Home Funny Pictures YouTube Funny Videos Funny GIFs Text/Links Channels Search
Anonymous commenting is allowed
#6 - chords ONLINE (10/01/2013) [-]
rubiks cubes arent as hard to solve as people make out .
my record is 25 seconds i know its not the best but im happy with it .
and yes i do have proof
#18 to #6 - roobax (10/01/2013) [-]
12.6 second master race reporting in.
Although I average low 20's generally
#29 to #18 - chords ONLINE (10/01/2013) [-]
i average with 29 seconds .
do you use oll and pll ? or 2oll and 2pll?
#31 to #29 - roobax (10/01/2013) [-]
Full OLL and 2 look PLL, would learn full PLL but cba learning 56 or whatever odd algorithms.
#32 to #31 - chords ONLINE (10/01/2013) [-]
i think you have it the wrong way around . OLL has the **** ton of algorithms and PLL has 21
#33 to #32 - roobax (10/01/2013) [-]
Yes I just realised that, I do the other thing.

Also I recommend Dayan cubes, I have the Zhanchi. ****** fast and cuts corners incredibly easily
#34 to #33 - chords ONLINE (10/01/2013) [-]
yeah was thinking about getting one , at the moment i have an edisons cube since i didnt have much to spend .

but at the moment im doing the 5x5 + since everything from the 4x4's are the same
#42 to #34 - roobax (10/01/2013) [-]
I have a 5x5 and a 7x7 Vcube, I want to get one of those 11x11 ones I've seen on eBay but they cost around £100 (No idea what that is in USD) When the 7x7's pop they go bloody everywhere and can be a bitch to rebuild, I lost a single piece on my first one so I had to fork out for another one for the sake of one little bit.
#43 to #42 - chords ONLINE (10/01/2013) [-]
i only have a 3x3 4x4 and 5x5 and i cant even rebuild my 4x4 too many little pieces !
User avatar #11 to #6 - mrjbrown (10/01/2013) [-]
i dont think i can do mine faster than a few min. it sticks alot and it really slows me down
#12 to #11 - chords ONLINE (10/01/2013) [-]
take it apart and apply Vaseline
User avatar #15 to #12 - luthervonappledorf (10/01/2013) [-]
We still talkin' 'bout Rubiks Cubes here?
#16 to #15 - chords ONLINE (10/01/2013) [-]
yes , yes we are
#17 to #16 - luthervonappledorf (10/01/2013) [-]
Oh...    
   
Okay.
Oh...

Okay.
User avatar #13 to #12 - mrjbrown (10/01/2013) [-]
ill give that a shot thanks
#14 to #13 - chords ONLINE (10/01/2013) [-]
no problem ^_^
User avatar #9 to #6 - imakejewburgers (10/01/2013) [-]
I'm too lazy to learn anything beyond the basic 7 step method, I'm not sure if it has another name, but I've got it down to about 50 seconds to a minute which I'm happy with.
#10 to #9 - chords ONLINE (10/01/2013) [-]
yeah thats called the beginners method . its pretty good its simple but not flexible . though ive never really gone for the times and stuff i just got bored and had a rubik cube and the cycle continued
User avatar #7 to #6 - Milos (10/01/2013) [-]
I can do it in under 2 minutes. Never bothered to learn full Fridrich's Method, just f2l.
#8 to #7 - chords ONLINE (10/01/2013) [-]
i did that for a while . f2l with beginners method and i got 40 seconds max . and i didnt want to learn like 70 algorithms so i learns 2oll and 2pll
 Friends (0)