Keep Britain British. In the UK, ethnic minorities disproportionate source of crime and asocial behaviour: www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/crime/7856404/Police- Keep Britain British In the UK ethnic minorities disproportionate source of crime and asocial behaviour: www telegraph co uk/news/uknews/crime/7856404/Police-
Upload
Login or register

Keep Britain British

BRITAIN was Alwyn Bin:
a Minion:
...
+22
Views: 3523 Submitted: 06/19/2014
Hide Comments
Leave a comment Refresh Comments (137)
[ 137 comments ]
> hey anon, wanna give your opinion?
asd
User avatar #6 - decapitation
Reply +9 123456789123345869
(06/19/2014) [-]
Anyone that contributes to British society is British. End of.
User avatar #69 to #6 - konradkurze
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(06/20/2014) [-]
so exactly what do the apes from africa india and jamaica contribute?
crime? poverty? genetic contamination?

the arabs do contribute to the hard working middle and lower class but they act like the arab culture should snuff out the british culture
User avatar #76 to #69 - decapitation
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/20/2014) [-]
Who were out upfront strike force last night against Uruguay? Look through the Forbes rich list of the UK and tell me how many are English?

White people don't commit crime?
User avatar #78 to #76 - konradkurze
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(06/20/2014) [-]
white people commit crime, of course, but they dont do it as much as blacks and dont cry racism when they get caught

User avatar #111 to #78 - decapitation
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(06/20/2014) [-]
and the source www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/269399/Race-and-cjs-2012.pdf

have a read, looks like you have lots to learn
#110 to #78 - decapitation
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(06/20/2014) [-]
Documentation obtained from the Ministry of Justice says otherwise..
User avatar #137 to #110 - schnizel [OP]
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/23/2014) [-]
Compare the % of the population to the % of the crime.
Take America as an example:
[url deleted]
#7 to #6 - schnizel [OP]
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/19/2014) [-]
Everyone who contributes to the Roman society is Roman. End of.
User avatar #10 to #7 - decapitation
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/19/2014) [-]
Instead of using my example but replacing key words, explain what's wrong with what I said?
#12 to #10 - schnizel [OP]
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/19/2014) [-]
You can't change your haplogroup like that, a culture and land is tied to the people, not the outlander if he wishes to switch sides.
User avatar #13 to #12 - decapitation
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(06/19/2014) [-]
I was born in England to 'immigrant' parents. I went through the schooling system. I pay my taxes and national insurance.

Am I less British that someone with white skin? **** no lol
#19 to #13 - schnizel [OP]
Reply -2 123456789123345869
(06/19/2014) [-]
lOL
LOL NICE JOKE M8
YOU PAY TAXES, YOU MUST BE BRITISH
He must be Chinese?
User avatar #21 to #19 - decapitation
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/19/2014) [-]
haha mature! where are even from?
#24 to #21 - schnizel [OP]
Reply -2 123456789123345869
(06/19/2014) [-]
Oh look, another Swedish woman, does she look Swedish?
Bosnia son.
User avatar #27 to #24 - decapitation
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/19/2014) [-]
I literally have no idea where that even is. Maybe worry about your own country first?
User avatar #35 to #27 - testaburger
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/19/2014) [-]
Bosnia or Sweden?
User avatar #46 to #35 - decapitation
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/19/2014) [-]
bosnia
User avatar #28 to #27 - schnizel [OP]
Reply -2 123456789123345869
(06/19/2014) [-]
To each his own.
User avatar #29 to #28 - decapitation
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/19/2014) [-]
but I do hope you go far in the World Cup ;)
User avatar #34 to #29 - schnizel [OP]
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(06/19/2014) [-]
Thanks man.
User avatar #45 to #29 - schnizel [OP]
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(06/19/2014) [-]
I'm sorry for my rage, I like you hindus.
User avatar #47 to #45 - decapitation
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/19/2014) [-]
Never make assumptions
User avatar #48 to #47 - schnizel [OP]
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(06/19/2014) [-]
Why?
User avatar #49 to #48 - decapitation
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/19/2014) [-]
cos I have nothing to do with Hinduism
#51 to #49 - schnizel [OP]
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/19/2014) [-]
And you and I share blood.
User avatar #50 to #49 - schnizel [OP]
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/19/2014) [-]
They are your ancestors.
User avatar #52 to #50 - decapitation
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/19/2014) [-]
Aren't we all African?
User avatar #70 to #52 - konradkurze
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/20/2014) [-]
no, the first humans came from the middle east, and spread out from there through europe eurasia and over to the americas

what stayed in africa isnt human
User avatar #53 to #52 - schnizel [OP]
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/19/2014) [-]
Nope.
We aren't.
User avatar #54 to #53 - decapitation
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(06/19/2014) [-]
Hmm ok. I'm going to sleep now. Feel free to leave loads of information cos I do genuinely find this very interesting!
#55 to #54 - schnizel [OP]
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(06/19/2014) [-]
#58 to #54 - pjers
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/20/2014) [-]
He's wrong you know, we are from africa the thing he commented does not alter this, it just demonstrates the Neanderthal interbreeding that happened in europe.
#80 to #58 - schnizel [OP]
+1 123456789123345869
(06/20/2014) [-]
Actually, no.
My comment has proven otherwise.
We share no genetic conection with the blacks whatsoever.
Pic related, our haplogroups.
#5 - marvelboytwo
Reply +4 123456789123345869
(06/19/2014) [-]
So I don't count as British because my skin happens to be darker than yours? After All, i do have English Citizenship. I'm sorry to be born to Indian parents, IS THAT ******* BETTER!
User avatar #11 to #5 - schnizel [OP]
Reply -3 123456789123345869
(06/19/2014) [-]
No, you are an outlander. You just don't have darker skin, you are from another culture, another people. I would not care if Brits had purple skin and red haird, they are still British, you not so much.
#135 to #11 - marvelboytwo
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/23/2014) [-]
That is easily the most rascist thing I've heard this month. After all, I was born and brought up here, in this culture, in this country, and I can't be considered British?
User avatar #136 to #135 - schnizel [OP]
Reply -2 123456789123345869
(06/23/2014) [-]
Racism is a communist term used for racial dominance. This isn't the case. My message is ethno-centric and tribalis, corresponding with human nature.
You are as British as a Chinese man is Japanese.
You are like an adopted child, many people may see you as a child to your parents, and even like you, but you aren't really theirs and they aren't really yours.
#71 to #5 - konradkurze
0 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #72 to #5 - konradkurze
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/20/2014) [-]
bureaucracy versus ancestry

fill out as much paperwork as you like it doesnt backdate your bloodline to england
#75 - froggernaught
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(06/20/2014) [-]
i thought america was the multicultural society of immigrants
founded by white people

and stolen from native americans
User avatar #131 to #75 - Conquistador
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/22/2014) [-]
And then stolen again by Jews.
User avatar #56 - caffeinecommissar
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/19/2014) [-]
I was first writing this when I saw your post Schnizel, but had to leave the computer for half an hour, I can see now that you've actually said many of the same things. Posting it regardless.

I'm sorry Schnizel, but for once I disagree. England has a long history of two or more cultures occasionally meeting each other in England after having migrated there from other lands.

That being said "multiculturalism is the norm" is a terrible argument. Why?

Because when these cultures met - they clashed violently, and when the invading culture was victorious, it would establish itself as a ruling class over the pre-existing cultures. If the invading culture was not victorious, it would just sod back off to where ever it came from.

From the top of my head, haven't bothered to look it up, but if you want I can find sources:

First came the Romans and made England a part of the Roman Empire.
When the Romans left, in came the Jutes and Danes who forced "Danegeld" upon the local lords.
Then came the Angles from Angeln took over and became the Anglo, a word still used this day to denote England and English people.
Followed by the Saxons, thus Anglo-Saxon became a thing.
Then the Normans came in 1066 and in the Battle of Hastings defeated King Harold and the Normans were established as the ruling class over the Anglo-Saxon.
The Normans were eventually in a situation wherein they had to decide whenever they would return to Normandy and retain their landholdings there, or stay in England. Some stayed while others left.
The next couple of centuries were the Medieval ages, wherein no one was really successful in conquering England, but England was busy conquering each other and generally became the "United Kingdom" when the English conquered Wales, Ireland and the Scottish King James the VI inherited the English throne and became King James the I.

Again, England does have a mutli-cultural history of load of "immigrants" - but is a bloody history written in blood.
User avatar #83 to #56 - schnizel [OP]
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(06/20/2014) [-]
Hell, even my entire culture is a slavic pan arabic/turkish culture, but that does not mean that this land is not ours.
That that pisses me off. We ******* lost our illyrian language and culture.
User avatar #89 to #56 - schnizel [OP]
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(06/20/2014) [-]
How's Slovenia?
User avatar #91 to #89 - caffeinecommissar
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/20/2014) [-]
At the moment it is slightly raining with roars of thunder in the distance, but otherwise a nice country. It isn't the first time, but it is the last, I'll be here.

I've been really tempted to take a picture of a Slovenian flag and upload it on Funnyjunk with the caption "Go to the Balkans, they said. Find Schnizel, they said. Wrong country, Schnizel said."

But when it is not raining it is warm, really warm, like 'How do these people live here without killing each other' warm.
#92 to #91 - schnizel [OP]
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/20/2014) [-]
Schnizel is love, schnizel is life.
User avatar #97 to #92 - caffeinecommissar
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/20/2014) [-]
If Schnizel was a beverage you'd be coffee.
#99 to #97 - schnizel [OP]
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(06/20/2014) [-]
You have to be ******** me.
User avatar #100 to #99 - caffeinecommissar
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/20/2014) [-]
But... I like coffee.

Did coffee or I do anything to annoy you?
User avatar #101 to #100 - schnizel [OP]
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/20/2014) [-]
Lubs you <3
User avatar #102 to #101 - caffeinecommissar
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/20/2014) [-]
Uuuh, you'll lube me? Do you have protection?
User avatar #103 to #102 - schnizel [OP]
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/20/2014) [-]
I have my big aryan muscles.
#104 to #103 - caffeinecommissar
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/20/2014) [-]
Oh, I meant the other kind. Guns.

But then again who needs guns when you've got big Aryan muscles?
User avatar #105 to #104 - schnizel [OP]
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(06/20/2014) [-]
User avatar #81 to #56 - schnizel [OP]
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/20/2014) [-]
We Bosnians also have a bloody history, but that does not mean that this is not our land.
#90 to #56 - schnizel [OP]
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/20/2014) [-]
Forgot the picture.
#57 to #56 - pjers
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(06/20/2014) [-]
That's not exactly true, there are differences between immigration and invasion. and there have been innumerable cases of immigration where they neither '****** off' nor slotted themselves in at the top, their descendants can be identified by oddly spelt surnames and nothing else.
The immigrants arrive, the first generation do their best to integrate the second rebel against the first and overact (causing a second group to come, the hardliners) the third group just think of themselves as natives and are folded into the melange.
User avatar #59 to #57 - caffeinecommissar
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(06/20/2014) [-]
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historical_immigration_to_Great_Britain

"Modern humans first arrived in Great Britain during the Palaeolithic era, but until the arrival of the Romans (1st century BC) there was no historical record. With the fall of the Roman Empire, Anglo-Saxons (c. 5th century AD) and Vikings (8th century AD) migrated to Great Britain. In 1066, the Normans successfully took control of England and, in subsequent years, there was some migration from France. In the 19th century, immigration by people outside Europe began on a small scale as people arrived from the British colonies. This increased during the 20th century."
#60 to #59 - pjers
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(06/20/2014) [-]
Is that exhaustive? I doubt it. those figures in no way reflect ad hoc migration only mass migration.
User avatar #61 to #60 - caffeinecommissar
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/20/2014) [-]
We are talking about the Dark Ages here, peasants weren't simply "free" to travel around the world.

And if one were free to travel the world, the easiest way to do so then, would have been to sign up for on or more raiding parties or establishment of colonies in England. It is implausible that there weren't any violent clashes between them.

We are talking about a period of time where xenophobia was wide spread, any foreigners would be met with suspicion.

What you are trying to refer to is a group of people so ridiculously limited in size that their numbers at best would be a couple of hundred people over a few centuries.
#62 to #61 - pjers
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(06/20/2014) [-]
when the national population is less than 250'000 and the rate of social change is as slow as it was, then the migrant population is proportionally similar, especially since mobility was far higher than your estimate.

You are also forgetting the Celts whose civilisation covered Britain and indeed most of south west Europe with good trade and mobility, hell their main seminary was in Wales.
User avatar #63 to #62 - caffeinecommissar
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/20/2014) [-]
Oh, you mean Wales that England eventually easily conquered one village by one without any real resistance because they thought the people from the neighbouring villages were subhuman scum, so they didn't bother to try and warn them.

And those are some interesting population figures considering that the world population in year 1000 was between 254.000.000 Source: Jean-Noël Biraben, 1980, "An Essay Concerning Mankind's Evolution", Population, Selected Papers, Vol. 4, pp. 1–13. Original paper in French: (b) Jean-Noël Biraben, 1979, "Essai sur l'évolution du nombre des hommes", Population, Vol. 34 (no. 1), pp. 13–25. and 310.000.000 .Source: United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division.

Are you saying that 10% of the world population in year 1000 lived in England?
#64 to #63 - pjers
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(06/20/2014) [-]
you'll notice I said less than.

Yes genocide happens, it's sad but true, if it does that would be an example of invasion or civil war.
User avatar #65 to #64 - caffeinecommissar
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/20/2014) [-]
You're right, my mistake.

Also, it weren't even genocide. The English just pretty much walked in, built a castle in each village and started demanding money.
#66 to #65 - pjers
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(06/20/2014) [-]
Ah, invasion yes. That happened too (in Hereford you can claim 1 shilling for a Welshman's head) but you can't find the people who are descended from the welsh immigrants of the same era who moved east, like the longbow men & so forth, they were badly treated but aren't all immigrants treated badly?
User avatar #67 to #66 - caffeinecommissar
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/20/2014) [-]
"But aren't all immigrants treated badly?"

Not always. In the 17th century a huge group of Dutch people was allowed to immigrate to Denmark and settle on the island of Amager with the King's blessing.

But to stay on the current topic of Wales, in Diane M. Korngiebel's article "Forty acres and a mule: the mechanics of English settlement in North-east Wales after the Edwardian conquest" (Publishes in Haskins Society Journal in 2003) it is argued that the native Welsh people were being forced to leave their lands in order to allow English settlers to claim the areas.

Which is kind of the point I was making in the original post: Two different cultures meet and one begins to exterminate the other, the victor starts to allow their people benefits while the loser becomes the lower classes.
#68 to #67 - pjers
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(06/20/2014) [-]
So you think we need less xenophobia & more social mobility?
Culture is not like Civilisation it's plastic, the culture of today is quite different to that of 50 years ago, that's what does it folds new memes into it'self and discards old ones changing in the process. True culture clash comes from memes that are mutually exclusive like anti-intellectualism and technocracy. some meme groups can be thought of as predatory like the Mongols in the 13th century or even vegetative like 15th century Japan. Where cultures clash the stronger engulfs the weaker but not without being changed in some way, take the difference between Britain and the US, if the cultures are more or less equal in strength and they have reasons not to go to war then you get something between like the Ottomans and modern India.
#94 to #68 - caffeinecommissar
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(06/20/2014) [-]
That is an interesting picture, I wonder what happened to them, oh wait, we - white people - got pretty ******* close to exterminate them.

And you're diverging from the point, the point is not what defines a culture, but what happens when two cultures meet, and history consistently shows that when two or more cultures or civilisations meet.

Anyone can say "But civilisations change" and yes civilisations do change, one would have to be a fool to suggest otherwise. But it would be equally foolish to suggest that when two or more civilisations or cultures meet it isn't more likely to go violent than remaining peaceful. History suggests otherwise, and I can keep arguing this.

I don't like the "us>them" or "them>us" maxims, but look what happened in the Balkans in the 1990s and it will be clear that if we don't pay attention to what happens. Isolationism only works when you have the military might to back it up.

As you mentioned Japan in the 15th century, yes they isolated themselves for 200 years but as soon as a mightier power arrived - in the form of Commodore Perry and his US war ships - the country was forced to open to outside influence. Again, one mighty civilisation pushes their interest upon another civilisation.

The immigration to Europe at present day is arguably another case, and I'm not saying we should exclude all foreigners - merely that we should not be presuming that there won't be a problem. If people who move here are willing to co-exist peacefully and respectfully to one another, it won't be a problem, and we should allow so to happen.

But to say it is just the norm and not be even a bit cautious is in my opinion foolish, picture related.
#95 to #94 - pjers
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(06/20/2014) [-]
of course we should remain cautious, but the fact remains that immigration is not new and the vast majority of immigrants just want to buckle down and work, their kids go to native schools, speak the language like natives and play video games. Literally the only time I saw someone with one of those laughable behead those who insult islam signs he was being pursued by some bangra kids younger than me who were pretty ******* irate.

It's Schnitzel he pisses me off with the number of keep britain british ********, ************ is bosnian and I'd have thought that someone from the only country in europe to have had a frikking genocide in the last 40 years would have had enough of nationalism and racial profiling.
User avatar #96 to #95 - caffeinecommissar
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/20/2014) [-]
You know, I don't think I have anything to counter that since we agree that immigrants who are willing to adapt and "assimilate" (weird expression) are O.K in my book. It is the "kill all whiteys" that bothers me - if one said "kill all brownies" people would call them racist.

About Schnizel? He is a pretty cool guy once you get to know him, and he has the best intentions with his postings, he just wants people to take care - even if one does not agree with all of Schnizel's views. So we must hate him, because he can take it, a silent guardian a protector.

And while the genocide in the Balkans happened 20 years ago, if you speak with people down there, you'll see that there are still a lot of unresolved tension, I've spoken to many Ex-Yugoslavs (Slovenes, Croats, Bosnians and even a Serb) and they all agree that another is not implausible.
User avatar #98 to #95 - schnizel [OP]
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(06/20/2014) [-]
40% of muslims in UK want Sharia law, the rest just want sharia law for muslims.
I could make you my friend but if you want we can talk about it.
User avatar #82 to #59 - schnizel [OP]
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(06/20/2014) [-]
>Modern humans first arrived in Great Britain during the Palaeolithic era,
AKA natives.
User avatar #116 - acemcgunner
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(06/20/2014) [-]
k. what?
User avatar #93 - bestfoxgirl
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(06/20/2014) [-]
Remove kebab from Europe.

I'm glad that there are still some people who understand the importance of keeping European culture safe from devolution
User avatar #4 - testaburger
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(06/19/2014) [-]
Does the data include socioeconomic status?
User avatar #8 to #4 - schnizel [OP]
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/19/2014) [-]
What status?
User avatar #14 to #8 - testaburger
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/19/2014) [-]
How much money they have.
Where they live
What their income is

**** like that.
Immigrants tend to have a lower SocEc status, which would account for them being prone to crime.
I heard emphasis on heard that, in my country, a study was conducted into the SocEc status of immigrants, along with their crime rate, and it was shown to be equal to that of natives with the same SocEc status.
User avatar #16 to #14 - schnizel [OP]
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(06/19/2014) [-]
Being poor is no excuse to rape, kill and destroy property.
User avatar #18 to #16 - testaburger
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/19/2014) [-]
Of course not.
But it might help explain it
User avatar #26 to #14 - schnizel [OP]
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/19/2014) [-]
Also, the Chinese are poor as **** and work their ass of day and night, what aren't they as bad as the *******?
User avatar #32 to #26 - testaburger
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(06/19/2014) [-]
"work their ass of day and night"
I think you answered your own question
User avatar #73 to #32 - konradkurze
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/20/2014) [-]
hell
just using the word 'work' makes the difference between blacks and asians
User avatar #36 to #32 - schnizel [OP]
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/19/2014) [-]
They make work and don't live off welfare and blame whity.
They sound good to me.
User avatar #37 to #36 - testaburger
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/19/2014) [-]
>_>
I'm not disagreeing
#38 to #37 - schnizel [OP]
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/19/2014) [-]
User avatar #41 to #38 - testaburger
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/19/2014) [-]
I'm not gonna read all that.
What's the tldr?
User avatar #42 to #41 - schnizel [OP]
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/19/2014) [-]
Just scroll down a bit.
User avatar #43 to #42 - testaburger
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/19/2014) [-]
To which part?
User avatar #15 to #14 - testaburger
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/19/2014) [-]
tldr
The ******* might be more prone to crime, but not because they're black, but because they're poor. which might be because they're black
#20 to #15 - schnizel [OP]
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/19/2014) [-]
Actually, no.
User avatar #23 to #20 - testaburger
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/19/2014) [-]
So do you have an explanation as to why this is?
User avatar #25 to #23 - schnizel [OP]
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/19/2014) [-]
Link in description below.
User avatar #123 to #25 - testaburger
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/21/2014) [-]
That does not in any way lead to "genetics is the cause"
Could be cultural.
User avatar #124 to #123 - schnizel [OP]
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/21/2014) [-]
Considering that blacks, either christian, or muslim, or do they have an african culture show similar acts of violence.
And they out of all races hold the "most warrior genes" which are liked to violent behaviour.
User avatar #125 to #124 - testaburger
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/21/2014) [-]
How do you know this isn't a cultural thing?

"And they out of all races hold the "most warrior genes" which are liked to violent behaviour."
Source?
User avatar #126 to #125 - schnizel [OP]
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/21/2014) [-]
>How do you know this isn't a cultural thing? Just because he has a cross or a wodoo doll on his neck won't change the fact that no matter where or what culture he has been primitive and savage.
See #124 again.
You will get the source when I find it.
User avatar #127 to #126 - testaburger
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/21/2014) [-]
So what about violent whites? Is that genetic too?
User avatar #130 to #127 - schnizel [OP]
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/21/2014) [-]
Yep.
User avatar #128 to #127 - schnizel [OP]
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/21/2014) [-]
You need to login to view this link
They are more controlable of their behaviour but violence is a part of us all.
User avatar #129 to #128 - testaburger
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/21/2014) [-]
This isn't very convincing
User avatar #30 to #25 - testaburger
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/19/2014) [-]
I'm not gonna read through a hundred pages.
Can't you just tell me?
User avatar #31 to #30 - schnizel [OP]
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/19/2014) [-]
The tl;dr is in the buble.
User avatar #33 to #31 - testaburger
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/19/2014) [-]
Which bubble?
User avatar #39 to #33 - schnizel [OP]
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/19/2014) [-]
Right one.
User avatar #40 to #39 - testaburger
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/19/2014) [-]
It tells me nothing about why
It just tells me that it is
User avatar #44 to #40 - schnizel [OP]
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/19/2014) [-]
******* are justing going to ****. Their ancestors have been nothing but raiders and slave owners, they are just continuing the tradition.
User avatar #77 to #44 - testaburger
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/20/2014) [-]
So you think it's cultural?
User avatar #79 to #77 - schnizel [OP]
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/20/2014) [-]
It's in their blood.
User avatar #117 to #79 - testaburger
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/20/2014) [-]
So it's genetic?
User avatar #118 to #117 - schnizel [OP]
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/21/2014) [-]
Yep.
User avatar #119 to #118 - testaburger
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/21/2014) [-]
Do you have any evidence of this?
User avatar #120 to #119 - schnizel [OP]
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/21/2014) [-]
The resoults.
User avatar #121 to #120 - testaburger
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/21/2014) [-]
Of what?
#122 to #121 - schnizel [OP]
0 123456789123345869
(06/21/2014) [-]
Of their primitive way of life on how savage they are.
Or in the leatest case see the countries of Haiti or even South African on how primitive and backwards they are.
Or just see their crime rates:
www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/htus8008.pdf
Their excuse for crime is ******** because when Bosnians, who are considered to be European ******* came to St. Louis, kicked the ******* out of what are know to be the ghettos and made them into normal places to live and opened businesses everywhere.
User avatar #84 to #79 - tkfourtwoone
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/20/2014) [-]
Then it's in your Bosnian blood to be so ******* beta and/or retarded.

OK, at least we can understand that
User avatar #85 to #84 - schnizel [OP]
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/20/2014) [-]
My great great grandma was an Austrian noble.
I am neither beta nor retarded.
I am an Aryan noble.
User avatar #86 to #85 - tkfourtwoone
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/20/2014) [-]
And my family is a line of long-distant descendants of Charlemagne.

Prove me wrong, bitch!
User avatar #88 to #86 - schnizel [OP]
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/20/2014) [-]
Charlemagne is also taken as the father of christian Europe, from what I hear he was a great man.
User avatar #87 to #86 - schnizel [OP]
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/20/2014) [-]
I can't right now.
You will need to take out your blood and test it at least 3 times giving you the cost of a minimum of 200$.
#22 to #20 - testaburger
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/19/2014) [-]
WELL THEN
User avatar #17 to #15 - testaburger
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/19/2014) [-]
I did not see this survey myself, but the person who told me was a university professor
#108 - anon id: ecd57fd9
0 123456789123345869
Comment deleted by schnizel [-]
#2 - anon id: eb611552
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/19/2014) [-]
What about the Romans, the Saxons, Angles, Jutes, the Danes and the French?

All of them at least influenced the English language by quite a bit.
User avatar #9 to #2 - schnizel [OP]
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/19/2014) [-]
Romans came to conquer Britan.
So did the Saxons.
Anglos.
Danes and the French.
They may have "influenced" Britan but the fact remains that Britan is British.
User avatar #74 to #2 - konradkurze
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/20/2014) [-]
actually they all had some input into english but it wasnt till the french invaded england that the official english language was written by french magistrates to be a language of legalese
#1 - crazyolitis
0 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
[ 137 comments ]
Leave a comment