Litterally. . ll! lloll. family man
x
Click to expand
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#5 - prezodent ONLINE (08/19/2014) [-]
HFW that night
HFW that night
User avatar #13 to #5 - helterskeletor (08/19/2014) [-]
As much as I love Hank, he was kind of a pansy.
User avatar #23 to #13 - acemcgunner (08/19/2014) [-]
look here, that's no way to talk about a American hero, son.
#63 to #13 - jubajubejiblets (08/19/2014) [-]
He worships at the altar of propane; thats what 'merica was built on i tell ya hwat.
#30 to #5 - slenderwolf (08/19/2014) [-]
His wife 			*******		 pisses me off though
His wife ******* pisses me off though
#33 to #30 - gruntmastr (08/19/2014) [-]
Do you mean Peg, or Marge?
#2 - fezzo (08/18/2014) [-]
Manatees aren't all that importan though, not when there are so many animals strugling with drug addictions
User avatar #8 to #2 - captainprincess (08/19/2014) [-]
That bear is not struggling at all
#24 to #2 - dafogman (08/19/2014) [-]
Agreed man. Let's stop animals from abusing drugs.
#42 - seniorawesomesauce (08/19/2014) [-]
simpsos
#7 - yindragon (08/19/2014) [-]
family man
family man
#64 to #7 - anon (08/19/2014) [-]
*family guy
User avatar #17 to #7 - toasthemost ONLINE (08/19/2014) [-]
nice meme
User avatar #1 - gayobliteratorhere (08/18/2014) [-]
and they should
#11 to #1 - corsairjoshua (08/19/2014) [-]
What the hell are you doing outside of **** ?

Get your ass back in there and continue to post nonsensical three to four word posts that everybody ******* loves.
User avatar #12 to #11 - gayobliteratorhere (08/19/2014) [-]
Yeah you will see
User avatar #53 to #12 - AresX (08/19/2014) [-]
Woah dude are you speaking coherently?
User avatar #56 to #53 - gayobliteratorhere (08/19/2014) [-]
just be prepared
#66 to #56 - AresX (08/19/2014) [-]
My anus is ready
My anus is ready
#6 to #1 - floggnawstalgia (08/19/2014) [-]
I couldn't see your text and I thought people were thumbing you up because you blank posted
User avatar #65 to #6 - maxismahname (08/19/2014) [-]
 
#15 - deckbox (08/19/2014) [-]
Bonfire of the Manitees    
   
Episode 1 Season 17, Oh look Homer is a neglectful husband and marge in unhappy episode #8363743627868571785478513487745187451, wasn't great since overused story.
Bonfire of the Manitees

Episode 1 Season 17, Oh look Homer is a neglectful husband and marge in unhappy episode #8363743627868571785478513487745187451, wasn't great since overused story.
User avatar #31 to #15 - jaynsilentbob (08/19/2014) [-]
Yeah because it's not like the jokes are completely different or it's a completely different story with the only similarity being the theme of the episode... If you're going to criticise a show for using the same theme in more than one episode then you might as well criticise every sitcom and cartoon series ever.
#38 to #31 - anon (08/19/2014) [-]
I can count on my hands how many good episodes of the Simpsons there have been since season 12. Hes right, the plots became overused. Simpsons in its prime was still better than any other animated show but that doesnt mean new stuff doesnt suck
User avatar #39 to #38 - jaynsilentbob (08/19/2014) [-]
oh come on, you really think theres been less than 10 good episodes since series 12? I can honestly say some of my favourite episodes came from series 13 and 15. I personally think the simpsons is still great. The jokes are still smart despite having reused themes and the quality of them them still surpass Family Guy which is a bunch of fart jokes and self-aware jokes of their popularity.
#35 to #31 - deckbox (08/19/2014) [-]
na the jokes and story are largely the same, hence the decline in quality. Usually those sitcoms have continuity and progression such as Frasier etc, but simpsons re hashes the same **** over and over, and leans more on social media and celeb culture these days than it used to.
User avatar #37 to #35 - jaynsilentbob (08/19/2014) [-]
You honestly think the jokes are the same? The only similarity is the theme of the episode, that being homer is a bad husband. This is the same in American Dad and Family Guy. Do you know why? Because it's their character. That's essentially the point of a cartoon series, the characters don't need to age or change. They can stick to the same format and create episodes which revolve around that. They can't do 11 years of that and suddenly change the whole dynamic of the show. If you want character development watch a drama series not a cartoon comedy.
#41 to #37 - deckbox (08/19/2014) [-]
The Spy Who Learned Me,the war of the simpsons, this one, then you got plots like in little orphan millie where he doesnt know her eye colour, not including the dozens of ' becoming a better father because he neglects his kids' almost every other episode. Whilst they are themes of such running throughout, far too many storylines revolve around constantly repeated stories, just like in family guy when you had that episode with Meg shouting at the family how they always **** on her, it got so old by then, its like Oh you are shouting now about it when it is a 10 year theme?
User avatar #57 to #41 - jaynsilentbob (08/19/2014) [-]
But by saying its the story you're saying it's exactly the same. It's the theme. The theme that homer is a bad husband or a bad father. Granted they've done it a lot but they've never done it the same. They've even commented on it saying something like 'when you've been on air that long, things are bound to get repeated. I maintain the fact that although they have recurring themes, no joke is the same nor is the plot. Therefore i think its unfair to say they're doing the same thing. The fact of the matter is it's been on air for 26 years and has become as big as it is and still managed to remain humble which is more than i can say about family guy, which you can tell from the writing that they know they're hot **** .
#59 to #57 - deckbox (08/19/2014) [-]
ok the theme of the overall stories is the same then i guess
#34 - neosonic (08/19/2014) [-]
Sandstorm - Darude
Sandstorm - Darude
User avatar #22 - nosurprise (08/19/2014) [-]
I guess Simpsons content is just doomed forever with nodding gifs, oh the humanity
#25 to #22 - xchaosreaperx (08/19/2014) [-]
**xchaosreaperx rolled image**

i believe you mean Hue-Manatee.
User avatar #4 - admiralen (08/19/2014) [-]
if its pregnant its just hurting two manaties to save two manaties, kinda reks the argument
#9 to #4 - anon (08/19/2014) [-]
Depends. The whole save the women and children thing comes into play. We save kids because they have more years ahead of them than grown men and their life is more precious. So we assume all 3 are adult manatees. Do you save the 2 adult manatees who will live the rest of their life or the pregnant manatee who may or may not die giving birth and the baby manatee who may or may not survive the birthing.
Whose life is worth saving? It's not as black and white as you think it is.
#18 to #9 - fecal ONLINE (08/19/2014) [-]
given the relatively slim chance a baby manitee will become a mature one, and the relative worth of a mature manitee (having already beat the other odds) to the procreation of its kind I believe killing the mother is the better choice
User avatar #16 to #9 - admiralen (08/19/2014) [-]
not really, the only reason the argument works at first its because you have to hurt/kill 1 to save 2. if 2 are gonna die regardless its not really anything but preference instead of ideals
User avatar #27 to #16 - penileburglar (08/19/2014) [-]
Yes, killing a child or killing an adult is clearly a matter of ideals.

Killing an animal that most likely won't make it to maturity versus killing one that's already been lucky enough to make it there is also clearly a matter of ideals.

Pretending that it's not is just being too afraid to tackle a heavy, difficult question. As much as we want all lives to weigh in equally, they simply don't.
User avatar #28 to #27 - admiralen (08/19/2014) [-]
you dont get it, the thing is if its morally ok to kill one to save several.
if its kill two to save two it doesnt matter
User avatar #29 to #28 - penileburglar (08/19/2014) [-]
It does matter. They have different amounts of life ahead of them, different qualities of life ahead of them, and different chances of survival. If morality were simply a one-dimensional headcount, then no other moral issues would exist at all.
User avatar #61 to #29 - admiralen (08/19/2014) [-]
>implying having more time left makes you worth more
the older ones have more experiences and things to teach the rest than the young ones, the young ones can be replaced as easy as ******* and in a year there will be a new one, the old ones experiences will take more than 50 years to reproduce so it doesnt matter, its 2 for 2 so theres no point.
User avatar #70 to #61 - penileburglar (08/20/2014) [-]
Except you just listed several reasons why the pregnant one and the child are worth less, if you believe that the old ones are worth more because they have more experience and the young ones are more easily replaced.

You can't say 'its two for two so there's no point' after making an argument for exactly why one is more valuable than the other.

User avatar #71 to #70 - admiralen (08/20/2014) [-]
and you listed several reasons why the older ones were worthless
my point is that all humans have the same potential and its just 2v2 doesnt matter if youre old or young, mother or not
User avatar #72 to #71 - penileburglar (08/20/2014) [-]
Except they don't. A 60-year-old who's near death and a child with his entire life ahead of him do not even remotely have the same potential. The child has far more potential, the sixty year old has more active value, and measuring the need for each and chances for each to survive certainly isn't easy, but it's certainly still there.

Just because it's a difficult decision does not mean it doesn't matter. If the population is declining and the adults are past breeding age, the child is far more valuable. If the adults are both within breeding age and the needed gender, they're far more valuable than the single child. Even still, the mature adults are very valuable and that may secure needed funding for conservation efforts. There are still a lot of factors.

Even according to your own argument, if they are all worth the exact same, then you should definitely let the mother and unborn child die, because children rarely reach maturity and mothers often die during childbirth. There's a fair chance they're going to die either way, so you should choose to keep the two with less chance of immediately dying if all the lives are equally valuable.
User avatar #73 to #72 - admiralen (08/20/2014) [-]
i guess you didnt realize this, but the world is hugely overpopulated at the moment, what we need sure as hell isnt more breeding, and again, a young child with his whole life ahead of his is useless and easily replacable at that age, thus the 60 year old is far better candidate for the community.
and then we have your side with good points as well, and what it all turns out to is that theyre worth the same and that killing 2 to save 2 is pointless since it just adds the act of killing
User avatar #74 to #73 - penileburglar (08/20/2014) [-]
...What?

You do realize we're talking about manatees and not humans, right? The world is definitely not overpopulated with manatees.

And no, it doesn't turn out they're worth the same. There's no point in continuing the discussion with you, because you're just looking for an easy answer, and there isn't one. One side is certainly going to end up being more valuable than the other, pretending that's not the case is just a way to pussy out of making a difficult decision, and there's no way for me to stop you from doing that. Have a good one.
User avatar #75 to #74 - admiralen (08/20/2014) [-]
im obviously talking about humans, wtf can an old manatee teach the younger generation. and what im saying is also is that either you let two live, or you kill and let two live. see the difference? is the difference in worth more than what killing is?
#10 to #9 - BloodyTurds ONLINE (08/19/2014) [-]
Also you have to factor in that your hurting, not killing, and to what degree that implies
#20 - megusters ONLINE (08/19/2014) [-]
classic cartoon
classic cartoon
#40 - uchihalover (08/19/2014) [-]
i dont like manatees because sasuke sama's favorite person was killed by one. r.i.p steve irwin
User avatar #55 to #40 - lanfearandthecup (08/19/2014) [-]
green only for steve irwin... onnnnnnly for steve irwin
#60 to #40 - anon (08/19/2014) [-]
I love finding this guy in the comments, just cause of how everyone reacts to him
#58 to #40 - thelastelephant (08/19/2014) [-]
Son, this here's a manta ray, not a manatee.
User avatar #44 to #40 - alphagex (08/19/2014) [-]
I'm not even sure if you are a weabo or a troll

seriously he was a good guy
#47 to #44 - fizzordodge (08/19/2014) [-]
I will admit, his dedication is astounding. He also has a lot of those ******* reaction pictures.
User avatar #48 to #47 - alphagex (08/19/2014) [-]
I don't think he is a troll he is a otaku or a very clever guy who knows how to troll
#49 to #48 - fizzordodge (08/19/2014) [-]
I mean, I can be a weeb, but he's just going full out troll here, it's rather obvious.
User avatar #50 to #49 - alphagex (08/19/2014) [-]
Yeah i know i mean naruto can beat sasuke he is not even a ''pro anime nerd'' seriously
#51 to #50 - fizzordodge (08/19/2014) [-]
Naruto is basically the Sage of Six Paths at this rate and he doesn't even have Rinnegan, and we all know that Rinnegan has been a death sentence so far. Besides, Naruto hasn't even been willing to go full out and beat the **** out of Sasuke yet, he's basically just toyed with him a bit, not trying to kill him, trying to incapacitate him at the most. Sasuke was trying to kill him. Then you know, Sasuke was a good guy again and all that jazz.
#21 - wetturtle (08/19/2014) [-]
the simpsons
the simpsons
#54 to #43 - selfdenyingbeggar (08/19/2014) [-]
Be original
User avatar #62 to #43 - swagfagit (08/19/2014) [-]
i was wondering when you would come back
#67 to #43 - labree (08/19/2014) [-]
Comment Picture
#52 to #43 - anon (08/19/2014) [-]
howdareyoustandwherehestood.jpeg
User avatar #45 to #43 - seras ONLINE (08/19/2014) [-]
I always read it as lizarddickscereal.
#46 - anon (08/19/2014) [-]
#36 - baitdoesnttalkback (08/19/2014) [-]
he ******* answered it right in the god damn first statement. he would not harm a manatee at all to save another. jesus ******* christ you people idiots
#32 - nekaz (08/19/2014) [-]
uh american guy   
uh asians in america
uh american guy
uh asians in america
User avatar #19 - leafonthewind (08/19/2014) [-]
oh the hu-manatee
User avatar #3 - satanisrealgod (08/19/2014) [-]
Nice Nose Manatee , What nose hahah
 Friends (0)