Upload
Login or register
x

Comments(91):

Leave a comment Refresh Comments Show GIFs
Top Rated Controversial Best Lowest Rated Newest
Anonymous comments allowed.
91 comments displayed.
Reply
+117
#19 - sonofpsychodad (01/08/2016) [-]
Trust nobody, not even yourself.
Reply
+278
#1 - ubercookieboy (01/08/2016) [-]
Now to wait for someone to post ****
Reply
+34
#17 to #3 - bigswingingrichard ONLINE (01/08/2016) [-]
what the ****
Reply
+32
User avatar #40 to #17 - CAPSEDDIE (01/09/2016) [-]
If it makes anyone feel better, he actually lived
Reply
+13
User avatar #48 to #40 - trojanmannn ONLINE (01/09/2016) [-]
it makes it worse
Reply
+9
User avatar #49 to #48 - CAPSEDDIE (01/09/2016) [-]
he was't paralyzed or anything. Just needed some surgery on his jaw
Reply
+3
User avatar #71 to #40 - asmodeu (01/09/2016) [-]
He was one lucky ass man it didn't touch his jugular veins or carotid arteries otherwise he would have been dead in a matter of minutes .
I bet his teeth are ****** up though.
Reply
+10
#51 to #3 - pikapoopie (01/09/2016) [-]
GIF
Oh sweet ****
Reply
+27
#37 to #3 - bigbadpapaboris ONLINE (01/09/2016) [-]
He deserved it
Reply
+37
User avatar #42 to #37 - victhree ONLINE (01/09/2016) [-]
Bullfighting ethics are a hot topic here in Spain, but if there's something everyone can agree it is that if you voluntarily run against a quarter ton killing machine you had whatever happens to you coming.
Reply
+3
User avatar #45 to #42 - bigbadpapaboris ONLINE (01/09/2016) [-]
Yhea, I recognize that every sport (Generalization here) has its risk, but since the corrida is in my opinion plain barbarism he just deserved all of it. It would be as if we in italy went back putting gladiator against lions and other exotic beasts...
Reply
+5
User avatar #47 to #45 - victhree ONLINE (01/09/2016) [-]
Many agree with you, and so do I, pretty much.
Reply
+6
#72 to #3 - crackalacking (01/09/2016) [-]
GIF
***** needs to step his game up
Reply
+4
User avatar #43 to #3 - victhree ONLINE (01/09/2016) [-]
he ok dont despair
Reply
+3
User avatar #20 to #3 - secretsecret (01/09/2016) [-]
not even on my top 10 in that computer,
Reply
+5
User avatar #25 to #20 - thesweetape (01/09/2016) [-]
I'll take your word for it. Jesus christ, man.
Reply
+3
User avatar #60 to #20 - drhat ONLINE (01/09/2016) [-]
You should dump them into the gore channel.
Reply
+3
User avatar #67 to #60 - secretsecret (01/09/2016) [-]
done and done
Reply
0
User avatar #79 to #67 - poshblobfish ONLINE (01/09/2016) [-]
link?
Reply
+3
User avatar #9 to #3 - heatblaze (01/08/2016) [-]
Ah **** , wtf man?
Reply
0
User avatar #76 to #3 - enlightednatzie ONLINE (01/09/2016) [-]
Nature strikes back!
Reply
0
User avatar #64 to #3 - advice (01/09/2016) [-]
do we know he's pepsi? it's possible to live through that and they usually have medical personal nearby.
Reply
+1
User avatar #66 to #64 - secretsecret (01/09/2016) [-]
he good
Reply
0
User avatar #46 to #3 - hexproof (01/09/2016) [-]
Jesus Christ!!!
0
#35 to #3 - bigbadpapaboris has deleted their comment [-]
Reply
+2
User avatar #58 to #1 - secretsecret (01/09/2016) [-]
i didnt get banned for the bull..... should i...... should i post worse?
Reply
0
#70 to #58 - indonesia (01/09/2016) [-]
post it on morbid channel then mention me when you're ready
I like **** like that
Reply
+19
#2 to #1 - animesource ONLINE (01/08/2016) [-]
Does this count?
Reply
+3
User avatar #38 to #2 - rockerrocksixty (01/09/2016) [-]
I managed to find an uncensored version: obviously **** You need to login to view this link
Reply
+1
User avatar #4 to #2 - wastelandgunner ONLINE (01/08/2016) [-]
I like the semi-3D animation style. I hate the song tho.
Reply
+7
#5 to #4 - animesource ONLINE (01/08/2016) [-]
I'm not the one who chose it. Stole it from somewhere.
Same place as this.
Reply
+2
User avatar #12 to #11 - dreygur (01/08/2016) [-]
I haven't watched it, but I recognize Yuru **** from miles away
Reply
0
User avatar #13 to #12 - xevilpenguinx (01/08/2016) [-]
Thanks.
Reply
-1
User avatar #75 to #11 - heartsickruben (01/09/2016) [-]
that **** doesn't happen though
is edited.
Reply
-1
#14 to #11 - animesource ONLINE (01/08/2016) [-]
Yuru **** .
Reply
0
#6 to #4 - mixedfeelings (01/08/2016) [-]
it's even worse if you can understand it
Reply
0
User avatar #8 to #4 - emiyashirou ONLINE (01/08/2016) [-]
Which one? There's more than one song in that webm.
Reply
+1
User avatar #29 to #8 - wastelandgunner ONLINE (01/09/2016) [-]
First one, I guess. Didn't watch past it.
Reply
0
#84 to #2 - anon (01/09/2016) [-]
hxhmaniac
Here, you can fap to this
You're welcome
0
#21 to #2 - thatnamelessguy has deleted their comment [-]
Reply
0
User avatar #16 to #2 - doblade ONLINE (01/08/2016) [-]
This confuses me.
Greatly.
Like... why?


I am also curious to see if there is anymore.
Reply
+20
User avatar #15 - reeeeeeeeeee (01/08/2016) [-]
Quantum physics is so ******* wizard, seriously, I'm only one year into an advanced physics course, so I know next to nothing on it, but quantum tunneling? Holy **** , it's literal magic. Quantum entanglement? Quantum spoopiness? **** . You could make so many people interested in physics and make a ******** tonne of money if there was a cosmos style tv show on the basic crazy things.

******* science man.
Reply
0
#74 to #15 - myjunk (01/09/2016) [-]
The general public won't understand even the most basic scientific principles.
I find the notion that they would get quantum mechanics or there could be huge amounts of profit to be made from a tv show about it naive.
Reply
-4
#31 to #15 - jeanmariegrangon (01/09/2016) [-]
I doubt that you study physics if you think quantum mechanic is wizardry. It got a lot of counter intuitive results but that's only because we're used to a scale where quantum effects are negligible, but it's all pretty rationnal. It's just that reality is probabilistic and non-local.
Reply
+1
User avatar #54 to #31 - huchkizz ONLINE (01/09/2016) [-]
"pretty rational" is an overstatement. There's alot of new math and ways of thinking and rational and intuitive are the two words I would never use to describe it.
.. and the word "negligible" bothers me in that context.. Quantum effects simply does not happen on larger scales. It's not that it's too small variations so we can't see them, it literally does not happen on any small un-isolated particles.
Reply
+1
User avatar #78 to #54 - choobe ONLINE (01/09/2016) [-]
How about the many worlds interpretation? Doesn't it state that a possible explanation for quantum effects only happening observably on smaller scales because when it happens on bigger scales it literally creates parallel universes?

I only know about quantum physics on a hobby level, please don't kill me if that's wrong.
Reply
+1
User avatar #81 to #78 - huchkizz ONLINE (01/09/2016) [-]
kinda and not really.
Quantum effects don't happen on larger scales because for quantum effects requires a certain level of uncertainty or "unknowsness". The particle in question must be unobserved to be in that quantum state called a superposition where it is both a particle and a wave-form at the same time (particle-wave duality). If we know the, say, position of a particle at any given time, we've measured the superposition and it collapses to a particle and only a particle. We can't measure the position of wave-formation, so of course it's a particle. If you drop a pebble in water, exactly where is the waterwave?
[sidenote: Quantum effects have been successfully tested on larger scales as well, up to molecules of ~100 atoms if I'm remembering correctly. Just requires the right setup. ]

What your saying about the multi-verse theory (or many worlds interpretation) is a currently valid theory, and one I myself hope and believe to be true, but it doesn't explain why it quantum effects don't happen on larger scales. It, like you correctly say, states that every time a particle has to choose from a superposition, it creates two new universes, one with each outcome of the superposition. This however, is really really hard (if not impossible) to prove and will probably remain a theory for(ever) a long time.

\rant sorry
Reply
+1
User avatar #55 to #15 - huchkizz ONLINE (01/09/2016) [-]
You'd soon learn that alot of wizardry is explain with alot of complex math. Physics itself is not that hard; it's drawing a parallel from the math you're doing to the physical world that is hard; at least in my opinion.

Also, the thing in quantum mechanics I've found the most strange and counter-intuitive is the uncertainty principle for energy and time. Basically, a particle can borrow any amount of energy, seemingly out of nowhere, as long as it's for a short enough time, and it afterwards returns the entire energy to... whatever it borrowed it from.
Reply
+2
#18 to #15 - derangedbear (01/08/2016) [-]
yeah, but some people who get interested in physics by seeing the highlights you'd see from tv shows and pop-sci. Nobody talks about ******* depressing and excruciating it is to get through the whole degree. It's a whole 'nother ball game compared to what you see on television.

Nice architects pic btw.
Reply
0
User avatar #28 to #18 - reeeeeeeeeee (01/09/2016) [-]
Ta for the notice. And it is a shame that not everyone can like physics to the same extent, it's really only in the last couple of months that I've begun to like it a lot and I'm glad I have
Reply
+2
User avatar #22 to #15 - thegamegestapo (01/09/2016) [-]
I'm a writer with a predisposition towards science biology is my speciality though , give me a shortlist of stuff you've found particularly wizard and maybe we can talk about this " ******** tonne of money".

I also appreciate your use of the metric system to describe the cash influx
Reply
+5
#26 to #22 - reeeeeeeeeee (01/09/2016) [-]
Young's slit experiment is cray-cray
Quantum computers are cray-cray
Quantum tunneling and entanglement as previously stated are ******* looney toons
Three things that aren't quantum physics but that I love even more are room-temperature superconductors, nuclear fusion and thorium based nuclear reactors.

I can't wait until governments get their act together and start funding more research into these world changing and mind blowing things (Room temp superconductors even with limited funding are expected to be here in 10 years, fookin hyped) . Science is so much fun, and I'm really just in the shallow end, I've got so much science to come in my next 4-5 years of education, and I truly believe that we're entering a singularity of science in the immediate future.
Reply
+1
#33 to #26 - thegamegestapo (01/09/2016) [-]
Couldn't agree more. In my field we're getting close to synthetic DNA, a true understanding of epigenetics, negligible senescence (read: immortality), and maybe even genetic programming. By the time we've reached the limit of human understanding I truly believe we'll be able to move the goalposts.

I'm vaguely informed about fission, superconducters, and thorium reactors (why are we not funding this?) but my quantum physics is a little below par. Would you mind giving me the cliff notes on the three things you mentioned?

I've always found enthusiasm gives the best explanations.
Reply
+3
User avatar #82 to #33 - huchkizz ONLINE (01/09/2016) [-]
Seeing as he doesn't I'll try.

Young's slit (never heard it by that name) or the double-slit experiment : Pictures a bolwing ally where someone blocking the lane at the halfwaypoint with two slits. If you throw a bowling ball you'd expect it to go through either one and end up in a similar pattern down the line where the pins are. ( cs-exhibitions.uni-klu.ac.at/uploads/pics/doubleslitexperiment.GIF first picture )
What we instead see is that the particles are actually waves interference so a wave pattern emerges on the back of the bolwing ally ( cs-exhibitions.uni-klu.ac.at/uploads/pics/doubleslitexperiment.GIF second picture )

Quantum computers: I've not studiet this in depth so I think these guys gives a better answer. Also, watch this and everything else they've made. They're geniuses: www.youtube.com/watch?v=JhHMJCUmq28

In quantum physics everything's a probability. quantum tunneling is where a particle has a low energi, but via. this probability, it can "tunnel" through a potential bigger than it's energy, without breaking the laws of physics. Image a ball getting outside of a bowl without anything pushing or lifting on the ball.

Quantum entanglement is really weird and something physicist still struggle to understand and is focus in many experiments. Basically, two particle can be linked and transfer information between them faster than the speed of light (breaks basic physical laws)
The last answer is somewhat wrong, but for simplicity, I won't go into further details, as that would take my whole afternoon ._.

Hope that wasn't too ******** written or to confusing to read.
Reply
0
User avatar #89 to #82 - thegamegestapo (01/09/2016) [-]
Thanks for the cliffnotes, although I confess to not seeing the significance of the double-slit experiment. I may have just had an idea or two.
Reply
0
User avatar #83 to #26 - figosound (01/09/2016) [-]
sauce of that gif?
Reply
0
User avatar #87 to #83 - reeeeeeeeeee (01/09/2016) [-]
Dammit, Elite Dangerous, but with a colon in the middle
Reply
0
User avatar #86 to #83 - reeeeeeeeeee (01/09/2016) [-]
Eliteangerous, it's a game where the entire map's one whole galaxy
Reply
0
User avatar #32 to #26 - potatorgue (01/09/2016) [-]
Do u have a sauce on that gif? it looks like elite dangerous but im not sure
Reply
0
User avatar #88 to #32 - reeeeeeeeeee (01/09/2016) [-]
Yeah it is
Reply
-5
#56 - huchkizz ONLINE (01/09/2016) [-]
but... it's not possible to travel back in time ._.
Reply
+1
User avatar #61 to #56 - sketchE (01/09/2016) [-]
not necessarily. if we assume that time exists on one timeline than yes you are correct. however if we assume that every timeline is its own universe than if traveling to another one was possible it could be assumed wed be able to land in the time of our chosing
Reply
+1
User avatar #80 to #56 - choobe ONLINE (01/09/2016) [-]
Today. We can hope though. Nothing we have found out explicitly say it can't work. not that that means it IS possible, but here's hoping.
Reply
+3
User avatar #68 to #56 - ogthegreat ONLINE (01/09/2016) [-]
It is in fiction.
Reply
+3
#27 - assholy (01/09/2016) [-]
Has anyone tried using one of those smart alarm apps on their phones?
I started using one yesterday and even though I only slept like 4 hours because of schoolwork, I woke up well rested.
Reply
+1
User avatar #39 to #27 - amsel (01/09/2016) [-]
I didn't know such a thing existed :o. Which one do you use, how much does it cost, and do you need a plug-in (like fitbit or smartwatch)?
Reply
+2
#41 to #39 - assholy (01/09/2016) [-]
There are some free ones out there, personally I use Sleep as Android play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.urbandroid.sleep&hl=en 14 day free trial, $5 for the full version though It seems to say 5 MX pesos now that I'm in mexico

You don't need anything other than your phone, but if you dislike having you phone on your bed while you sleep or if you can't, you can use wearable tech.

Otherwise, it'll use your phone's accelerometer to measure your movements as you sleep and estimate your sleep phase. You set a fixed amount of time within which it is allowed to wake you and it will do so when it detects you're in light sleep, so you wake refreshed and not groggy as if you were in deep sleep.

So say you set your alarm for 7:00a.m. with a 30 minute wake period. If at anypoint from 6:30am-7:00am you enter light sleep, the alarm will go off. It's also not a sudden start, the alarm gradually increases in volume, so on the off chance that during that period you don't exit deep sleep, it's still not a "jerked out of rest" waking.

If you have an Iphone, I dunno what a good alternative is, I've only tested this one, though surely one of the free ones works just as well albeit with less settings/options perhaps.

This specific app also has settings to help you try to have lucid dreams, though I only found it today and have yet to see how effective it might be.
Reply
+1
User avatar #44 to #41 - amsel (01/09/2016) [-]
awesome, thanks for all the info.

Do you personally use it with wearable tech, or is it pretty good with just the accelerometer?
Reply
+1
#50 to #44 - assholy (01/09/2016) [-]
I don't have any, so no.

The accelerometer is pretty accurate, I used the trial on an older phone last year and forgot about the app till recently. So long as your phone's not ****** up (I've dropped mine like 10 times now), it'll work accurately enough.

Also, the app has nearly 200,000 review, of which over half of them are 5/7 perfect, the bad ones seem to be a bug caused by a new update it is constantly worked on and supported, with complaints from users as recently as december having a reply from the devs so it might be smart to keep a "last minute" alarm on a separate app if you're paranoid about that kinda thing.

I especially like how it graphs out your sleep stages and tells you how much sleep you missed, how much of your sleep was in the deep sleep stage, snoring stats, etc.

So last night I slept just over 4 hours, (almost five since it keeps counting time after you hit snooze like I did 5 times) 48% of which was in deep sleep. Woke me up at around 6:15 and I probably didn't dream much since I didn't hit REM sleep apparently.

So it's accurate enough and IMO it's effective. My friend also tried one out on his Iphone, and for the first time all semester, he didn't fall asleep in class.
Reply
+1
User avatar #52 to #50 - amsel (01/09/2016) [-]
I appreciate all the info!
Reply
+1
#53 to #52 - assholy (01/09/2016) [-]
Yeah mate, I wish I'd discovered this when I was working in highschool, I'm glad to pass it along.
Reply
0
#57 - anon (01/09/2016) [-]
**anonymous used "*roll picture*"**
**anonymous rolled image**
Reply
0
#77 - bjornkrage (01/09/2016) [-]
**bjornkrage used "*roll picture*"**
**bjornkrage rolled image**
You know, i never really thought about it, but now i really want a few shirts that says "yesterday me", "today me" and "tomorrow me"
 
Leave a comment
<
>
 Friends (0)