Click to expand
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
User avatar #3 - rulebysecrecy ONLINE (10/15/2013) [-]
No, you see, since the material is on the cats back, the cat would land on its feet and nothing would change, it needs to be on the cats belly
User avatar #63 to #3 - rulebysecrecy ONLINE (10/16/2013) [-]
oh well... ffs I feel like a retard now, after numerous explanations I get it, idk why the **** i didnt get it, my bad peoples, my bad.
#41 to #3 - ogloko (10/15/2013) [-]
so many red thumbs but your idea is solid. butter side up on the cat's belly
#15 to #3 - toof (10/15/2013) [-]
This should clear it up
User avatar #26 to #15 - sonicthefast (10/15/2013) [-]
Well you know, if the cat lands on it's feet, then the toast never lands, meaning that the toast never lands butter side up, and fulfilling the law. Sorry to spoil it.
#4 to #3 - doggstar (10/15/2013) [-]
but then it'd create an extreme gravitational force where both are slammed into the ground at such force it could destroy the device... but with it on its back the cat and toast will be at an equilibrium that will create a perpetual rotation till the end of the cats life
#35 to #4 - markonj (10/15/2013) [-]
Are you people actually arguing about this?
#47 to #35 - mrmymilkshakes (10/15/2013) [-]
What do you mean, "you people"
User avatar #11 to #4 - ilolzville (10/15/2013) [-]
or we could just use two pieces of toast.
 Friends (0)