Upload
Login or register
x

Comments(363):

Leave a comment Refresh Comments Show GIFs
123>
[ 363 comments ]
Top Rated Controversial Best Lowest Rated Newest
Anonymous comments allowed.
293 comments displayed.
Reply
+847
User avatar #11 - skateboardingdog ONLINE (11/15/2015) [-]
Looks like jim murray is about to have an "accident"
Reply
-114
User avatar #142 to #11 - kaiserdjg (11/15/2015) [-]
******* A LOL
Reply
+63
User avatar #182 to #142 - billyblooper (11/15/2015) [-]
Go back to Tumblr
Reply
-68
User avatar #231 to #182 - kaiserdjg (11/15/2015) [-]
? wat
Reply
+17
User avatar #275 to #142 - platinumaltaria (11/15/2015) [-]
Are you gonna eat all those red thumbs?
Reply
-18
User avatar #301 to #275 - kaiserdjg (11/15/2015) [-]
STILL DONT GET IT, ITS NOW JUST ABANDWAGON OF HATE LOL FUNNYJUNK IS A STRANGE PLACE WHERE IDIOTS DECIDE TO PAT EACH OTHER ON THE BACK FOR BEING IDIOTS LOL
Reply
+5
User avatar #308 to #301 - elsenortamatoe ONLINE (11/15/2015) [-]
What the **** is wrong with you? Say a sentence without caps, random ****** punctuation, or an intelligent thought.
Reply
-12
User avatar #315 to #308 - kaiserdjg (11/15/2015) [-]
NO I WILL NOT £%$"%£$%"&%
Reply
+2
User avatar #316 to #315 - elsenortamatoe ONLINE (11/15/2015) [-]
Its just obnoxious for the sake of being obnoxious. Please refrain from doing it
Reply
-10
User avatar #317 to #316 - kaiserdjg (11/15/2015) [-]
NEVER

dont say things like that they will catch on
Reply
0
User avatar #321 to #317 - elsenortamatoe ONLINE (11/15/2015) [-]
Common sense and basic human interaction have "caught on" for generations.
Reply
-11
User avatar #322 to #321 - kaiserdjg (11/15/2015) [-]
obviously funnyjunk is full of morons with a shared iq of 12 then
Reply
-2
#313 to #301 - sandmantaxman (11/15/2015) [-]
That sounds like something platinumaltaria would say.

Probably his alt.
Reply
-4
User avatar #304 to #301 - platinumaltaria (11/15/2015) [-]
The thirst is strong with this one.
Reply
-55
User avatar #232 to #142 - kaiserdjg (11/15/2015) [-]
wat tha fuk lol whats with the red surge lol
Reply
+17
User avatar #235 to #232 - conisnon (11/15/2015) [-]
Yeah, those types of comments aren't exactly top-par on this website. Don't worry, I posted the same types of comments when I was new, too.
Reply
-54
User avatar #236 to #235 - kaiserdjg (11/15/2015) [-]
i dont get it, its just agreeing with op, funny junk is full or retards
Reply
+18
User avatar #237 to #236 - conisnon (11/15/2015) [-]
Hey, man, I don't write the rules of the internet.
Reply
-46
User avatar #238 to #237 - kaiserdjg (11/15/2015) [-]
thing is im not new to this website and ive seen tons of people post things like that.... and wtf does it have to do with tumbler
Reply
-44
User avatar #239 to #238 - kaiserdjg (11/15/2015) [-]
im generally confused
Reply
+17
User avatar #267 to #239 - feffog (11/15/2015) [-]
normie get out REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
Reply
+2
#305 to #239 - anon (11/15/2015) [-]
You mean genuinely rather than generally. Though generally is probably accurate too.
Reply
+33
User avatar #240 to #236 - shenro (11/15/2015) [-]
a newfag saying FJ is full of retards, that's a good one.
Reply
+6
User avatar #306 to #240 - thegrohltroll (11/15/2015) [-]
aight, hear it from me: fj is full of retards
Reply
0
User avatar #319 to #240 - darksideofthebeast (11/15/2015) [-]
Been here since early 2000's, only made an account 2 years ago.
FJ Is full of retards.
Reply
-54
User avatar #241 to #240 - kaiserdjg (11/15/2015) [-]
new fag...been lurking 3 years...yep your retarded
Reply
-59
User avatar #242 to #240 - kaiserdjg (11/15/2015) [-]
also a higher rank than you .....
Reply
+29
User avatar #243 to #242 - shenro (11/15/2015) [-]
what does that have to do with anything? this ain't a dick measuring contest m8.
Reply
-52
User avatar #244 to #243 - kaiserdjg (11/15/2015) [-]
if fact all of funnyjunk is a dick measuring contest m8
Reply
-8
User avatar #299 to #265 - kaiserdjg (11/15/2015) [-]
NEVER
Reply
+1
User avatar #318 to #236 - darksideofthebeast (11/15/2015) [-]
Agreed.
Reply
-45
User avatar #233 to #232 - kaiserdjg (11/15/2015) [-]
has no one ever heard anyone say ******* A, as in agreeing with a statement before?
Reply
+22
User avatar #247 to #233 - angelusprimus (11/15/2015) [-]
No, lots of people say " ******* A!"
What they don't do is write it all in caps, don't use punctuation (common coma needs love too) and glue a LOL at the end.
Next time try writing actual " ******* A!" and see the difference.
Reply
-6
User avatar #314 to #247 - kaiserdjg (11/15/2015) [-]
no, ill write it however i like and other people should stop being ******* retards
Reply
+1
#340 to #314 - wimpymanatee (11/15/2015) [-]
>Wonders what's wrong with what he posted.
>Someone tries to explain what was wrong with it.
>" I'LL WRITE IT HOW I FEEL LIKE WRITING IT YOU GUYS ARE THE ******* RETARDS!!"
Reply
-3
User avatar #346 to #340 - kaiserdjg (11/15/2015) [-]
im sorry the following statement got 14 thumbs up ....how is mine any different

TESLA WILL TURN ANIME REAL!!!!!!11111111!!!!!1!1!1!!11
Reply
0
User avatar #359 to #346 - angelusprimus (11/19/2015) [-]
While it was written all in caps it didn't do few other things.
1: It didn't completely forgo punctuation. If anything it was way over enthusiastic with exclamation marks.
2: It didn't use any of the OMG, LOL, WTF crap.

So, basically, there are three no-noes. No punctuation, all caps, texting abbreviations.
Using of one of those per post is generally overlooked. Using two will probably get you a few red thumbs, using all three will be downvoted to oblivion unless some really special circumstances apply.
Reply
-1
User avatar #360 to #359 - kaiserdjg (11/19/2015) [-]
LOL WTF STFU LOL
Reply
+1
User avatar #361 to #360 - angelusprimus (11/19/2015) [-]
I know you think you are trolling, but this isn't trolling, this is just being an idiot.
Reply
-1
User avatar #362 to #361 - kaiserdjg (11/19/2015) [-]
HURR DURR
Reply
+9
User avatar #250 to #233 - dinonator (11/15/2015) [-]
just end yourself
Reply
-1
#269 to #233 - faggyniggy (11/15/2015) [-]
** ********** used "*roll 5, cis privilege*"**
** ********** rolls You don’t have to deal with old photographs that did not reflect who you truly are.**
** ********** rolls Being able to purchase clothes that match your gender identity without being refused service/mocked by staff or questioned on your genitals.**
** ********** rolls Your validity as a man/woman/human is not based on how much surgery you’ve had or how well you “pass” as non-transgender.**
** ********** rolls Having your gender as an option on a form.**
** ********** rolls If you end up in the emergency room, you do not have to worry that your gender will keep you from receiving appropriate treatment, or that all of your medical issues will be seen as a result of your gender.***roll picture* just because u have so many red thumbs i will too.





ye
Reply
0
User avatar #307 to #11 - jesusisagoose (11/15/2015) [-]
sorry, but i don't know what you mean. Care to enlighten me?
Reply
0
User avatar #342 to #307 - alwaysscaroused (11/15/2015) [-]
he is gonna get dieded
Reply
0
User avatar #343 to #342 - jesusisagoose (11/15/2015) [-]
yeah i kind of got that but what accident is he reffering to?
Reply
0
User avatar #345 to #343 - alwaysscaroused (11/15/2015) [-]
he is implying that he is gonna get murdered but the murder will be disguised as an accident
Reply
+5
#197 to #11 - anon (11/15/2015) [-]
Its ******* sad, but true..

BP for example.. Their shelving millions of inventions..
Reply
+17
#153 to #11 - tarabostes (11/15/2015) [-]
I had a little accident when I looked at you
Reply
+4
User avatar #201 to #153 - skateboardingdog ONLINE (11/15/2015) [-]
awwww
Reply
+4
#202 to #201 - tarabostes (11/15/2015) [-]
I awwwwwwwwwwwwwwww you too
Reply
+3
User avatar #207 to #202 - boomerpyro (11/15/2015) [-]
i don't get it, didn't you piss yourself in fear?
Reply
+3
#208 to #207 - tarabostes (11/15/2015) [-]
I did more than that ... Let's do it together !
Wow , did you do something to your hair ? You look extra cute today!
Reply
+3
User avatar #209 to #208 - boomerpyro (11/15/2015) [-]
i can be pretty fugly when i want to be
Reply
+4
#216 to #209 - tarabostes (11/15/2015) [-]
Fugly? more like ********
Now tell me , what turns you on the most ?
0
#217 to #216 - boomerpyro has deleted their comment [-]
Reply
0
#220 to #209 - tarabostes (11/15/2015) [-]
y u delete??
Reply
+3
User avatar #225 to #220 - rollmeanddie (11/15/2015) [-]
Deleted comments turn him on.
Reply
+99
User avatar #22 to #11 - muffincannibal (11/15/2015) [-]
And you look like a human pony getting ****** .
Reply
+114
User avatar #29 to #22 - muffincannibal (11/15/2015) [-]
Don't ******* tell me that profile picture doesn't look like rainbow dash taking a rear dash.
Reply
+14
#51 to #29 - anon (11/15/2015) [-]
static2.fjcdn.com/comments/I+love+having+this+picture+_00b96e408c690fef573d2d45e04f5559.jpg for anyone curious, sfw. Not worth the 30 secs of googling.
Reply
+47
User avatar #62 to #51 - mondominiman (11/15/2015) [-]
It would have been better if it was porn
Reply
+34
User avatar #92 to #51 - adu (11/15/2015) [-]
Foot fetishists ruin everything.
Reply
+2
User avatar #158 to #92 - kriml (11/15/2015) [-]
Damn foot fetishists, they ruined foot fetish! Never liked it
Reply
-1
User avatar #211 to #92 - infinitereaper (11/15/2015) [-]
Feet are great, but that art is **** .
Reply
+1
User avatar #52 to #51 - childpls (11/15/2015) [-]
awful
Reply
0
User avatar #113 to #51 - crazyguyindahood (11/15/2015) [-]
i have a tickling fetish, hot
Reply
0
User avatar #77 to #51 - muffincannibal (11/15/2015) [-]
Idk, if you get caught with that on your history at work, you'd have to answer some **** .
Reply
+5
User avatar #122 to #114 - muffincannibal (11/15/2015) [-]
It was not an argument, just a statement on her profile picture, I would of made that comment no matter what the comment was.
Reply
-5
#154 to #114 - tarabostes (11/15/2015) [-]
"Excuse me , but it seems like you insulted m'lady!"
Reply
+1
#271 to #154 - deutschblut (11/15/2015) [-]
Been dying to use my rare Hermann Göring...

More rare than the rarest Pepe.
Reply
+1
#298 to #271 - tarabostes (11/15/2015) [-]
M'Blut und Eisen
Reply
0
User avatar #84 to #22 - affix (11/15/2015) [-]
Problem?
Reply
+44
#129 to #11 - captaincapital (11/15/2015) [-]
he's probably going to fall from some stairs straight into some bullets
Reply
+52
#27 - robuntu (11/15/2015) [-]
This is like the end of the world predictions. Every now and then, someone comes along and says 'I have this secret scientific break through' and they get a little press, then they fail to deliver, then everyone forgets.

Meh.

If he had something worth talking about, he'd show it. Talking about what he's going to talk about is a stupid waste of time.
Reply
+111
User avatar #2 - fatminion ONLINE (11/14/2015) [-]
I actually have a few "secrets of Tesla" PDFs I got from a conspiracy theory friend. Anyone who wants one just reply to this message with your penis size and I'll post a link and mention you and comment on the size of your member.
Reply
0
#95 to #2 - mreggsalad (11/15/2015) [-]
~6 in
~15.24 cm
Reply
0
#120 to #2 - adolov (11/15/2015) [-]
big enough for your mom 18cm now gif me the book
Reply
0
User avatar #135 to #2 - finntastic (11/15/2015) [-]
2.8 inches.
Reply
0
User avatar #170 to #2 - DrWanksta (11/15/2015) [-]
5
Reply
0
User avatar #215 to #2 - killboy (11/15/2015) [-]
7 plus inches of lovin'!
Reply
+32
#3 to #2 - finishhimlarry (11/14/2015) [-]
Sure I'll bite. 1.5 inches


in diameter!
Reply
0
#36 to #2 - anon (11/15/2015) [-]
1.5 cm *13
Reply
+7
User avatar #141 to #2 - agronimo (11/15/2015) [-]
20 minutes long
Reply
+12
User avatar #45 to #2 - nignogprime (11/15/2015) [-]
At least an inch
Reply
+13
User avatar #13 to #2 - spelly (11/15/2015) [-]
2nm
Reply
+2
User avatar #110 to #13 - fatminion ONLINE (11/15/2015) [-]
you could have at least flattered yourself and gone with 2000pm
Reply
+14
User avatar #43 to #2 - teevee (11/15/2015) [-]
30 speed
Reply
+20
#20 to #2 - mississippiriver (11/15/2015) [-]
Between 1 and 15 inches
Reply
+1
#57 to #20 - RawrS (11/15/2015) [-]
Same
Reply
+18
User avatar #140 to #2 - midgettitwank (11/15/2015) [-]
the length of a small child 's penis
Reply
+26
User avatar #188 to #2 - fatminion ONLINE (11/15/2015) [-]
mentions: TreesyDoesIt roadrager xenosthepirate iwillnotforgetthis urchinator vpngtn arnarinn ohmytoast shreksorcist shortdevil PebbleBinder ozzyfromaussie quantumranger jackstyle dragemit wherejohnny antheny dawnsblight Temari sirwill arreatface pyromanicturtlez teevee isuriand morale aidnyan chimpaflimp jackdynam lennylorenzo optimogappi vlademitrius shadowallyx duhusst nightroller pyropsychopath imdan questionspark kylefromabove goblinraider theonlyg masterpenguin jabzilla sansikal rakosember maternation meathooksodomy shuckleduck servantd thedrainox nothingheretosee ltbuttstrong absolutelynyet corranhorn towerofpower thethirddoctor thethirddoctor crackerdawg DrWanksta ryuggu willypmedina thedrgonzo spunkmckullins danniegurl xgumgumx agronimo midgettitwank buttinspecter funnaycraptwo sajero finntastic nnever dmkstarstar superanonymouspers adolov liamjamse traks doomsdaysnail hassanane jabzilla mreggsalad sirosd lordjebadia moribus haroldsaxon illburnyou fatminion kanaka fatminion almaster fistings thisisspartah iflirtwithanyone lennylorenzo swagbot sleepehz bladeguy uncledick nignogprime teevee shadowstepone moldybreadcrumb Petarded arreatface charak toaofmemory feorhhyrde mrd spceinvdr TheThinkingMan mississippiriver RawrS draeman captainbalu spelly mrclorox britexplain iridium demonicknighty ezzay newtamalego nought zmranger finishhimlarry

Here's a bunch of **** . Most is about Tesla: from his diary or lecture notes or stuff about free energy based on his work. Also a bit about "hacking" for all you 12-year-olds out there.

Enjoy!

www.miketheburns.com/tesla_free-energy_hacking_docs.zip

PS I'm glad so many of you have such large penises.
Reply
+2
User avatar #190 to #188 - fistings (11/15/2015) [-]
I lied, my penis is actually 5.5 µm
Reply
0
User avatar #286 to #188 - mpghbombsaway (11/15/2015) [-]
Free energy? Please don't tell me this is the whole magnets make free energy **** . When magnets are used to generate energy they are degaussed ergo its not free energy
Reply
0
User avatar #189 to #188 - TreesyDoesIt ONLINE (11/15/2015) [-]
thanks bruh
Reply
0
User avatar #70 to #2 - kanaka (11/15/2015) [-]
i got a 6er
Reply
+2
User avatar #177 to #70 - fatminion ONLINE (11/15/2015) [-]
I got a bon er
Reply
0
User avatar #48 to #2 - bladeguy (11/15/2015) [-]
6.5 inches long, and like 5 in girth or so, im not ashamed.
Reply
+6
User avatar #132 to #48 - uncledick (11/15/2015) [-]
We got matching dicks.
Reply
+1
User avatar #234 to #132 - bladeguy (11/15/2015) [-]
hooray
Reply
+6
User avatar #183 to #2 - thethirddoctor (11/15/2015) [-]
5'5''. But my mom says we can round upwards.
0
#26 to #2 - xenriath has deleted their comment [-]
Reply
+4
#282 to #2 - adrenalinegiraffe (11/15/2015) [-]
Just ask your mom.
Reply
0
#245 to #2 - lawdjd (11/15/2015) [-]
6.5
Reply
+4
User avatar #74 to #2 - illburnyou (11/15/2015) [-]
All of the length
Reply
+2
User avatar #109 to #74 - fatminion ONLINE (11/15/2015) [-]
technically correct - the best kind of correct
Reply
0
#203 to #2 - SergeantSarcasm (11/15/2015) [-]
My penis is an average 5.4 inches. Gimme secrets plz
Reply
+2
User avatar #325 to #2 - klina ONLINE (11/15/2015) [-]
6.5 inches kinda thin in girth and a slight upwards curvature and to the right

has a 3 mm mark on the head from a botched handjob and a 2 mm mark on the glands from forgetting to remove a rubber band after mastrubating for a whole day

he's a good member
Reply
0
#159 to #2 - willypmedina ONLINE (11/15/2015) [-]
17 cm
Reply
+2
User avatar #161 to #2 - ryuggu (11/15/2015) [-]
0cm
Reply
0
User avatar #174 to #161 - fatminion ONLINE (11/15/2015) [-]
at least it's not a negative penis
Reply
+8
User avatar #198 to #174 - danniegurl (11/15/2015) [-]
I've got a negative one.
Reply
0
User avatar #213 to #198 - fatminion ONLINE (11/15/2015) [-]
yeah, but even a negative dick is pretty impressive in Gainsville
Reply
0
User avatar #214 to #213 - danniegurl (11/15/2015) [-]
how would you know where I live? are you from tallanasty?
Reply
0
User avatar #222 to #214 - fatminion ONLINE (11/15/2015) [-]
your profile said 20, female, G-ville, and "Gainsville" is the first place I thought of that could be that. You a fan of Lynyrd Skynyrd? They were from near Gainsville, I think. They were my favorite growing up until I started listening to Pink Floyd more. But I still own every album and listen to them at least once a month. They inspired me to play guitar, actually.
Reply
0
User avatar #227 to #222 - danniegurl (11/15/2015) [-]
I thought people might assume I meant "gangsta" or something by "G"
Reply
0
User avatar #226 to #222 - danniegurl (11/15/2015) [-]
I like them well enough, but don't ever think to go out of my way to listen to them, except for simple man.
Less than jake is from gainesville though. A day to remember is from my hometown.
Reply
0
User avatar #178 to #174 - ryuggu (11/15/2015) [-]
it kinda is.
Reply
0
User avatar #130 to #2 - dmkstarstar ONLINE (11/15/2015) [-]
Half an inch tucked away 6 inches erect? Yes I have the weird penis
Reply
+2
User avatar #175 to #130 - fatminion ONLINE (11/15/2015) [-]
I'm the same. Flaccid is like mini mini or even goes into me when it's cold, but erect it's normal. Many other people have like a 4.5" dick flaccid and then it only grows up to 5 1/2" when erect. Seems like it's be a pain in the arse when you got this 4-6" floppy thing hanging around in your trousers.
Reply
0
User avatar #181 to #175 - dmkstarstar ONLINE (11/15/2015) [-]
Oh yeah I guess it can be annoying your dick flopping about.
So I'm actually glad that little willy decides to stay tucked inside of me.
Only coming out and expanding when I need him or whenever I don't.
Reply
0
User avatar #185 to #181 - dmkstarstar ONLINE (11/15/2015) [-]
I realized I forgot to spoil this usually I'm not one to talk about my dick
Reply
+1
User avatar #303 to #130 - kresh (11/15/2015) [-]
Ur a grower not a shower
like it shows itself when erect, its spelled the same as shower, **** english sometimes
Reply
+2
User avatar #148 to #2 - spunkmckullins (11/15/2015) [-]
4 feet.
Reply
0
User avatar #118 to #2 - traks (11/15/2015) [-]
One, maybe two?
Reply
+2
#138 to #2 - funnaycraptwo ONLINE (11/15/2015) [-]
7 inches...

MFW People don't usually believe me on this
Reply
0
User avatar #89 to #2 - moribus ONLINE (11/15/2015) [-]
gimme
Reply
+1
User avatar #108 to #89 - fatminion ONLINE (11/15/2015) [-]
follow the rules
Reply
+1
User avatar #312 to #2 - twondai (11/15/2015) [-]
somewhere between 0 and 0.5 planck lengths
Reply
+1
User avatar #326 to #312 - fatminion ONLINE (11/15/2015) [-]
top kek
Reply
0
User avatar #59 to #2 - lennylorenzo (11/15/2015) [-]
12 ft
Reply
+1
User avatar #274 to #2 - supercargo (11/15/2015) [-]
6.75 in/sec^2
Reply
+1
#263 to #2 - anon (11/15/2015) [-]
11in. Actually not kidding, ive yet to have sex cause theyre usually to scared of getting hurt bigger is NOT better!!
Reply
0
User avatar #30 to #2 - spceinvdr ONLINE (11/15/2015) [-]
5.5 inches average master rice
Reply
+1
User avatar #146 to #2 - danniegurl (11/15/2015) [-]
-7"
Reply
0
#15 to #2 - captainbalu (11/15/2015) [-]
18 cm
Reply
+1
User avatar #144 to #2 - xgumgumx ONLINE (11/15/2015) [-]
27
Reply
0
User avatar #253 to #2 - whtkid (11/15/2015) [-]
5.5in
Reply
+1
User avatar #139 to #2 - buttinspecter (11/15/2015) [-]
3 inches from the ground.
Reply
0
#230 to #2 - anon (11/15/2015) [-]
3 foot, 3 millimeter girth
Reply
+1
#136 to #2 - sajero (11/15/2015) [-]
like 5 and a half i dunno i dont have a ruler around i used my own thumb to measure
Reply
0
User avatar #204 to #2 - defski (11/15/2015) [-]
My boys don't call me tripod for nothin
Reply
+1
User avatar #270 to #204 - fatminion ONLINE (11/15/2015) [-]
cuz you only have one arm and you bend over and take it in the ass from your boys all the time?
Reply
+1
User avatar #117 to #2 - doomsdaysnail ONLINE (11/15/2015) [-]
-8 Joules
Reply
0
User avatar #176 to #117 - fatminion ONLINE (11/15/2015) [-]
<===8 family jewels
Reply
0
User avatar #163 to #117 - hassanane (11/15/2015) [-]
o.5 inches plz
Reply
0
#172 to #2 - crackerdawg (11/15/2015) [-]
20cm thats 7.87401575 inches for you Americunts
Reply
+3
#255 to #172 - dinonator (11/15/2015) [-]
>japan bigger then america
Reply
+1
#277 to #172 - anon (11/15/2015) [-]
As if some of the Korean's weren't having enough of a bad time already...
Reply
+1
User avatar #93 to #2 - sirosd (11/15/2015) [-]
30 Long
Reply
0
#167 to #2 - iflirtwithanyone (11/15/2015) [-]
I would just like to say to everyone in this thread

6 inches
Reply
+1
#49 to #2 - sleepehz ONLINE (11/15/2015) [-]
**sleepehz used "*roll picture*"**
**sleepehz rolled image**Negative five inches.

Long story short it is like a dogs. So five when the lipstick is a rockin.
Reply
0
User avatar #151 to #2 - thedrgonzo (11/15/2015) [-]
6.5 inches
Reply
+1
User avatar #18 to #2 - draeman (11/15/2015) [-]
69 cm
Reply
-2
User avatar #248 to #18 - angelusprimus (11/15/2015) [-]
I'm sorry you never had an erection.
Any penis over the size of 32cm can never get more than half hard. Yours probably not even a quarter.
Reply
0
#133 to #2 - nnever (11/15/2015) [-]
7.5
Reply
+3
#289 to #133 - myjunk (11/15/2015) [-]
I hope those are inches...
Reply
0
#341 to #289 - nnever (11/15/2015) [-]
no lol that'd be ridiculous
Reply
+1
#34 to #2 - feorhhyrde (11/15/2015) [-]
6 1/2
Reply
0
User avatar #121 to #2 - superanonymouspers ONLINE (11/15/2015) [-]
plz

7
Reply
0
#131 to #2 - anon (11/15/2015) [-]
2.3 hand widths. (not including the thumb)
Reply
0
User avatar #119 to #2 - liamjamse (11/15/2015) [-]
15cm
Reply
0
User avatar #69 to #2 - almaster (11/15/2015) [-]
5 inches
Reply
-1
#107 to #2 - jabzilla (11/15/2015) [-]
7.6 inches when I'm very turned on but mostly 7
Reply
0
User avatar #61 to #2 - fistings (11/15/2015) [-]
5 inches
Reply
0
User avatar #91 to #2 - lordjebadia (11/15/2015) [-]
9
and by 9 I mean cm
-3
#38 to #2 - arreatface has deleted their comment [-]
Reply
+2
User avatar #112 to #38 - charak (11/15/2015) [-]
Almost as gay as ninjas
Reply
+2
#116 to #112 - toaofmemory ONLINE (11/15/2015) [-]
Heard you were talkin' crap
Reply
0
User avatar #76 to #2 - haroldsaxon ONLINE (11/15/2015) [-]
Never measured. I'll just guess 5-6.
Reply
0
User avatar #347 to #2 - bluboyrulez (11/15/2015) [-]
6.5
Reply
0
User avatar #60 to #2 - thisisspartah (11/15/2015) [-]
3 inches ling, 11 inches arround
Reply
+1
User avatar #168 to #60 - iflirtwithanyone (11/15/2015) [-]
That sounds terrifying but I'm up for the challenge.
Reply
0
#294 to #2 - pedobearson (11/15/2015) [-]
-18 inches long, -4 inches wide.
Reply
0
#350 to #294 - nightmarexnxnxnxnx (11/16/2015) [-]
He wanted the length of your dick, not your nose.


You dirty jew.
Reply
0
#58 to #2 - swagbot (11/15/2015) [-]
All of it send now pls
Reply
0
#293 to #2 - nagafever (11/15/2015) [-]
**nagafever used "*roll picture*"**
**nagafever rolled image** 5.5 inches
Reply
0
User avatar #42 to #2 - shadowstepone (11/15/2015) [-]
8.2 inches
Reply
0
User avatar #291 to #2 - jsrf (11/15/2015) [-]
6 mm
Reply
0
#39 to #2 - Petarded (11/15/2015) [-]
16 cm now gimme the goodies
Reply
0
User avatar #288 to #2 - agovernment (11/15/2015) [-]
You can see it in private, i don't have a liner with me
Reply
0
User avatar #33 to #2 - mrd (11/15/2015) [-]
6in gib pdf
Reply
-1
#287 to #2 - ssg (11/15/2015) [-]
- 1 cm
Reply
0
User avatar #28 to #2 - TheThinkingMan (11/15/2015) [-]
7.5in
Reply
0
User avatar #278 to #2 - Temptations (11/15/2015) [-]
6 1/2 inches
Reply
0
User avatar #19 to #2 - banwagon (11/15/2015) [-]
6.23In
Reply
0
#268 to #2 - jdizzleoffthehizzl (11/15/2015) [-]
Chinese Padiwagon
Reply
0
User avatar #9 to #2 - mrclorox (11/14/2015) [-]
6in now gimmie pdfs
Reply
0
#257 to #2 - anon (11/15/2015) [-]
4.5 cm
Reply
+29
#4 to #2 - britexplain ONLINE (11/14/2015) [-]
That's in inches.
Reply
+9
User avatar #125 to #4 - iridium (11/15/2015) [-]
"=0"

Bruh
Reply
+2
#85 to #4 - demonicknighty (11/15/2015) [-]
So you are saying you don't have a penis?
Reply
+1
User avatar #7 to #4 - ezzay (11/14/2015) [-]
looks interesting... But what does it mean?
Reply
+42
#40 to #7 - anon (11/15/2015) [-]
The real clue is the = 0 at the end there.
Reply
+15
User avatar #24 to #7 - newtamalego (11/15/2015) [-]
It means he has no dick
Reply
0
User avatar #23 to #7 - nought (11/15/2015) [-]
nothing of theoretical importance, looks like some **** Maple would spit out :^)
Reply
+2
User avatar #111 to #23 - fatminion ONLINE (11/15/2015) [-]
I'm guessing if we solve for Tau I think that's lower-case Tau, but not sure we'll get dickbutt(tm) or something. See all the imaginary numbers? That means we're going to have real and imaginary parts. And because Tau is often exponential, I imagine the real and imaginary parts describe planes, so we might be in 3-space. And due to the complexity, I believe it to be non-continuous in places. Exciting.

Maybe later I'll transcribe this bitch and run it through some software to see what we get.
Reply
+1
#157 to #111 - zmranger ONLINE (11/15/2015) [-]
>"Exciting."
Reply
+3
User avatar #173 to #157 - fatminion ONLINE (11/15/2015) [-]
all right. I used "x" instead of Tau or whatever that was, and we got this:

(0 - 30.1996i) * x^6 + (0 + 9.81486i) * x^5 * sqrt(x^2 - (0 + 640.701i)) + (0 + 20.3847i) * x^5 * sqrt(x^2 - (0 + 1127.53i)) + (0 + 20.3487i) * x^4 * (x^2 - (0 + 640.701i)) * (x^2 - (0 + 1127.531)) - (0 + 20.3847i) * x^3 * (x^2 - (0 + 640.701i)) * sqrt(x^2 - (0 + 1127.53i)) + 408.549 * ((0 - 0.630868i) * x^3 - (0 + 14.0909i) * x^2 * sqrt(x^2 - (0 - 640.701i)) - (0 + 6.45738i) * x^2 * sqrt(x^2 - (0+ 1127.53i)) (0 + 1.21667i) * x * (x^2 - (0 + 640.701i)) + (0+ 0.585806i) * x * (x^2 - (0 + 1127.53i)) + (0 + 7.08825i) * sqrt(x^2 - (0 +640.701i)) * (x^2 - (0 + 1127.53i)) + (0 + 14.7217i) * (x^2 - (0 + 640.701i)) * sqrt(x^2 - (1127.53i))) = 0

"sqrt" is "square root" (so, ^0.5), and "i" is the square root of -1, or sqrt(-1).

Now there's something fishy about all the vectorish-looking paranthetical expressions. They always do something like (0. +1234.56i). I'm wondering if this is simply a vector notation, saying something like (real. imaginary). So every vector here has no real part, just imaginary. Of course they are just constants that make the plot move around when we graph it. I'll go ahead and start plugging into Wolfram or something to see what I get. But it's been like 10 years since I graduated engineering school and I've been doing programming ever since, so my math is out of practices. So feel free to try your hand as well, anyone reading this.
Reply
0
User avatar #200 to #111 - nought (11/15/2015) [-]
That is definitely zeta, it has different meanings in different contexts but it's most well known as the Riemann zeta function
Reply
0
User avatar #219 to #200 - fatminion ONLINE (11/15/2015) [-]
thanks! I knew it was a lower-case one, but couldn't remember which Greek letter. I doubt in this case it's a Riemann zeta function. Actually I just checked that **** out, looks quite interesting. I'm not sure of its applications just from browsing the Wikipedia page, but it seems to be useful for at least mathematicians. I only ever used a Riemann summation for a few things in school, and never since.

Do you happen to have Matlab or Mathematica or something? I don't feel like torrenting it at the moment. If you do, maybe you can put that **** in and see what the equation looks like when graphed

see >>#173
Reply
0
User avatar #295 to #219 - nought (11/15/2015) [-]
I have mathematica installed but I never learned how to use it
I don't think it will graph to anything useful but who knows
Reply
+24
#35 - feorhhyrde (11/15/2015) [-]
Theres an old man where i live that made a gearbox with a flywheel that would put out more electricity than was put in, he was harassed by feds and airplanes until he dismantled it ._.
Reply
+39
#55 to #35 - Corndoggeh (11/15/2015) [-]
And what was the purpose of this gearbox? I've taken too many thermodynamic classes to honestly believe what you're claiming. In order to get a system to even output exactly what is put in would mean dealing with a large amount of ideal assumptions and that is not the kind of world we live in (but holy **** that would be nice then I wouldn't have to be dealing with all these extra calculations!)
Reply
+25
#63 to #55 - dremnus (11/15/2015) [-]
I could be wrong but I think he's referencing a southpark episode.
Reply
0
#150 to #63 - rollfourexplain (11/15/2015) [-]
Really? It reminds me of a book I read about an old book where it talked about perpetual energy hoaxes. In the context of 300+ years ago I'm imagining an entirely different situation that is very similar.
Reply
0
#64 to #63 - Corndoggeh (11/15/2015) [-]
Ah **** I hope its not.
Reply
+1
User avatar #65 to #64 - dremnus (11/15/2015) [-]
I'm like 80% certain it is. Sorry brochacho.
Reply
+2
#66 to #65 - Corndoggeh (11/15/2015) [-]
I've been bamboozled!
Reply
+9
#67 to #66 - dremnus (11/15/2015) [-]
Smeckledorfed!
Reply
-1
#358 to #55 - feorhhyrde (11/18/2015) [-]
All I remember from the old ass pictures he showed us was that it was a rig in a metal frame I ****** up by saying gearbox with a flywheel and counter weights plus some other junk that put out a little more than was put in.
Reply
-2
User avatar #78 to #55 - haroldsaxon ONLINE (11/15/2015) [-]
It could be just poor phrasing. Remember that we have unlimited unlimited =/= infinite amounts of energy surrounding us. We need just to tap into it.


Imagine a ball. This ball can be charged. It uses this power to fly around and absorb energy from it's surroundings (e.g sunlight, wind). It sends most of it back, but uses some to keep on going. Of course this wouldn't be like what was described, only a thought experiment. Until I see what it is, I won't dismiss it nor accept it.
Reply
+3
#143 to #78 - psychoknot (11/15/2015) [-]
How are those not equal? If it's not infinite then there is a limit to how much can exist.
Reply
+84
User avatar #32 - ultimatebuttercup (11/15/2015) [-]
Electricians hate him!
Reply
+24
User avatar #102 - nanako ONLINE (11/15/2015) [-]
Oh he's going to publish a book is he? I suppose we can all have tesla's secrets for just $59.95

is he publishing any research papers?
Reply
0
#180 to #102 - anon (11/15/2015) [-]
He is just another "give me money" type of guy who will fail to deliver and everyone forgets about him.

He is not the first one and won't be the last either. If he really had anything, he probably would show you and not sell it for money..... after begging for money so he could sell it.... (that's what he wants to do anyway)
Reply
+1
#155 to #102 - tarabostes (11/15/2015) [-]
Y-Yes....
Reply
+25
User avatar #17 - gilliam (11/15/2015) [-]
My base understanding of the conept of energy conservation tells me that's impossible, there's probably some context missing to the phrase "magnifying power".
Reply
-10
#21 to #17 - anon (11/15/2015) [-]
Are you Nikolia tesla? then shut the **** up, he made god.
Reply
-3
#126 to #17 - JustintheWaysian ONLINE (11/15/2015) [-]
I think it has to do with a magnetic wheel, with some smaller magnets on the side. You're inputting a small amount of electricity to spin the smaller magnets at a particular speed, so that the similar poles are causing the main magnet to spin incredibly fast.

Since it mainly relies on residual magnetic energy, you don't have to input very much electricity.
Reply
+1
User avatar #145 to #126 - ikweetnietmeer (11/15/2015) [-]
Then the magnets have to be electrical magnets or moving normal magnets.
Either way there will be more power used than produced because of friction and gravity.
Reply
+4
User avatar #37 to #17 - funbaggy (11/15/2015) [-]
You can increase (or decrease) voltage with a transformer. That is how they transport power through wires. But you can't create energy.
Reply
+3
#44 to #37 - anon (11/15/2015) [-]
to be fair the universes matter and energy had to come from somewhere even if we cant prove how
Reply
0
User avatar #191 to #44 - thesoulseeker (11/15/2015) [-]
There's the zero energy hypothesis.
Reply
+1
#124 to #37 - JustintheWaysian ONLINE (11/15/2015) [-]
But you lose/gain amperage when you do that
Reply
+6
#68 to #17 - swagbot (11/15/2015) [-]
The idea is not that these machines are 'Making' Energy from nothing - that's something I stumbled over a bunch of times in my first investigations into this.

The idea is that these machines essentially tap into the radio-background of the universe.... which, it turns out (or, "is claimed that") contains unimaginable amounts of energy, traveling in behaviors (longitudinal vs. scalar, "multi-dimensionally") and at frequencies / wavelengths that make them undetectable in everyday life... at least with our eyes and ears, and simple, "small" reactions that we see every day. The orbit of planets... might be a different story - it may be magnetic, not based on 'gravity' at all.

It's no different than putting a wind turbine in a breeze... the only different here is your "turbine" is basically a weird radio-receiver-like device, and your "breeze" are absurdly high-voltage quantum particles, zipping through every point in space all around us / through us at every instant.

free-energy-info.com/Chapter7.pdf
www.free-energy-info.tuks.nl/P26.pdf

Just playing with the ideas... not saying they're true just yet.
Reply
0
#246 to #68 - anon (11/15/2015) [-]
Do tell me, what the hell is a quantum particle? I'm gonna guess right off the bat that you don't actually know what "quantum" means, or how it relates to things.
Reply
0
#351 to #246 - swagbot (11/16/2015) [-]
Sign in and I'll explain.
Reply
-1
User avatar #194 to #68 - thesoulseeker (11/15/2015) [-]
"Just playing with the ideas... not saying they're true just yet."

Well that's good, because most of what you said was pure word salad. At least from the perspective of a 3rd year physics student. Seriously most of those terms don't make a lick of sense to me, so either you are using different definitions/contexts or it really is word salad.
Reply
-1
#352 to #194 - swagbot (11/16/2015) [-]
U so butthurt, bro?

My little conspiracy theory wrestle your johannases?

Did it mess with your little reality?

Got a feeling in your pants to 'sort me out'... because you got it all figured out?

I said "JUST PLAYING with ideas... not saying they're true just yet."

What else do you need to hear?

You cannot explain to me the origins of the model used to explain mainstream physics.... the researchers who made each of the experiments on the evidence 'tree' that supports EACH piece of the model - EACH 'particle', and EACH aspect of its behavior.

I had hopes for mainstream physics too, but very quickly, all 'lectures' and course materials start devolving into hand-waving ******** . There's a lot of recitation, but no from-the-first-experiments-forward explanations of A-N-Y-T-H-I-N-G.

I like reconstructing things from First-Principles. Takes longer, lots of frustration from mainstreamers in the meantime (as they claim they're "Got it All Figured Out", but I've always found rewards at the end.

By the way, your years-in-college don't impress me. AT. ALL.

You'll come out of college, and be washing tables and driving a GASOLINE-POWERED car like the rest of 'em.
Reply
-1
User avatar #357 to #352 - thesoulseeker (11/16/2015) [-]
No, I'm not butthurt, you didn't mess with my reality and I most certainly don't have it all figured out.

I simply pointed out that you are either using your own definitions of the terms you used or you are using them incorrectly.

"no from-the-first-experiments-forward explanations of A-N-Y-T-H-I-N-G. "
What exactly do you mean here? English isn't my first language and that doesn't help.

"as they claim they're "Got it All Figured Out" physicists don't claim to have it all figured out, but we do have a lot of things figured out. For example if you say that you have a generator with over 100% efficiency, then you better have some damn good evidence to support your violation of the laws of thermodynamics.

Finally I didn't say I was at university to impress you, I said that to give you context of my own knowledge on the subject.
Reply
0
User avatar #98 to #68 - thedugster (11/15/2015) [-]
I don't believe so, i think this particular wacko is actually taking about magnifying a power source by "changing its reference frame." Something like taking advantage of the difference between net power and absolute power generated.
Reply
+15
User avatar #25 to #17 - Lambda (11/15/2015) [-]
It is impossible, you can't get something from nothing. It's a scam, it's always a scam.
Tesla was brilliant but no amount of brilliance can break the laws of thermodynamics.
Reply
+1
#249 to #25 - anon (11/15/2015) [-]
Well, TECHNICALLY you could prove the laws of thermodynamics false. Doubt that it would ever happen, but hey, at one point we thought Newton had discovered everything there is to know about physics. Hell, even Einstein didn't explore the entirety of physics. We could discover, say, absurdly small or absurdly large systems which ignore thermodynamics (which would be consistent with many other historic findings - that is, we discover a rule which works for things human-sized, but then learn they don't quite work when you get too large or too small), which could potentially (read: really impractically) lead to perpetual energy.

The other alternative is to be able to travel to alternate universes (should they exist), and bring in matter from there. We could bring in, say, plutonium or uranium of the desired isotope and dump all of our nuclear waste, leading to perpetual (so long as there are infinite alternate universes) nuclear energy.

Both of these are impractical, nearly impossible, etc. But to say that "no amount of brilliance can break the laws of thermodynamics." isn't necessarily correct. They are observation-based laws, created under the same circumstances which created many laws which have today been proven to be either false (but close to the truth) or conditionally true. It's entirely possible that the laws of thermodynamics are just a really, really, really good estimation.
Reply
+1
User avatar #83 to #25 - haroldsaxon ONLINE (11/15/2015) [-]
-ish. I believe it's often a matter of poor wording. You can use energy to get more energy, but you can't duplicate energy, as far as I'm concerned. There are a lot of probable energy sources we haven't tapped into yet, or have even really considered, I bet. Imagine how many unknown sources there were back in Tesla's age. If he found a way to absorb power a lot easier, that could easily be worded as "magnifying power", though maybe not accurate.

Also this

Source -> Power means Source > Power. If you could make Source = Power, wouldn't you magnify power?
Reply
+1
#56 to #25 - Corndoggeh (11/15/2015) [-]
Well if were going based on the literal use of "power" (Kw/h), then magnifying the power output by 5,000% would essentially mean that current energy plants would only be producing .02% of the energy stored in whatever material is put in. But as I've stated, this is dealing with purely ideal assumptions all over the system to produce a 100% energy input-output system.

On the other hand, if were not talking about literal power and "power" was being misused in the picture above. I would assume that the "power" may more likely be voltage or the "ability to do work". In that case it is possible to increase voltage, probably not by 5,000%, but we already achieve that through transformers. Maybe this design is a more efficient transformer? Or maybe something that can increase current?
Reply
0
User avatar #71 to #56 - Lambda (11/15/2015) [-]
Kw/h isn't a unit of power. I don't know what that would be a unit of, exactly. Rate of change in power, maybe? Kw-h is the unit of power, since watts is joules per second the times cancel out and you just get energy, 3.6 megajoules per kilowatt-hour.
Anyway, I've seen this use of "magnifying power" before. They generally have a machine that you put energy into, and the energy output from the machine is somehow 50 times higher. The extra energy doesn't come from anywhere.
teslashiddendiscoveries.com/
look, here's the guy's website. He's just trying to sell those DVDs. If he knew anything at all about Tesla, and what he was saying was true, he would make his findings public for all.
Reply
0
#75 to #71 - docbraun (11/15/2015) [-]
Goddammit, get ur **** straight. U said Kw-h was a unit of power, then u used math to realize it's actually a unit of energy/work. Watt is a unit of power already. If u increase power by 5000%, u're just increasing the rate of energy transfer 50 times, which is just what a transformer does. There's nothing surprising about it except maybe the number.
Reply
+6
User avatar #80 to #75 - Lambda (11/15/2015) [-]
Oh, I meant to say Kw-h was a unit of energy.
You're not just increasing the rate of energy transfer, because the extra energy has to come from somewhere.
Increasing the rate of energy transfer isn't what a transformer does. A transformer changes voltage and current, but each will increase/decrease in balance so the power is always the same. If you use a transformer to increase the voltage 50 times, the current will be 1/50, and since the power is voltage times current, it will stay the same.

I did some research on this Jim Murray.
His site is connected, eventually, to clickbank.com , a corporation that seems to make its money by selling people mediocre stuff that they don't need.
People sign up to become "associates", basically to shill these products everywhere. You ever wonder who gets paid to make those comments on youtube and even here? People who sign up for this **** .
This Jim Murray site is one of many similar sites, operated by associates of a company that specializes in selling the writings and lectures of people who claim to have some scientific secrets. I think a lot of these are written and operated by the same person. advancedmotorsecrets.com is almost identical to that Jim Murray one.
These "associates" pitch these various sites and get paid a commission if somebody actually buys the thing.

There are no secrets of Tesla here, it's all one big corporate machine-- And funnyjunk user stadshaug is part of it. Although maybe not, because the rest of his posts aren't consistent with this.
Reply
0
#187 to #80 - stadshaug [OP](11/15/2015) [-]
Hahahahahahaha! I found this on fb....
Reply
0
User avatar #149 to #80 - ikweetnietmeer (11/15/2015) [-]
Anywho, you write confusing stuff, but you are right.
they change one thing but dont show the drop in something else... frequency drop etc.

And the clickbank stuff exposes the people who back this stuff.... (or they are just really uneducated on the subject)
Reply
-1
User avatar #147 to #80 - ikweetnietmeer (11/15/2015) [-]
"and since the power is voltage times current, it will stay the same. "
Watts = Amps * volts
KW/h = Watts * kilo (1000) per hour.... so yes kw/h is power.
Reply
0
#87 to #80 - docbraun (11/15/2015) [-]
WOW, I should not write about science when I'm sleepy. I was confusing current (charge per unit time) with power (energy per unit time). You are correct indeed about transformers. Also, I never believed there was anything relevant in the actual post; nothing in it sounds actually groundbreaking.

If u want to increase electrical power, what u need is an amplifier, which is also common (and I bet 50x is common in that case), but it isn't typically used for power transmission.
Reply
+70
#6 - draaaaiven (11/14/2015) [-]
Love those conspiracytards that think Tesla found the way to create free energy, money, food, real life waifus, heal all sicknesses and ascend any human being into a god like status.
Reply
+1
User avatar #82 to #6 - haroldsaxon ONLINE (11/15/2015) [-]
Isn't just solar power "free energy"
Reply
+10
User avatar #94 to #82 - thedugster (11/15/2015) [-]
check the going price of solar panels
Reply
+17
User avatar #97 to #94 - haroldsaxon ONLINE (11/15/2015) [-]
My family has a cabin, being used roughly 3 months a year, that has been entirely solar powered for over 15 years.


Even if you have to pay for the cup, the water is free.
Reply
0
User avatar #90 to #82 - rakogoki (11/15/2015) [-]
it costs alot of resources to produce solar panels and they dont pay out for a while, especially on larger scales. works great for small devices and lights, but you cant power a city on solar alone, at least not until we find some way to make them efficient enough.
Reply
+1
User avatar #96 to #90 - haroldsaxon ONLINE (11/15/2015) [-]
You have high efficiency solar panels, and more common low efficiency ones. Unfortunately because of the low efficiency ones, there's less research in the high efficiency ones. If you cover a smaller part of the Sahara, you get more power than the entire world uses I know about problems and yada yada, that's not the point . You can power a lot on solar alone. My family has a cabin way up in the mountains. It's powered by solar alone (only lights and TV, and whatever is getting charged). Been so for as long as I remember. No idea for how long. That's "free energy" for 15+ years. 0 bills.


You can get free soda if you bring a cup. "But I only have small cups".


I know solar isn't a solution in itself. However, I dislike how people are taught to hate it. In my opinion, what resources you use is entirely dependent on your location. I get most of my power from water, for instance. I would not recommend that to be your main source in Egypt.


The pros of solar is that it can be used most places, is currently being worked on (though not enough), and lasts forever*. Besides we have the new and improved Jesus Christ, Elon Musk, working on it.
Reply
0
User avatar #100 to #96 - thedugster (11/15/2015) [-]
Nuclear power is where we need to go. Solar power would work for urban areas, and apparently the average household could become energy independent for ~12,000 USD, but for cities the required initial cost and upkeep would be ridiculous.
Reply
+2
User avatar #101 to #100 - haroldsaxon ONLINE (11/15/2015) [-]
I agree a bit. I would never agree "nuclear power is the future", simply because I want to optimize all* most options. Besides, I think people fanboying nuclear as the only thing we need is very narrow-minded. Think of space stations, for instance.


We need to use all renewable sources when viable. The reason why I focus on solar is because I believe we need much more research and funding here (as well as nuclear, for the record). In reality we should look at what's around us. Norway gets 98% of it's power from water. Sweden uses the ground, and Denmark uses wind. There is no one solution we should put all our eggs in.
Reply
0
#128 to #101 - anon (11/15/2015) [-]
Nuclear reactors, albeit small ones have been used in space successfully. I am not against solar but please note there are other options. Also, beyond Jupiter there's too little sunlight for solar panels to be anything but a burden.
Reply
0
User avatar #103 to #101 - thedugster (11/15/2015) [-]
your opinions are in the right place bud. I like to bring up nuclear because people tend to write it off because it's between caught between renewable and nonrenewable, and also the media likes to lead people to believe it's crazy dangerous. IMHO we have to kick fossil fuels out as quick as possible and the best way is to use all available resources we can
Reply
0
User avatar #104 to #103 - haroldsaxon ONLINE (11/15/2015) [-]
I'm with you there. Been a couple of years since I did my research on this, but I'm wishing for Thorium. I guess we will see. Thorium and affordable, high efficiency solar panels would be swell.
Reply
0
#196 to #104 - jacg (11/15/2015) [-]
India's pouring some research into thorium, last I heard in b4 designated

There's also a new design for a fusion reactor that uses some really nice superconductors to boost efficiency to the point that it actually produces more energy than it takes to maintain fusion. Exciting times!
Reply
+1
User avatar #252 to #196 - angelusprimus (11/15/2015) [-]
If HT3R project in Texas is successful we will have a ceramic-thorium beads test reactor by the end of next year.
Then its a matter of scaling it up.
Thorium is really exciting, if we manage to do it it will be a huge boost because that technology could be given to Iran, India and China, since you can't use Thorium to make bombs. If they need less coal that would reduce pollution massively.
Reply
+1
User avatar #210 to #6 - infinitereaper (11/15/2015) [-]
He literally wanted to transmit electricity with sort of radio towers for free to the world, that was his dream, and the actual technology works. Also, there was a man who claimed he built a working water engine. He even had a deal with the department of defense to build big generators. But you know what? Just before the deal went through he died of food poisoning.

Nobody ever talks about it.
Reply
0
#323 to #210 - draaaaiven (11/15/2015) [-]
"With sort of radio towers for free"

If you disregard massive losses due to the way too high resistance of air then yes, it was free.
Reply
0
User avatar #256 to #210 - angelusprimus (11/15/2015) [-]
Water engine one is very popular but its a known falsehood.
Anyone with a background in physics can tell you that there just isn't enough potential energy in water to power anything.
Reply
0
User avatar #292 to #256 - infinitereaper (11/15/2015) [-]
Hydrogen fuel cells? kinda like solar power, if you can figure out how to make something 100% efficient a lot of things become viable. Solar power would obsolete even nuclear power in terms of efficiency and cost at 99% power efficiency.

I recall an engineer who invented a way to split water and burn the hydrogen to create a welding flame save to touch but hot enough to burn metal.

Oil companies just buy all these technologies and bury them.
Reply
+2
User avatar #14 to #6 - rakaka (11/15/2015) [-]
He was a neet and died a virgin, of course the majority of the internet worships him.
Reply
+4
#8 to #6 - anon (11/14/2015) [-]
get ready for the future. you'll hate it.
Reply
+4
#10 to #8 - draaaaiven (11/14/2015) [-]
Get ready for reality, the drugs are going to wear off at one point.
Reply
+2
#31 to #10 - anon (11/15/2015) [-]
but i don't do drugs
Reply
+9
User avatar #12 to #6 - beroty ONLINE (11/15/2015) [-]
TESLA WILL TURN ANIME REAL!!!!!!11111111!!!!!1!1!1!!11
Reply
+4
#50 to #12 - sleepehz ONLINE (11/15/2015) [-]
**sleepehz used "*roll picture*"**
**sleepehz rolled image**"Tesla found the way to create free energy,..., food, real life waifus"

-draaaaiven

YOU HEARD THE MAN!
Reply
0
#224 to #50 - anon (11/15/2015) [-]
**anonymous used "*roll picture*"**
**anonymous rolled image**
Reply
+10
#152 - fatsigurd (11/15/2015) [-]
**fatsigurd used "*roll picture*"**
**fatsigurd rolled image**<- Tesla's darkest secret
Reply
+9
#195 - anon (11/15/2015) [-]
Today I learned that FJ is ******* retarded.

Please take your NaturalNews-tier clickbait **** somewhere else.
Reply
0
User avatar #205 to #195 - itssakamoto (11/15/2015) [-]
Oh anon...
Reply
+9
User avatar #115 - yiffcario (11/15/2015) [-]
Here comes the Death Ray.
Reply
0
#127 to #115 - anon (11/15/2015) [-]
well at least someone's made progress on the "wireless power transfer" idea
i'm talkin about those battery chargers that dont need any wires connected.

its just a matter of time before someone starts swinging some vibrations back and forth again to the point where all the trees in a 2mile radius circle in a secluded forrest dissappears overnight.
Reply
+7
User avatar #134 - lapsushominum (11/15/2015) [-]
>"Magnifying power by nearly %5,000"
>What is Thermodynamics
Reply
+1
User avatar #137 to #134 - whitie (11/15/2015) [-]
Magnifying power as in the power of an electromagnet which is the basis behind a tesla coil and the wireless transfer of electricity

What its saying is he discovered how to wirelessly transfer electricity 5,000 times faster
Reply
+2
User avatar #336 to #137 - lapsushominum (11/15/2015) [-]
So really he claims to have increased the efficiency of said system. Sorry, to be fair the content uses the word "power" very vaguely and when it comes to Tesla there's tons of "free" energy talk thrown around
Reply
+1
User avatar #348 to #336 - whitie (11/16/2015) [-]
free power typically refers to a reform of the energy industry where all electricity would be paid for by tax money and distributed via tesla coil networks, providing the ultimate convenience for civilians and cheaper power by streamlining power production into singular massive & effecient power plants

Basically free in the same sense that water is considered free
Reply
+5
#193 - anon (11/15/2015) [-]
Reply
+15
#1 - anon (11/14/2015) [-]
They'll kill him
Discredit him
His work will vanish....

They want to hold us back
Reply
+3
User avatar #285 - mechgeek (11/15/2015) [-]
Sounds like Nikola has come back from the dead to finish what he started.
By creating the ultimate electrical nipple clamps that we deserve.
Reply
+3
User avatar #281 - commoncrunch (11/15/2015) [-]
I'm gonna be honest, I read "Jim Murray" and thought of both Jim Carrey and Bill Murray.
Reply
+3
User avatar #166 - noobstoski (11/15/2015) [-]
I don't know about this, bro. It might be a hoax.

I mean, they're talking about putting some energy in and much more than that amount comes out. Sounds akin to perpetual motion, to me.
Reply
+1
#169 to #166 - anon (11/15/2015) [-]
it's something to do with quantum effects and zero point energy, but I'm not claiming to understand it
Reply
+1
User avatar #179 to #166 - captainprincess ONLINE (11/15/2015) [-]
Well let's not rule it out
It could totally be possible and we just don't commonly know the trick
Reply
+2
#212 - solarisofcelestia (11/15/2015) [-]
I hope there will be old-timey robots.
Reply
+1
User avatar #320 - failtolawl (11/15/2015) [-]
All I know is Tesla made expensive ass lightbulbs, couldn't actually afford to produce them, while having these moral qualms that prevented him from making any profit.

Then Edison came in, made cheaper and longer lasting lightbulbs, and sold them to the world.
Reply
0
#363 to #320 - anon (11/30/2015) [-]
and also ****** tesla over and stabbed him in the back. Edison was a business man and an inventor, not necessarily a good person. Of course, history likes to glaze over the fact that edison was a massive cunt.
123>
[ 363 comments ]
Leave a comment
<
>
 Friends (0)