Muslim culturally enrich England
| |
Anonymous comments allowed.
66 comments displayed.
#17 to #1
-
stinkbugfrick (12/21/2015) [-] "No-Go Zones"? Guess I'm behind the times on that, I thought the "Law" applied everywhere, and they should be shooting these pieces of **** .
#32 to #17
-
anon (12/21/2015) [-]
Some of the larger cities, namely Birmingham and London, have such a high Muslim population that they have declared certain parts of the city Muslim only areas where Sharia Law applies and British Law does not.
So far the government has turned a blind eye and denies these places exist, London police are starting to come forward and say that there are areas they cannot police because things like this happen.
So far the government has turned a blind eye and denies these places exist, London police are starting to come forward and say that there are areas they cannot police because things like this happen.
#64 to #48
-
stinkbugfrick (12/22/2015) [-] That always does so much, "Oh we were just going to go hunting americans, but the law here says no guns or knives so I guess we can't" ******* cunts just disarming law abiding citizens and causing problems for people.
#9
-
anon (12/21/2015) [-]
But "no go" areas don't exist, the Guardian told me so. These are just British chavs who have had their faces photoshopped brown.
#4
-
randomuploads (12/21/2015) [-]
Go propagate your racewar somewhere else asshole. Nohting funny about this **** .
#25 to #23
-
hatedpanda (12/21/2015) [-] You realize that picture compares >250 years of crusades to over 1400 years of Islamic civilization?
It also doesnt show a lot of the crusades, such as the siege of Tunis and a large number of invasions throughout the Levant.
Its a screenshot from a youtube video made by some old conspiracytard who has no actual formal education on the topic.
It also doesnt show a lot of the crusades, such as the siege of Tunis and a large number of invasions throughout the Levant.
Its a screenshot from a youtube video made by some old conspiracytard who has no actual formal education on the topic.
#27 to #26
-
hatedpanda (12/21/2015) [-] Wow you sure addressed the historical discrepancies that I highlighted in my post by linking an hour long video that has nothing to do with the topic!
Thanks!
Thanks!
#34 to #28
-
hatedpanda (12/21/2015) [-] Ive seen him use it in another video as well, I didnt recognize this one.
After going through it, it still doesnt address any of my points, such as why hes comparing 250 years of battles to 1400 years. Or why he excluded so many battles that took place during the crusades. You have yet to address that.
After going through it, it still doesnt address any of my points, such as why hes comparing 250 years of battles to 1400 years. Or why he excluded so many battles that took place during the crusades. You have yet to address that.
#37 to #34
-
klowserpok (12/21/2015) [-] He's comparing the amount of battles fought for the Crusades with those fought in the name of Jihad, and showing how saying that the Crusades were the same as Jihad is entirely false. He goes on to say how the crusades have been over for hundreds of years, but the Islamic world is still in a state of civilizational war with non-muslim nations due to the concept of Jihad.
Also, you could probably send him emails to ask about whatever historical discrepancies you see.
Also, you could probably send him emails to ask about whatever historical discrepancies you see.
#40 to #37
-
hatedpanda (12/21/2015) [-] Not to mention its pretty retarded to compare 1400 years to 250 years when taking a running total. Its comparing apples to oranges.
Additionally a battle can be any conflict involving government forces.
50 soldiers fighting 60 soldiers can be considered a battle, just like 150,000 fighting 160,000 can be considered a battle.
Additionally a battle can be any conflict involving government forces.
50 soldiers fighting 60 soldiers can be considered a battle, just like 150,000 fighting 160,000 can be considered a battle.
#42 to #40
-
klowserpok (12/22/2015) [-] He is arguing that from a quantitative point of view, that Jihad has lasted longer and has taken more lives than the Crusades, and that it is false to say they were the same.
If you're concerned about historical discrepancies, like I said, email him. He mentions in that video and others that his studies of political Islam are not complete, in particular the effect of Muslim conquests on Asia
If you're concerned about historical discrepancies, like I said, email him. He mentions in that video and others that his studies of political Islam are not complete, in particular the effect of Muslim conquests on Asia
#43 to #42
-
hatedpanda (12/22/2015) [-] Are you saying that the Crusades are the only conflicts that involved Christians? Thats a blatantly false statement.
From a quantitative view its still grossly skewed. Even to this day there are still conflicts going on that involve various Christian parties.
Christian wars didnt start with the crusades, and they did not end with them.
From a quantitative view its still grossly skewed. Even to this day there are still conflicts going on that involve various Christian parties.
Christian wars didnt start with the crusades, and they did not end with them.
#38 to #37
-
hatedpanda (12/21/2015) [-] If he was comparing the amounts, why did he exclude a large portion of crusades?
Are you denying the invasion of Tunis is historical fact?
Are you denying the invasion of Tunis is historical fact?
#41 to #39
-
hatedpanda (12/21/2015) [-] So why should anyone in their right mind take this guy seriously when he excludes historical fact from his pictures?
#35 to #30
-
hatedpanda (12/21/2015) [-] Yes but I dont claim to be an authority on the topic. All I did was point out the obvious discrepancies.
#12 to #11
-
randomuploads (12/21/2015) [-]
Born and raised in the Netherlands, I'm 1.82 with blue eyes and blonde hair.
Go **** yourself caveman.
Go **** yourself caveman.
#5
-
darkoyan (12/21/2015) [-] YUO MUST BE OF REMOVINGS KEBAB! KEBAB IS BAD! KEBAB MUST BE OF REMOVE!
#10
-
gingerowne ONLINE (12/21/2015) [-]
love how they keep calling them cowards lol. they wouldnt be so cocky if the brits police actually had weapons
#6
-
slayhumanity ONLINE (12/21/2015) [-] >In Northern Ireland, all police officers carry firearms. In the rest of the United Kingdom, the majority of police officers do not carry firearms, that duty is instead carried out by specially-trained firearms officers.
Oh gee, i wonder what will happen if we disarm our police..
Oh gee, i wonder what will happen if we disarm our police..
#47
-
pandasecret (12/22/2015) [-] Let me get this straight - Muslims are literally denying the police access to a part of their own country!? Isn't that basically just cutting out a piece of England and claiming that their own? Why hasn't anything been done? Why is England not willing to do anything?
#51 to #47
-
anon (12/22/2015) [-]
cz the only politics left in white countries is left-wing cuck politics.
the majority of people arent redpilled enough. the news dosent report this **** . i couldnt tell my family about this and have them believe it. its just a lesser version of what happened with all those pakistani pedos in rotherham. theres so much brainwashing in the media, allways broadcasting white guilt and showing immigrants as peaceful people who just need help.
meanwhile any political party who attempts to stop this flood (BNP, NF ect) gets immediately played up as a comical bunch of idiots innefectively goose-stepping to mein kampf readings. they take honest political suggestions like "maybe lets not let akbars into our country" and just slap a "omg m8 ur a racist aint u". and people just dismiss it.
its the problem with having the recent progressive decades that western civilisation has had. women wanted the vote? yea np thats reasonable. gays want to marry? fine do what you like m8. but after years and years of people reflexively backing anything that says it is opressed, and censoring anything deemed "opressive", people just dont know how to think outside the "let them do whatever they want" mindset. people keep holding up the slippery slope fallacy like you can use it whenever and disregard evidence to the contrary but guess what now we are nearing the crash at the bottom of that slope and there are no venues to reasonably discuss any other political course of action.
TLDR western civilisation has painted itself so convincingly as the "niceguy hero" that its trapped itself unable to make harsh decisions for the future. also electing politicians whos only aim is to make themselves look good for next election is a ****** up system, i'd happily go back to a monarchy if the king/queen started acting like one thinking about how history will judge what they did for thier nation ect instead of some slimy twat in a suit thinking how far left he can go in order to lock in next years election cz he wont give a **** what happens after he is dead so long as his coffin is gold-plated.
the majority of people arent redpilled enough. the news dosent report this **** . i couldnt tell my family about this and have them believe it. its just a lesser version of what happened with all those pakistani pedos in rotherham. theres so much brainwashing in the media, allways broadcasting white guilt and showing immigrants as peaceful people who just need help.
meanwhile any political party who attempts to stop this flood (BNP, NF ect) gets immediately played up as a comical bunch of idiots innefectively goose-stepping to mein kampf readings. they take honest political suggestions like "maybe lets not let akbars into our country" and just slap a "omg m8 ur a racist aint u". and people just dismiss it.
its the problem with having the recent progressive decades that western civilisation has had. women wanted the vote? yea np thats reasonable. gays want to marry? fine do what you like m8. but after years and years of people reflexively backing anything that says it is opressed, and censoring anything deemed "opressive", people just dont know how to think outside the "let them do whatever they want" mindset. people keep holding up the slippery slope fallacy like you can use it whenever and disregard evidence to the contrary but guess what now we are nearing the crash at the bottom of that slope and there are no venues to reasonably discuss any other political course of action.
TLDR western civilisation has painted itself so convincingly as the "niceguy hero" that its trapped itself unable to make harsh decisions for the future. also electing politicians whos only aim is to make themselves look good for next election is a ****** up system, i'd happily go back to a monarchy if the king/queen started acting like one thinking about how history will judge what they did for thier nation ect instead of some slimy twat in a suit thinking how far left he can go in order to lock in next years election cz he wont give a **** what happens after he is dead so long as his coffin is gold-plated.
#74
-
vilememory (12/22/2015) [-] You want to be a no go zone? Fine, you are a no go zone. Help our homes are on fire! Sorry no go zone. Help we have wounded! Sorry... but we're not allowed in your area. Son of a bitch our power is out and the water isn't running! *Rubbing nipples now* Ooooh I'm soooooo sorrry, but we aren't allowed into your area to service your troubles sir. What the **** they put up giant walls in the streets we can't get out! Yeah, the no go zone is now a two way thing. We can't go in and you can't get out. Have a nice day.
#33
-
anon (12/21/2015) [-]
''Lets start a ******* war then''
lol If we went to war with these guys and armed our police officers or sent a couple of military units, they'd be wiped out in an afternoon
lol If we went to war with these guys and armed our police officers or sent a couple of military units, they'd be wiped out in an afternoon
#22
-
anon (12/21/2015) [-]
I cant wait till we get ours in the u.s. we are so excited and are anxiously waiting with open arms... If this **** happens in my country I only pray our police dont take a pussy approach like that. they want to start a war, then so be it. if our police wont fight back then the citizens will.
#52 to #29
-
wolfiet (12/22/2015) [-] I don't think Muslims will be able to pull **** like this in the U.S., solely because of how wary police are. Urban police are pressed to hell on a daily basis, and if they aren't careful, they could end up dead - it's sort of calming knowing that if they try something like this, they won't be given the same treatment as Europeans give them.
#53
-
anon (12/22/2015) [-]
seriously just grab the military, drive them out and send them back to their own countries, if they face death there then let them gather together and overthrow that government, the only reason they're doing it in Europe is because they know Europeans wont seriously fight back.
#80
-
IamWhoIam (12/22/2015) [-] England you look like you need some help. Do you want some help? We have plenty of military surplus that our police aren't even using.
