No Canada!. . eh: -see food bank beceuse It peer people Irma delete CLE tench to In ! Int r. rnl We twig at We mm; at , at Inital ' Hut TABB, it & um aim that h No Canada! eh: -see food bank beceuse It peer people Irma delete CLE tench to In ! Int r rnl We twig at mm; Inital ' Hut TABB it & um aim that h
Upload
Login or register

No Canada!

Click to block a category:GamingPoliticsNewsComicsAnimeOther
eh: -see food bank beceuse It peer people
Irma delete
CLE tench to In ! Int r. rnl
We twig at
We mm; at , at Inital '
Hut TABB, it & um
aim
that he-. 2 we Tali
ate @ iti activities. The
male the
we mm: In J genie
1: 4: meat‘ weater lief. DI?” t
The Univ Clutch ''' ita' ,
Pent: -neen preteen! the Week ,
by Feed Maine. and Mid the chm I
will mt: ennui rewe = Heine: be
SIN! lil DAMN
...
+501
Views: 32486 Submitted: 12/10/2013
Hide Comments
Leave a comment Refresh Comments (51)
[ 51 comments ]
> hey anon, wanna give your opinion?
asd
#1 - xexpertx
Reply -49 123456789123345869
(12/10/2013) [-]
Proof that all Christians are selfish greedy assholes.
User avatar #11 to #1 - beren
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/10/2013) [-]
*"Christians"
#13 to #1 - anon id: cb0617e8
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/10/2013) [-]
Uh, really?! "Proof that all Christians are greedy" . . .

This story is proof that two churches are unsure about how they should be allocating their resources.

1. Read story on FJ.
2. Mold story in mind to back up something you believe, regardless of corollation.
3. ??????????
4. Profit!!!
#23 to #1 - adamks
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/10/2013) [-]
Are people really dumb enough to fall for this? Or is this like one big elaborate ruse?
#36 to #1 - anon id: b3257b5e
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/10/2013) [-]
So euphoric, so fedora, so beta.
User avatar #2 to #1 - urbancohort
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(12/10/2013) [-]
What about the pope? By the way, i dont see any mention in the church being catholic.
#41 to #2 - abbaabbaabba
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(12/10/2013) [-]
well he said christian, not catholic. not all christians are catholic
#25 to #1 - theycallmedingus
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(12/10/2013) [-]
Don't vote him down
User avatar #15 to #1 - twofreegerbils
Reply +8 123456789123345869
(12/10/2013) [-]
Proof that FunnyJunk is still the easiest website to troll, ever.
#17 to #1 - gilleeyjon
Reply +8 123456789123345869
(12/10/2013) [-]
User avatar #5 to #1 - tittylovin
Reply +82 123456789123345869
(12/10/2013) [-]
*some
User avatar #42 to #5 - ugoboom
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(12/10/2013) [-]
proof that you just got b8 m8
#3 - werefell
Reply +7 123456789123345869
(12/10/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
#8 - Shadow Guardian
Reply +5 123456789123345869
(12/10/2013) [-]
The article says they will be focusing more on "spiritual hunger."
User avatar #6 - sirbones
Reply +5 123456789123345869
(12/10/2013) [-]
I wanted to send you this friendly little letter to inform you of your imminent demise. If you're curious about the frequency of which I send these letters, it is merely to instill as much fear as I can. As if basting a turkey. Then I will proceed to have sex with.
That's right.
I'm going to **** the fear turkey.
Follow me ***************!
Sincerely, Alucard
#49 to #6 - newdevyx
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/11/2013) [-]
Follow me @***************
Follow me @***************
#18 - wolviewolverine
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/10/2013) [-]
This image has expired
I don't really get this. So waht? Implying any of you even ******* care about the poor outside these pretentious moments on FJ (or Facebook).
Church is not a place to feed the poor. It is a place of wellbeing of the church community.
I don't care about religion much, but I assume a happy churchee is like a well oiled car, ready to do their religious duty. Happy churchee creates benefits for the poor with value 100X. If he has not ahd church meal - 50X. Finally we can speculate that a poor person would evaluate the snack as 2X. So we see, that when we rather give snacks to the unpoor, the poor eventually would benefit.

This is actually the reality. For example when an event is held to rise funds or to discuss some welfare initiative, it is more beneficial to feed the organisers or performers, rather than to grant immediate relief to the poor on the expense of future benefits.
It's the fish&fishing-line situation.

Therefore OP is not only unfunny, but also seems to be overlooking many things just to jerk off with some pity thumbs.

An argument I left aside was that church is for those of the faith, meaning that 1) poor people could be not of the same faith, thus rendering these infidel meals completely bogous, 2) particular church maybe rather a relaxation centre for the members. E.g. sometimes it doesn't matter if you're in the same intrest club, but if you are disrupting peace, then you must leave; it's a private gathering.
User avatar #45 to #18 - hoponthefeelstrain
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/11/2013) [-]
Jesus preached love and kindness. He never said " unless those people are x x and x". The church blaming those people for the position they're in is despicable. And it also shouldn't matter what religion the person is, LOVE THY ************* NEIGHBOR. What better way to convert someone by showing them kindness and giving them a reason to believe besides the whole " if you don't you'll burn in hell 5ever."
#46 to #18 - proudnerd
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(12/11/2013) [-]
User avatar #20 to #18 - cacti
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(12/10/2013) [-]
What are you even trying to say? A group meant to benefit poor people should help them. AM I ******* RIGHT?
User avatar #21 to #20 - wolviewolverine
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/10/2013) [-]
I believe the words "food bank" are missued either by the press or by this particular church
#37 to #18 - doomtroll
Reply +4 123456789123345869
(12/10/2013) [-]
...except when one of the main teachings of the church is to feed and clothe those who do not have the means to do so themselves, heck even if they do have the means to feed or clothe themselves you should help them. You know that whole "when I was hungry you had fed me and when I was naked you had clothed me" part (i dont know exactly where that is because I'm not catholic, but I was raised in a catholic school so I know it's in there
#26 - anon id: d2f2fbed
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/10/2013) [-]
I really have no sympathy for the homeless. They obviously did something wrong to wind up where they are now, they ****** up somewhere in life and now have to suffer. They get no pity. At least this guy found a job finally, that I respect, but usually they don't. It's really not that hard to find a job... if some 16 year old highschool kid can find one, why the **** can't they? They have no excuse. If you just lost your job, you'll do what ever it takes to keep food on the table. You'll mow a damn lawn, do some manual labor, it doesn't matter. I don't understand where this false sense of entitlement comes from. They act like they're too good to do certain jobs like fast food and stuff. They need to get over themselves. You have no reason to feel accomplished and like you deserve anything.
#50 to #26 - lolibear
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/11/2013) [-]
1. The impoverished aren't always that way because they messed up, maybe their parents messed up and they don't have anywhere to start.
2. Yes, the assholes that won't take minimum wage jobs are horrible, any money should be good money, you aren't above that.
#27 to #26 - autoxx
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(12/10/2013) [-]
I agree that there are some that think the world owes them something but man homeless have mental or emotional issues and are incapable of gainful employment.
I have always maintained that people who work hard never have trouble finding work but there are cases where people are incapable of working hard.

I highly respect one particular individual in my town that has obvious mental disabilities but continues to collect bottles daily from over 40 businesses. He donates this money to the care center that houses him.
#35 to #27 - anon id: d2f2fbed
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/10/2013) [-]
Don't even get me started on the mentally disabled... ******* hate those parasites.
User avatar #39 to #35 - fzjoss
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/10/2013) [-]
Oh no you didnt... ill just abandon thread, or else ill get filled with your stupidity
#40 to #39 - anon id: d2f2fbed
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/10/2013) [-]
I'm sorry but I hate mentally disabled people. They're so ******* useless. I'm talking about the hardcore kind, not the people with slight OCD or something problems. I'm only talking about the hard core mentally disabled. They're all leeches and parasites. They leech off of everyone around them. They can never live on their own, someone always has to take care of them, and they'll never have a job. They're a burden to everyone around them. All they do is take and give absolutely nothing in return. They can never be a productive member of society.
#52 to #40 - autoxx
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/11/2013) [-]
It's impossible to gauge with any accuracy but if you could, I'd say that a pregnancy with a sufficiently flawed fetus should be legally terminated unless the parents provide proof they will be able to financially support the child through adulthood. If that person at any time is unable to support them self they will be summarily "terminated" pending an evaluation by several professionals.
User avatar #14 - TardytheTurtle
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(12/10/2013) [-]
and there goes my opinion of Canada
User avatar #19 to #14 - grimsho
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(12/10/2013) [-]
This is an isolated incident I promise.
User avatar #24 to #19 - TardytheTurtle
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/10/2013) [-]
what about the rioting after the stanley cup a few years ago when Boston won?
User avatar #34 to #24 - slapchoppin
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(12/10/2013) [-]
Canucks fans are massive retards

they havn't won the stanley cup and they've been around over 40 years
#4 - traycepickering
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(12/10/2013) [-]
Goddammit Winnepeg.
Goddammit Winnepeg.
#9 - mattdoggy
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(12/10/2013) [-]
The original Christians would sell everything they had and give the money to their church which wasn't a building but a group a people. They would use that money to get them by and take care of others. The term Christian isn't made from people saying we follow Christ, but people who could recognize Christians because they were so like Christ. When the plague broke out the Christians were the only ones who would stay to take care of the sick and dieing. They would work all day for money just to be able to give it all to feeding the poor. That Church isn't following Christ, it is a daycare center for a bunch of old people who live in a rut and are just playing dress up
User avatar #22 to #9 - heartlessrobot
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(12/10/2013) [-]
The original Christians would have charged them money for entering the church, then invaded nearby Islamic countries and taken their ****.
User avatar #28 to #22 - mayormilkman
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/10/2013) [-]
I am not surprised a comment like this came from you.
User avatar #29 to #28 - heartlessrobot
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/10/2013) [-]
What? I'm just saying, not everyone has a squeaky clean history. Hell, most of history is one big **** hole. You've got assholes in every faith, and assholes where there isn't faith either.
User avatar #30 to #29 - mayormilkman
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/10/2013) [-]
I'm not exactly sure why you posted that, though.
User avatar #31 to #30 - heartlessrobot
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/10/2013) [-]
You do know why there was a first split in the church, right? They were charging people money to forgive their sins and **** like that.
And the second part is about the crusades.
User avatar #32 to #31 - mayormilkman
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/10/2013) [-]
I just found your comment pointless in response to his. Of course things aren't perfect, but they were trying to achieve something.
#38 - fyaq
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(12/10/2013) [-]
Ok libtards since you blindly bandwagon,

their food kitchen was intended for the homeless, the actually broke and destitute, and people were using it while they paid their cars/phones/houses off to eat well instead of paying for it themselves.

they have homes and possessions they have the income to pay for, while others who were meant to use it have nothing.
#48 to #38 - anon id: 747c64f5
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/11/2013) [-]
What the **** does liberalism have to do with this? You fat ***** will turn anything into a petty insult.

Owning a house after the housing crisis is meaningless, by the way. It's possible to have EITHER food or shelter. *******.
User avatar #51 to #48 - fyaq
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/11/2013) [-]
going anon to spread tears only proves my point

thanks
[ 51 comments ]
Leave a comment