everything beyond 3.5e isn't worth anyone's time

HAH
HAHA
HA
HAHAHAHAHA

oh.
oh god, please don't be serious

everything 3+ is just trash, but at least 5e is trash because it was designed for new players.

3.5 is overcomplicated and underbalanced garbage

I actually prefer 3.0 over 3.5, 3.5 DOES have poor balance, we just normally pick the things from 3.5 that aren't in 3.0 and interest us and rebalance them.

one word to just absolutely destroy any argument people can have for 3.0

psions.

I've played 3.0 all my life and I've never heard of psions

it was a core part of 3.0. caster classes that use psychic abilities instead of magic.

they're OP. retardedly OP.

it was one of the only things fixed in 3.5

I think I know the class you refer to, my books are in spanish you see, so we have sorcerer and "mage" which I assume is the psion according to what I can compare to the dnd wiki, it's unusual to see any casters in the games I've played, usually we got a cleric, fighters (warriors, paladins, barbarians) and maybe a bard.

I still don't like how over-simplified 4e feels to me after playing 3.0 all my life

4e and 5e were designed to be more newbie friendly. that's why they're terrible for veterans but not for newbies.

if you like 3.0 or 3.5 but want a more balanced experience, try pathfinder.

yeah our DM is thinking of switching to Pathfinder, I understand it's pretty similar, still, even I get bored of medieval fantasy-like games and have been trying to convince him to master some Shadowrun or Cyberpunk 2020

are you a fan of horror?

are you going to propose call of cthulhu? I heard that game is pretty much the DM saying: "okay game's on... survive, ******* ."

kind of. it's definitely punishing.

but on top of call of cthulhu, you might like World of Darkness or Paranoia

World of Darkness, you mean like Vampire: The Masquerade?

yep

always wanted to try VtM ever since I played the PC game, I'd probably go for a Toreador and enjoy the ********* as everyone tries to hate on me, especially the nosferatu

**tazze used "*roll 1, 1-20*"**
**tazze rolls 04**

^ Found the Wizard.

I still need to endure 8 more years to become a wizard

No I mean that because you like 3.5.

Wizards were OP as **** .

well excuuuuse me, princess, but I only play warriors, bards and rogues

**aximil used "*roll 1, 1-20*"**
**aximil rolls 06**

**setimanosomo used "*roll 1, 1-20*"**
**setimanosomo rolls 10**

**gamblingriverman used "*roll 1, 1-20*"**
**gamblingriverman rolls 12** lets do this!

**gamblingriverman used "*roll 1, 1-20*"**
**gamblingriverman rolls 09** Let the runner pick up the ball. *he has sure feet.*

>athletics
>4e
>being that much of a scrub

>thinking 4e is worse than 3.5
>thinking 3.5 is good at all
>thinking that 4e wasn't more playable
>not knowing athletics was in 5e.
>getting this ******* rekt

-Thinking 3.5 was bad
It's not broken,it's "rewarding mastery of the system"
www.dandwiki.com/wiki/Pun-Pun_ (3.5eOptimizedCharacter_Build)
+ webm

it's stupid ******* broken, even outside of optimizing.

I remember when our DM wanted to nerf our mage because he was plain OP,
so he gave a scenaristic reason for the guy to change class
the cheeky cunt chosed a 3.5 class,wich could have made him even more broken,AT LVL 1.
Fortunately,the DM modified it.
3.5 is like reading a book made by a flat-earth believer: You just say "what the **** is that" and you don't know if you want to cry or laugh.

pathfinder is balanced, and actually competant at it.

sure, the wizard can **** time in the ass six ways to sunday, but the fighter can beat the **** out of god with his bare hands

5th edition is honestly pretty good. So you got blown to **** m8, sorry.