Not Today
| |
Anonymous comments allowed.
61 comments displayed.
#11
-
installation (12/30/2015) [-]
Pictured: Guns never being used in self defense by a law abiding citizen.
#47 to #43
-
urmomsagrot (12/30/2015) [-] 
And then shortly after he recovers quickly from the minor daze caused by the punch, he shoots the clerk in the head. Good plan.
#49 to #48
-
urmomsagrot (12/30/2015) [-] Really? I didn't know our military gave all vets power fists that will always OHKO their target. Being in the military (depending on branch) gives you -some- martial arts training but it doesn't suddenly make your punches god tier.
#51 to #50
-
urmomsagrot (12/30/2015) [-] I'm not gonna insult you or throw random "autism" comments around, but I wouldn't go around spewing that to, as its total bs and makes you sound 13.
#23 to #14
-
anon (12/30/2015) [-]
>implying U.S. Army soldiers are actually good shots
Most of the time Veterans were ******* Pougs who never shot a gun out side of basic.
The level of idiocy in them is actually breath taking
This guy however looks like has some trigger time and spends a while at the range
Most of the time Veterans were ******* Pougs who never shot a gun out side of basic.
The level of idiocy in them is actually breath taking
This guy however looks like has some trigger time and spends a while at the range
#35 to #23
-
namesnshit (12/30/2015) [-]
also, theres this thing called weapons training. civilian or military.
#34 to #23
-
namesnshit (12/30/2015) [-]
i'm in the us army and yeah, most of us don't ever shoot unless we're qualifying. but don't downplay the combat MOS. they know what they're doing. the rest of us don't. there's two jobs in the military. there's the killers, then there's the people that support the killers.
#57 to #23
-
captchakid ONLINE (12/30/2015) [-] Except that everyone shoots outside of basic, like weekly. Also, unless you're a special type of soldier, you're typically taught to use volume of fire, which causes the enemy to become suppressed. This prevents them shooting at all.
#13 to #12
-
installation (12/30/2015) [-]
Yes. but imagine if the store owner didn't have a gun in this situation. He would be completely at the mercy of the other dude. So I think it's safe to say that citizens owning guns is a completely healthy thing.
#22 to #21
-
installation (12/30/2015) [-]
Yeah, cuz he was a criminal. I those 15+ kids had guns, they'd be able to defend themselves.
#46 to #11
-
einsampibroch (12/30/2015) [-]
He should have pulled the goddamn trigger on that human shaped filth.
#33 to #11
-
internetshakespear (12/30/2015) [-] > except he's a soldier that served 4 tours in iraq, not some random civvy that has 0 firearm traning and no experience in high-stress situations
#55 to #45
-
jdizzleoffthehizzl (12/30/2015) [-]
"firearm training and no experience in high-stress situations"
Honestly hardly any of these situations resolve like this one did, the Daily Show had a piece on how many people with guns actually end up saving the day in response to active shooter. But guns also do make a deterrent so I suppose there's ups and downs to both sides of the argument
Honestly hardly any of these situations resolve like this one did, the Daily Show had a piece on how many people with guns actually end up saving the day in response to active shooter. But guns also do make a deterrent so I suppose there's ups and downs to both sides of the argument
#2
-
misternobodie (12/29/2015) [-] Why does this look fake ? The cashier guy is good and all but the man in the white... Was he drunk ? What kinda **** move is that...
#8 to #2
-
deadfed ONLINE (12/30/2015) [-]
Im pretty sure the cashier was an ex marine. Dude in white thought he was bad because he had a gun, he thought he was in control of the situation until he had a gun to his neck. I normally wouldnt advise getting that ******* close with a gun, I mean its a ranged weapon for a reason, but the cashier did the best thing he could by putting his hand over the other guys gun hand.
#18 to #2
-
toosexyforyou (12/30/2015) [-] In addition to what deadfed said, most thieves are just that. They have the weapon to scare you into complying quicker but they don't intend to use it. So the guy goes from having a gun in his hand that he doesn't intend to use against a defenseless person to the person he just threatened pointing a gun at him and he is well within his rights to use that gun against him without hesitation.
#31 to #18
-
misternobodie (12/30/2015) [-] I guess thats right, most of them wouldn't have the balls to do something.
#28
-
fiveblackmen (12/30/2015) [-] I'm assuming this was staged because security cameras don't move around like that.
#17
-
toosexyforyou (12/30/2015) [-] The store clerk really should have pulled the trigger as soon as he had the chance. You shouldn't risk the other guy pointing that gun at you again.
#59 to #17
-
brokentrucker ONLINE (12/30/2015) [-] Not everyone really wants to take another life. Gun or no. I know I really don't want too. Human life. **** deer.
