math problem
Tags: math problem
Solve if you
are Genius !
are Genius !
...
| |
Anonymous comments allowed.
27 comments displayed.
#20 to #2
-
chris chris (11/03/2015) [-] there are a few ways to do it, that was the second way i noticed. the first pattern i saw was
56-14=42.....................its just subtracting
42-12=30.....................two off of the amount
30-10=20.....................you subtract each time
20-08=12
12-06=6
56-14=42.....................its just subtracting
42-12=30.....................two off of the amount
30-10=20.....................you subtract each time
20-08=12
12-06=6
#27 to #24
-
chris chris (11/03/2015) [-] there:
1.in, at, or to that place or position.
"we went on to Paris and stayed there eleven days"
their:
1.belonging to or associated with the people or things previously mentioned or easily identified.
"her taunts had lost their power to touch him"
you can figure out which word to use by figuring out what that word is describing. in this circumstance i am not talking about a place or direction, it would be describing a previously mentioned mathematical formula
1.in, at, or to that place or position.
"we went on to Paris and stayed there eleven days"
their:
1.belonging to or associated with the people or things previously mentioned or easily identified.
"her taunts had lost their power to touch him"
you can figure out which word to use by figuring out what that word is describing. in this circumstance i am not talking about a place or direction, it would be describing a previously mentioned mathematical formula
#8
-
anon (11/02/2015) [-]
super simple, it's 6 of course.
8*7=56
7*6=42
6*5=30
5*4=20
4*3=12
3*2=6
basic af doesnt take a genius
8*7=56
7*6=42
6*5=30
5*4=20
4*3=12
3*2=6
basic af doesnt take a genius
#6
-
anon (11/02/2015) [-]
"solve if you are Genius !".
This was either written for kids or by someone inept. The pattern is simple, the equations written poorly, and the text has at least two mistakes. You would argue that those details are minor, but a person used to doing things properly is a person used to not make small mistakes. This wasn't written by such a person.
This was either written for kids or by someone inept. The pattern is simple, the equations written poorly, and the text has at least two mistakes. You would argue that those details are minor, but a person used to doing things properly is a person used to not make small mistakes. This wasn't written by such a person.
