Left wing parties in Europe.... No God no. Pedophilia Now Classified As A Sexual Orientation Comments ml american psychological association. APA, , Caitlin Myer Left wing parties in Europe No God no Pedophilia Now Classified As A Sexual Orientation Comments ml american psychological association APA Caitlin Myer
Login or register

Left wing parties in Europe...

Click to block a category:GamingPoliticsNewsComicsAnimeOther
Pedophilia Now Classified As A Sexual
Comments ml american psychological association. APA, , Caitlin Myers, Diagnostic and
Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, DSM ll, National, Paul Christiano, pedophilia, pedophilia ,
pedophilic disorder. sexual orientation
Hannah Malayan ' 25, 3313 : am. PDT
Staff Reporter
People can classify themselves as
heterosexual, homosexual, asexual,
met rose xaal. The re are endless
sexual orientations under the sun,
and now, pedophilia can be added to
the list.
In the fifth edition of the Diagnostic
and Stati. stirn. rrf" Mss. retal
of people, ttell, t .
Views: 4060 Submitted: 10/27/2013
Hide Comments
Leave a comment Refresh Comments (26)
Anonymous comments allowed.
#3 - teranin
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(10/27/2013) [-]
So, if I said "it's happening" would that be a fair assessment?

Because IT'S ******* HAPPENING.
User avatar #15 - dabronydude
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(10/28/2013) [-]
this changes nothing though.
User avatar #14 - mynameisgeorge
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(10/28/2013) [-]
******* called this

Of course, I assumed it would happen in about 50 years from now.

Whatever, just check your privilege pedophobes
User avatar #10 - piratecrew
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(10/27/2013) [-]
was this even a debate?!

it's an sexual oritentation to ****.KIDS. ... it's ******* disgusting and you should be disowned just by thinking of them that way but it's an orientation nonetheless...
User avatar #23 to #10 - pentol
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/28/2013) [-]
3 reasons why it is wrong to be attracted to kids, GO!

acting on your instincts is something else entirely.
#8 - anon id: 0656f924
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/27/2013) [-]
This no doubt has something to do with homosexuality aswell.

Both are an "unnatural" . However one we call sexual orientation, the other we call a mental illness. But the difference between these two is non-existent. The only difference is the object of the sexual deviation.

Someone probably made the link, and rather then relegating homosexuality as a disease right next to pedophilia they'd just move it the other way around.
#9 to #8 - furrysheaperd
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/27/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
#16 to #9 - sgtxrootbeer
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(10/28/2013) [-]
Now tell me... how is he stupid?
User avatar #17 to #16 - furrysheaperd
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/28/2013) [-]
he said being gay is unnatural and there's no deference between it and being a pedo and called it a disease
#18 to #17 - sgtxrootbeer
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(10/28/2013) [-]
Well if you look at the anatomy of the human body, then you realize they are "built" for 2 genders. not for 1, we are not hermaphrodites. therefore you are deviating from what are bodies are designed to do, and as a result something must be wrong.

Its like a boat. if the boat starts veering to the left for no reason there are 2 possibilites
1 it was designed to do that (no, it was designed to go straight)
2 somethings wrong

we are just forcing ourselves to believe that we are designed to veer left or go straight but not both

however, in the case of pedo; we think that veering right is a problem unlike veering to the left
User avatar #19 to #18 - furrysheaperd
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/28/2013) [-]
anatomy has nothing to do with it if two dudes or two chicks wanna love each other let them but if a guy or female there are female pedos wants to force a kid they are mentally ill
#20 to #19 - sgtxrootbeer
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/28/2013) [-]
here is what i said boiled down:
*if our bodies were designed for 2 genders then any deviation in the mind must be wrong
*this is no different then pedo because our bodies are designed for mature partners, not young ones.
its like the command center of a battleship operating as if it was on an aircraft carrier. it will make strategic decisions that would be a lot better suited for an AC, not a battleship.

If it is doing that, then something in it is definetly wrong. tell me why it isnt, i dare you.
User avatar #22 to #20 - DementedDoom
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/28/2013) [-]
You keep coming up with the *if our bodies were designed* thing; they weren't. Sorry, the argument is invalid.
Homosexuality is present in every known species of animal, so it can't be labeled unnatural. If it wasn't natural, then it literally wouldn't happen, especially in humans, as we too are just animals (over complicated ones, but animals nonetheless, as the definition of an animal also includes consuming another entity [through digestion] to sustain it's life)

Men have the prostate gland in their anus, there must be a reason it's been put there (if we were designed that is)

On the same topic, I consider pedophilia COMPARABLE to an orientation, as they can not change their own personal tastes. Now, personal tastes are one thing, but acting out on them is another matter.

Please stop the "created design" thing, because its obvious that it doesn't fit into the proper debate.
#26 to #22 - sgtxrootbeer
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/28/2013) [-]
1, Ok, i understand your logic. you are seeing the placement of the prostate gland a reason to support gays. however, think of this; if we could be gay, then why can i not get pregnant from anal? Why is there even a female gender?

2 tell me which animals are homosexual (with 2 genders, otherwise they are only hermaphrodites)

3, why does the "created design" thing not fit in? obviously we were designed, how else would we accomplish this level of over-complexity?
#27 to #26 - DementedDoom
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/29/2013) [-]
There are far more complex things going on in the universe, then just our self awareness. The reason men can't carry children through anal sex is obvious.
Just because A+B=C does NOT mean A+A or B+B is wrong.
Just because a penis fits in a vagina, and produces a baby doesn't mean that is the ONLY way.

The gene, that is identified as the "homosexual" gene is a complex gene. It doesn't strictly say "**** the same sex" no, it is more like "**** THAT OVER THERE, ITS MOVING." Now, this gene would most likely get passed down, for the opportunity to procreate would be pretty common. Occasionally the genetic code might get a little mixed, and lead to individuals who are only attracted to the same sex. Oh well, its a common situation, and it isn't dying out. For all you know, you probably are carrying these genes around as well.

The complexities that you are claiming come around through millions of years of trial an error. There is much more evidence supporting this than the design theory.
You say men and women are supposed to create children, correct? What about over population? What about parents that don't want children? We have orphans, because their parents died, and the children didn't have anybody to take them in. Now, these children could be raised by these same sex couples, in an understanding and healthy environment. Shooting a load, and then babies out of a vagina isn't all that entails in "making children" there is proper care, and nurture.
I've seen plenty of "normal" families **** their children up. Atleast in same sex couples, you KNOW they want that child, and are willing to do everything in their power to raise them properly. We are complex, and that is WHY i say we AREN'T created by some divine being, because so many paradoxes, and hypocrisies, prevent us from actually just being human.

God, "Don't have sex until you're married, but if you rape a woman before that, you must pay her father so many silver sheckels and then marry her."

No characters left.
#28 to #27 - sgtxrootbeer
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/29/2013) [-]
I'm getting tired of this, I'm not a persistent person. so I will say this

if a+b=c, then we can do a+a or b+b, however. if the only reason we do this addition is to create C, then a+a (providing it isn't 1/2 of C) or b+b is wrong because it produces something useless.

I will say that you are right about adoption, if you go through all the trouble to adopt then you must really want a child and will raise the hell outta it.

also, good post at least you looked at the science behind it.
User avatar #29 to #28 - DementedDoom
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/30/2013) [-]
I'll leave it at that. Sex isn't only for babies.
Glad we could at least come to a civil understanding, even if we still disagree.
User avatar #21 to #20 - furrysheaperd
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/28/2013) [-]
because of ******* emotions you can feel for the other person doesnt matter if a guys ass wasnt "designed " to take a dick it can take one and two girls can use sex toys they dont need a dick to have sex
#25 to #9 - anon id: 0656f924
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/28/2013) [-]
Homosexuality and Pedophilia. In both cases there was a mix up with the persons sexual development, causing the person to be sexually attracted to someone (or something) that nature didnt intent for.

One is harmless, the other very much isnt. But the underlying problem is the same. But to comfort people like you we changed how we viewed homosexuality. Because it was easier to convince people it was exactly like nature wanted it to be then to explain that it wasnt but not a big deal because it doesnt hurt anyone.

The line isnt drawn at "aslong as you are attracted to a legally consenting adult, its an orientation. Anything else, is a mental illness".
Neither are normal, neither are what nature had in mind. But we shouldnt ******** ourselves just because some people might feel offended. Instead, figure out the ones that are harmful and see what we can do to help these people or atleast prevent them from harming others. And the harmless ones you leave alone, if theyre happy.
#11 to #9 - economic [OP]
-1 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
#24 - fjlee
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/28/2013) [-]
uncle tommy is pleased
User avatar #13 - buttplugmaster
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/28/2013) [-]
including metrosexual has me questioning the legitimacy of the article.
#7 - anon id: 9aeb525f
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/27/2013) [-]
Well, OP didn't put a ******* link to the article, but from the first part of the bottom paragraph it seems like this is about some psychology institution, and not the government. This is just some academics are changing how they classify this mental condition, not a government changing any laws or somehow "legalizing pedophilia".
User avatar #2 - newsuperyoshi
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/27/2013) [-]
I'm a left wing, and this isn't something I'd vote for.
#4 to #2 - economic [OP]
0 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #12 to #4 - newsuperyoshi
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/27/2013) [-]
I'm well aware of how far right and left wings work.