Refresh Comments
Anonymous comments allowed.
28 comments displayed.
How could get past the terrible pacing, ****** dialogue, overly choreographed fights, and the terrible character development?
Man, that video wasn't at all drawn out and full of so much fluff irrelevant to the topic in addition to statements fro. Individuals who are in no way friends with the person making the video.
Seriously, is that the best you have? His argument had little basis to it and was more pointless rambling than anything.
Seriously, is that the best you have? His argument had little basis to it and was more pointless rambling than anything.
It didn't get any better. It's the same old biased complaints every time.
It comes down to this, if you don't like it that's your business, but people do like it so get over it.
It comes down to this, if you don't like it that's your business, but people do like it so get over it.
Are you really so blinded by your fanboyism that you can't accept the faults in logic and storytelling? Trust me I loved the prequels as a kid, but as I grew up the story made less and less sense and the flashing lights impressed me less.
I'm hardly a fanboy, so way to show your ineptitude by assuming my disagreement is because I'm a "fanboy". I just see the arguments you're making baseless unless viewed through your lense. The movies weren't nearly as bad as you'd like people to believe, but you're allowed to dislike them.
The issue here is that people like you aren't satisfied unless everyone sees it your way, you're right and everyone who disagrees is wrong and a fanboy. Get over it, people's opinions aren't any less valid because they don't agree with you.
The issue here is that people like you aren't satisfied unless everyone sees it your way, you're right and everyone who disagrees is wrong and a fanboy. Get over it, people's opinions aren't any less valid because they don't agree with you.
That's where you're wrong you're free to like what you like, but just because you like something it doesn't make it good.
i just really enjoy them because they add to the knowledge of the star wars universe. the movies could have been done a lot better , less cgi more movie make-up, stronger character development, better actors, actually making jar jar a sith lord. most people could go on forever for how it couldve been better but i dont think its bad because the knowledge you gain from it adds so much to the original trilogy i feel.
#19 to #14
-
LewdFlapjack (12/14/2015) [-]
Am I the only one who thinks the whole Jar Jar/Sith thing is even more retarded than the Jar Jar character in the first place?
#27 to #19
-
citizenlame (12/14/2015) [-]
You are correct, but if you're going to go bad, you may as well go all the way, and hope it circles back round to being good by being so bad
They were completely unnecessary and it really shows. What did you really learn? That Anakin falls to the dark side? We already knew that.
By the same logic the only movies we need to make are the last in any series you dingus
Look at it this way if you watched Return of the Jedi without watching A New Hope or The Empire Strikes Back would you know what's going on? No, probably not and that's because they are a contained trilogy. You can however watch A New Hope without watching the prequels and understand what's going on.
fair enough, but that's because its a trilogy emphasis on TRI, 3. Watch episode 3 without watching 1 or 2, you don't know whats going on. They were made post production of the originals simply to expand upon the story. its to satisfy peoples curiosity and to put the story out in a way that's pleasing (movies).
tl;dr unnecessary to the originals is not evidence of being bad movies.
I don't disagree with what you said in earlier comments about the movies but i don't think them being unnecessary is relevant.
tl;dr unnecessary to the originals is not evidence of being bad movies.
I don't disagree with what you said in earlier comments about the movies but i don't think them being unnecessary is relevant.
For me them being unnecessary is just icing on the cake. If they were really well done movies the fact that they were unnecessary wouldn't have really mattered. The prequels however weren't well done and so it just adds to it.
Most prequels are completely unnecessary and these were no exception.
But do you even know what a prequel is? You didnt answer.
Then we dont even need to start a conversation. Thank you and have a good day.
#16 to #15
-
mariovsbowser [OP](12/14/2015) [-]
its not that he turns to the dark side its how and why, it explains the relationship between Ben and Anakin. it explains why yoda was so careful and hesitant with luke (because of his father). It gives us a look on who obi wan was as a younger man. it shows us why the Jedi are no more. It shows us who anakin really is not just as vader but as a young man trying to discover who he is and what the force means to him. of course they didnt need to happen, not many prequels do, it just helps expand our knowledge of star wars. plus it has some pretty nuts light saber duels
Does it really explain the relationship though? What you see in the prequels contradicts what you were told in the originals. For instance when Obi wan is talking to luke about his father being good friends you believe it, then you see them practically at each others throats through out the 2nd and 3rd movies. You might then say but that's him turning to the dark side, but that's ****** character development. You never see Anakin being good at all, you don't see him falling from goodness to evil. All you see is a whiney angsty brat get deep fried and shoved in a bdsm suit.
