Sorry for the huge wait, have a job and Fallout 4 now. Extra extra long post as apology. Happy Thanksgiving, post what you are thankful for in the comments.
The Fort Harrison Hotel is used by the Church of Scientology as an area in which to feed, train and house visiting practitioners.[4] It provides both accommodations and "course & auditing" rooms, for Scientologists studying at high levels of Scientology. The Fort Harrison is joined by a walkway bridge over South Fort Harrison Avenue to the Flag Building on the other side of the street.
The hotel also is used for the Rehabilitation Project Force (RPF), a program used to punish members of the Church of Scientology Sea Organization for "serious deviations." Members of the church in this institution are subject to prison like conditions, forced labor, and many more acts against human rights.[6] Hanna Whitefield's affidavit described the situation:
“Some of us slept on thin mattresses on the bare cement floor. Some had crude bunk beds. There was no place for clothes, so we lived out of suitcases and bags which were kept on bare floors. Some privacy was maintained by hanging sheets up between bunk beds and between floor mattresses. The women and men had separate bathrooms and toilets but they were small. We were not allowed to shower longer than 30 seconds. We had only to run through the shower and out the other end. There was no spare time for talk or relaxation. We awoke at 6:30 A.M. or earlier at times, did hard labor and heavy construction work and cleaning until late afternoon. After [a] quick shower and change of clothing, we had to audit each other and 'rehabilitate' ourselves until 10:30 P.M. or later each evening. There were no days off, four weeks a month. We ate our meals in the garage or at times in the dining rooms AFTER normal meals had ended. Our food consisted of leftovers from staff. On occasions which seemed like Christmas, we were able to prepare ourselves fresh meals if leftovers were insufficient.”[7]
In December 1926, daredevil Henry Roland scaled the building blindfolded.[8]
The Fort Harrison has been the site of at least three suspicious deaths since 1975, most notably the death of Lisa McPherson, who died on December 5, 1995, after spending 17 days in room 174[9] of the building.[10] The officially reported cause of death was a blood clot caused by dehydration and bedrest. This was later challenged in court.[11][12] In 1997, a church spokesman acknowledged that McPherson died at the Fort Harrison, rather than on the way to the hospital. The church later retracted its spokesman's statement.[13]
In February 1980, prior to McPherson’s death, a Scientologist named Josephus A. Havenith was found dead at the Fort Harrison. He was discovered in a bathtub filled with water hot enough to have burned his skin off. The officially reported cause of death was drowning, although the coroner noted that, when he was found, Havenith's head was not submerged.[14]
In August 1988 Scientologist Heribert Pfaff died of a seizure in the Fort Harrison Hotel. He had recently stopped taking his seizure medication in favor of a vitamin program.[14]
In 1997, Clearwater police received over 160 emergency calls from the Fort Harrison Hotel, but they were denied entry into the hotel by Scientology security.[14][15]
As my father always said: if you don't know what it's about, it's about money.
If no one has busted this mad circus yet, then someone, somewhere, is making enormous money off of it. No tricks, no catches, the more money it is about, the more human lives become insignificant.
I live in Clearwater, Fl - The Scientologists pay the Police chief for incidents like this; when the police respond, they call the chief and boom, he gets on dispatch and tells them leave premises. **** is happening in that hotel and no one knows what it is.
I don't think he paid for the cards, I think it's some sort of loyalty card system that you sign up for for free, and they check your birthday and give you a free drink.
The loyalty card system at Starbucks is done using gift cards. You could use any gift card and make it your loyalty card. However, I believe that it still has to be activated as a gift card at some point, and we couldn't do less than 5 dollars when I worked there. You might be able to use a card that has never had money on it though, not sure.
"Among" which implies there are other "most needed" items, which if I were to guess some other items also among the most needed would be underwear...and maybe gloves. Usually when I donate, I give things like old sweaters, jeans, jackets but old underwear I throw out because...that's nasty. Didn't even occur to me about socks.
If anything needs to be edited here, it is your original post because for ***** sake do you even know how to write a proper sentence structure? "Hurr durr but den if ppl become aware of dat fact den it won't be the most needed, and dat makes me angry *chimpanzee noises*"
Inb4: "oh I was too drunk/tired/mentally retarded when writing my original post"
Inb4: "English is not my native language"
Further more I forgot to add, a "most needed item" can in fact also be a "most donated item" depending on the circumstances. An example could be sweaters and jackets could be mostly donated (just an example I don't know the true stats on these items) may seem a bit useless during spring and summer but come winter time, homeless people will want to grab a jacket/sweater come fall and winter making those items "the most needed" for that circumstance and yet luckily "the most donated". Hope that clears your confusion if that was what you were implying.
im not doubting that, just the fact itself is a bit stupid
if everybody donated socks theyd no longer be the most needed item, it would be whatever is second least donated no?
The concern is what criteria is used in judging one answer over the other. Sincerity? Insight? Integration of complex implications? Being a sassy ************ ?
Like I said, it sounds like the kind of question you'd get asked if you wanted to get into an Oxbridge uni, which are asked in order to judge your evaluative skills and in general see how you think; they don't care about your answer, they care about how you got that answer, what your reasoning is -- your working.
Oxbridge form the two most prestigious universities in the UK and among the most prestigious in the world. They let people in after they answer questions very similar to these (one, for example, was "what is best about fish?"). Pornhub is not without precedent, and I am suggesting that the reasons behind their question is similar for the reasons behind Oxbridge's.
Then the reasoning can't just be "because we said so!" There is a criteria for it, even if they're going to admit that it's a full sham to make people think there's some criteria and they really just wanna give money out to who the **** ever.
The more I hear about Scientology, the more dangerous it sounds.
If they're receiving 911 calls from their gatherings, the FBI should force their way in guns drawn as they have for other dangerous cults.
If someone calls the police, you can't just refuse them entry, right? Interfering with police-officers responding to an emergency call is a crime, isn't it?
Clearwater is basically Scientology central, they pretty much own the chief of police.
Scientology has a nasty habit of destroying anyone who opposes them with hundreds of lawsuits (not ment to win, just to financially kill you), killing your pets, blackmail etc.
In Clearwater officials pretty much gave up.
You'd think that if they were THIS blatant about it, the clearwater chief of police would have immediately been fired and replaced with someone with no tolerance for their ******** .
Can't you fine people for filing frivolous lawsuit?
Well, to replace police chief only person having that authority is the mayor. Cretekos seemed to be ready to take them on in 2007 but suddenly backed off and stopped even mentioning them. Guess is, they found dirt on him and made him back off.
Only other way is to get Feds involved, but since Scientology is a business masquarading as a church, they start screaming Freedom of religion, whenever gov tries anything.
And since people calling for help are members of scientology...
Yeah.
You can. They don't care. They have money to burn, and destroying problems is more important.
www.xenu.net/ good site to read up on them. They have been trying to shut it down in legal and illegal ways since it opened.
Yeah but... If you fine them for frivolous lawsuits, and they have to pay for the lawsuit itself, then they're burning money from both ends. See if there's a way to make them pay your legal fees too, then it costs you nothing.
As for Feds...
You can cry about freedom of religion as much as you like, but if people are literally calling for help from inside this building, then they're clearly doing something illegal. Even if it's "merely" illegally detaining people. No religion has the right or freedom to do that. Thus, having the FBI kick their doors down and investigate the place is entirely legal.
If the local authorities are too corrupt or incompetent to do anything about it, then someone above the influence should deal with it.
I mean, for ***** sake, Germany of all places managed to give them the boot. Unless they personally have Obama's ear, there's no excuse for them getting away with this **** in america, not when they're clearly not hiding any of their illegal activities anymore.
I mean, random people on the internet know all about it, the evidence is our there. The idea that no legal effective action has been taken against them yet is absurd.
Its more complex than that.
In a local shelter where I used to help out they got asked for socks so often that even if they got three times as many socks as t-shirts (the most donated item) there would still not been enough.
Its actually better in California, its so warm here most of the year a lot of homeless goes barefoot or with flip flops a lot of the time. Still, demand outstrips the supply by a wide margin.