Can somebody give me YT sauce? This reminds me of back when I played RollerCoaster Tycoon - I got this super angry guy (like steam coming out of his hears, red and his face melting off angry) but unlike normally in that game, he never stopped being angry. They're supposed to be relatively rare to get created by something to make them angry in your park, but are much rarer to find or have stick around because they stop being angry once they vandalize something and also generally just want to leave if they've gotten angry.
But as a kid, I never used park benches or stuff that could be vandalized. And since apparenlty the anger emotion is separate from the happy/sad slider, he just went around my park for years screaming things like
"THIS PARK IS SO CLEAN AND TIDY!!!"
"THUNDERBOLT WAS AMAZING!!!"
i don't like viners or most famous actors from vine because the majority of their videos are just the video equivalent of briefly famous pop songs that get overplayed and are over done.
with FJ there's a difference between reposting good content that is funny and reposting other people's recently popular posts. i feel like most viners are just the FJ equivalent of all the users that only repost things that are popular in the last 24 hours not even before the original post is down.
The guy is Jimmy Tatro, I don't know if he does vine videos but he's a pretty big youtuber. He has some pretty funny videos and he was in 22 jump street too
I agree mostly, but that is not a vine, nor are the actors famous because of their vine videos.
The Guy did Youtube videos way before vine, mostly college related sketches. quite entertaining.
The Girl.. no Idea actually. Her jawline frightens me.
and thats fine. i don't think anyone should think its not funny because i don't think its funny. i was just saying my opinion hence the unpopular meme.
Vine isn't evil, it is possible to make a funny original vine, even though most of them aren't. And making a vine shouldn't ruin a content creator's reputation. It feels akin to saying you shouldn't listen to Adam Lambert because he's gay.
You did get the unpopular opinion puffin right though... This may be one of the only times I've seen it used properly. Kudos for that.
i didn't say it was evil. and i don't think it's impossible for vine not to be funny because i will admit there probably has been content from vine i have laughed at without realizing it was from vine.
I never went on a long distance flight with a gf but I don't understand why people make such a fuss about it.
As long as there's not a long queue to the bathrooms you just go in, have a good time and leave.
It's not like it's illegal or something...?
My point is: If you spread your germs in the bathroom when having sex, you would probably be spreading those by using the restroom in the intended manner.
Depends on how and what exactly you're doing tho
Funny story. I was in high school and I forget what exactly I said (I think it involved the word "crap), but someone thought I said something like "I got crabs". I was like "wait, how exactly would I have gotten crabs if I haven't banged anyone?" (I wasn't really ashamed of my virginity) Now, imagine a big dude who was on the football team saying, "Someone could have done the nasty on a toilet seat and you could have sat in it." I gave him this really confused look and he started singing "You sat in the nasty." I couldn't help but laugh at that point.
Because variance in humor and entertainment is what is going to destroy our culture. Not actual harmful issues, but the fact that that other people think different things are funny.
I'm sorry, I had completely forgotten that the quality of humor is in NO WAY WHATSOEVER capable of being objectively assessed. Humor = 100% subjective.
Also, I had forgotten too this means that one's preference in humor cannot give any insight as to one's intelligence or sophistication (like a child finding poop jokes funny vs a forty year old man who enjoys political satire) or cultural sensibility.
And, most of all, I am sorry that I extended my proposition into the societal spectrum, thereby implying the unthinkable concept of a cultural mindset comprised of, and affecting, the individuals within.
Humor is what you find to be funny. If it isn't funny to you, you don't find it to be humorous. There is no set meaning of what is funny or what is not, so yes humor is subjective. There is no rule book that says if it doesn't follow these guidelines and have these parameters, it cannot be funny.
One's preference to humor can be used to see their intellect, as there are jokes that some of differing intellect levels find funny or not because of the understanding of the joke's elements, but it is no way some set method of determining anything worthwhile. Because someone found a poop joke to be funny, what does that change about them in their intellectual or societal standing or sensibility? Nothing, except how you feel about that person. If you enjoy political satire, does that make you more sophisticated than the next person? No, it just means you understood the joke and found it funny, because the joke could easily be found to be unfunny by another person who understood the joke. If you found out the smartest person alive today enjoyed a video of a monkey slinging his feces at something, it means nothing at all except that he finds that particular thing funny.
And who cares if you have an entire culture of people who find poop jokes funny? We are creatures of higher thought, we have the ability of being able to indulge ourselves in seemingly childish or sophomoric humor (which would only be regarded in such negative ways by people with different tastes) and still be able to run things smoothly while we go home and giggle at cat videos.
Oh, and by the way, mister retard: you don't need a rule book for something to be true.
There is no rule book behind cognition or emotions or social behavior, yet all these have their reasons which can be explained (evolutionary and current (as in ultimate and instrumental)).
There certainly are "laws of humor" and not knowing them is not a good reason to go around shouting that they don't exist.
Your comments are the proof that our society does not punish stupidity thoroughly enough.
I was telling people how to act. Ordering them around. All of that most likely so I could feel superior when I play with my tiny carrot friend in my bathtub tonight.
What I wasn't doing in any way was voicing an opinion and offering some insight into the state of our culture's humor.
Of course, one might say my insight is oversimplified and unclear--simplistic, even! But, judging by your comment, that wouldn't be too much of a problem for you.
Do you even read your own comments?
or do you believe irony is only possible when you employ it? Either way, give up the game mate. This one's over, move on to the next.