It all makes sense now. . RMS Titania: Noah’: Ark feet 450 feet Width: 92 feet 25 feet Const ruction: Steel Wood Capacity: people people Enough fund and water b
Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

hide menu

It all makes sense now

RMS Titania: Noah’: Ark
feet
450 feet
Width: 92 feet 25 feet
Const ruction: Steel Wood
Capacity: people people
Enough fund and water birds
for I weeks 11, 003 reptiles
HIDE mammals
5, 000 amphibians
2, Insects
Enough fund and water for
a year
Question:
How in the world did all the animals fit inside the ark?
Answer:
...
  • Recommend tagsx
+562
Views: 26848
Favorited: 24
Submitted: 02/10/2014
Share On Facebook
Add to favorites Subscribe to moneym E-mail to friend submit to reddit

Comments(258):

[ 258 comments ]

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Show:   Top Rated Controversial Best Lowest Rated Newest Per page:
Order:
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
User avatar #11 - mathematics (02/10/2014) [+] (127 replies)
haven't you seen Ken Ham's debate. it's not species on noah's ark, it's kinds, and there aren't that many kinds back in the day.
#16 to #11 - phoenixactual (02/11/2014) [-]
But that just proves that evolution is real
#37 - solitaryweasel (02/11/2014) [-]
mfw people are actually trying to explain it.
mfw people are actually trying to explain it.
#19 - tolpi (02/11/2014) [+] (19 replies)
NOTE: Not every single sub-species was brought aboard, also account for space on the titanic taken up by engines and various other mechanics and also account for the roomier accommodations that allowed it to receive luxury liner status. ...I.E. Much more square footage per capita, rendering it not such a massive leap of logic to comprehend. Not the roomy room in picture....
User avatar #20 to #19 - ninjaroo (02/11/2014) [-]
Try keeping an animal in a room that small and see how long it takes for it to get depressed and die.
User avatar #17 - stifflimb (02/11/2014) [+] (2 replies)
Wait, you forgot all the freshwater fish!
That is some sick indoor pool that boat had!
#196 - stepsword (02/11/2014) [+] (7 replies)
Ken Ham, I choose you!!

ATTACK 1: thats historical science
ATTACK 2: you werent there
ATTACK 3: your theory is invalid because its not from the bible
ATTACK 4: my bible is less fictional than pokemon
ATTACK 5: nothing will change my mind
User avatar #55 - skypatrol ONLINE (02/11/2014) [+] (16 replies)
Also, humans were much larger in prehistoric times, as we've found human femurs up to 5 feet long dating back a few thousand to ten thousand years ago.
Since the Ark was measured in cubits
(cubits = elbow to fingertip)
the ark would have been much larger than that anyway
User avatar #62 to #55 - zomaru ONLINE (02/11/2014) [-]
I walk into a 100 year old house and my average height hits ever door frame.
You got it backwards, people were hella short .
#12 - AnonymousDonor (02/11/2014) [+] (10 replies)
what if the tale of noah's ark was rewritten to the technology of the times?

what if the ark was in fact a spaceship, moving from one doomed planet to another? (or perhaps simply rising above the same planet earth until the floods died down)

if nothing else, the animals part makes a lot more sense in that the male and female DNA sequences of millions of species would be a lot easier to fit on an ark without worrying about the fact that the lions have to eat
User avatar #18 to #12 - metalmind (02/11/2014) [-]
Well, evidence?
No.
It's an exraordinary claim that would require a lot of evidence.
User avatar #220 - faimbot (02/11/2014) [-]
Genesis 7:2 "Take with you seven pairs of every kind of clean animal, a male and its mate, and one pair of every kind of unclean animal, a male and its mate".

That's 14 of every animal considered clean.
#96 - anonymous (02/11/2014) [+] (1 reply)
Titanic had electricity, motor, engines, ect. take that away and you have enough space. Im a atheist.
#182 to #96 - GEARBOY (02/11/2014) [-]
Titanic is still 130 feet longer  - your statement might hold a microbe of value if both ships were perhaps the same length.   
   
You're not an athiest - you're a 						*******					 moron. You know how I know that? Because even you were not sure about your 						******					 response to this post - yet you were still inclined to comment - so you posted it as anon.   
   
Yes you were wrong. And I hope you 						*******					 die a little inside now knowing how pathetic your claim was. You make me 						*******					 sick. You 						****					 on the word perspicacity. You and 90% of 						*******					 imbeciles like you scroll through a post - absorb a toothpick of information - and then have the 						*******					 audacity to piss your opposing views or disagreements at it . Without having actually read the 						*******					 post properly in the first place you don't get a free ticket to post whatever illogical banter that first comes out of your ass into the comment section.    
   
You people are so 						*******					 insecure online that it will be no surprise that it actually reflects how you behave and are treated in real life. Social 						*******					 outcasts due to not wanting to listen when recommended for their own benefit to change or adjust their appearance/ health/ shape/ manners/ personality or in your case: their way of thinking.    
   
Just because you like to post a 'clever comment' to illustrate your freedom of speech/ or to feel like you've accomplished something - doesn't give you the excuse to not pick up a 						*******					 book and pump a few extra brain cells into your thick skull.    
   
You are the prime example of the level of retardedness most people laugh at on this site (on the cringe comps and whatnot) - illustrating a size comparison between 2 boats and it's content has no 						*******					 correlation with you being an athiest. Do you think pointing out that you're an atheist justifies your point? It automatically must mean you are correct? Take that extra hand that you were gifted with out of your sloppy dick/vag and use it to type a few more words of extra sense.   
   
   
I'm having a bad day
Titanic is still 130 feet longer - your statement might hold a microbe of value if both ships were perhaps the same length.

You're not an athiest - you're a ******* moron. You know how I know that? Because even you were not sure about your ****** response to this post - yet you were still inclined to comment - so you posted it as anon.

Yes you were wrong. And I hope you ******* die a little inside now knowing how pathetic your claim was. You make me ******* sick. You **** on the word perspicacity. You and 90% of ******* imbeciles like you scroll through a post - absorb a toothpick of information - and then have the ******* audacity to piss your opposing views or disagreements at it . Without having actually read the ******* post properly in the first place you don't get a free ticket to post whatever illogical banter that first comes out of your ass into the comment section.

You people are so ******* insecure online that it will be no surprise that it actually reflects how you behave and are treated in real life. Social ******* outcasts due to not wanting to listen when recommended for their own benefit to change or adjust their appearance/ health/ shape/ manners/ personality or in your case: their way of thinking.

Just because you like to post a 'clever comment' to illustrate your freedom of speech/ or to feel like you've accomplished something - doesn't give you the excuse to not pick up a ******* book and pump a few extra brain cells into your thick skull.

You are the prime example of the level of retardedness most people laugh at on this site (on the cringe comps and whatnot) - illustrating a size comparison between 2 boats and it's content has no ******* correlation with you being an athiest. Do you think pointing out that you're an atheist justifies your point? It automatically must mean you are correct? Take that extra hand that you were gifted with out of your sloppy dick/vag and use it to type a few more words of extra sense.


I'm having a bad day
#210 - anonymous (02/11/2014) [+] (6 replies)
Here's the thing with Noah's ark:

Evolution and christianity can go hand in hand. The big debate is whether humans cam from evolution or were created by god. Noah's ark didn't have birds; birds fly. They didn't have fish/water creatures; they can swim. THey didn't have every kind of dog; they had two wolves which later EVOLVED into dogs (descended is the better term). They didn't have every kind of cat, they have two tiger/lions (whichever came first) which later descended into cats. Get my drift? Noah's ark is definitely possible.
User avatar #218 to #210 - myjeren (02/11/2014) [-]
No bird could survive only flying for forty days. No fish could live that far beneath the surface and continue to live. There would be nothing on the Earth. They'd all die.
Creationism is ******** and it's bad for ya.
#14 - ubbashnubba (02/11/2014) [+] (4 replies)
It was kinds of animals. No insects (they could survive the flood on their own), so probably only about 2000 animals. As for the bigger ones, like elephants, you would take babies, so their size wouldn't be a problem at all.
#15 to #14 - phoenixactual (02/11/2014) [-]
Bugs still need a place to land, and water is notoriously bad for that
#205 - rublixcube (02/11/2014) [+] (1 reply)
Or ya know, noah was a time lord. Didn't he live real old?
User avatar #214 to #205 - teamrocketninja ONLINE (02/11/2014) [-]
I believe the Bible says around 500 or so years, yeah.

The ark was bigger on the inside.
User avatar #40 - skubasteve (02/11/2014) [+] (2 replies)
To be fair, if God was real and informed noah to build the ark, why wouldn't an omnipotent being have the power to do all of this?
#26 - jancz (02/11/2014) [+] (1 reply)
i bet it's... bigger on the inside
User avatar #1 - psychadelicace (02/10/2014) [+] (9 replies)
I'm pretty sure 2m+ pokeballs wouldn't fit on noah's ark
User avatar #4 to #3 - rikter (02/10/2014) [-]
I actually came across this memory while thinking that logistically it would make sense to let the insects stay outside the balls.
#230 - fourtitwo (02/11/2014) [-]
In order to store this many animals in pokeballs you would need 2,043,400 pokeballs.
Assuming a pokeball is 6 centimeters in diameter (gross assumption, but I can't find the official dimensions...) each would take up 113.1 cubic centimeters amounting to a total of 231103.1 cubic decimeters of space, assuming there is no space between the balls (which would be incorrect).
This is the same as 231103.1 liters of liquid.

If we assume the ship is square with the measurements provided it would have an internal size of
42,987,739.1 cubic decimeters of space. Even assuming that 2/3 of it's space was lost due to living areas, actual shape of the ship, rooms, levels, hull and whatnot, there would still be amble room for the pokeballs ^^b

Turns out you could in fact store all the pokeballs onboard this ship. Didn't expect that.
Science approves of these calculations.
User avatar #206 - catpisseverdeen (02/11/2014) [-]
Humans are selfish creatures. We all want room to ourselves, usually 650sqft+ for one-four people. Add that on top of all the maintenance rooms that no one uses on the ship. Now, birds, reptiles, insects, and amphibians are A LOT smaller than a human. And you can cram A LOT of them into a 650sqft room, including the mammals. Can't really explain the food one, though.
#202 - jimli (02/11/2014) [+] (1 reply)
Mfw all the super edgy atheists
User avatar #223 to #202 - richardstiffy (02/11/2014) [-]
Next time, try to form a coherent argument.
User avatar #194 - mehturtlesareok (02/11/2014) [-]
If you genuinely think there is some way this actually happened, you are a ******* moron. I don't care if this is a controversial way to put it, because it shouldn't be.
[ 258 comments ]
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)