Nationalism
| |
Anonymous comments allowed.
98 comments displayed.
#1
-
meringueluka ONLINE (11/27/2015) [-] 
>when a ******* terrorist has better trigger discipline then you
#84 to #1
-
anon (11/28/2015) [-] **anonymous used "*roll picture*"**
**anonymous rolled image**
haha, not sure why this is thumbed down. its actually pretty funny. as people have said before, part of being accepted into a community is being able to laugh at yourself. stereotypes exist for all cultures. comedy is universal.
**anonymous rolled image**
haha, not sure why this is thumbed down. its actually pretty funny. as people have said before, part of being accepted into a community is being able to laugh at yourself. stereotypes exist for all cultures. comedy is universal.
#101 to #84
-
peterdivine ONLINE (11/28/2015) [-]
Her fingers are all clearly around the grip, you nitwit, with nothing around the trigger. The Americans' trigger discipline is perfectly fine.
It's false commentary like this which jeopardizes citizens' ability to legally own and carry. It's a touchy subject.
It's false commentary like this which jeopardizes citizens' ability to legally own and carry. It's a touchy subject.
#13 to #1
-
bronywiseman ONLINE (11/28/2015) [-] What the **** are you talking about?
That Canadian has excellent trigger discipline! Why, his finger's nowhere near the trigger!
That Canadian has excellent trigger discipline! Why, his finger's nowhere near the trigger!
#93 to #12
-
jdrinfantry ONLINE (11/28/2015) [-] tbf one of those pictures werent taken for the lols
It's for real, and her finger is definitely on the trigger
Not to mention that weird scope ontop of the iron sights
Doesn't really matter, muslims don't aim
It's for real, and her finger is definitely on the trigger
Not to mention that weird scope ontop of the iron sights
Doesn't really matter, muslims don't aim
#2 to #1
-
Whaaaaaaaaa (11/28/2015) [-] I counted four fingers on the grip... the terrorist has three.
#3 to #2
-
sptnfouroneseven (11/28/2015) [-] I see what happened. There's a small gap you can see part of the white strap on the flag behind the rifle. It does look like she has a finger on the trigger when she doesn't.
#5 to #3
-
mybackpacksgotjets (11/28/2015) [-]
I think he's talking about the out of control Canadian with a condition 4 hammer
#9 to #5
-
threeeighteen ONLINE (11/28/2015) [-] I'm pretty sure that book could be used as a weapon too.
#77 to #3
-
wraithguard (11/28/2015) [-] I think that that white spot is a screw in the underside of the gun. Note its circular shape.
#14
-
politicsnstuff (11/28/2015) [-] There are no modern Christian theocracies that actively persecute non-believers
that's the difference
that's the difference
#25 to #14
-
Stevethewizard (11/28/2015) [-]
That's because there are no modern Christian theocracies.
The instant you merge two powers, they look for ways to consolidate both. If that means wiping out everyone that doesn't believe that the church-state should rule absolutely without any questions asked, they'll do it in a heartbeat.
To properly quote someone whose name I'm too tired to actually look up: "Power tends to corrupt. Absolute power corrupts absolutely."
The instant you merge two powers, they look for ways to consolidate both. If that means wiping out everyone that doesn't believe that the church-state should rule absolutely without any questions asked, they'll do it in a heartbeat.
To properly quote someone whose name I'm too tired to actually look up: "Power tends to corrupt. Absolute power corrupts absolutely."
#51 to #25
-
thesovereigngrave ONLINE (11/28/2015) [-] Well the Vatican is a sovereign entity, so it's technically a theocracy.
#62 to #14
-
praemium ONLINE (11/28/2015) [-] None of them are theocracies in name and none of them rise to the level of Islamic republics, but just because something isn't as bad as something else, doesn't mean it should be ignored. It is relative fallacy. That being said, countries/areas with strong Christian tendencies are plenty. Northern Ireland rivalry of Protestants vs. Catholics nearly stopped in the 90's. In the ******* 90's a Western European country was still having religious slaughter, though it has slowed down, the battles are on-going. The Yugoslav massacres of Kosovo and Bosnia were entirely religious. The Russian Orthodox Church has seized complete power in Russia and has made any other form of religiousity almost entirely illegal, illegalized what they call "gay propaganda", but it practically means it is illegal to come out of the closet. Joseph Kony's group is openly Protestant. The Vatican has been the bulwark against any progress in Africa, always using the excuse "we are helping the poorest of the poor".
Though there are no official Christian theocracies, there still are majority Christian countries committing huge acts of atrocities. But yes, comparing the content, implying Christian Americans are as bad as the jihadists is tedious and doesn't constitute an argument, it is barely a comparison.
Though there are no official Christian theocracies, there still are majority Christian countries committing huge acts of atrocities. But yes, comparing the content, implying Christian Americans are as bad as the jihadists is tedious and doesn't constitute an argument, it is barely a comparison.
#78 to #14
-
hongkonglongdong (11/28/2015) [-]
So the difference is political, rather than religious?
Because that I would agree with. After all, plenty of Muslim countries exist that aren't insane theocracies -- look at Malaysia.
Oh, and you're wrong by the way. Plenty of horrible **** goes down in Africa. But that's not really "the state is persecuting non-Christians" so much as it is "Christian warlords are extralegally ******* up non-Christians".
Because that I would agree with. After all, plenty of Muslim countries exist that aren't insane theocracies -- look at Malaysia.
Oh, and you're wrong by the way. Plenty of horrible **** goes down in Africa. But that's not really "the state is persecuting non-Christians" so much as it is "Christian warlords are extralegally ******* up non-Christians".
#38 to #14
-
terranrollerskates (11/28/2015) [-] Dogmatic thinking is the commonality, though. It wasn't that long ago that Bush was selling himself for a presidential election by presenting himself as a wholesome, god-fearing christian. Its a mode of conduct that doesn't have to be exactly as it was in older times, it just needs a new banner with some fresher buzzwords & rallying points. At the end of it, people are acting the same as they were in older theocracies & civilisations of fervent zealotry.
Such useless ***** are all to willing to die or kill for their beliefs, but are they willing to live for them?
Such useless ***** are all to willing to die or kill for their beliefs, but are they willing to live for them?
#16 to #15
-
lmOldGreg ONLINE (11/28/2015) [-] How many times have you seen someone get executed on the internet and not heard "Allah akbar" after it? You can probably count them on your hand for all the years you've been on the internet. There are no people cutting heads off in the name of Jesus. Say what you like, Islam is barbaric. Europe is importing barbarism.
#103 to #35
-
peterdivine ONLINE (11/28/2015) [-]
In their defense, the Muslims didn't forcibly convert their conquered people after their conquests. That was a Christian mainstay.
#36 to #17
-
politicsnstuff (11/28/2015) [-] So Christianity has kept up with society but Islam is still stuck in the dark ages?
Is that the point you're trying to make?
Is that the point you're trying to make?
#23 to #22
-
lmOldGreg ONLINE (11/28/2015) [-] How can you compare then to now? Do you not see how in an argument where we're both struggling to look for answers, you just going "Oh well they used to do it years ago" is just stupid. I can't even think of why that's stupid, if I say "times have changed" it feels like im being euphamistic.
#24 to #23
-
asasqw (11/28/2015) [-] I understand times have changed, and the reason the church backed off is since people where sick of the mass corruption and taxation the church imposed. But that took a few hundred years. They are going though their crusading phase now, but may take much longer to become peaceful since the entire religion is based around refusal to change.
#32 to #24
-
rainbowblast ONLINE (11/28/2015) [-]
They are not going through their crusading phase now. Based on time they are at about the same point Christianity was 300-400 years ago. The Muslim faith has already done their major religious wars, what's happening now is the result of a few outliers.
#34 to #16
-
listerthepessimist (11/28/2015) [-] depends how often you go looking for mexican cartel videos
#39 to #14
-
skeletorexplains ONLINE (11/28/2015) [-] Yeah..
"Gays should be killed"
The big billboards going "Atheists go to hell"
Small acts of terrorism
"Do you believe in god? Yeah? *Shoots*"
there's several other things but yeah, they totally do none of this.
"Gays should be killed"
The big billboards going "Atheists go to hell"
Small acts of terrorism
"Do you believe in god? Yeah? *Shoots*"
there's several other things but yeah, they totally do none of this.
#52 to #41
-
thesovereigngrave ONLINE (11/28/2015) [-] Saudi Arabia's technically just an absolute monarchy where the law is based on religious law; which is different from a theocracy like Iran where the country is ran by a high-ranking Shi'ite cleric.
#42 to #41
-
skeletorexplains ONLINE (11/28/2015) [-] Do you mean the same government that changed its pledge during the Soviet war in order to inject more "God" into the nation?
#43 to #42
-
brobathehutt (11/28/2015) [-] To be fair the pledge was made to sell the ******* flags anyway so its not like it mattered in the first place, at least the original pledge was pretty neat though.
#46 to #43
-
skeletorexplains ONLINE (11/28/2015) [-] The original was far superior, the current just sounds like a massive tosser contest.
#88 to #46
-
brobathehutt (11/28/2015) [-] They're the same pledge outside of 2 words that were added later you dolt.
#45 to #44
-
skeletorexplains ONLINE (11/28/2015) [-] Or the fact they broke some amendments with the whole "Separation of religion and state"?...
#72 to #45
-
anon (11/28/2015) [-]
Read our ******* Constitution, you Australian cunt. There is NOTHING about any separation of Church and State. In most states during the 18th and 19th centuries, residents of a state paid taxes to the state's largest church. A single treaty that was voided after less than 5 years, which uses vague and in no way legal language, is what I always see cited on this. Now, religion and government absolutely should not mingle, but there is no LEGAL separation, except for legislation at the Federal level. The entire reason the U.S. has banned the federal government from forming an official church is because of all of the variegated Christian denominations in different states who would not join the Union without the promise of religious freedom.
#6
-
removekimchi (11/28/2015) [-] i hate it when people say "what's the difference between these pictures"
well, one of them is an actual terrorist and the other one is an attention whore
well, one of them is an actual terrorist and the other one is an attention whore
#79 to #6
-
hongkonglongdong (11/28/2015) [-]
Actually, they're almost certainly both attention whores. The Muslim one is showing off her Allah-penis, after all.
#92
-
xsap (11/28/2015) [-] "hurr watd da difrunce betwen #1 and #2 XDD"
ifferent is # is excersing her riht to bare arms and probbly only uses that gun to protect her family while #2 is killing people and striping bombs to her kids because other people don't read the same fairytale as her
ifferent is # is excersing her riht to bare arms and probbly only uses that gun to protect her family while #2 is killing people and striping bombs to her kids because other people don't read the same fairytale as her
#94 to #92
-
usarmyexplain (11/28/2015) [-] Also #2 was a suicide bomber who got caught and blew herself up at a check point, she was planning on killing civilians
#97 to #95
-
beastybaconman (11/28/2015) [-] Oh I guess you're right, at least the Canadian has it figured out
#66
-
okamibanshu (11/28/2015) [-] whoa whoa whoa! Canada, why are you being so violent? I mean really, brandishing a hammer, i feel threatened Canada, i thought you were a safe place.
#31
-
sirkanesixtytwo (11/28/2015) [-] Trigger discipline please you dumb cunts.
and hammer discipline
and hammer discipline
#83
-
fatsigurd (11/28/2015) [-] honestly I wouldn't trust the top one more than I would trust the middle one
to me they both look way more ridiculous than the canadian
to me they both look way more ridiculous than the canadian
#73
-
hurpfry ONLINE (11/28/2015) [-] Starbucks is getting real aggressive with heir sales tactics, aren't they?
