Upload
Login or register
x
Anonymous comments allowed.
19 comments displayed.
#4 - anon (12 hours ago) [-]
Well yeah, I know it sounds bad, but lemme explain:
1) We have a raging, massive corrupt faggot as mayor of Mexico City, so the lil bitch always panders to wannabe feminazis and looks for more stupid ways to spend our tax money
2) Sexual abuse was kind of a big deal in the subway. Not rape per se, but groping and improptu gay orgies I'm not even kidding so it became necesary to separate men and women on public transportation. I know that doesn't solve the problem with same-sex offenders, but it's Mexico, so we have to be grateful at least part of the problem was fixed.
Funnyjunk and leddit have really scared me of the posibility of Mexico ending like the cuck-filled, SJW-ravaged wasteland that is our northern neighbour. Knowing people like Patricia Hernandez and other latino SJW exist makes me extremely concerned with the future of our society
#33 to #4 - anon (5 hours ago) [-]
Thing is, looking at the sign, the front is women only but the back is unisex. Either the word "separate" means something different in Mexico or someone ****** up.
#31 to #4 - mexicandudeinsd (7 hours ago) [-]
FIERRO PARIENTE
#10 to #4 - randomuploads (10 hours ago) [-]
You think separating men and women in public transport is an acceptable solution but you're worried about the future of your society..? Not a lot to worry about then is there.
#19 to #10 - anon (8 hours ago) [-]
with how corrupt their government is? I'd rather see segregated seating on buses than to find out there are no more buses because the transportation fund has been siphoned and is now empty. pick your battles and often times it's better to simply choose the lesser of two evils.
User avatar #9 to #4 - lebarricuda (10 hours ago) [-]
How about you abolish the mafia and arm the civilians with guns and jobs. ffs.

this is ******* retarded.
User avatar #12 to #9 - vorarephilia (10 hours ago) [-]
What, you mean the mexican government fight the drug lords? they are.

and they are losing.
User avatar #13 to #12 - lebarricuda (10 hours ago) [-]
the drug lords run the government.

At least to my knowledge.
User avatar #15 to #13 - vorarephilia (10 hours ago) [-]
they do. and they have weakened every government in central america that holds a route into Colombia. they make radio songs, shows and sell t-shirts with their logos on it within their territories.

Hate to bring politics in, but I have a hunch if Trump tries to build the wall, there will be sabotage at the very least. If they are smarter, they would do smaller things like damage underground microphones and dig tunnels. If they are the same cartels that makes people on buses fight to the death, then engineers are going to get turned to swiss.

The cartels are a hornet's nest. At some point, we will have to take it down, and it might be better to do so sooner and not later, but we're going to get stung no matter what we do.
#43 to #15 - anon (5 minutes ago) [-]
fyi take out a hornets nest at night. while they sleep.
#35 to #15 - kanedam ONLINE (4 hours ago) [-]
trump will have trouble anyway because the us gov and intelligence is so deep in drug business themself to earn money for operations...
User avatar #16 to #15 - lebarricuda (10 hours ago) [-]
I would be pleased to see a great wall of murka that rivals the wonder in China.
User avatar #17 to #16 - vorarephilia (10 hours ago) [-]
I think our time would be better spent on space colonization personally.
User avatar #18 to #17 - lebarricuda (9 hours ago) [-]
I agree and disagree.
Yes I would love space colonization and exploration to be the new meta.
However, I have how every single country is ran and until we can fix our **** and the way we treat our planet, we shouldn't be allowed.
#20 to #18 - anon (8 hours ago) [-]
personally I'd like to see the U.S. invade Mexico, root out all the major drug lords, destroy the drugs, keep the money, kill anyone with a gang affiliation, then build the great all of trump along Mexico's southern border and oversee mandatory reelections of people with no corruption. all you gotta do then is declare the wall U.S. territory, build a few bases (labeled embassies of course) and keep an eye out for where the drug cartels run under the carpet. Mexico gets the chance at a government un-corrupted by drug lords, the U.S. makes decent money off the drug lord estates it seizes, the great all of Trump is substantially shrunk to control drug trade across Mexico's southern border, the only thing would be fighting the Mexican military because the corrupt officials wouldn't want to be rooted out.
#27 to #20 - anon (7 hours ago) [-]
#29 to #27 - anon (7 hours ago) [-]
... how is the idea of just dealing with mexico's drug problem to stem the flow of drugs into the U.S. considered "edgy?"
User avatar #22 to #20 - vorarephilia (8 hours ago) [-]
At the cost of thousands of occupying soldiers.
#23 to #22 - anon (8 hours ago) [-]
as opposed to the thousands constantly working to fight drug smuggling already? or the hundreds working to stem the flow of illegal immigrants (most of which are from farther south than Mexico anyway) besides I'd rather have U.S. soldiers fixing the problems in Northern America than in the middle east.

Top Content in 24 Hours

No entries found.
 Friends (0)