Mein Gott. Man könnte meinen Elvis lebt. Mein Gott Man könnte meinen Elvis lebt
Upload
Login or register
Hide Comments
Leave a comment Refresh Comments (265)
[ 265 comments ]
> hey anon, wanna give your opinion?
asd
#9 - solidderking
Reply +170 123456789123345869
(08/10/2014) [-]
#30 to #9 - hattheifbatman
Reply +10 123456789123345869
(08/11/2014) [-]
User avatar #3 - fourtwentt
Reply +111 123456789123345869
(08/10/2014) [-]
The world we live in sucks
User avatar #107 to #3 - cdmin
Reply -4 123456789123345869
(08/11/2014) [-]
over 50 thumbs for that comment... . i m assuming, a firlst world kiddy prefering hitler would won the war.
#29 - delio
Reply +23 123456789123345869
(08/11/2014) [-]
Im not a socialist but sometimes I wonder, was Germany the good guys and the bad guys won the war?
Im not a socialist but sometimes I wonder, was Germany the good guys and the bad guys won the war?
User avatar #44 to #29 - ivoryhammer
Reply -5 123456789123345869
(08/11/2014) [-]
The Nazis weren't socialists you moron, they were fascists.
User avatar #54 to #44 - konradkurze
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/11/2014) [-]
so the term National Socialism means nothing to you

User avatar #57 to #54 - ivoryhammer
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(08/11/2014) [-]
I can call myself the King of England, doesn't mean I am.
User avatar #60 to #57 - konradkurze
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(08/11/2014) [-]
germany was led by the NSDAP National Sozialisthiche Deutsche Arbeite Partei, aka National Socialists....

theres more than one definition of socialism, lifes not all black and white kid
User avatar #79 to #60 - Sethorein
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(08/11/2014) [-]
If a man says "I'm a libertarian" then proceeds to enact socialist policy, he's not a libertarian, he's a socialist.

The Nazis may have been a socialist party but they governed in a Fascist manner.
#36 to #29 - boothead
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(08/11/2014) [-]
To put it bluntly it depends what happens in the future. Yes, Germany would have erased anybody who isn't white. Which at the time was millions of people, but they would have united the Earth under one flag ending war for eternity and removing the threat of an all out nuclear war. So when war breaks out and 5 billion people die in a nuclear holocaust Germany becomes the good guys because by removing the threat of a nuclear war they would have saved billions.
#42 to #29 - anon id: dc02bda2
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/11/2014) [-]
Being a socialist or not doesn't have anything to do with this. At least not these days
User avatar #68 to #29 - phunkyzilla
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/11/2014) [-]
I like the skill that went into that gif and I congratulate whoever made it
User avatar #109 to #29 - nanako
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/11/2014) [-]
Wondering is good. You should never stop doing that. keep an open mind and look for facts.
#207 to #29 - anon id: 61897fc0
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/11/2014) [-]
One thing that absolutely rustles my Jimmies is that the western part of europe and america think they won the war. I live in small easter european country that has been under the soviet and nazi rule and russian and german rule for many times and everyone says that the soviet rule was way worse than the nazi. I mean both were terrible but the Allies helped ******* soviet russia wich is worse out of the two and claim they won the war.... By helping the bad guy win.

History is written by the victor.. No ****!
User avatar #43 to #29 - iamaniceperson
Reply +13 123456789123345869
(08/11/2014) [-]
You don't really need a history lesson to know that genocide is bad
#37 to #29 - hopkinator
Reply +84 123456789123345869
(08/11/2014) [-]
in honesty, national socialism is top notch, now hear me out
no, killing off an entire race to acquire lebensraum for nat soc is wrong
but think about it, an entire reich, all white people, no minorities(with all racism aside think of all the problems solved by that, again, racism aside)
everything is for the betterment of the people and the state, health care, education, public services a forefront of national spending. strong work ethics and a sense of pride for your nation. whats so wrong with that? im no nazi, but that doesnt mean i cant see that they had some things going for them. just alot of demonetization because of the, you know, whole jew/gyp/slav thing that went on....and most "nazis" had no quarrel with the jewish people, they were just fighting for your country as i or you would do if we were against the whole ******* continent of europe.

oh and not to mention that without the nazis, a major chunk of modern day tech would not have been developed. they were responsible for the first jet engines (me262) rockets, the ak 47 (sturmgewher 44) clearer radio tech/recording, and alot more.
**** the evil people of the reich like hitler, himmler and eichman, praise be erwin rommel, the good nazi.
#61 to #37 - santsbro
Reply +16 123456789123345869
(08/11/2014) [-]
>everything is for the betterment of the people and the state, health care, education, public services a forefront of national spending

That's the "socialism" part of national socialism. Which is what the Nazis were trying to fight against... Because apparently only white guys (not only just white, a specific brand of white) deserve that? No, that's stupid and unethical.

But yes, you are correct in that the average German shouldn't be blamed for being a Nazi, nor should the Wehrmacht be.
pic unrelated
User avatar #112 to #61 - mephiblis
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(08/11/2014) [-]
communism/=socialism
#119 to #61 - schnizel
Reply -9 123456789123345869
(08/11/2014) [-]
You dumb ****, Aryan is not determined by the color of his skin but by the nobility of him and his people.
#66 to #37 - clannadqs
Reply +11 123456789123345869
(08/11/2014) [-]
This sort of gets on my nerves. When people attribute inventions and creations to people or nations, they always say," It could have never been developed without them". Are you saying our technological progress would just magically halt because some German didn't think of it?
User avatar #134 to #66 - xzenoo
Reply +8 123456789123345869
(08/11/2014) [-]
This sort of ignorance gets on my nerves, war is the greatest catalyst for human productivity.
User avatar #136 to #134 - clannadqs
Reply +4 123456789123345869
(08/11/2014) [-]
Wait, are you backing me up or calling me out? Either way your comment isn't too relevant mate.
User avatar #64 to #37 - iviagic
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(08/11/2014) [-]
Let's be honest. History repeats itself and every millennium one particular race gets to lead the world in terms of science and development.
User avatar #83 to #64 - sadaurkar
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(08/11/2014) [-]
How so?
User avatar #84 to #83 - iviagic
Reply +7 123456789123345869
(08/11/2014) [-]
Whites haven't always led the world. Before the renaissance is was Arabia and before that was china. You don't seriously believe whites have been eternally leading the world.
User avatar #86 to #84 - sadaurkar
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(08/11/2014) [-]
Nah, I just wanted to see if you could back your point with evidence (y)
User avatar #88 to #86 - iviagic
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(08/11/2014) [-]
Okay, but I thought my point was rather obvious.


The next leading continent will be Asia.
User avatar #232 to #88 - mephiblis
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/12/2014) [-]
Your point is obvious, he's just asking you to provide some evidence. You say the Arabs dwarfed Europe in scientific progress during the middle ages, i say they got close to being on the same level but Europe was still far ahead.
User avatar #267 to #232 - iviagic
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(09/07/2016) [-]
>i say they got close to being on the same level but Europe was still far ahead.
oh god. please take that back
User avatar #257 to #232 - iviagic
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/12/2014) [-]
Definitely not anywhere near the same level. Arabia at that time was the centerpiece of human civilization with respect to science, art, literature, and mathematics. Please do your own research.
User avatar #118 to #84 - mephiblis
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/11/2014) [-]
Let me guess, you also think that the Dark Ages were a period of 0 learning and science, only EU people killing each other and burning witches, right?
User avatar #230 to #118 - iviagic
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/12/2014) [-]
Of course not. But you sound like the type of person who would believe the Middle East is a terror-infested wasteland where people are bombed on a daily basis and that Africa is an uncivilized plague-world.

Everything is true to a certain extent.

But when we look at the Dark Ages, we see that Arabia was the leading region. That isn't to say that there was zero science and learning, but it was all dwarfed by other regions. Just as how Europe and the U.S's scientific progress now dwarf the rest of the world.

It's all a cycle and sooner or later the position will be handed over to East Asia.
User avatar #182 to #37 - dwarfman
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(08/11/2014) [-]
There successful economy was based on credit, due to be repaid by land and assets seized in the war.
User avatar #265 to #37 - themarineelite
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/14/2014) [-]
You also forget, the term "Nazi" referring to Germans back in WW2 is very loose at that. If you are talking about all the germans who fought for the Reich during the war, They were technically "nazis" because they had to swear an oath to fight for the third reich, and not following that oath was being labeled and sentenced as a war criminal which led to concentration and death camps. The actual "nazis" of the war were the evil people you mentioned because they followed all of the ideals of nazism which were ****** up and evil in the first place. Ones like Rommel, had to swear the oath to fight because
1. He was already in the Wehrmacht when the nazis came to power
2. Like I said before, it was follow the oath or death
Doesn't mean he followed the oaths. Hitler wanted him to execute all "sub-humans" that were captured in the North African campaigns. Rommel basically defied that order and treated POWs as well, normal POWs.
User avatar #162 to #37 - theshadowed
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/11/2014) [-]
No national socialism doesn't ******* work
Everything in it was ********.

So people are killed, or sterilised, because of their birth? Oh thats ******* fair
Solve racism by getting rid of every non-white person? SOlve racism with the ultimate act of racism?
Nothing was for the betterment of the people. Germany's income increased slightly, but its national debt ******* quadrupled. Hitler's economy was about to collapse.
He just used shadow figures, and fired anyone who wasn't a national socialist white male.
And most of the nazis did have problems with the jews. As bad as it sounds, everyone had problems with the Jews. Everyone hated the Jews. Hitler used hem as a scapegoat for WW1 and the Depression, and the people lapped it up.
#229 to #162 - hopkinator
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/12/2014) [-]
i never said the sterilization and killing people part was good.
nat soc without all that, my point, is a good system.
relocation, however is a much more moral way of getting lebensraum.
i think you took my post the wrong way, and you sound full on tumblr sjw, **** off with that **** will you?
User avatar #234 to #229 - theshadowed
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/12/2014) [-]
Haha, no.
I'm saying that national socialism, while in principal may seem good.
Obviously getting rid of anyone who isn't white is complete and utter ********. And still pretty damn racist.
But in practice, which you would know if you have even studied history, you would know that national socialism, like communism, does not work.
User avatar #258 to #234 - hopkinator
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/12/2014) [-]
whats so wrong with separating races? its not racist unless you look at it like that.
no minorites means no prejudice among them, no hate crimes no unfair treatment like affirmative action or police bias or **** like that. it just eliminates the possibility of bad **** happening like that. separation isnt about hating or looking down upon the other race, its just letting them do them and letting us do us. how about that?
User avatar #259 to #258 - theshadowed
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/12/2014) [-]
Still, why bother separating people based on where they are born? Hypothetically, there would be no issue in letting people mingle
User avatar #261 to #259 - hopkinator
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/12/2014) [-]
the jews, pissed off the romans something fierce because they would not heed to roman rule and culture, causing the jewish roman wars and uprisings, siege of madassa, etc
we keep on trying to celebrate diversity within the population, but all that mixing is what destroys what makes us diverse from one another.
no segragation, separation.
User avatar #262 to #261 - hopkinator
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/12/2014) [-]
*siege of masada
User avatar #260 to #259 - hopkinator
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/12/2014) [-]
take a look around the world man, its not working all too well
america: blacks and whites, self explanitony
europe: influx of muslims are creating problems
africa- apartheid
asia all different types of asians hate each other in a nutshell
remember brevik? went on a child killing spree because of the fear of muslims ******* with the way of life over there
would happen if they were somewhere else, or the beheading of that guy in the uk, and the riots that happened because of that and more **** that happnend, subways in the uk stopped serving bacon and **** because a minor amount of the customers were muslim. its the mixing of culture that pisses people off on both sides and causes unrest and strife.
User avatar #263 to #260 - theshadowed
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/12/2014) [-]
Brevik attacked a communis camp because he was a nazi. Thats political.

Speaking of which, as much hatred is caused by religion and politics as skin colour, if not more. Segregate them as well?
User avatar #264 to #263 - hopkinator
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/13/2014) [-]
here we go with the slippery slope fallacy
#151 to #37 - anon id: ddc44f6a
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/11/2014) [-]
"everything is for the betterment of the people and the state, health care, education" Yeah, expelling Albert Einstein REALLY helped Nazi Germany to develop and be great and all.

Don't get me wrong, I hate people who have a black and white view on history, but the entire nazi system was heavily flawed, if you look deeper into it. The technical advances in some areas were at the cost of development in other areas (e.g. computer science) and the system was living beyond it's means and only could be paid by illegal measures like not paying international debts.

Also, it all was at the cost of personal freedom, so **** it. You couldn't post your opinion here if the nazis won.
#130 to #37 - anon id: 330807f8
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/11/2014) [-]
Just wrong. First operational jet engine was Italian, you fool.
#133 to #130 - anon id: 330807f8
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/11/2014) [-]
Caproni Campini N.1 , August 1940, sorry, that was the second one, the first one was the Heinkel He 178. lol.
#97 to #37 - anon id: f91d2eee
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/11/2014) [-]
*At least, in theory.
It's like communism. It leaves countries in ruins and only sounds nice on paper. Hitler did what he did because he did not have to regard much in a long-term economical way. He built debt that could only be repayed through conquist. If Hitler should have been forced to look at the long term, he would not have been able to do so much.
#93 to #37 - anon id: 998b7ce1
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/11/2014) [-]
The Brits developed jet engines at around the same time The AK-47 was designed completely separately starting in 1943, a year before the StG-44 even entered combat Got me there with the V2, but to be fair, Werner Von Braun only worked with the Nazis because they were willing to pay for his experiments - if somebody else came along and was willing to pay for it, he would have done it for them On the other hand, one piece of tech the Nazis developed was the computer, with the work of Konrad Zuse from 1934 onward.
#80 to #37 - tunit
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/11/2014) [-]
i would have follow general Rommel into battle, the man was a top tactician and a genius. not to mention he knew his way around a tank.
#47 to #37 - anon id: 4aed9e7b
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/11/2014) [-]
The British developed the jet engine, and just didn't develop it as quickly. The Germans also did build the first assault rifle, but it is unfair to say that the Soviets copied the sturmgewher 44 lock and barrel; certainly inspired by the concept, but there were a lot of bright people who worked on the AK-47 and developed it, and saying that they just copied the Germans is an insult to their work.

The Germans did develop a lot of stuff during WW2. However, there is a massive amount of denigration of other country's capabilities and their own development. The British were more advanced in radar, the Soviets built rockets before shooting the design team, the Americans the nuclear bombs, along with their own electronic computers not long after the Germans, France patented the first jet engine design in the 1920s, the list goes on and on. No one denies the Germans built some good stuff, but them being so far ahead of everybody and responsible for all technological development is a myth.
#95 to #47 - anon id: 998b7ce1
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/11/2014) [-]
Actually they developed the jet engine around the same time oddly enough, completely independent of each other. The main difference in each nation's design was the type of compression. The British design used the centrifugal compressor, which is bulkier but more reliable, while the German design used the axial compressor, which was less reliable but more aerodynamic.
#77 to #47 - anon id: 5847ecc2
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/11/2014) [-]
while you arent completely on point, just like the person you person you replied to isnt

(srsly documentation is incomplete and mostly written by winners, which is just natural!)

it should be noted that all that was founded by printing money on a scale, todays states would just laugh about.
yes the germans worked insanely hard. but if all fighting just magically turned into peace when germany started to lose, germany's economy would be completely trashed.

it was supposed to be financed by overtaking other countries and stuff.
#40 to #37 - kranske
0 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #116 to #37 - schnizel
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(08/11/2014) [-]
>Hitler
>Evil
Why?
User avatar #74 to #37 - tkfourtwoone
Reply -2 123456789123345869
(08/11/2014) [-]
Soooo you're saying that you'd like your state to be mostly a totalitarian one, with a centralized, state-driven economy.

Also, what's the problem with minorities?! As long as you don't start creating special, privileged laws for them (isn't everybody supposed to be equal before the law, anyhow?) "just because", then I don't see why anybody, of any color, religion, sex or sexuality couldn't make a living in your country.

"strong work ethics and a sense of pride for your nation"

It's not the state that should impose the sense of "work ethics", that should come through family education.

Also - pride for your nation. Being a patriot is one thing, being a nationalist is another.
Nothing good can come with nationalism, since it only leads to egocentric, megalomaniac views, xenophobia, shovinism and so on.
#115 to #74 - mephiblis
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/11/2014) [-]
"What's the problem with minorities?" Ayyy lmao

Right now, in the US, there is a chimpout, nignogs looting and burning stores down because a thug lyf ***** tried to steal a cop's gun and got his ass shot.
Muslim ghettos in France, UK etc don't abide by the state's law but by Sharia. What that means is genital mutilation and all the other 'perks'.
User avatar #226 to #115 - tkfourtwoone
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/11/2014) [-]
Well then blame the state for being incompetent at enforcing its own rules & laws
#1 - schnizel
Reply +71 123456789123345869
(08/10/2014) [-]
Comment Picture
#28 to #1 - Haruhi
Reply -16 123456789123345869
(08/11/2014) [-]
#17 to #1 - komandantmirkoo
0 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
#121 to #1 - volksunion
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(08/11/2014) [-]
User avatar #122 to #121 - schnizel
Reply -2 123456789123345869
(08/11/2014) [-]
lel
User avatar #123 to #122 - volksunion
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(08/11/2014) [-]
kek
or should i say
kike
#124 to #123 - schnizel
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(08/11/2014) [-]
Comment Picture
#125 to #124 - volksunion
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(08/11/2014) [-]
#147 to #1 - turtletroll
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(08/11/2014) [-]
Dont cry bby
Dont cry bby
#32 to #1 - thisiskevinhanian
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(08/11/2014) [-]
#4 to #1 - Steinwolf
Reply +4 123456789123345869
(08/10/2014) [-]
Comment Picture
#7 to #4 - trevorbelmondo [OP]
Reply +5 123456789123345869
(08/10/2014) [-]
#18 to #4 - komandantmirkoo
Reply +4 123456789123345869
(08/10/2014) [-]
Comment Picture
#6 to #1 - ablueguy
Reply +4 123456789123345869
(08/10/2014) [-]
Comment Picture
#2 to #1 - trevorbelmondo [OP]
Reply +5 123456789123345869
(08/10/2014) [-]
Let it go my son..
User avatar #5 to #2 - schnizel
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(08/10/2014) [-]
Never.
#135 to #5 - masterboll
Reply -4 123456789123345869
(08/11/2014) [-]
#153 to #135 - schnizel
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/11/2014) [-]
You muzzies really love me.
You muzzies really love me.
User avatar #227 to #153 - masterboll
Reply -2 123456789123345869
(08/11/2014) [-]
wouldnt go as far as saying i "love" you, but your *********** and petty insults are nonetheless alway amusing
#233 to #227 - schnizel
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(08/12/2014) [-]
***********? Because it does not suit your political agenda and facts are insulting to you? Hmm, interesting. As always, your words are empty.
***********? Because it does not suit your political agenda and facts are insulting to you? Hmm, interesting. As always, your words are empty.
#255 to #233 - anon id: 96ed4f68
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/12/2014) [-]
FAGGOT
User avatar #256 to #255 - schnizel
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/12/2014) [-]
I didn't know that you are a faggot anon.
#235 to #233 - masterboll
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(08/12/2014) [-]
>Because it does not suit your political agenda and facts are insulting to you
>Because it does not suit your political agenda
>facts
>insulting to you

you really do mentally create your own opponent, dont you?
#236 to #235 - schnizel
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/12/2014) [-]
yourlogicalfallacyis.com/personal-incredulity   
yourlogicalfallacyis.com/tu-quoque   
   
Are you going to post more epic may mays you found on 9gag?
yourlogicalfallacyis.com/personal-incredulity
yourlogicalfallacyis.com/tu-quoque

Are you going to post more epic may mays you found on 9gag?
#237 to #236 - masterboll
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(08/12/2014) [-]
you, of all people, are going on about logical fallacies again?
top lel

its okay, your may mays from le 4chan /pol/ (aka jammy rumblers utd) are predictable and have gotten repetitive to the point where i dont even notice them anymore
#238 to #237 - schnizel
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(08/12/2014) [-]
>you, of all people, are going on about logical fallacies again?    
Yes, to prove the ignorant and the stupid wrong. Muslims, when will they ever learn?   
>predictable and have gotten repetitive to the point where i dont even notice them anymore   
I say the same for you, even your stuff is old and boring.
>you, of all people, are going on about logical fallacies again?
Yes, to prove the ignorant and the stupid wrong. Muslims, when will they ever learn?
>predictable and have gotten repetitive to the point where i dont even notice them anymore
I say the same for you, even your stuff is old and boring.
User avatar #239 to #238 - masterboll
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(08/12/2014) [-]
>Yes, to prove the ignorant and the stupid wrong.
>Muslims, when will they ever learn?
oh Lawdy, this retard is still trying to offend me after all this

>I say the same for you, even your stuff is old and boring
i dont actually find you old or boring, regardless of the repetitive 4chin may mays or petty jammy rumbling attempts. i find you entertaining.
User avatar #240 to #239 - schnizel
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(08/12/2014) [-]
I could care less about you, you take everything as an insult. I think you should see a psychologist.
User avatar #241 to #240 - masterboll
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(08/12/2014) [-]
back to creating your own imaginary opponent to make yourself feel better?

with the amount of dedication you put towards ***********, I think you are the one that needs to be seeing a psychologist, not me lol
User avatar #242 to #241 - schnizel
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(08/12/2014) [-]
No, that's strawmaning, I'm talking to you slave.
Stupider by every comment I see.
#243 to #242 - masterboll
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(08/12/2014) [-]
man, the irony is mainly what makes you so entertaining
#244 to #243 - schnizel
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(08/12/2014) [-]
>the use of words to convey a meaning that is the opposite of its literal meaning
Would you please be a good slave and show me where you see it.
User avatar #245 to #244 - masterboll
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(08/12/2014) [-]
>tries to rumble jammies on the internet through a pseudo-intellectual *********** (and more often, flooding with le 4chin "facts" at once so that the opposition dont bother replying anymore)
>doesnt know what irony is and needs someone to point it out for him
User avatar #247 to #245 - schnizel
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(08/12/2014) [-]
Also
>said facts are wrong
>does not disprove them because he can't
Fallacy, fallacy, fallacy.
User avatar #252 to #247 - masterboll
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(08/12/2014) [-]
reply to www.funnyjunk.com/Mein+Gott/funny-pictures/5252292/251#251

>Never proven what he has said
refer back to second part of previous comment for same response

>always resorts to ad hominem
pointing out the irony in this part is now becoming repetitive

>follows lies and calls them the truth
in contrast to the "facts" you call truth. top lel

>Holy **** you are the definition of retarded
more irony, but with the amusing "holy ****" at the start

>I won debates with schnizel in my head
simply twists my "back to creating your own imaginary opponent to make yourself feel better?" comment and redirect it at me. top lel-ocaust

>Trust me, people disproved schnizel, I don't have proof but other people did, trust me
same thing as im responding to in the first point in this comment, but this time says it as if im the one who is saying it. more lel

it appears to me that the repetitive aspect of your *********** is where your supposed strength lies
#254 to #252 - schnizel
-1 123456789123345869
(08/12/2014) [-]
Also, since I have won every debate we had you try to discredit them by talking about me as much as you can with no evidence responding to anything I have proven.
You muslims are really the most worthless things on this planet.
#253 to #252 - schnizel
-1 123456789123345869
(08/12/2014) [-]
Evidence meter:0
Ad hominem:9001
Personal incredulity:9001
Tu quoque:9001
Status: Rekt
User avatar #249 to #247 - masterboll
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(08/12/2014) [-]
>said facts are wrong
>facts are wrong
>facts
>retard still wants me to teach him the difference between facts and biased interpretation of facts

>does not disprove them because he can't
>throws the "you havent saved all of the times when people have disproven me, therefore, i am right" argument again
#251 to #249 - schnizel
-1 123456789123345869
(08/12/2014) [-]
>retard still wants me to teach him the difference between facts and biased interpretation of facts
>Never proven what he has said
>always resorts to ad hominem
>follows lies and calls them the truth
Holy **** you are the definition of retarded.
>you havent saved all of the times when people have disproven me, therefore, i am right
>I won debates with schnizel in my head
>Trust me, people disproved schnizel, I don't have proof but other people did, trust me
User avatar #246 to #245 - schnizel
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(08/12/2014) [-]
You have just reached a new plebian level, for a person who believes in flying horses you have just suprised me.
You should really get some help slave, I fear that you will not be able to serve your master for much longer with that state of mental health.
User avatar #248 to #246 - masterboll
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(08/12/2014) [-]
>for a person who believes in flying horses you have just suprised me
if i had a penny for every time you pulled this out of your ass to defend your logical fallacies, id end up with a lot of money

>You should really get some help slave, I fear that you will not be able to serve your master for much longer with that state of mental health
i dont even know if thats meant to be an insult or if you just put it there to fill in space
User avatar #250 to #248 - schnizel
-1 123456789123345869
(08/12/2014) [-]
>said that I say fallacies
>Does not point them out
>0/10
>i dont even know if thats meant to be an insult or if you just put it there to fill in space
>insult
It's not an insult, it's a fact.
#20 - navien
Reply +57 123456789123345869
(08/10/2014) [-]
#15 - ILoveFurries
Reply +54 123456789123345869
(08/10/2014) [-]
Comment Picture
#58 - betars
Reply +14 123456789123345869
(08/11/2014) [-]
tfw Berlin 1936 looks better than Detroit 2014
User avatar #73 to #58 - brobafett
Reply +37 123456789123345869
(08/11/2014) [-]
>A world power looked better than America's own little slice of Somalia

No ****.
#266 to #73 - anon id: 86ab0625
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/24/2014) [-]
"America's own little slice of Somalia"
"America's own little slice of Somalia"
#49 - Orangepeel
Reply +37 123456789123345869
(08/11/2014) [-]
#221 to #49 - shadowpico
-1 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
#114 - nightlynutria
Reply +21 123456789123345869
(08/11/2014) [-]
the nazi one looks pretty badass if you ask me
the nazi one looks pretty badass if you ask me
User avatar #145 to #114 - melwach
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(08/11/2014) [-]
Yeah. It looks just like the cool bad dudes in those movies.
User avatar #59 - tffan
Reply +18 123456789123345869
(08/11/2014) [-]
Germany has been saying sorry and sucking ass to the Jews for the past 70 years and it will probably never stop.
#106 to #59 - anon id: f91d2eee
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/11/2014) [-]
Will probably stop when the people who witnessed it will die.
#200 to #106 - cockineveryorifice
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(08/11/2014) [-]
We thought that with slavery but they're still using that victim card today despite no-one from that time being alive.
User avatar #137 to #59 - nimba
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(08/11/2014) [-]
yeah it was ages ago who even gives a **** anymore get over it silly jews