Let's get her some recognition. . During WWII. Irena got permission ta work in the Warsaw ghetto. as a F' specialist. She had an ulterior motive- Irena smuggled recognition
Upload
Login or register

Let's get her some recognition

Click to block a category:GamingPoliticsNewsComicsAnimeOther
During WWII. Irena got permission ta work in the Warsaw ghetto. as
a F' specialist. She had an ulterior motive-
Irena smuggled Jewish infants out in the bottom of the tool bolt
she carried. She also carried a burlap sack in the back of her truck,
for larger kids,
Irena kept a dog in the back that she trained to bark when the Nazi
soldiers let her in and out of the ghetto. The soldiers, of course,
wanted nothing to do with the dog and the barking covered the
noises.
During her time of doing this. she managed to smuggle out and
save 2500 . Ultimately, she was caught. however, and
the Nazi' s broke both of her legs and ems and heather severely.
Irena kept a record of the names of all the kids she had smuggled
out In a glass jar that she buried under a tree in her back yard.
After the war. she tried to locate any parents that may have
and tried to reunite the family. Most had been gassed-
Those kids she helped got placed into faster family homes or
adopted.
In HID? Irena was up for the Nobel Peace Prize.
She was not selected.
Al Gore won. for a slide show on Global Warming.
...
+912
Views: 40937 Submitted: 05/06/2014
Hide Comments
Leave a comment Refresh Comments (235)
[ 235 comments ]
> hey anon, wanna give your opinion?
asd
#15 - doctorprofessornv
Reply +125 123456789123345869
(05/07/2014) [-]
To be fair, the Nobel peace prize isn't much of a distinction anymore, and seems to be more of a political tool than anything else. Obama received one essentially for existing, considering it was at the start of his first term in office before he had even done anything of significance. In 2012 the prize was awarded to the EU, which was justified rather vaguely as 'because they've worked towards peace'. Seems to me like the prize has become little more than a means to pander to politically popular/influential groups, as opposed to actually recognizing the achievements of exceptional human beings.
#31 to #15 - anon id: ad3f809a
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/07/2014) [-]
Well then let's correct that.
#39 to #15 - samoaspider
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/07/2014) [-]
he's got a point
he's got a point
User avatar #44 to #15 - angelious
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/07/2014) [-]
didnt obama himself protest againts the nobel peace prize he received?

just curious about it...
User avatar #94 to #15 - authvin
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(05/07/2014) [-]
The prizes given to Liu Xiaobo in 2010 and to three female activists in 2011 weren't political at all. The one in 2010 even hurt Norway's relationship with China, and we're still being ignored by them because of it. I see your point, and it's a pretty discussed topic in Norway, but it's not completely pointless.
User avatar #125 to #94 - wimwam
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/07/2014) [-]
Not sure if you are being sarcastic, but those are both very good example of how it is used to promote political ideals. Not saying they didn't deserve it, but you can't ignore that
#129 to #125 - anon id: 1fa2caef
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/07/2014) [-]
It just isn't used to promote Norway politically.
Norway just has to deal with the political fallout caused by China being a bitch.
User avatar #137 to #129 - wimwam
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/07/2014) [-]
That's not what is meant by "promoting political ideals"
A good example is the OP: a person does amazing things to save lives, and another person makes a statement that agrees with my political leanings. I'll give the medal to the latter.
It doesn't strengthen Norway politically; It promotes a political ideal
#97 to #15 - gerfox
Reply +7 123456789123345869
(05/07/2014) [-]
The Obama one was ********.

The EU one was extremely deserved at the time. The EU has achieved the feat to create complete peace in Western-Europe since WW2 through creating trust between nations, and tying them together tightly economically (and also politically with the Treaty of Maastricht) with mutual benefit. Remember that the nations of Western-Europe has diligently been more at war from before the Romans and until WW2 than any other continent through history. Furthermore they've attempted to spread peace and prosperity eastward with their post-Cold war expansions. I'm studying political science with EU being my specialty, so this I know.

The timing was not very good though, considering the heavy anti-EU protests in Greece, and rise of extremist parties in several eastern European member states.

I also feel that how they are handling the crisis in Ukraine is worthy of critique, and is in conflict with their initial ideals. This isn't relevant for a prize already given tho..

The fact that the EU got the peace prize is not problematic, although the timing could've been better. I think it would've been much more concerning if they'd gotten it now. I do agree that it has been a bit politicized though. The leader of the Nobel Committee, Jagland, is pretty silly - and he's luckily resigning now. So perhaps we'll get even more worthy winners in the future.
#19 - thesimonved
Reply +80 123456789123345869
(05/07/2014) [-]
OP says lets recognize her, doesn't tell full name. Dammit.

FYI: Irena Sendler
User avatar #27 - danmanjonesnz
Reply -60 123456789123345869
(05/07/2014) [-]
"most had been gassed"
- gas chambers for mass extermination are a myth. It never happened. Deal with it
User avatar #153 to #27 - danmanjonesnz
Reply -2 123456789123345869
(05/07/2014) [-]
-46 thumbs for telling the truth. Thanks Hollywood & the American education system!
#197 to #153 - onderdonk
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/07/2014) [-]
Comment Picture
#29 to #27 - anon id: ad3f809a
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/07/2014) [-]
Prove it
#38 to #27 - anon id: 3a4f23d1
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/07/2014) [-]
Are you ******* kidding me?
There are people alive today who's grandparents were gassed.

www.yadvashem.org/yv/en/remembrance/multimedia.asp#!prettyPhoto
Ok here is a list of a hell of a lot of testimonies. Watch all the videos, learn about all the horror before you even dare to think like that.
It's downright disgraceful you can say something like that frankly, and troll or not you should really rethink the things you say.
User avatar #47 to #38 - defeats
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(05/07/2014) [-]
I agree, but there are still people alive today who's brothers and sisters were gassed.
User avatar #156 to #38 - danmanjonesnz
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/07/2014) [-]
Gas chambers deaths are based on rumours. If it was true there would be physical evidence. Where are the photos of the gas chambers? The only gas chambers that exist are the ones the Soviets & US military built, or as they say, "reconstructed".

Forgive me if I don't trust people who heard from others who heard from others about what was going on on those forced labour camps.
#98 to #27 - onderdonk
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(05/07/2014) [-]
Comment Picture
#121 to #27 - crazyolitis
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(05/07/2014) [-]
#34 to #27 - curtisbentley
Reply +43 123456789123345869
(05/07/2014) [-]
If you're 24 years old and this stupid, I reckon you may as well just stop eating and expire now.
#60 to #34 - anon id: 888987ae
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/07/2014) [-]
"stop eating and expire now"
haha that's new
#66 to #34 - swagboii
-1 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
#162 to #66 - anon id: 4a28ed4c
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/07/2014) [-]
Wait, you mean both sides of the conflict committed atrocities? Holy smokes, Batman!

In all seriously, of course people on both sides did horrible things - it's war. It sucks. The point here is that the scale of Nazi atrocities was far and above anything else.
User avatar #235 to #162 - schnizel
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(05/08/2014) [-]
It goes the other way around anon.
User avatar #51 to #34 - johnstuartmill
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(05/07/2014) [-]
Correct me if I am wrong but those look like ovens/furnaces and not gas chambers.
User avatar #53 to #51 - curtisbentley
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(05/07/2014) [-]
What do you think they burned the bodies in?
User avatar #55 to #53 - johnstuartmill
Reply +5 123456789123345869
(05/07/2014) [-]
Agreed but he said gassed so I assume the picture was to prove him wrong.
User avatar #56 to #54 - johnstuartmill
Reply +4 123456789123345869
(05/07/2014) [-]
Crediblehulk.jpeg
User avatar #36 to #34 - danmanjonesnz
Reply -6 123456789123345869
(05/07/2014) [-]
what's that pic?
Is that some kind of attempt to prove gas chambers were used in a mass genocide?
User avatar #37 to #36 - curtisbentley
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(05/07/2014) [-]
Ugh.

And really? "Mass" genocide? Genocide is genocide, adding "mass" doesn't make it anymore of a hyperbole. You need schooling pal.
#40 to #37 - danmanjonesnz
0 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #42 to #37 - danmanjonesnz
Reply -5 123456789123345869
(05/07/2014) [-]
True the 'mass' was unnecessary. It doesn't change the point I made & is by no means proof that I need more 'schooling'. I realised the mistake after I typed it but it was too late.
User avatar #52 to #36 - johnstuartmill
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(05/07/2014) [-]
At least he brought up evidence of some kind.
User avatar #61 to #34 - schnizel
Reply -8 123456789123345869
(05/07/2014) [-]
That is not a picture of 6 million dead jews. I can only see 4 dead bodies decomposing.
#64 to #61 - curtisbentley
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(05/07/2014) [-]
Here you go buddy, only photo I could find with more than 2 million Jew casualties, you might have to look really hard though but they're definitely there.

This entire thread is questioning my tolerance on internet retards.
#79 to #64 - schnizel
Reply -2 123456789123345869
(05/07/2014) [-]
That is an air picture of a territory.
This is a report of all those who died within those camps.
I don't tolerate stupidity.
User avatar #178 to #79 - gammajk
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(05/07/2014) [-]
That's a red cross record, numbnuts. If you seriously can't understand why an international organization's inspections of secret extermination camps would have inaccurate numbers regarding the number of dead, then you are hopeless.
#179 to #178 - schnizel
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/07/2014) [-]
Yes, yes, people can't count dead bodies.
User avatar #182 to #179 - gammajk
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(05/07/2014) [-]
...I don't see what that has to do with anything. You really think the Nazis would just allow the red cross to see a mass grave or the methods they used to dispose of thousands of bodies?
Something you need to remember and would already know if you actually researched is that the ICRC explicity states that the German camps were used as extermination camps.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticism_of_Holocaust_denial#International_Committee_of_the_Red_Cross
#183 to #182 - schnizel
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(05/07/2014) [-]
1979
muh 60000000000
muh crocodile tears
User avatar #185 to #183 - gammajk
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(05/07/2014) [-]
...what the **** are you even talking about? Can you please actually address something I'm saying instead of just spamming memes and constantly jumping around to different points?

This is why nobody takes you ********* seriously, you are absolutely **** at debating anything.
User avatar #194 to #185 - schnizel
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/07/2014) [-]
Statistics relating to Jewish populations are not everywhere known in precise detail, approximations for various countries differing widely, and it is also unknown exactly how many Jews were deported and interned at any one time between the years 1939-1945. In general, however, what reliable statistics there are, especially those relating to emigration, are sufficient to show that not a fraction of six million Jews could have been exterminated. In the first place, this claim cannot remotely be upheld on examination of the European Jewish population figures. According to Chambers Encyclopaedia the total number of Jews living in pre-war Europe was 6,500,000. Quite clearly, this would mean that almost the entire number were exterminated. But the Baseler Nachrichten, a neutral Swiss publication employing available Jewish statistical data, establishes that between 1933 and 1945, 1,500,000 Jews emigrated to Britain, Sweden, Spain, Portugal, Australia, China, India, Palestine and the United Sutes. This is confirmed by the Jewish journalist Bruno Blau, who cites the same figure in the New York Jewish paper Aufbau, August 13th, 1948. Of these emigrants, approximately 400,000 came from Germany before September 1939. This is acknowledged by the World Jewish Congress in its publication Unity in Dispersion (p. 377), which states that: "The majority of the German Jews succeeded in leaving Germany before the war broke out."
User avatar #198 to #194 - schnizel
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/07/2014) [-]
In addition to the German Jews, 220,000 of the total 280,000 Austrian Jews had emigrated by September, 1939, while from March 1939 onwards the Institute for Jewish Emigration in Prague had secured the emigration of 260,000 Jews from former Czechoslovakia. In all, only 360,000 Jews remained in Germany, Austria and Czechoslovakia after September 1939. From Poland, an estimated 500,000 had emigrated prior to the outbreak of war. These figures mean that the number of Jewish emigrants from other European countries (France, the Netherlands, Italy, the countries of eastern Europe etc.) was approximately 120,000. This exodus of Jews before and during hostilities, therefore, reduces the number of Jews in Europe to approximately 5,000,000. In addition to these emigrants, we must also include the number of Jews who fled to the Soviet Union after 1939, and who were later evacuated beyond reach of the German invaders. It will be shown below that the majority of these, about 1,250,000, were migrants from Poland. But apart from Poland, Reitlinger admits that 300,000 other European Jews slipped into Soviet territory between 1939 and 1941. This brings the total of Jewish emigrants to the Soviet Union to about 1,550,000. In Colliers magazine, June 9th, 1945, Freiling Foster, writing of the Jews in Russia, explained that "2,200,000 have migrated to the Soviet Union since 1939 to escape from the Nazis," but our lower estimate is probably more accurate. Jewish migration to the Soviet Union, therefore, reduces the number of Jews within the sphere of German occupation to around 3-1/2 million, approximately 3,450,000. From these should be deducted those Jews living in neutral European countries who escaped the consequences of the war. According to the 1942 World Almanac (p. 594). the number of Jews living in Gibraltar, Britain, Portugal, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Ireland and Turkey was 413,128.
User avatar #200 to #198 - schnizel
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/07/2014) [-]
A figure, consequently, of around 3 million Jews in German- occupied Europe is as accurate as the available emigration statistics will allow. Approximately the same number, however, can be deduced in another way if we examine statistics for the Jewish populations remaining in countries occupied by the Reich. More than half of those Jews who migrated to the Soviet Union after 1939 came from Poland. It is frequently claimed that the war with Poland added some 3 million Jews to the German sphere of influence and that almost the whole of this Polish Jewish population was "exterminated". This is a major factual error. The 1931 Jewish population census for Poland put the number of Jews at 2,732,600 (Reitlinger, Die Endlösung, p. 36). Reitlinger states that at least 1,170,000 of these were in the Russian zone occupied in the autumn of 1939, about a million of whom were evacuated to the Urals and south Siberia after the German invasion of June 1941 (ibid. p. 50). As described above, an estimated 500,000 Jews had emigrated from Poland prior to the war. Moreover, the journalist Raymond Arthur Davis, who spent the war in the Soviet Union, observed that approximately 250,000 had already fled from German-occupied Poland to Russia between 1939 and 1941 and were to be encountered in every Soviet province (Odyssey through Hell, N.Y., 1946). Subtracting these figures from the population of 2,732,600, therefore, and allowing for the normal population increase, no more than 1,100,000 Polish Jews could have been under German rule at the end of 1939. (Gutachen des Instituts für Zeitgeschichte, Munich, 1956, p.80).
User avatar #201 to #200 - schnizel
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/07/2014) [-]
To this number we may add the 360,000 Jews remaining in Germany, Austria and former Czechoslovakia (Bohemia-Moravia and Slovakia) after the extensive emigration from those countries prior to the war described above. Of the 320,000 French Jews, the Public Prosecutor representing that part of the indictment relating to France at the Nuremberg Trials, stated that 120,000 Jews were deported, though. Reitlinger estimates only about 50,000. Thus the total number of Jews under Nazi rule remains below two million. Deportations from the Scandinavian countries were few, and from Bulgaria none at all. When the Jewish populations of Holland (140,000), Belgium (40,000), Italy (50,000), Yugoslavia (55,000), Hungary (380,000) and Roumania (725,000) are included, the figure does not much exceed 3 million. This excess is due to the fact that the latter figures are pre-war estimates unaffected by emigration, which from these countries accounted for about 120,000 (see above). This cross-checking, therefore, confirms the estimate of approximately 3 million European Jews under German occupation.

#168 to #79 - gisuar
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/07/2014) [-]
beurkundete sterbefälle
User avatar #169 to #168 - schnizel
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(05/07/2014) [-]
Yes.
#172 to #169 - gisuar
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/07/2014) [-]
confirmed deaths
we germans might be correct/accurate but i'm pretty sure that there were at least some people dying without anyone writing it down in any kind of file
User avatar #173 to #172 - schnizel
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(05/07/2014) [-]
I doubt, Germans kept a clean record of anyone they shot.
A there might be a few mistakes here and there but the whole 6 gorrilion myth was created long before the war and supported by a german officer who had no clue what was going on in the camps and said that 3 million people died in the camps and 3 million somewhere else.
#216 to #173 - gisuar
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/07/2014) [-]
are you able to read german?
de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opferzahlen_der_Konzentrationslager_Auschwitz

Nach jeder größeren Aktion mussten in Auschwitz alle Unterlagen, die Aufschluss über die Zahl der Vernichteten geben konnten, laut RFSS-Befehl verbrannt werden.

quote from rudolf höß saying that after every bigger "project" they had to destroy any kind of document that could have given a hint of how many were killed on the other hand he's stating that it seems overexaggerated since even auschwitz had it's limits

in this article the estimated number of deaths is something around 500.000 depending on the source
User avatar #217 to #216 - schnizel
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/07/2014) [-]
It's nowhere close to the 6 million.
#225 to #217 - gisuar
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/07/2014) [-]
never said that but 280.000 is a joke germans are way more productive than that
oh and i forgot those 500.000 are for auschwitz alone so it might be something around 1million +/-200.000 for all of the camps combined but thats camps only there i'm pretty sure quite a few died outside of them somewhere between russia and the spanish coast
User avatar #230 to #225 - schnizel
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/07/2014) [-]
#223
#228 to #225 - gisuar
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/07/2014) [-]
okay ****** it up it says after the first few lines there were aprox. 1.1-1.5 mio deaths in auschwitz (never said jews only "just" the majority)
User avatar #180 to #173 - gammajk
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(05/07/2014) [-]
>the whole 6 gorrilion myth was created long before the war
Nope. You're referring to the "LOOK AT ALL THE NEWSPAPERS THAT SAY 6 MILLION JEWS". Those are cherrypicked examples. There are countless newspapers that have been collected that reference anywhere from 1 million to 10 million jews and you can easily find a compilation of those if you, you know, actually researched your own ******** instead of relying on /pol/'s honour system of "trust me i'm not being disingenuous"
User avatar #181 to #180 - schnizel
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(05/07/2014) [-]
> Those are cherrypicked examples.
Nope. They would be if I left something out.
>1 million to 10 million jews
TOP KEK
Indisputable evidence is also provided by the post-war world Jewish population statistics. The World Almanac of 1938 gives the number of Jews in the world as 16,588,259. But after the war, the New York Times, February 22nd, 1948 placed the number of Jews in the world at a minimum of 15,600,000 and a maximum of 18,700,000. Quite obviously, these figures make it impossible for the number of Jewish war-time casualties to be measured in anything but thousands. 15-1/2 million in 1938 minus the alleged six million leaves nine million; the New York Times figures would mean, therefore, that the world's Jews produced seven million births, almost doubling their numbers, in the space of ten years. This is patently ridiculous.
#190 to #181 - konradkurze
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(05/07/2014) [-]
and now we know
User avatar #189 to #181 - gammajk
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/07/2014) [-]
User avatar #184 to #181 - gammajk
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/07/2014) [-]
Jesus ******* christ, you're REALLY bad at this.
>Nope. They would be if I left something out.
You did. You left out all the newspapers that cite figures of numbers of jews that aren't 6 million. You are only looking at the newspapers that say 6 million and pretending that that means something. It doesn't. It's completely meaningless.
>top kek
Oh good, we're just going to turn this into a ******* meme contest. Great.
Those numbers are blatantly false.
www.ushmm.org/wlc/en/article.php?ModuleId=10005161
www.ushmm.org/wlc/en/article.php?ModuleId=10005687
Did it ever cross your mind that the New York Times' figures might be wrong?
#191 to #184 - schnizel
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/07/2014) [-]
>You did. You left out all the newspapers that cite figures of numbers of jews that aren't 6 million. You are only looking at the newspapers that say 6 million and pretending that that means something. It doesn't. It's completely meaningless.
It was the ammount of the times it happened over again and the number of jewish propaganda that was in it.
>Holocaust Encyclopedia
TOP ******* KEK m8
you brainwashed german
User avatar #195 to #191 - gammajk
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/07/2014) [-]
>It was the ammount of the times it happened over again and the number of jewish propaganda that was in it.
Like, what, maybe 10? What about all the times they cited numbers of x million jews that WEREN'T 6?
>jewish propaganda
Yeah ok

>ad hominem
Yeah, no, don't look at where they cite their sources or anything! Don't do any research of your own! Just listen to /pol/ and don't think for yourself! It's not like you can find these figures elsewhere!

Jesus ******* christ
User avatar #207 to #195 - schnizel
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/07/2014) [-]
Also
>HOLOCAUST MUSEUM
User avatar #209 to #207 - gammajk
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/07/2014) [-]
THE SAME FIGURES CAN BE FOUND ELSEWHERE. DO SOME ******* RESEARCH YOU BRAINLESS ******* SHEEP
User avatar #215 to #209 - schnizel
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/07/2014) [-]
>calls me a sheep
>believes in the yolocaust of 600000000000000000000000000000000
User avatar #221 to #215 - gammajk
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/07/2014) [-]
The holocaust has actual facts to back it up. You do not. All you have are stupid ******* memes, ****** argumentation and a lot of factually incorrect pictures and infographics, and the ability to literally ignore everything I say here that refutes it and just go spam the same ******** everywhere else, which is exactly what you're going to do.
#223 to #221 - schnizel
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/07/2014) [-]
#194 to #201
Read it pig.
User avatar #227 to #223 - gammajk
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/07/2014) [-]
...I already refuted that ******** image. Scroll down, numbnuts. Are you capable of reading?

I'm done here. You're hopeless. You don't care about the truth.
User avatar #229 to #227 - schnizel
0 123456789123345869
(05/07/2014) [-]
No, you think you did, your claims are retarded and follow no evidence and most of all they are from jews.
get rekt by the truth turk
User avatar #210 to #209 - schnizel
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/07/2014) [-]
Oy vey, another yolocaust.
User avatar #196 to #195 - schnizel
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/07/2014) [-]
Ok kike.
User avatar #203 to #196 - gammajk
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/07/2014) [-]
>can't refute it? just call him a kike
This isn't /pol/.
User avatar #206 to #203 - schnizel
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/07/2014) [-]
Look up.
User avatar #208 to #206 - gammajk
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/07/2014) [-]
....what.
So, just like on /pol/, you're going to dodge everything I've said, refute nothing, assert ******** that can be easily disproven, and when all else fails, just resort to "you're a kike/your sources are kikes, therefore I win".
#211 to #208 - schnizel
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/07/2014) [-]
#201 and up
#218 to #211 - gammajk
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/07/2014) [-]
>#1: the leuchter report

.....seriously? You're hopeless. I'm not even going to bother going through all of them because YOU WON'T LISTEN. You don't give a **** about facts. You don't give a **** about the truth. All you want is to be a ******* edgy faggot that's such a LE EPIC TROLL ROFLMFAO KIKE KIKE HAHAHAHAHA. It doesn't matter what I say here, it doesn't matter what anyone else says, you're hopeless. Kill yourself.
#233 to #218 - gisuar
0 123456789123345869
(05/07/2014) [-]
to be honest you aren't acting that much more mature either. i've never liked this guy and the stuff he's talking about is usually bullcrap but the estimated number of 6 million still seems to be something someone pulled out of their ass. my guess would be something around 2-3million people (camps only) overall (nonjews included) . btw it's funny how everyone is saying that 6 million jews (i'm pretty sure quite a few were just "in the way" without being jewish) were killed in the camps i'm sure there is enough space to shot them somewhere outside.
User avatar #222 to #218 - schnizel
0 123456789123345869
(05/07/2014) [-]
Nice cherry bro.
Go suck turkish cock you lefttard.
User avatar #101 to #79 - curtisbentley
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/07/2014) [-]
You missed the joke pal. I was hinting to the fact that many, many Jews died in Auschwitz and that the picture was taken at the time. i.e. If you looked "really close", as in, zoomed in; you would witness the horrors of the camp at the time. That was a follow-up of my point that it'd be difficult to shove 6 million dead jews into a photograph. (What schnizel was hinting at.)

TL;DR, you're a autistic faggot who doesn't understand humor and thinks I'm an idiot because I didn't go the factual route on a site named Funnyjunk.
User avatar #103 to #101 - schnizel
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(05/07/2014) [-]
Ok.
#83 to #79 - alfonshister
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/07/2014) [-]
This image is gonna be shared alot at least i hope so
User avatar #95 to #79 - newsmyrna
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(05/07/2014) [-]
Ok just for ***** and giggles if it's not true why doesn't Germany speak up about it and say differently. Why doesn't Bayar say that they didn't create zyklon-b to gas jews and other groups, why do so many people claim that it was real, and that they saw the camps.
#96 to #95 - schnizel
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/07/2014) [-]
History is written by the victorious one.
Please read this picture on the left to understand.
User avatar #99 to #96 - newsmyrna
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/07/2014) [-]
Listen man I'm not a jew my self, but my mother's side of the family is. I don't know where people get all these ideas about jews the ones I know are just regular people. The only jews that piss me off are the New Town JAPs from outside of NYC.
#104 to #99 - schnizel
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/07/2014) [-]
User avatar #112 to #104 - newsmyrna
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/07/2014) [-]
I'm going to be honest here half of the people mentioned in this list aren't even jews, and even if there was a one world government conspiracy I wouldn't be too worried about it. First off a one world government sounds like it would lead to a lot less war and may even lead to the death of nationalism, which in my opinion isn't a bad thing. Secondly if there plan is to start with the EU they are off to a terrible start what with it falling apart and with the biggest banking country of Europe not even wanting to be apart of the EU. Thirdly the won't let Turkey join no matter what the try to do so obviously they have standards that it would seem most countries around the world wouldn't meet. So the whole EU thing just doesn't seem to add up for me.
#118 to #112 - schnizel
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(05/07/2014) [-]
Also, they would wipe out more than 90% of the total population of Earth.
#116 to #112 - schnizel
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(05/07/2014) [-]
<Also
#115 to #112 - schnizel
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(05/07/2014) [-]
>First off a one world government sounds like it would lead to a lot less war and may even lead to the death of nationalism, which in my opinion isn't a bad thing.
Yes, a brown mass with no cultural identity would be good slaves to the jews.

Also, nationalism is nothing more than ethno-centrism and tribalism, it's in our nature.

The neurotransmitter oxytocin "makes people more co-operative, benevolent, loyal, generous and trusting of others. It is involved in the parent-child bond - new mothers and fathers have raised levels of oxytocin. Production also increases when people hug and when they have sex and, recent research suggests, when they receive psychological warmth." However, oxytocin has been alleged to "foster racism."
www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2011/jan/30/bright-ideas-oxytocin-hormone-racism
#84 to #79 - alfonshister
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(05/07/2014) [-]
Also, you might be liking this one.
User avatar #177 to #84 - gammajk
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/07/2014) [-]
---******** ALERT---
"We know it takes four hours from start to finish to operate a crematorium"
WRONG. That number comes from a MODERN crematory, in which you must fully clean it out, turn it on, let it get to the proper heat, place the body in, let it burn, turn it off, let it cool down, collect all the ashes and COMPLETELY CLEAN IT. Crematoria in the camps did not have to worry about cleaning it, collecting ashes, or repeatedly turning it on and off.
User avatar #186 to #177 - alfonshister
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/07/2014) [-]
You seem to be forgetting that i just uploaded somehting i found on the internet. If you dont agree with it, explain yourself, but dont turn into a raging downvoting monster. This has been uploaded, deal with it or dont use the Internet.
User avatar #188 to #186 - gammajk
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/07/2014) [-]
So why didn't you research it yourself?
At least make a goddamn attempt to pick apart your own arguments to see if they hold up.
User avatar #193 to #188 - alfonshister
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/07/2014) [-]
Imho opinion the argumentation does make sense.
User avatar #202 to #193 - gammajk
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/07/2014) [-]
It doesn't though. It's based on factually incorrect notions. The first being that every single body was burned, and the second being that it takes 4 hours to burn a body in an extermination camp. There's more in there that's just patently false but that's the two biggest ones.

Are you saying that my rebuttal is not sufficient?
User avatar #212 to #202 - alfonshister
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/07/2014) [-]
As long as i dont use my opinion in public discussions it doesnt matter. Also,by then i would be proven wrong. So well, nevermind. Im not in the mood to read through all the numbers. I simply remembered this post and re posted it.
User avatar #214 to #212 - gammajk
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/07/2014) [-]
Here's a pro-tip: don't assert things if you aren't prepared to back them up. Don't hold stupid opinions based on factually incorrect information that you haven't researched.
User avatar #219 to #214 - alfonshister
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/07/2014) [-]
K.
User avatar #85 to #84 - schnizel
Reply -2 123456789123345869
(05/07/2014) [-]
Thanks man.
#213 to #85 - alfonshister
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(05/07/2014) [-]
Moar.
User avatar #28 - MegaAwesomeSauce
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/07/2014) [-]
Posts like these make me wonder how the Nazi Regime didn't know they were the playing the cliche "Ridiculously evil" empire. I wonder how soldiers could do such things simply on orders
User avatar #88 to #28 - Draigor
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(05/07/2014) [-]
Take a history class on WW2. Maybe you'll learn something
#122 to #28 - fuckyosixtyminutes
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/07/2014) [-]
Yes, thumb this guy for wondering something, way to encourage that independent thought, ******* faggots.
#32 to #28 - LewdFlapjack
Reply +22 123456789123345869
(05/07/2014) [-]
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Milgram_experiment

The average person will do things they normally wouldn't when told to by a person with authority.
#57 to #32 - anon id: b0f8b25c
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/07/2014) [-]
I think it's partially that, and partially the fear of retribution. If they said no, the nazi regime would not hesitate to "deal with" them and their families. Even the higher-ups had to worry about that. Unless the vast majority revolted at the same time, they'd have almost no chance of coming out of that alive, and the torture/killing would still go on regardless, making their death, and their family's death, in vain.
User avatar #33 to #32 - decapitation
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/07/2014) [-]
awwwh yeah that reminds me of A level psychology.
#131 - GetOnMyHorse
Reply +20 123456789123345869
(05/07/2014) [-]
Blame the Nobel Prize committee, not Al Gore
User avatar #133 to #131 - itsmedumbass
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(05/07/2014) [-]
I don't think you'll get much rage. Your opinion is pretty solid.
#152 to #133 - bluelightbebop
Reply +5 123456789123345869
(05/07/2014) [-]
#1 - anon id: fbb00134
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/06/2014) [-]
Any wonder why more and more people are realizing that the Nobel selection and award process is a crock of excrement?
#4 to #1 - kez
Reply -9 123456789123345869
(05/07/2014) [-]
Not saying what she did wasnt incredible.

But Al gore made global warming mainstream, and global warming going tits up would kill millions compare to 2500
#41 to #4 - samoaspider
Reply +6 123456789123345869
(05/07/2014) [-]
your comment
your comment
User avatar #110 to #4 - satansferret
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/07/2014) [-]
Maybe in a few centuries once we've uploaded our brains to androids and live on another planet just because we don't need to breathe/eat.
#2 to #1 - kulamia
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(05/06/2014) [-]
I didn't realize it until Obama got one for "World Peace"(This is before he increased troop levels in Afghanistan and tried to keep us in Iraq, like that would have helped him anyways)
#3 to #1 - mayoroftownsville
Reply +16 123456789123345869
(05/07/2014) [-]
The Nobel Peace Prize is, but the scientific ones are significantly better of.
#126 to #3 - anon id: 18a8f2b4
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/07/2014) [-]
The Norweigans handles the peace prize..
#90 to #3 - wunderlichh
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/07/2014) [-]
Hitler was in 1939 nominated for the Nobel peace price
Hitler was in 1939 nominated for the Nobel peace price
#117 to #90 - turbodoosh
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(05/07/2014) [-]
i didn't realize they made finger scooters.

Love how he doesn't even have the coordination to keep his fingers on
#23 - economic
Reply +11 123456789123345869
(05/07/2014) [-]
Now the ******* are in our banks, media and buying off our politicians while sending our kids to the middle east to fight their wars.
The road to hell is paved with good intentions.
User avatar #80 to #23 - undeadwill
Reply -2 123456789123345869
(05/07/2014) [-]
Why are you called economic when you know nothing of economics?
User avatar #123 to #80 - awesomanium
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/07/2014) [-]
To be fair, he didn't really mention any economics other than the fact that they are "in our banks"
User avatar #159 to #123 - undeadwill
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/07/2014) [-]
Dude's on the politics board.
User avatar #160 to #159 - awesomanium
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/07/2014) [-]
Then bring it up over there?
Isn't really related to his comment.
User avatar #165 to #160 - undeadwill
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/07/2014) [-]
Because he wants to be taken serious as a nationalist socialist but all he ever does is bitch and bitch and bitch about "Dem jews are evil"

But never offers a solution that isn't a final one.(Aka holocaust v2) So when he does this **** nonstop it starts to rustle my jimmies.
#119 - phlem
Reply +10 123456789123345869
(05/07/2014) [-]
Comment Picture
User avatar #127 - thijsofbodom
Reply +9 123456789123345869
(05/07/2014) [-]
didn't Obama get one for being black?
User avatar #130 to #127 - genhawk
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/07/2014) [-]
you will all my internets
User avatar #139 to #127 - mrdeadman
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/07/2014) [-]
half black
#63 - Jakknife
Reply +7 123456789123345869
(05/07/2014) [-]
**Jakknife rolled image** Future Nobel Peace Prize winner
User avatar #111 to #63 - secretdestroyers
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/07/2014) [-]
I would....totally be okay with that, somehow.