually a slightest chance of integrating these people?
NOT A ******* CHANCE IN HELL, they'll just create more isolated communities, more beggars on the street, more no-go zone, more "do as we dictate or be called Islamophobe" by libtards like YOU,..
I'm sorry I'm just not OK with that and I understand how you can never view it the way I do, since you're the libtard who will come to their aid calling me an Islamophobe when I decide to employ someone who's capable of shaking hands with women over Mohamed.
They are not the most reputable sources, but since people in here tend to use Breitbart as theirs, this counts too. I am looking for an article about economists that said that it would only take refugees about 7 years to make up for the costs of their arrival, and after that they'd have a good balance towards the economy, when I find it I'll post it.
Dude why start a fight if you are going to willingly lose it from the beginning? Also the thing about the ecnonomists, just because a country CAN afford something doesn't mean it is good for it, even if migrants would raise the country's GDP (which they won't, I assure you), it isn't worth it, Europe isn't made of poor countries which desperately need money even if it cost them their own culture heritage.
The more reputable source that I was trying to find is right below. At least I was being honest with the trustworthyness of my sources (people citing Breitbart or other ************ media often aren't, and honesty is something I value a lot).
I'd just like to point up a little detail about that 4 tards killing hundreds in France.
That wasn't the first attack that came to plan and action inside one of the "No-go zones" as the muslim ghettos are called. Little zones where Sharia law is enforced and police nor medical aid goes there as they fear for their life. A little middle east island within "safe and civilized" area as you could call it. They are known among the citizens and police alike, yet they don't do **** about them because.. SURPRISE SURPRISE it would be racist/Islamophobic to try and civilize it.
Why am I even bothering writing this when that delusional libtard will just put on his pink glasses and reply with some **** like "bias bias, lies, racist, you hate migrants, I'm not arguing anymore, bye"
The hilarious thing is... they were french. This is what happens when you take people in (in France's case it was Algeria) and you don't integrate them properly. I have family in France and not only are they pretty racist against arabs, they even look other Europeans over their shoulders thinking they are better. When you get migrants and don't integrate them properly, relegating them to ghettos and saying " **** off, don't disturb", then you have these problems.
I'm not blind to the fact that they can be problematic, but if they are taken in reasonable numbers and handled properly, they can add something to the society. The problem comes when things aren't done properly, which may or may be not be the case in Europe (I guess it is not done properly in most places, where I live we haven't got that many of them yet, so the first arrivals will be properly handled).
You were kind of polite and I could talk to you like a human being, I appreciate that (not everyone can say the same these days). Also, do not worry about grammar mistakes, I am not even an english native speaker and I make them all the time. Despite disagreeing with you, this has been enriching as it has been, and I really agree with you on not arguing anymore. As stated before, good night.
Nice white blaming right there, so migrants getting into ghettos is the country's fault, right. Really this cuck mentality, you know what any civilized person would do if he planned on living in another country? He would first learn the language, that's the bare minimum, and yet most migrants you see in my country don't know how to speak the language even after more than 10 years.
It is not white blaming goddamit, what does race have to do here? If the homing country recieving them was ******* black, then they'd be the dumb ones too. If you are taking people in, the state should make sure they are at least somewhat integrating, by teaching them the language, basic knowledge, etc. If not, you risk them grouping up, forming ghettos and creating a potential bomb in case conflict arises (France has had previous problems with people from the suburbs because of this exact reason, and they weren't jihadists). And this isn't exclusive to this wave of migration, but rather all of them, if you want people to integrate rather than form their own micro-societies inside of yours, the state has to work towards that, and it will probably pay out in the long run.
Why go through the trouble? Why waste resources on them while risking them not giving a **** and just forming guettos (as they usually do)? Seriously you keep talking as if they were needed here or something, they aren't, they aren't doing us a favour by coming here.
Maybe not to your country, but some actually are in desperate need of younger people (low as **** fertility rate) willing to work. My country, with an unemployment rate through the roof, probably doesn't need them, but they can do good in countries such as Germany, and in fact economists seem to have certified that (economists independent from the Government, btw). Here's a link to an article citing study saying so (it is in German though, the study), plus there have been multiple companies and businessmen stating that they regard the refugees as an opportunity.
1) I don't think it's bad because it could be much worse (aka stone age tier Iraq bad)
Do you even listen to yourself?
One of the most civilized and safest area in the world. EXACTLY. So how else are we going to turn all this civilization building success into a pile of **** ?
Oh right, lets import millions of people from countries where stoning women for getting raped is the norm. But hey, it won't turn us into one of those countires overnight so it's ok.
It's NOT ******* ok, it's only going to be getting worse with every next military age male "refugee" we import.
Isolated cases? Are you out of your mind? This is the only argument you rainbow people always bring up and it's utter ******** .
How many more hundreds of "isolated cases" do you need before you realize they are actually not as isolated. The NYE in Germany wasn't an "isolated" case, it was just a case on such a huge scale that not even the liberal controlled media could keep silent about it.
HERE, have a taste of "it's not bad because we're not middle east tier yet" and "safe and civilized areas won't turn bad anytime soon"
2) I never said I want US to invade Europe, I said I want Trump to come here and be president here, because we ******* need someone who's not afraid to speak the truth and doesn't want to turn all of Europe into a steaming ******** just to appear having some sort of "moral high ground"
Aaaand you cite the bias-video-man, that ends the discussion for me. I am not even from Sweden, and obviously not all Europe is like that, but ok. And yes, they are isolated cases, like it or not, statistics show so (it is funny how people include cases from migrants that have been here for years and try to count them as Syrian refugees, it really is). I won't be talking against a brickwall, so it's ok, reply if you want I won't anymore. And pssst, we're not importing "millions of people", and even if we did, I'm sure that it wouldn't be too bad, considering Europe has a population of several hundreds of millions. But hey, whatever floats your boat, I think you should go out more and stop eating this "they'll tear the civilized Europe apart" ******** that comes from /pol, Breitbart, the nutjob side of FJ or the three of them. Good night.
"nanana you're talking something not fitting my delusional agenda, Im not listening anymore nor talking to you anymore bye"
Maybe when the refugees molest or rape one of your relatives and YOU will be called racist and Islamophobic for suggesting they should perhaps face some sort of trial or be deported, maybe then you'll realize that being all liberal and tolerant wasn't the best choice.
Because remember... it's only racist/sexist/crime/... if a WHITE man does that
> "Im sure importing millions of homeless people with no job, no acquaitances, who don't know the language and whose culture is completely opposite to ours wouldn't be too bad"
Geez you just tried really hard to go full retard, or is it natural for you?
******* cucks like you are the ones who are killing Europe, I dont give a **** if only 5% of migrants are savages, STILL TOO MUCH, Europe doesn't need them, there is no benefit in letting them in, so why do it? Poor refugees who only want a better life can suck my dick, they are as bad for letting the extremists do things like this.
The good thing is all you cuck countries are the ones getting invaded because cuck culture, so when Europe finally realizes that we have to kill this cancer, you and your cuck genes will be wiped out.
Yes, I'm sure you'll do all the killing anon, preeetty damn sure. Your genes must also be top tier, you show such a terrific display of intellect, it is scary. I bet all the girls you've laid with along the years also agree with me. Are you a part of the Mensa? You should apply.
In case you didn't get it, it was sarcastic, I think you're pretty damn dumb
1. You post as anon.
2. You attack me by saying ******* cuck, my genes should be erased, blah blah blah
3. I respond you in an equal manner (aka, being rude and not giving a **** about someone who hasn't given arguments and has been ******* rude)
4. "Muh ad hominem attacks, you have no arguments bro"
I literally don't want to waste my time arguing with you, so I guess that you'd understand the " **** off" I was waving in your face by yourself, seems I was wrong. Want my arguments? Go read them somewhere else in these comments, where I talk to people not as incoherent as you.
Thing is you didn't give a single argument, "muh multiculturalism" isn't an argument, you have yet to present a single reason why taking arab migrants is good to Europe while being blind to all the violence they bring.
So what? It is still my opinion, there is no battle to be won or lost. I know I won't convince anybody out there, as everybody seems to have their mind made up (either being in one side or the other), but I refuse to believe that everyone in thise website is racist and hates migrants.
I would gladly be governed by a right wing extremist as long as he promised he would protect my culture and my country from beings that are little more than monkeys
Well that might actually happen as well...
Despite all the **** that Merkel cunt did she achieved the unthinkable
She actually united the entire right wing spectrum ranging from neutral people with a tiny spec of nationalism and self respect all the way to the white supremacists and extremists. Pretty much guaranteeing that our next elected politicians will all be right wing oriented and not some liberal cucks.
SAND ******* GET OUT REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
Seriously though what in the **** is Germany doing? They're going to single-handedly destroy europe and turn it into the Middle East 2 Electric Bugaloo. And why in the **** are feminists supporting this? This is the ******* rape culture they've been talking about for years. This **** drives me ******* mental. At least my country is only taking 4,000 and wants to screen the ******* before we let them in. www.independent.ie/irish-news/politics/lucinda-creighton-refugees-coming-to-ireland-should-be-screened-34350358.html There is literally no ******* reason that any country should be taking them in before screening them. RIP Europe
Unpopular opinion incoming: I'd argue any country should only take in the disabled, the elderly and the children. The remaining men should stay in their country and defend it with their lives and the woman should stay to help out as well. Deserting your own country when it needs you most is cowardly. Unless of course there is a very good reason for them not fighting such as no weaponry available or no food/ water. Then again, they can always do factory work in order to gain more supplies or some **** .
i'm quite unhappy about how the crisis is handled, but the whole 'stay and fight' argument is just insanely retarded.
who are they supposed to fight for? The 'moderate' rebels? ISIS? Or maybe do vladi putin a solid and join assads army?
the only alternative is throwing rocks at tanks i'm afraid.
it is a little more complicated than that.
as long as the conflict is not resolved, there will be no end to any of this.
sadly, the whole situation is insanely convoluted.
The US and Turkey have shamefully admitted to sponsoring and arming some of the rebels, and only after their men were bombed to bits by russian troops.
Then there was that whole thing where the turks shot down a russian plane.
So there is a lot of tension between nations about this conflict right now.
And i would wager that most of it is being kept from us.
Something big is going down soon, mark my words.
Might even be WW3, and this one is gonna be so ugly, that you are gonna wish it was only the refugee crisis.
Excluding first wave feminism, it has never been about women's rights. It's about leftist ideology. The stated goal of Communism is to stir up race relations in order to destabilize the West so that Capitalism falls and Communism can offer its solution. Whether they know it or not, radical leftists including the feminists are advocating for destabilization, not freedom. This is fairly obvious because, like you pointed out, they do not adhere one bit to principles. It's 100% ideology and pack mentality. Go against the mob and you meet fierce resistance. This is what happened to Sommers when she noticed the direction feminism was going and tried to apply principles to the ideology.
The feminazis benefit more from capitalist society than anyone else. All they want is money. If you scream about the commies people will stop treating it seriously
Canadian here, just came back from glorious kkk supporting haven finland, and from touring around europe.
yep. this is happening. this is real. this is what i've heard from residents of these countries, this is what i've seen in the streets of cities.
They aren't refugees, they are not running from war, they are not migrants, they are barely human.
when it comes to them the only solution is slaughter, kill or be killed. praying for gulag/deathcamp development as a final solution.
i disagree with your whole stance on genocide there,
but i gotta say that immigration policy sounds pretty awesome.
the sheer volume of refugees would make it mad expensive though.
No, after living in Canada for a long term.. Your immigration system is a joke. And if it weren't for the likes of Germany and Sweden, you guys would be the biggest contributor to left-wing liberals and also have the highest rate for migration. Quite Literally shovelling them in.
I even noticed it when I went over to see the family, how much had changed on the streets with regards to ethnic diversity. It was a joke.
YES, definitely, screening needs to take place, but the massive flaw in that is, like in Europe, the SN's don't carry with them correct documentation, now quiz me this, how can, when someone carries with them, ZERO documentation as to who they ACTUALLY are, how can screening be carried out, effectively.
ALSO, no, you're still doing it wrong, mass loans and housing and the rest for "Refugees" still isn't a fix. To start, they're not "Refugees" as you so eloquently put it... they never were, refugees, they're there to STAY. So whatever side of the political fence anyone stands on, they're not war refugees, escaping the war and conflict of their home land. They're there to STAY. I can't stress this enough. And no amount of loans, housing or political refuge will correct this.
But I'm not having a go at you, per'se. I'm stating a fact that Canada DOES NOT have it right either.
From what I can gather, 'Straya is doin' it right. But even the liberals at their end are raising their ugly heads. Luckily for now, from what my Friends and Family have told me from other there is that the government is culling them back. At least with 'Straya they're very much "Oh you don't like our rules? You don't think we should do that ? Oh you're offended!? **** off then you cunt" *Aussie Accent required*.
They're screening, but no documents, "Bye then".
Telling the .. majority of liberals to do one.
And they're very much with the ideaology of, break the rules, out you go.
Wait, what the **** ? You screen them out!?
The whole point of identifying who that particular person is, is so that you establish whether or not they have an affiliation with X and Y terror groups, or a history of crime etc. I never said ANYTHING about criminals being allowed in.
What the **** are you talking about.. Unless I missed something here, you're blatently confused.
Ohhhh... Wait.. Your first comment was saying my point of view was extreme? Not paranoid. Just reading what you're saying as "Screening is an extremist attitude" To which I said how is it extreme? Then you starting exclaiming that "If criminals are allowed in, then everyone suffers" Which again, seemed as though you were grabbing the wrong end of the ********** .
I was just saying, screen the cunts, and keep those cunts out etc.
You read a little too much into what I said. I asked a question, it wasn't ambiguous. It seems like a lot of people on this post are too angry to make a rational decision, even if the media cannot be trusted.
2. If they don't have documentation or proof that they are a complete family unit of parents and children with birth certificates for the children and marriage certificates they don't get in. poorfag grubby sandnigs chasin after jobs and benefits would not have these papers, forgeries not accepted canadian currancy and documents are held to the Highest standards of anti-forgery, we are pretty good at spotting fakes in any document from anywhere. . also no unaacompanied single men allowed, www.cbc.ca/news/politics/canada-refugee-plan-women-children-families-1.3330185
3. There are no "mass loans" or "housing projects". did you not read my sources from before? we make most migrants pay for their transportation to Canada within a month of arrival. www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/refugee-loans-canada-1.3378573 they don't get their own damn houses, they live with Canadian families until they have jobs and buy places of their own. migrants aren't getting free handouts unless they qualify for them the same way a Canadian national would. **** we've been described as financially "cruel" to migrants. how much tighter on them could we be?
4.difference between european countries and canada is we actually have the SPACE to put these people in, and we're even still capping it off at 50k immigrants this year. put up against canada's population that is a 0.14% increase of migrants in canadas population. we actually have plans to put these migrants to work in private and public sector projects, we will actually PROFIT from their work as a nation. www.cic.gc.ca/english/refugees/welcome/overview.asp
You're talking to someone who has studied national an international policies and politics for years now, hope i have been able to make you realize that you really need to construct a better argument by using research and logic.
LOL we have millions of illegals FLOODING across the border every year. Our immigration system is awful. The only thing we have better is that Mexicans aren't radical muslims trying to kill Americans.
Because Jewish Press, TV, government, media, etc., control the flow of information, and through psychological tactics, ostracize people who speak against the white genocide happening in Europe and America.
I'm reading through the comments of it all now, most a in aggreement of it all. But there'e this one .. 2 guys 'Maalik Islam' and 'Paolo Rossi'. Maalikmaballs is siting verses of the Quran and claiming we'll all be under the boot and how "we'll all be slaves" when they're done raping our spouses etc.. and Paolow-can-you-go is retarded off-the-scale Left and claiming that people, you know, in the right frame of mind.. are "Brainwashed".
Even if the physical truth is right there, when there's a ******* Extremist/self-proclaimed "Messenger" spouting off total bollocks in the comments about how we're all pigs and filth etc etc. This Paoloves-the-taste-of-bunghole-sweat is STILL calling everyone Brainwashed Marxists.
******* Christ on a bendy-bus. How do these ******* cucks even dress themselves in the morning?
Just saying that could summon countless plebs who post hitler jpgs I'm sure .... But right now that's what is keeping germany from acting against this nonsense. Every politician is afraid that he/she would fall into the nazi-category .
That is a pretty big deal because if the main partis don't change , those on the far right receive more and more votes , and that's a bad thing .... look at france , their front nationale gets a ******* of votes and that is voting for Nazis , don't try to defend it
Well I mean if people want changes and the current people in power won't agree to such changes then the people tend to go to whoever promises said changes.
I'm confused on what you're getting at here.
Are you saying that voting for the far right is a terrible thing? which I personally am more in the middle ground between right and left. my original post was more joke than anything.
Or are you simply stating the current situation?
1. Voting for far right is bad (as seen 1938 , would be the same thing again)
2. The current situation is that middleground parties are paralized (also because the "EU" has left germany alone because they always received money but now don't want to do stuff) and some slightly right partys are picking up "votes" by adapting to the situation in a way that a lot of people want but nobody dares to speak out loud . fun fact : top 10 articles on Amazon in germany (outdoorsection): 10 different brands of pepperspray.
Well I mean in the 1930s the Nazi party DID turn Germany from post WWI weakling into a powerhouse strong enough to take on the entirety of Europe again and not give a **** . But I get what you're saying as the Nazi party ALSO caused the Holocaust and tore Europe to pieces.