Please. Do not read the tags. that my son "turn offes device.". maybe she was talking about whatever was used to take that picture The Game
Upload
Login or register
Hide Comments
Leave a comment Refresh Comments (106)
[ 106 comments ]
> hey anon, wanna give your opinion?
asd
#19 - loltech
Reply +334 123456789123345869
(11/25/2013) [-]
maybe she was talking about whatever was used to take that picture
User avatar #94 to #19 - edforce
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(11/25/2013) [-]
Why the **** is this so thumbed up? It clearly says insisted to turn off HIS device. As in the child. The person probably waited until takeoff to take the picture of what the flight attendant thought was an electronic device.
User avatar #106 to #94 - makonendrak
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(11/26/2013) [-]
Probably because the rest of us understand that loltech wasn't being serious
#51 to #19 - astonop
Reply +4 123456789123345869
(11/25/2013) [-]
Maybe, but she could have been using one of these things.

Who knows.
User avatar #77 to #51 - dross
Reply +5 123456789123345869
(11/25/2013) [-]
Jesus man you don't just play with antiques.
#83 to #51 - wizi
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(11/25/2013) [-]
and thats why its on the internet now?
#93 to #83 - philm
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(11/25/2013) [-]
scanners maybe?
User avatar #87 to #83 - astonop
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(11/25/2013) [-]
Fair point.
#8 - skiskate
Reply +125 123456789123345869
(11/25/2013) [-]
Gus hates people who don't turn off their devices
Gus hates people who don't turn off their devices
#81 to #8 - stonedphilosopher
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(11/25/2013) [-]
I was your 100th thumb.. In my culture, that's a milestone
#104 to #8 - webshark
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(11/25/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
#18 to #8 - yellowcardraiden
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(11/25/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
User avatar #23 to #8 - beroty
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(11/25/2013) [-]
Why gus,why?
#30 to #23 - intotheblaze
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(11/25/2013) [-]
#44 to #23 - matrixone
Reply -2 123456789123345869
(11/25/2013) [-]
becos i cen
#14 - skyelinesunrise
Reply -42 123456789123345869
(11/25/2013) [-]
Its called "security theater"
if a big pile of metal you're flying through the sky at half the speed of sound in thats full of highly flammable fuel isn't properly shielded from the small amount of electromagnetic interference produced by an electronic device, or the radio signals sent out by it on a band specifically chosen and enforced by the fcc to prevent signal interference, have the slightest possibility to cause any sort of issue, then you have a much bigger problem to worry about than some idiot checking facebook on his iphone
many countries no longer restrict it, now that things are held to much higher safety standards. its a tradition we keep in America and several other countries because "its what we've been taught" so it helps make people feel safer, even though it doesn't actually do anything.
people will buy into anything you tell them when its about airplane safety, due to our overly irrational fear of airline terrorism.
If you use your phone during takeoff on a modern plane, and it interferes with anything onboard in any way whatsoever, you should change planes immediately, because there is a serious problem with it.
#15 to #14 - elizabethsiber
0 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
#40 to #14 - itsmedumbass
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(11/25/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
User avatar #99 to #14 - pyrointheface
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(11/25/2013) [-]
The fear isn't irrational after four planes were hijacked and killed close to three thousand people
#37 to #14 - VersusTheWorld
Reply +12 123456789123345869
(11/25/2013) [-]
You're an idiot. I'm certified with my Private Pilot's license and I had to learn regulations.

Part 91.21 of the FAR/AIM says that nobody, not the Pilot in command may make use of any electronics on US-registered aircraft that's flying using Instrument conditions (due to the electromagnetic waves messing with radios and magnetic compass/navigation equipment.)

Instrument conditions means you can't see outside so you rely on your instruments to fly.

You're allowed to use your phone on airplane and ipods and stuff because they've been determined to not interfere with navigational or communicational equipment.

The waves don't cause explosions in fuel lines because if they did, the thousands of waves coming from the people IN the airport while the plane is parked would have already caused those explosions if that were the case. You take ALL electronics off during T/O and landing because if the plane were to lose engines, stall or something during take-off, the pilots NEED those radios to call tower and declare emergency on Emergency frequency among other things like setting transponders and SQUAWKing their emergency.

If you don't believe me on any of this: You need to login to view this link

#108 to #37 - skyelinesunrise
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(11/26/2013) [-]
Obviously they don't interfere with the fuel lines
And yes, the US regulations prohibit it
But a modern plane without anything extremely wrong with it will not get absolutely ANY radio interference from you using any sort of electronic device or radio device that is compliant with FCC regulations, because they operate on different frequencies. Thats the entire reason the FCC segments frequencies - so that they can guarantee there is a clear channel. Making a call on any modern FCC compliant phone CANNOT physically affect pilot communication or instrument operations.

The regulation is there for antiquated reasons, since way back in the day things were a lot less controlled.

And if using any other low wattage handheld device from the other side of a shielded cockpit door, that produces so little electromagnetic radiation to begin with that its virtually undetectable even a foot away, is capable of affecting instruments that are also properly engineered and shielded against interference, the electronics engineers paid 6-7 figures over at Boeing need to be replaced. I say this as an Electrical Engineer. It is NOT POSSIBLE for them to affect the plane.

The regulations are there for outdated reasons. Yes you're right that you aren't legally allowed to use them, in US airspace, during takeoff/landing, but there is no modern reason to justify this besides "making people feel safe."
#109 to #108 - VersusTheWorld
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(11/26/2013) [-]
Let's lay down some aeronautical knowledge up in this bitch.

All planes use a magnetic compass that relies on the magnetic field on the earth. Using the basic knowledge of physics that you should have as a so-called "electrical engineer", you'd understand that each plane has a compass direction card that shows if you want to fly (look at the top box, second one) a 0-3-0 heading using your magnetic compass (which is used in Instrument flight rules), with the radio on, it'll tell you to fly a 0-3-2 due to the interference from the radio and instruments since all radios and some instruments are electronically driven, it'll show you're going 0-3-2 but you're actually going 0-3-0.

Same thing would happen with cell signals since they send waves out to connect to cell towers and the like. Those waves interfere not only with the magnetic compass, but also the radio since they're a different frequency. With my phone on in the A/C i fly, i still get interference, so I keep it in airplane mode. It doesn't affect the airplane directly, it interferes.

**** nobody says: "I'm sure glad I can't use my phone on the plane, I feel so much safer." Being safe on a plane depends on the pilot's skill, his competence, and the aircraft being properly inspected and everything runs correctly.

User avatar #21 to #14 - OsamaBinLadenz
Reply +78 123456789123345869
(11/25/2013) [-]
It's... um... not electronic, though.
User avatar #22 to #21 - waffies
Reply +20 123456789123345869
(11/25/2013) [-]
^professional
#107 to #21 - skyelinesunrise
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(11/26/2013) [-]
im not talking specifically about the etch a sketch, but rather the whole "fear of electronics" during takeoff/landing
#75 to #21 - anon id: d98a1156
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(11/25/2013) [-]
he wasnt even talking about that though...
User avatar #43 to #21 - leafonthewind
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(11/25/2013) [-]
you know enough about wrecking planes already don't you?
#38 to #21 - belshir
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(11/25/2013) [-]
right, because of all the people to listen to about plane safety...
NOT THIS TIME WEIRDY BEARDY!!!
#27 to #21 - anon id: 0d8b5bad
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(11/25/2013) [-]
Since when are you allowed to be on a plane?
User avatar #33 to #27 - propanex
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(11/25/2013) [-]
Since he is dead.
User avatar #47 - fyaq
Reply +57 123456789123345869
(11/25/2013) [-]
Probably was talking to you to turn off your ******* camera.
#85 to #47 - spanishninja
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(11/25/2013) [-]
#60 to #47 - nicebeaver
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(11/25/2013) [-]
I genuinely laughed, thanks sir.
#96 to #60 - Schillsifer
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(11/25/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
#29 - intotheblaze
Reply +47 123456789123345869
(11/25/2013) [-]
Read the tags
#39 to #29 - cubinq
Reply -2 123456789123345869
(11/25/2013) [-]
gaayyy
#36 to #29 - munyman
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(11/25/2013) [-]
You son of a cunt
User avatar #74 to #29 - floydcalling
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(11/25/2013) [-]
Finally. I can say I'm a winner.
User avatar #24 - crustydingleberry
Reply -28 123456789123345869
(11/25/2013) [-]
hate to tell ya this but your family is poor. coach seats, ******* etchisketch and a wrinkly weenus
#67 to #24 - anon id: c3d9f7f0
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(11/25/2013) [-]
That's a magna doodle twat
#92 to #24 - nickypickle
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(11/25/2013) [-]
User avatar #35 to #24 - immabored
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(11/25/2013) [-]
Someone must not get enough attention at home.
User avatar #70 to #24 - dudenectar
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(11/25/2013) [-]
"Wrinkly weenus"
I'm pretty certain you can't judge someone's income by looking at the folds of skin on their elbow
#25 to #24 - rubiksoctohedron **User deleted account**
Reply +25 123456789123345869
(11/25/2013) [-]
that is not an etch a sketch
this is an etch a sketch
User avatar #26 to #25 - crustydingleberry
Reply -30 123456789123345869
(11/25/2013) [-]
WOW THAT LOOKS SO DIFFERENT TO THE ONE IN THE PICTURE..................IDIOT
User avatar #28 to #26 - OsamaBinLadenz
Reply +9 123456789123345869
(11/25/2013) [-]
Similar ideas, but the one above is more refined to allow someone that's young a way to draw more rounded pictures and such, with the use of a pen rather than knobs.

I find it pretty sophisticated that you would be that nice to him in return for his information, though.
#50 to #26 - greenthegunstar
Reply +6 123456789123345869
(11/25/2013) [-]
But...but it does look different, though.
But...but it does look different, though.
User avatar #34 to #26 - lukewarmpigeon
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(11/25/2013) [-]
its a lot different actually
#1 - badmotorfinger
-1 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
#2 to #1 - jcbiddulph
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(11/25/2013) [-]
#3 to #1 - pokemonnuzlocke
Reply +5 123456789123345869
(11/25/2013) [-]
User avatar #9 to #3 - brokenhalf
Reply +5 123456789123345869
(11/25/2013) [-]
what did he say?
User avatar #12 to #9 - schwerdaddy
Reply +9 123456789123345869
(11/25/2013) [-]
"one time i found one of these at goodwill and out of boredom drew a massive cock on it"
#4 to #3 - badmotorfinger
-1 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
#5 to #1 - shishiko **User deleted account**
Reply +13 123456789123345869
(11/25/2013) [-]
User avatar #6 to #5 - badmotorfinger
Reply -25 123456789123345869
(11/25/2013) [-]
**** all of you anyway
#7 to #6 - shishiko **User deleted account**
Reply +17 123456789123345869
(11/25/2013) [-]
wut i do
wut i do
#76 - werefell
Reply +11 123456789123345869
(11/25/2013) [-]
Turn off his "device"
Turn off his "device"
User avatar #46 - forgottenmyshorts
Reply +9 123456789123345869
(11/25/2013) [-]
The attendant was probably just etching to get the plane off the ground




...god that was an awful pun
User avatar #49 to #46 - gmarrox
Reply +7 123456789123345869
(11/25/2013) [-]
That pun was a bit of a sketch.
User avatar #62 to #49 - Lolzster
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(11/25/2013) [-]
She was drawing the wrong conclusion.
User avatar #100 to #49 - kristovsky
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(11/25/2013) [-]
you should have said "a bit sketchy"
User avatar #32 - dudemans
Reply +9 123456789123345869
(11/25/2013) [-]
Maybe the flight attendent was telling the ***** taking the picture to turn his/ her device off....
User avatar #86 to #32 - spartusee
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(11/25/2013) [-]
What if it wasn't an electronic camera?
User avatar #105 to #86 - dudemans
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(11/25/2013) [-]
I'm assuming by the half decent quality of the photo that it is