Mexico vs Holanda (Netherlands)
You murdered her
rm, it
You killed Casillas! .
I murdered her, I killed Casillas
Holland is going
to the !
rm, it
You killed Casillas! .
I murdered her, I killed Casillas
Holland is going
to the !
...
| |
Anonymous comments allowed.
66 comments displayed.
#38
-
thewalruss (06/30/2014) [-] As a Mexican, I can say that this is the most accurate thing ever... we should have kept attacking until those bastards were dead (No offense).
#2 to #1
-
selfdenyingbeggar [OP](06/30/2014) [-]
Eii pero pues hubo otra q si era penal y no lo marcó
#4 to #3
-
selfdenyingbeggar [OP](06/30/2014) [-]
ah si, eso fue una cerdada. Así igual se los van a coger la próxima, cualquiera q haya visto ese partido sabe q México jugó mejor.
#8 to #6
-
lozarus (06/30/2014) [-]
Robben se disculpo por el primer clavado, que no fue penal ( y que no cobraron)
El penal en sí, fue penal. Rafa marquez lo toca a robben y no lo deja pesar. Eso es falta, y falta en el area es penal.
Y si vamos a hablar de cosas no cobradas, la alevosa falta que hacen los dos mexicanos contra robben en el primer tiempo, era penal y roja para los dos. No fueron a la pelota, habia peligro para la salud del jugador y fue en el area. Se cumplen los requisitos para penal y roja.
Asi que dejen de llorar sobre perder, porque si el arbitraje fuese perfecto, hubiesen perdido por mucho mas.
El penal en sí, fue penal. Rafa marquez lo toca a robben y no lo deja pesar. Eso es falta, y falta en el area es penal.
Y si vamos a hablar de cosas no cobradas, la alevosa falta que hacen los dos mexicanos contra robben en el primer tiempo, era penal y roja para los dos. No fueron a la pelota, habia peligro para la salud del jugador y fue en el area. Se cumplen los requisitos para penal y roja.
Asi que dejen de llorar sobre perder, porque si el arbitraje fuese perfecto, hubiesen perdido por mucho mas.
#42 to #8
-
thewalruss (07/01/2014) [-] De hecho el primer contacto es fuera del área y el segundo es dentro del área. Si el arbitro marcaba algo, debía marcar la primera falta, fuera del área; y otorgar tiro libre, no un penal.
#117 to #95
-
thewalruss (07/04/2014) [-] De hecho no, porque ya venía cayendo después de la primera falta, y no había posesión manifiesta de la pelota. No podía dar ley de la ventaja de ninguna manera.
#37 to #1
-
plaguehammer (06/30/2014) [-]
dont be mad, that last pen might have been questionable, but you got a freebie in the first half and didnt get that pen against you. so justice!
#29 to #10
-
hellreaver (06/30/2014) [-] that man looks like putin, in this picture
somebody should shop putin on his face
somebody should shop putin on his face
#28
-
zombiesnipertwo (06/30/2014) [-] And next Saturday we play against Netherlands
Last game against Greece was 2intense5me
Last game against Greece was 2intense5me
#83
-
jayenoh (07/01/2014) [-] That cheeky dutch cunt should go and get ****** . Personally, I think the Dutch squad was better, and therefor deserved to go on, but jesus man, that cunty cunt cunt cunt should cunting cunt off. cunt one more time
#89 to #83
-
nightlynutria (07/01/2014) [-] Yeah man as a Mexican I say Holland is a better team as a whole. But in that specific game I have my doubts.
#51 to #45
-
anon (07/01/2014) [-]
That penalty kick was the most uncalled thing so far? Look up Fred falling in Brazil - Croatia or the two penalties the Dutch got against them. The defender stood on his foot, it was a foul. It maybe wasn't the most 'clean' penalty given but surely not the dirtiest...
#52 to #51
-
oceanfrank ONLINE (07/01/2014) [-] it's less about how bad of a call it was and more about me being salty that it actually happened, Mexico should not have lost in my opinion
#74 to #59
-
anon (07/01/2014) [-]
The way he falls is indeed disgusting, but you clearly see the Mexican defender placing his foot right in front of Robben right? Despite Robben's talent for theater it still was a foul. I still think the ref added it to the sum of fouls on Robben and decided it was enough for a penalty at last. A shame it had to be just before the end of the official time while it was 1-1 though, would've become an interesting match if they were to continue in extra time. Especially since the Mexicans would've been forced to actually attack again, instead of just playing mainly defensive.
#22
-
dontknowmeatall (06/30/2014) [-]
THAT WASN'T A FAIR PENALTY, HE JUMPED LIKE A ******* PUSSY AND YOU KNOW IT!!!!!!!!
#88 to #30
-
nightlynutria (07/01/2014) [-] Marquez said after the game Robben told him it wasnt a penalty.
#113 to #88
-
christmouth (07/01/2014) [-] Robben said in an interview that there were two clear penalties, and one was given.
#114 to #113
-
nightlynutria (07/01/2014) [-] Yes. In different interviews Robben is saying it was a fair penalty. However, right after the game, right there on the field he told Marquez it wasnt a penalty, and also immediately a reporter asked him and he said "I dove, I shouldnt be doing that(not specifying if it was on the penalty or the play before halftime)".
My conclusion is the man felt regret and confessed to Marquez and the interviewer. Then probably realized it wasnt a good thing because he could receive a punishment by FIFA or people throughout the world would confirm that the win and his team(even the country) are dishonest so he just gave the benefit of the doubt.
Thing's in the past though. I dont think the play before halftime should had been a penalty but people say it was. So maybe fair result after all. But the play at the end was definitely not penalty worth it.
Sauce:
www.google.com.mx/search?q=%22that+it+wasn%27t+a+penalty%2C+though+one+of+the+previous+(tackles)+was%2C%22&oq=%22that+it+wasn%27t+a+penalty%2C+though+one+of+the+previous+(tackles)+was%2C%22&aqs=chrome..69i57.287j0j7&sourceid=chrome&es_sm=93&ie=UTF-8#q=%22that+it+wasn't+a+penalty%2C+though+one+of+the+previous+(tackles)+was%2C%22&tbm=nws
in.reuters.com/article/2014/06/30/soccer-world-m51-ned-mex-marquez-idINKBN0F507620140630
My conclusion is the man felt regret and confessed to Marquez and the interviewer. Then probably realized it wasnt a good thing because he could receive a punishment by FIFA or people throughout the world would confirm that the win and his team(even the country) are dishonest so he just gave the benefit of the doubt.
Thing's in the past though. I dont think the play before halftime should had been a penalty but people say it was. So maybe fair result after all. But the play at the end was definitely not penalty worth it.
Sauce:
www.google.com.mx/search?q=%22that+it+wasn%27t+a+penalty%2C+though+one+of+the+previous+(tackles)+was%2C%22&oq=%22that+it+wasn%27t+a+penalty%2C+though+one+of+the+previous+(tackles)+was%2C%22&aqs=chrome..69i57.287j0j7&sourceid=chrome&es_sm=93&ie=UTF-8#q=%22that+it+wasn't+a+penalty%2C+though+one+of+the+previous+(tackles)+was%2C%22&tbm=nws
in.reuters.com/article/2014/06/30/soccer-world-m51-ned-mex-marquez-idINKBN0F507620140630
#24 to #22
-
herbolifee ONLINE (06/30/2014) [-] After 2 false penalties during the poule matches we ******* earned one.
#70 to #40
-
anon (07/01/2014) [-]
Dude the kick at the face one was on the ball, there were two guys kicking right at the ball and the Mexican guy decided to stick his head somewhere near it. It was dangerous play on both sides, not a foul. And yes Robben dived, but he dived after a Mexican defender placed his foot somewhere it clearly shouldn't have been. It was a stupid little mistake Robben took advantage off and apparently the ref thought it was enough for a penalty. Imo they shouldnt have gotten the pen, especially since it was already in overtime with 1-1 but they should've gotten it much earlier with the foul where a Mexican even managed to break his leg in the process. That way it would've become 1-1 much sooner and the match would've gone way different.
#93
-
realnapkin (07/01/2014) [-]
I have never seen game of thrones, but after reading this comic it made my Adrenalin pump
