Pls no ban
| |
Anonymous comments allowed.
62 comments displayed.
#20 to #6
-
sanitarysan (12/31/2014) [-] 
how you gonna **** post with that name and not even post slutty katerina...
#28 to #20
-
katarinaismywaifu (12/31/2014) [-] Find a better looking one and I'll ******** with it, in your honor.
#7 to #6
-
gabonicagracy (12/31/2014) [-] Besides the thong I don't see how the outfit is says 'whore.' I don't know about you but when I lean way forward my shirt tends to ride up on me too.
#10 to #9
-
katarinaismywaifu (12/31/2014) [-] What you mean didn't check name? I don't always troll.
#58 to #10
-
commencingfailure (12/31/2014) [-] But you will always be a dumb cunt
Also you weren't ''trolling'', you just made a stupid remark and tried saving yourself
Also you weren't ''trolling'', you just made a stupid remark and tried saving yourself
#54 to #4
-
anticitezenone ONLINE (12/31/2014) [-] False
"deo Voyeurism Prevention Act of 2004 - Amends the Federal criminal code to prohibit knowingly videotaping, photographing, filming, recording by any means, or broadcasting an image of a private area of an individual, without that individual's consent, under circumstances in which that individual has a reasonable expectation of privacy. (Defines a "private area" as the naked or undergarment clad genitals, pubic area, buttocks, or female breast of an individual.)
Makes such prohibition inapplicable to lawful law enforcement, correctional, or intelligence activity."
www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/108/s1301#summary
There's literally nothing saying that this is illegal, so go ahead and do it, ain't nothing they can do since they:
Knowingly went out in public wearing that
and Knowingly showed their Whale-Tail
So no, it's not illegal. And I did do my ******* research.
"deo Voyeurism Prevention Act of 2004 - Amends the Federal criminal code to prohibit knowingly videotaping, photographing, filming, recording by any means, or broadcasting an image of a private area of an individual, without that individual's consent, under circumstances in which that individual has a reasonable expectation of privacy. (Defines a "private area" as the naked or undergarment clad genitals, pubic area, buttocks, or female breast of an individual.)
Makes such prohibition inapplicable to lawful law enforcement, correctional, or intelligence activity."
www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/108/s1301#summary
There's literally nothing saying that this is illegal, so go ahead and do it, ain't nothing they can do since they:
Knowingly went out in public wearing that
and Knowingly showed their Whale-Tail
So no, it's not illegal. And I did do my ******* research.
#40 to #12
-
fuzzyballs (12/31/2014) [-] not in Belgium you can't
not since the law on privacy they passed a few years ago, even schools have to get permission from parents for class photos
not since the law on privacy they passed a few years ago, even schools have to get permission from parents for class photos
#24 to #16
-
superffuzzylogik ONLINE (12/31/2014) [-] not true, you have no expectation of privacy in public places. You can absolutely take pictures of public places, but you can't tell someone they're not allowed to do so if they happen to be there.
She has no expectation of privacy, and it's her fault to sport a whale-tail in a public store. Anyone and everyone is allowed to snap a picture of that fine ass.
She has no expectation of privacy, and it's her fault to sport a whale-tail in a public store. Anyone and everyone is allowed to snap a picture of that fine ass.
#61 to #24
-
nudybooty (12/31/2014) [-] Nope. In Canada it's illegal to take photos of people without consent, even in public. If you're taking a picture of a building and they happen to be in the backround, you can legally hang on to that photo but if you want to put the photo somewhere public, you have to get their consent first.
Why does everything think the instant you say anything about any place they instantly thing you're talking about America?
Why does everything think the instant you say anything about any place they instantly thing you're talking about America?
#25 to #24
-
superffuzzylogik ONLINE (12/31/2014) [-] they're not allowed to do so just because you happen to be there*
sorry, train of thought switched tracks mid-sentence.
sorry, train of thought switched tracks mid-sentence.
#38 to #25
-
subaqueousreach (12/31/2014) [-] Correct, but if the girl requested that he delete the picture, he is legally obligated to delete it as per her right of privacy, regardless of the fact that she was in a public place at the time.
If she told him to delete it and he didn't he can be charged for deflemation of character and sexual harassment, among other things.
If she told him to delete it and he didn't he can be charged for deflemation of character and sexual harassment, among other things.
#13
-
lapsushominum ONLINE (12/31/2014) [-] I don't think this is technically illegal, but that doesn't make him not an asshole for doing it.
#51 to #43
-
dubscausedthis (12/31/2014) [-] You can take picture of someone in a public place, it's not against the law to do that. If you go into a public area you don't have the privacy you had if you were in your own home, hence, public. However if they ask you to delete said photo, you are obligated to do so.
#2 to #1
-
evilkingganon (12/30/2014) [-] Looks like the were jammmed up her ass well before he got there
#46 to #21
-
plasticcup (12/31/2014) [-] sheeit ***** , i kno yu be all righteous and good guy knight ere boyo. But you can't beat thirsty ass *********** round er seen?
yo ass got no powah.
yo ass got no powah.
#49
-
butwhynot (12/31/2014) [-] Way to be a ******* creeper. Whoever took this picture is pure aids.
