Upload
Login or register
x

Nobody have choice

Hill ATAT '
Messages
I support gay marriage
but I wouldn' t want it on
TV because my kids
would see it, and I don' t
want them to be gay or
something tii)
yeah I totally understand.
I hate g when I]! -HER
people are on W
because I don' t want my
k. ids to be black
but black
people don' t have a
ohohoh
Assisi Q Us '
Nil'
abtn
...
+86
Views: 5292
Favorited: 3
Submitted: 03/01/2015
Share On Facebook
submit to reddit +Favorite Subscribe to qnamanmanga

Comments(16):

Leave a comment Refresh Comments Show GIFs
Anonymous comments allowed.
16 comments displayed.
#3 - pkmnexplain (03/01/2015) [-]
But kids cannot become black
But kids cannot become black
#4 to #3 - tonyredgrave (03/01/2015) [-]
Anyone can become a criminal, you just have to believe.
Anyone can become a criminal, you just have to believe.
#5 to #3 - luftvaffel ONLINE (03/02/2015) [-]
They can try
#7 to #5 - amuzen ONLINE (03/02/2015) [-]
In that sense we do censor our kids from watching black people on tv.
#2 - yunnie (03/01/2015) [-]
people are like teeth
the whiter the better
#9 to #2 - SuperSixONE (03/02/2015) [-]
Would've been more relevant if you said "The straighter the better"
#1 - lolzthree (03/01/2015) [-]
When their kids experiment.
#8 - amuzen ONLINE (03/02/2015) [-]
You totally can choose to be gay or become gay. It's actually generally more often attributed to nurture, various events throughout life, and personal decisions than a biological attraction to the hormones given off by those of the same gender.

Gay is an abberant sexual disposition, only different from beastiality, or pedophila by the fact that it doesn't leave a victim. it's been shown time and again that sexual disposition is very strongly tied to ones childhood and so exposure to homosexuality at a young age very well could play a pivotal in determining if that kid will grow up gay or not.
#10 to #8 - merrrione (03/02/2015) [-]
men have very low sexual plasticity. Pretty much every gay man ever interviewed has admitted to always having felt like he was gay and eventually coming out of the closet.
on the other hand, women have higher sexual plasticity, meaning they can consciously choose to be and/or become straight, bi or gay.
Also, animals shown homosexual behaviour as well. animals that had nothing but EVOLUTION as a way of progress, hence, it's not abherrant, it's very natural in a percentage of the animal kingdom, just not the norm.
check your facts before you **** on things.
#11 to #10 - amuzen ONLINE (03/02/2015) [-]
animals also **** creatures outside their species and children within their species, just because a behavioral pattern can occur inside the animal kingdom doesn't mean it's natural. Fun fact, a large majority of child molesters have admitted to being molested as a child proving strongly suggesting that sexual preferences can be effected by childhood experiences, I made the comparison to pedophillia not to try and say 'being gay is wrong yadayada, I made it to accentuate the point that it is a sexual preference and those are aren't some set in stone pre written instructions you're born with
the 'natural' purpose of sex isn't to be fun it's to reproduce, our bodies only evolved in such a way that its fun because that encourages animals to do it more. Preferring dick in the asshole isn't a biological mutation that you're born with although you could be attracted to male hormones or repulsed by female pheromones, that would be much rarer than just preferential behavior. , it's a preference you develop. Whether it's a preference you developed before you were sexually active or not doesn't change that at all.
it's like whether or not you like Rock and roll or country, generally speaking you develop a preference over time during your childhood, and then whether you like it or not you enjoy one over the other. Yeah it can be difficult to change ones preferences consciously, but on an unconscious level, if you listen to country every day your preferences might start to shift.

I'm male, I've been straight, I've been gay, and I've been straight again and I don't regret or believe I was 'just confused' at any one of those times nor was or am I Bi. I consciously and decisively chose to be gay (At the time I was fed up on women and their shenanigans) then after a bit I consciously and decisively decided I prefer pussy. It's not an impossibility for a guy to be in control of their preferences, even if controlling ones preferences is considered to be pretty difficult for most.
#12 to #11 - merrrione (03/03/2015) [-]
you must realize the fact that something deviates from the norm doesnt mean that feature is "abherrant" or "unnatural". Having red hair is a deviant feature, and you wouldnt call that unnatural, unless you lived in the middle ages. To state homosexuality is unnatural you must teleologically assume that the human individual is "supposed" to do something, when they're not. Now, i'm not saying the environment cant possibly have any effect on developing homosexuality, simply because i have no authority to. But what i do know is that it's not ONLY a matter of environment: some people are born with a high probability of being homosexual, some are not, some can choose to, some cant. Hell the ways the brain reacts to pheromones people cannot consciously perceive changes between heterosexual and homosexual individuals. And yes, obviously every living species has the basic instinct of reproduction. The thing is, the SPECIES has to live on, not the individual. The species lives on through casual "experiments", if you will, in each individual. These experiments can have positive results, and if they do, they're likely to be replicated (i.e. passed on through reproductions). But they can have no impact at all on the species or no impact at all. Such is homosexuality. If it "werent supposed to happen", and it's just an unlikely trend in modern human society, how would you explain the fact that it has existed for countless generations, and sometimes been accepted and encouraged?
#13 to #12 - merrrione (03/03/2015) [-]
sigh, i meant "no impact at all or even a negative impact". sorry i'm a little winded today.
#14 to #12 - amuzen ONLINE (03/03/2015) [-]
aberrant doesn't mean unnatural it means 'departing from the standard' I'm saying that straight up basic as **** vanilla sex dick in a vagina is the standard and homosexuality, dominatrices, gimps, furries, anal fisters, pedophiles, hentai's, masturbators, ass ******* , arm pit ******* , breast ******* , mouth ******* , foot ******* , cunt lickers and so and so forth, all those things, those are aberrations of the original.

also i'm using unnatural in it's most common form "contrary to the ordinary course of nature; abnormal" I'm not saying it doesn't occur in nature.

Now I'm not saying homosexuality or any of those things is wrong or bad, I'm not judging, I'm just saying thats what it is, it's a deviation from the norm, the original, or whatever you want call it, then after that I'm saying that those deviations have been shown time and again to be things that are influenced by nurture more than nature (nature in this sense again meaning the default, as in the basic biology of who are when you're born)
#16 to #15 - merrrione (03/03/2015) [-]
You may notice i used the word "deviant" trying to be relatively neutral, while "abherrant" has a much more strongly negative acception. English may not be my native language, but i pay attention to the words i use.
#6 - shickle (03/02/2015) [-]
dumbest comparison ever!
 Friends (0)