Patrick speaks femminist
| |
Anonymous comments allowed.
129 comments displayed.
#5
-
slobiscuit (12/25/2015) [-] 
**slobiscuit used "*roll picture*"**
**slobiscuit rolled image**1 in 3 women? do you know how many women that is?
**slobiscuit rolled image**1 in 3 women? do you know how many women that is?
#8 to #6
-
slobiscuit (12/25/2015) [-] **slobiscuit used "*roll picture*"**
**slobiscuit rolled image**Thats like 1139353126.67 women raped each year? . I seriously doubt that.
**slobiscuit rolled image**Thats like 1139353126.67 women raped each year? . I seriously doubt that.
#4
-
anon (12/24/2015) [-] "Girls preform better because of higher grades thus they're smarter and reliable than boys."
www.bbc.com/news/education-31751667
www.returnofkings.com/75159/study-shows-girls-get-better-grades-for-the-same-work-as-boys
www.bbc.com/news/education-31751667
www.returnofkings.com/75159/study-shows-girls-get-better-grades-for-the-same-work-as-boys
#54 to #30
-
bakagaijin (12/25/2015) [-] **bakagaijin used "*roll picture*"**
**bakagaijin rolled image**Justhand their diplomas in sealed jam jars
**bakagaijin rolled image**Justhand their diplomas in sealed jam jars
#111 to #30
-
theaddviser (12/25/2015) [-] They aaaaalllll say that, untill it comes time to open jars. Then we'll see whether or not strength is useful.
#56 to #37
-
hoponthefeelstrain (12/25/2015) [-] sorry but how would you expect otherwise when women weren't even allowed to get educations when these inventions were coming about?
#121 to #118
-
elementfall (12/25/2015) [-] Leonardo took art class and money from it,then he could study in his free time
For Newton,wikipedia says "From the ages of 12 through 17, he was educated at The King's School, Grantham (where his signature can still be seen upon a library window sill). He was removed from school, and by October 1659, he was to be found at Woolsthorpe-by-Colsterworth, where his mother, widowed by now for a second time, attempted to make a farmer of him. He hated farming.Henry Stokes, master at the King's School, persuaded his mother to send him back to school so that he might complete his education. This he did at the age of eighteen, achieving an admirable final report."
They had education,and they didn't had to educate kids or other things that were reserved to women.You couldn't have created a motor without knowledge of piston and other things.Womens clearly had enormous limitation,it's like asking someone with asthma to do a marathon without it's inhalerrobably possible,but with huge repercussions and failure possibility
For Newton,wikipedia says "From the ages of 12 through 17, he was educated at The King's School, Grantham (where his signature can still be seen upon a library window sill). He was removed from school, and by October 1659, he was to be found at Woolsthorpe-by-Colsterworth, where his mother, widowed by now for a second time, attempted to make a farmer of him. He hated farming.Henry Stokes, master at the King's School, persuaded his mother to send him back to school so that he might complete his education. This he did at the age of eighteen, achieving an admirable final report."
They had education,and they didn't had to educate kids or other things that were reserved to women.You couldn't have created a motor without knowledge of piston and other things.Womens clearly had enormous limitation,it's like asking someone with asthma to do a marathon without it's inhalerrobably possible,but with huge repercussions and failure possibility
#125 to #121
-
rluap (12/26/2015) [-] Leonardo was not an "Art Master", his inventions had nothing to do with art. Neither were his discoveries.
Who created these educations? Who wrote all that information that IS educated, before there were any educations at all???
Geniuses who created "Education" were MEN. This "women had no education" is an extremely pathetic excuse.
Who created these educations? Who wrote all that information that IS educated, before there were any educations at all???
Geniuses who created "Education" were MEN. This "women had no education" is an extremely pathetic excuse.
#127 to #125
-
elementfall (12/26/2015) [-] Except as i said before,the woman didn't had the time nor the liberty thanks to some mens being asses and then saying "it's a rule m'kay?" and we didn't seems to bother that much about it.So it was our role to hunt ,for example, and learn from trial and error.So we ,little by little,created rules,to do and not to do lists,etc...
Now you might say "but they could probably learn at time were they became a little more free!"Well they ******* did,but there was still the family pressure and all.
They were famous cafés and others places were intellectuals would go together to have a drink and discuss in the 17th century in France for example,at a time were money counted a little more than being born male or female.And guess what ? The managers of thoses were mostly females.
Problem is,if you wanted to join an university,you needed more of an education than making clothes and fast explanations from somes thinkers,and it's hard and time consuming to have to learn,manage a salon and educate your family
TL ; DR : We didn't gave them the possibility of trying in the domains were we invented a lot,and we didn't gave them education necessary for advanced domains
As for Leonardo,i stand by what i said :He made money by art first,since he took art class from verroccio in his early years and was kicked out for being too good,and made money from his various paintings and sculpturs,then his talent in drawing coupled with the free time,his absolute thirst of knowledge and Medici needs in ingeniery made him study math ,biology,etc...
Saying that Leonardo wasn't an Art master is literally saying that a big part of his life didn't happened.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leonardo_da_Vinci#Verrocchio.27s_workshop.2C_1466.E2.80.9376
Now you might say "but they could probably learn at time were they became a little more free!"Well they ******* did,but there was still the family pressure and all.
They were famous cafés and others places were intellectuals would go together to have a drink and discuss in the 17th century in France for example,at a time were money counted a little more than being born male or female.And guess what ? The managers of thoses were mostly females.
Problem is,if you wanted to join an university,you needed more of an education than making clothes and fast explanations from somes thinkers,and it's hard and time consuming to have to learn,manage a salon and educate your family
TL ; DR : We didn't gave them the possibility of trying in the domains were we invented a lot,and we didn't gave them education necessary for advanced domains
As for Leonardo,i stand by what i said :He made money by art first,since he took art class from verroccio in his early years and was kicked out for being too good,and made money from his various paintings and sculpturs,then his talent in drawing coupled with the free time,his absolute thirst of knowledge and Medici needs in ingeniery made him study math ,biology,etc...
Saying that Leonardo wasn't an Art master is literally saying that a big part of his life didn't happened.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leonardo_da_Vinci#Verrocchio.27s_workshop.2C_1466.E2.80.9376
#120 to #118
-
hoponthefeelstrain (12/25/2015) [-] Also Newton did go to college, but women back then also couldn't work unless it was something like baking or sewing. Having a woman do anything complex was laughable.
#119 to #118
-
hoponthefeelstrain (12/25/2015) [-] Well it's not even the school education, they were expected to just stay home and be wives and pop out babies. They were expected to aspire to marriage, to marry someone rich. Men were expected to work hard and be the rich guy women fought over. Men were expected to use their minds, women were expected to use their bodies. At certain points in history women weren't even trusted to vote, you think they'd be allowed to invent anything and get credit for it?
#68 to #4
-
piratedangel (12/25/2015) [-] If someone said "whites are smarter than blacks because they have higher grades," they'd be called racist.
#12 to #4
-
platinumaltaria ONLINE (12/25/2015) [-] Except that in fact girls test better because schooling systems were modified to boost the grades of female students.
#25 to #12
-
stormtraitor (12/25/2015) [-] Something about girls having an easier time sitting still and concentrating than young boys, as they're naturally impulsive and energetic during their childhood.
Black students, however, can't be trusted later on; I know from personal experience.
Black students, however, can't be trusted later on; I know from personal experience.
#129 to #12
-
hoponthefeelstrain (12/26/2015) [-] explain to me how the school system is designed for women
#130 to #129
-
platinumaltaria ONLINE (12/26/2015) [-] In short, boys are getting lower average grades than girls. Obviously this is a bad thing, since there's no sound reason that that should be the case. Many people will cite that female students used to underperform, but in fact the inverse is true, female students have always performed better, just in different subject areas. Of course the PC rabble decided that girls had to be better in every way.
#131 to #130
-
hoponthefeelstrain (12/26/2015) [-] you're the one saying that boys not being on top is a bad thing...
Still didn't explain how school is designed for women, it's been taught the same way ever since only boys could attend.
Still didn't explain how school is designed for women, it's been taught the same way ever since only boys could attend.
#132 to #131
-
platinumaltaria ONLINE (12/26/2015) [-] I literally just said that boys were never on the top...
Only RICH boys, the farmer's son couldn't go any more than the farmer's daughter.
The focus in education shifted from cultivating the brightest minds to making sure you had 50% of of passing students be girls, which is totally anti-merit. There should never be a time when one student is getting more attention than another because lots of vaginas with good grades looks good.
Only RICH boys, the farmer's son couldn't go any more than the farmer's daughter.
The focus in education shifted from cultivating the brightest minds to making sure you had 50% of of passing students be girls, which is totally anti-merit. There should never be a time when one student is getting more attention than another because lots of vaginas with good grades looks good.
#9 to #4
-
thearcher (12/25/2015) [-]
My opinion is that girls do better in school (aside from school being geared towards them only anyway) because they're encouraged by their parents from a young age to work and study as much as possible because a woman is perceived as being less likely to land a tough job like one in the hard sciences and so they develop and retain better study habits than boys and put them to use from school to uni so they continue to perform better
But that's just my theory
But that's just my theory
#23 to #9
-
kinginthenorth (12/25/2015) [-] My English teacher (and she said some other teachers did the sameaswell) actually quite openly admitted that she was harsher for boys in her class than for the girls. Both behaviour-wise, because girls are stealthier when they do something, and test-wise. She'd grade the boys' tests much harsher than the girls' and be harder on the boys if she caught them doing something like cheating or not paying attention.
Then again, it's all anecdotal.
Then again, it's all anecdotal.
#26 to #23
-
tropenthatshtup (12/25/2015) [-] Were your English tests open ended? I'm assuming they are but I just didn't see a lot of those in school.
Was usually a cut and dry correct definition or correct answer, even for a lot of the short answer questions. Couldn't really see a teacher being harsher on one student over the other if they both picked B.
Was usually a cut and dry correct definition or correct answer, even for a lot of the short answer questions. Couldn't really see a teacher being harsher on one student over the other if they both picked B.
#84 to #26
-
kinginthenorth (12/25/2015) [-] We did have a lot of open ended tests, since Belgium doesn't have standardized tests.
Certain things couldn't really be open ended, like vocabulary. But we were allowed to use synonyms if we didn't know the exact word from the vocabulary. And she'd be much harsher on that. Or for a grammar test where mutliple tenses were possible for a sentence, but she would suddenly pick one of those and declare all the other viable ones wrong.
Certain things couldn't really be open ended, like vocabulary. But we were allowed to use synonyms if we didn't know the exact word from the vocabulary. And she'd be much harsher on that. Or for a grammar test where mutliple tenses were possible for a sentence, but she would suddenly pick one of those and declare all the other viable ones wrong.
#117 to #84
-
tropenthatshtup (12/25/2015) [-] Sounds like a jerk teacher, in a lot of advanced or Dual Credit English classes we could "argue" about vocab definitions or similarities, but that was usually because of certain regional dialects, or she had explained the word badly in class. Or if we had to use the word in a sentence and our use was different then what she gathered from our sentence.
One of my friends would always write a sentence about an old man who disliked the government for a word he didn't know and it usually worked in his favor, at least better than if he had left it blank every time.
One of my friends would always write a sentence about an old man who disliked the government for a word he didn't know and it usually worked in his favor, at least better than if he had left it blank every time.
#57 to #9
-
hoponthefeelstrain (12/25/2015) [-] I hear this often, how is school geared towards women?
#10
-
sgtmajjohnson (12/25/2015) [-] "Rape culture is an actual thing!" Seriously, if there was a culture that accepted rape in the west, you wouldn't be faced with possible decades in prison for it, and a simple accusation wouldn't be enough to crush someone's life.
#42 to #10
-
buddywuggle (12/25/2015) [-] But wouldn't a culture where rape accusations be detrimental be a technical rape culture? A rape accusation is kinda like raping someone with words.
#86 to #10
-
unholyjebus (12/25/2015) [-]
When people refer to rape culture, they are not referring to what you are referring to. **** man, why did I come back to this website?
#13
-
platinumaltaria ONLINE (12/25/2015) [-] Fun fact, globally speaking women are in the majority. So actually it's the filthy oppressive women who are in charge.
#17 to #15
-
platinumaltaria ONLINE (12/25/2015) [-] Did you not catch the satire of feminist logic?
#19 to #17
-
commencingfailure (12/25/2015) [-] Yea I know Circlejerkjunk hates feminists, but at least try to come up with some ******** that makes sense in the slightest. Not just *retarded gibberish* "Durrr durr it's what feminist do too amirite????"
#21 to #20
-
commencingfailure (12/25/2015) [-] I'm just being the friendly person you've always known me as :^)
#59 to #22
-
ilovehitler (12/25/2015) [-] Well, maybe you haven't met him, but commencingfailure knows you.
He knows you very well.
He knows you very well.
#31
-
anon (12/25/2015) [-]
Apparently being beat by your husband isn't oppression and neither is sexual harassment or assault.
Also this:
www.google.ca/webhp?hl=en#hl=en-CA&q=What+percentage+of+women+have+been+sexually+assaulted%3F
Also this:
www.google.ca/webhp?hl=en#hl=en-CA&q=What+percentage+of+women+have+been+sexually+assaulted%3F
#39 to #31
-
buddywuggle (12/25/2015) [-] Husbands are beaten too, in fact in that certain case, men are the oppressed ones, since women seem to get justice for domestic abuse more than men, whereas men sometimes get jailed for being beaten by their wife due to how papers are formatted.
Also, 1/6 men get raped within their lifetime, vs. the 1/5 that women go through, the difference is somewhat significant, but nothing to differentiate the two by.
Also, 1/6 men get raped within their lifetime, vs. the 1/5 that women go through, the difference is somewhat significant, but nothing to differentiate the two by.
#98
-
elcreepo (12/25/2015) [-] Wasn't it something like 25-30% of all women ages 16 to 24 get raped, though?
The wage gap and oppression are one thing, but rape is relatively prevalent in this country. Not just women either, men too.
The wage gap and oppression are one thing, but rape is relatively prevalent in this country. Not just women either, men too.
#112 to #98
-
kmichel (12/25/2015) [-]
0.6% of all women in the US are sexually assaulted, and 0.2% are raped. See my OC on the myth of the 25%
/Feminist+myth+of+the+25/funny-pictures/5697877/
/Feminist+myth+of+the+25/funny-pictures/5697877/
#100 to #98
-
saintnovember (12/25/2015) [-]
1 in 4 of all women. Theres plenty of reasons why it's ******** but the real numbers are way lower. Still too high but inflating numbers only belittles real victims.
#101 to #100
-
elcreepo (12/25/2015) [-] 1 in 4 of all women is still pretty high for a first world country. I wasn't sure on the actual numbers, so thanks for clarifying. If we include male rape victims we'll get the actual rape statistics.
I suppose it may belittle them, but doesn't it also alert legislators and the like to a problem that really ought to be near eradicated in society?
At the risk of sounding like an SJW, I just don't think the suggestion that rape in this country is too high is crazy talk.
I suppose it may belittle them, but doesn't it also alert legislators and the like to a problem that really ought to be near eradicated in society?
At the risk of sounding like an SJW, I just don't think the suggestion that rape in this country is too high is crazy talk.
#103 to #101
-
saintnovember (12/25/2015) [-]
I think you misunderstood me man. The myth is 1 in 4. It was published by a feminist researcher who included questions like "have you ever had sex without planning too" and if the subject said yes they were marked down as a rape victim. According to the study I rape my wife every time we have spontaneous sex. I wish I had source on that but I don't care enough to find it.
It's still too high, your absolutely right on that. Any rape is too much rape. But there's only so much the law can do. It's already illegal. Rapists are punished severely. We need self defence classes and classes on avoiding getting drugged but the sjw crowd shouts "victim blaming" as soon as you mention that.
It's still too high, your absolutely right on that. Any rape is too much rape. But there's only so much the law can do. It's already illegal. Rapists are punished severely. We need self defence classes and classes on avoiding getting drugged but the sjw crowd shouts "victim blaming" as soon as you mention that.
#32
-
anon (12/25/2015) [-]
Actually, ignoring goddamn feminazis, there is a noticeable wage gap in certain occupations.
#36 to #32
-
lulzdealer (12/25/2015) [-] Any semblance of a "wage gap" is because of the careers women choose for themselves.
Unsurprisingly, STEM majors earn more than sociology majors.
Beyond that, men and women get paid the same amount provided they do the exact same job. It has been so since the 19- ******** 60s.
Unsurprisingly, STEM majors earn more than sociology majors.
Beyond that, men and women get paid the same amount provided they do the exact same job. It has been so since the 19- ******** 60s.
#38 to #36
-
buddywuggle (12/25/2015) [-] >Sociology
What is the difference between that a phycology, and why isn't it profitable? Wouldn't sociology major would be a politician/government worker?
What is the difference between that a phycology, and why isn't it profitable? Wouldn't sociology major would be a politician/government worker?
#52 to #51
-
buddywuggle (12/25/2015) [-] Oh neat.
How long do you think a sociology course would take, it might go well with the phycology courses I plan to take.
How long do you think a sociology course would take, it might go well with the phycology courses I plan to take.
#24
-
frenulum (12/25/2015) [-] Someone, as unbiasedly as possible, explain the wage gap to me. I understand the whole 'womyn less money thn man!" but is tru?
#40 to #27
-
buddywuggle (12/25/2015) [-] Well then wouldn't it be good for both women and companies to work on making women more productive then?
#48 to #45
-
buddywuggle (12/25/2015) [-] Christians that use the bible as a weapon aren't real Christians, they are just Facebook Christians.
#49 to #24
-
gmarrox (12/25/2015) [-] The claimed wage gap is that women make 77 cents for every dollar a man makes. This is a ludicrous assertion, as it is illegal for companies to pay women less for the same work. The wage gap doesn't take into consideration types of careers, it's just average male pay vs average female pay. The disparity in these numbers comes from a few factors, such as the fact that women are less likely to take higher paying STEM jobs and instead stick with jobs dealing with or caring for people. Also, women tend to take more time off and work fewer hours per week.
#7
-
chiyoshi (12/25/2015) [-] **chiyoshi used "*roll picture*"**
**chiyoshi rolled image**I hope no one thinks this is what Patrick really said I wouldn't be surprised
**chiyoshi rolled image**I hope no one thinks this is what Patrick really said I wouldn't be surprised
#72
-
fancyjokes (12/25/2015) [-] We all know how ****** life is for middle east victims, but we hate talking about issues about american lifestyle that impact females in a similar way.
Women are expected to behave in a sexy, lesbian, open-minded way in college. Young societies are confused about a girl not turning into a slut and "living life". Some young girls live through the porn industry crisis and are humiliated by their friends and family.
We are as full of **** as any other country in the world. Our morality is just different against that one of other places; and it's easier to point a finger. Muslims believe alcohol poisons humanity, and they are ******* right.
Women are expected to behave in a sexy, lesbian, open-minded way in college. Young societies are confused about a girl not turning into a slut and "living life". Some young girls live through the porn industry crisis and are humiliated by their friends and family.
We are as full of **** as any other country in the world. Our morality is just different against that one of other places; and it's easier to point a finger. Muslims believe alcohol poisons humanity, and they are ******* right.
#75 to #72
-
testaburger (12/25/2015) [-] Alcohol is one of the earliest foundations of society.
Muslims can go suck on a donkey.
Muslims can go suck on a donkey.
#90 to #72
-
anon (12/25/2015) [-]
it's not that you're not entirely wrong, it's that what you are saying "sexy, bisexual, open minded" were all used by women long before men wanted women to do it. look at cleopatra and the woman that gained knowledge from her lifestyle. the control she had over men was brilliant, and very much so her own doing. also what does the porn industry have to do with it! do you do porn? why not? oh that makes sense! why don't other people not do it? money? work hard at some labour job like the rest of us? oh you're a woman and you shouldn't have to/can't/wanna do something else with a better pay and less manual labour? ****** princess.
#99 to #72
-
elcreepo (12/25/2015) [-] I dunno about you but as a woman I have had one sexual partner and am not sexually attracted to women. I appreciate beauty but I'm not about to go tongue deep into someone else's clam cake, you know?
Yeah there are issues facing women out there, namely white old guys making restrictive rules or otherwise treating them unfairly, but as a first world country America treats its women better than a good third of the world.
I mean sure, few males understand how a hymen works there is no true virginity test but that's about it as far as I can see. If anything as a woman I get a lot of privileges which honestly are rather demeaning, insinuating I can't do **** without handouts.
Yeah there are issues facing women out there, namely white old guys making restrictive rules or otherwise treating them unfairly, but as a first world country America treats its women better than a good third of the world.
I mean sure, few males understand how a hymen works there is no true virginity test but that's about it as far as I can see. If anything as a woman I get a lot of privileges which honestly are rather demeaning, insinuating I can't do **** without handouts.
#80 to #72
-
thedutchs (12/25/2015) [-] Women are not expected to **** every guy they meet nor are they expected to experiment on other girls. In fact, most sensible people frown upon that kind of attention seeking and the only kind of people who cheer it on are fratbros or people who are desperate. You're painting some kind of picture as if women are expected to slut it out, then join the porn industry and then get shunned by society.
And even if all of the above was the case (which it simply isn't), if you think that equals to being stoned because you had sex before marriage or actually get raped by your pre-arranged husband because your own parents would murder you if you said "no", you're a ******* retard.
This is modern day feminism.
And even if all of the above was the case (which it simply isn't), if you think that equals to being stoned because you had sex before marriage or actually get raped by your pre-arranged husband because your own parents would murder you if you said "no", you're a ******* retard.
This is modern day feminism.
#83 to #72
-
faggotville (12/25/2015) [-] Cool but some people also believe the world is run by lizard hybrids.
#64
-
garymotherfingoak (12/25/2015) [-] The wage gap does exist, but it's a lot smaller than people make it out to be, and much of it is because women are more likely to go on leave for a job (especially with **** like being pregnant) than men, not because muh oppression.
That ******* 2nd one though, there's a feminazi group at my university and they actually ******* believe close to that number, and **** like .1% of rape accusations are false. thankfully they're a pretty small group and no one takes them seriously, except the idiots in said club.
That ******* 2nd one though, there's a feminazi group at my university and they actually ******* believe close to that number, and **** like .1% of rape accusations are false. thankfully they're a pretty small group and no one takes them seriously, except the idiots in said club.
#105 to #64
-
tobistrigoivii (12/25/2015) [-] The wage gap is misleading. Some women won't take certain jobs that men will still take. Despite the fact that the company has an equal opportunity doctrine. The same argument could strawmanally be made for any perceived or actual, underrepresented group. If two people work 8 hours for the same pay, having the same taxes taken out, they will receive the same check. Period. The wage gap seems to suggest otherwise. That's like saying two people went to SchMickey D's and ordered a whoppertaco. For no reason other than her being a woman, her order received less maylettuce. I don't know why I suddenly started getting possessed near the end there.
#126 to #114
-
puggles (12/26/2015) [-] luckily she doesn't have to deal with the victim directly and make the call, she handles the evidence. she does however have access to witness interview tapes and videos so the witness statements can be compared to the physical evidence and checked for inconsistencies. seems like most women, especially the ones that falsely cry rape, don't realize what constitutes rape, and think that if they're pissed off after sex for any reason that they can just scream rape and be instantly agreed with. a lot of times the women openly admit and tell the truth about the circumstances but don't realize that by admitting that the sex was consensual at the time they pretty much disprove their own rape claims.
