Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

hide menu
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#20 - samoaspider ONLINE (05/03/2014) [-]
now here's the big question - why didn't he just get 2 buttered pieces of toast? (or 2 cats)
#128 to #20 - flyingcube (05/04/2014) [-]
The answer is simple: He didn't have two cats or two toasts just one of each. I mean the dude looks poor
#63 to #20 - infotechexplain (05/03/2014) [-]
We've been through this.
#38 to #20 - cheeseboyofdoom (05/03/2014) [-]
Toast always lands butter side down. So they will just separate and fall down.
Do you even science
#39 to #38 - samoaspider ONLINE (05/03/2014) [-]
he could totally duct-tape those 2 pieces of buttered toast together aswell
he could totally duct-tape those 2 pieces of buttered toast together aswell
User avatar #95 to #39 - cattestacles (05/04/2014) [-]
Except then the butter is covered and can no longer see the ground, so it will just fall and fail
#33 to #20 - attifyon (05/03/2014) [-]
If he used two buttered toasts, the one with more butter would count as more buttered toast, and neutralize the other side.
Taping two cats together is not really an easy task, let alone taping them exactly so their backs meet.
#53 to #33 - helpthepeople (05/03/2014) [-]
taping two cats together also results in more cat, and neutralizes it
#27 to #20 - golfbob (05/03/2014) [-]
Science doesn't work that way
User avatar #25 to #20 - IAmManbearpig (05/03/2014) [-]
or butter both sides of the toast?
#37 to #25 - anonymous (05/03/2014) [-]
Or butter the cats back
User avatar #54 to #37 - huffe (05/03/2014) [-]
because then it's not toast
User avatar #23 to #20 - lurifax (05/03/2014) [-]
Well, cats are too floppy. I can't tell you why he didn't just use toast though
 Friends (0)