Intruder Alert?. This is the actual transcription of the Apollo 10 flightcrew communications as recorded on the command module (CM). This particular section des intruder floater WTF Not okay
Upload
Login or register

Intruder Alert?

Click to block a category:GamingPoliticsNewsComicsAnimeOther
 
Intruder Alert?. This is the actual transcription of the Apollo 10 flightcrew communications as recorded on the command module (CM). This particular section des

This is the actual transcription of the Apollo 10 flightcrew communications as recorded on the command module (CM). This particular section describes a moment when the crew have to deal with an unexpected intruder...

The Apollo 10 mission was flown May 18th to May 26th 1969.

CDR - Commander Thomas P. Stafford
CMP - Command module pilot John W. Young
LMP - Lunar module pilot Eugene A. Cernan


Source: I ******* Love Science

95132915-
MI 13 as is
Dari
1151329 55 CNP
1351329 S?
CNP
dill whit?
Phat!
Maet an It' kurttster)
than did that can but
1111: In 1 . pl: muich-
the air.
I idn" t. an it It ain' t. one at tine.
I drept tunk It' s one of nine.
lung was a. little more stick: that that.
that IRIS.
thad
Intere' ts I turd flout his
Turn?
...
+686
Views: 34607 Submitted: 07/03/2014
Hide Comments
Leave a comment Refresh Comments (89)
[ 89 comments ]
Anonymous comments allowed.
asd
User avatar #8 - grimfuck
Reply +6 123456789123345869
(07/03/2014) [-]
stickied by bluedoritocat
GUYS this is public record..

www.jsc.nasa.gov/history/mission_trans/AS10_CM.PDF

you can read most mission transcripts on the Nasa website. This content starts on page 416 of the PDF
#4 - biscuitsunited
Reply +114 123456789123345869
(07/03/2014) [-]
The Confidential stamp and the fact this was documented makes this all the better.
User avatar #48 to #4 - deltoraquest
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/04/2014) [-]
good god I love me some danny2462
#9 - crocodilorage
Reply -37 123456789123345869
(07/03/2014) [-]
Moon landing didn't happen you americunts.
You can use a physics textbook and prove it.
It is amazing how people are ready to lie to
themselves in order to protect their hope.
#71 to #9 - garyhasmorebadges
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/04/2014) [-]
#73 to #9 - anon id: e791f00d
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/04/2014) [-]
am fizzicks student, cannot confirm
#23 to #9 - TheHutchie
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(07/04/2014) [-]
Which one?
User avatar #64 to #9 - leonhardt
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(07/04/2014) [-]
A telescope can prove you wrong.
User avatar #67 to #9 - altairibnlaahad
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(07/04/2014) [-]
>Claims moon landing didn't happen
>Wants proof it happened
>Gives no proof on his own side

7/10 made some people rage
#69 to #9 - spceinvdr
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(07/04/2014) [-]
ok very nice thank you for your input see you later.
#24 to #9 - oosime
Reply +9 123456789123345869
(07/04/2014) [-]
anyway, here's my proof that the landings were real. here's some footage from apollo 17: www.youtube.com/watch?v=sRSpntQ-VtY

do you see how the lrv kicks up dust? on earth, the dust would dissipate into the air and would leave behind clouds like this: www.youtube.com/watch?v=G-aO2Pzowko

in a vacuum (such as the moon) there is no air for the dust to dissipate into, so each particle will settle back onto the ground after a short little hop, as is seen in the apollo 17 footage. my question to you is how did they fake that? there was no cgi back then, so do you think they attached strings to each particle of dust and had a million-armed puppeteer control them?
#14 to #9 - mrcthuluman
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(07/03/2014) [-]
#82 to #9 - gtocforyou
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(07/04/2014) [-]
User avatar #49 to #9 - ivehadworse
Reply +4 123456789123345869
(07/04/2014) [-]
Mythbusters Moon Landing episode would like a word with you.
#22 to #9 - oosime
Reply +5 123456789123345869
(07/04/2014) [-]
someone's a bit jealous
User avatar #27 to #9 - oosime
Reply +6 123456789123345869
(07/04/2014) [-]
yeah, dont bother trying to refute my evidence that you asked for. instead, thumb down my comments! thatll show me!
#34 to #27 - crocodilorage
Reply -9 123456789123345869
(07/04/2014) [-]
I also flag them
#58 to #34 - bvsfang
Reply +7 123456789123345869
(07/04/2014) [-]
User avatar #10 to #9 - heartlessrobot
Reply +7 123456789123345869
(07/03/2014) [-]
Then prove it didn't happen.
If it didn't, don't you think the Russians would have told everyone by now?
#11 to #10 - crocodilorage
Reply -9 123456789123345869
(07/03/2014) [-]
How about you prove it did happen.
Russians know america never landed and they behave like it. They know it will take more then social media to convince an entire population of idiots.
User avatar #15 to #11 - heartlessrobot
Reply +9 123456789123345869
(07/03/2014) [-]
We've already proved it did happen. Why would we bother launching rockets to the moon if we didn't intend for them to land. And I've never heard of any sane Russians saying America never landed on the moon. So far the only people saying they haven't are the *******, tinfoil hat wearing freaks living in their mothers basement or in a trailer park hiding from the man.
#16 to #15 - crocodilorage
Reply -10 123456789123345869
(07/03/2014) [-]
Some people don't want to know the truth. They wan't to be fooled.
I hate in comments most of my time on FJ, but this time i am serious.
If you were really interested in moon landing hoax you would check out
some videos. Now you are lying to me that you know a lot about this subject,
while actually all you know is that people say it happened.
If you really want some proof ill give you a link but in the end you will just convince yourself that it isn't truth. Also rockets do land on moon, but the massive radiation prevents humans from doing so.
User avatar #17 to #16 - heartlessrobot
Reply +6 123456789123345869
(07/03/2014) [-]
We've had the capability to create buildings that can survive a direct strike from a nuclear missile and protect the occupants for a VERY long time. How difficult would it be to attach rockets to it? And the suits protect against radiation, we have people currently in outer space wearing similar suits, and they're protected. You're full of ****.
#18 to #17 - crocodilorage
Reply -11 123456789123345869
(07/03/2014) [-]
Just type "moon landing hoax" or smtn on youtube. I don't have time for this.
#20 to #18 - alexanderh
Reply +6 123456789123345869
(07/03/2014) [-]
I really hope you're not dumb enough to actually believe the ******** you're spewing.
So far, I haven't found a single compelling piece of evidence that we didn't land on the moon, and the fact that you don't cite a single source even though you said you would further proves you wrong.
User avatar #19 to #18 - heartlessrobot
Reply +6 123456789123345869
(07/03/2014) [-]
I could type "Earth being round hoax" into youtube and find plenty of people convinced the earth is flat. And the flag from the original landing is still there, it's just bleached white.
#28 to #19 - crocodilorage
Reply -5 123456789123345869
(07/04/2014) [-]
WHY are you all so afraid to look it up on youtube
one hour video that will change your fu**ing life
go search it, or are you afraid that you will know
the ugly truth? Also can anyone explain why are
there no more "lunar landings" now that they can
shoot it in HD; its fake as ****
User avatar #29 to #28 - oosime
Reply +7 123456789123345869
(07/04/2014) [-]
waiting for you to refute my evidence.
#30 to #29 - crocodilorage
Reply -7 123456789123345869
(07/04/2014) [-]
There is millions of you and i didn't make only one comment; WATCH VIDEOS ON YT
I don't have time to write you an essay
User avatar #31 to #30 - oosime
Reply +6 123456789123345869
(07/04/2014) [-]
ive seen plenty of nutjobs ranting on youtube. i can refute every one of their arguments. give me a specific one and ill be glad to do the same for you.
#32 to #31 - crocodilorage
Reply -6 123456789123345869
(07/04/2014) [-]
Why are there no videos of lunar landings for so long?
User avatar #35 to #32 - oosime
Reply +4 123456789123345869
(07/04/2014) [-]
because we have never sent any more people to the moon since apollo 17.
#33 to #32 - crocodilorage
Reply -6 123456789123345869
(07/04/2014) [-]
Im waiting
User avatar #37 to #33 - oosime
Reply +6 123456789123345869
(07/04/2014) [-]
by the way, you still havent countered my first bit of evidence. you should really get around to doing that.
#38 to #37 - crocodilorage
Reply -5 123456789123345869
(07/04/2014) [-]
My internet is ******, sorry bout that
Anyway why are there no more missions?
User avatar #45 to #38 - oosime
Reply +4 123456789123345869
(07/04/2014) [-]
0.5% of tax money goes to nasa. if they can pull off a moon mission with that kind of money, they can solve world hunger. plus, its all about politics. the only reason we went to the moon was because we thought the ussr might do it first. now, theres no political reason to do it, so nasa gets no funding.
#46 to #45 - crocodilorage
Reply -13 123456789123345869
(07/04/2014) [-]
YOU DELUSIONAL *****.
DO YOU REALLY BELIEVE WHAT YOU JUST SAID?
HOLY ******* ****. NO WONDER THE WHOLE PLANET THINKS YOU ARE RETARDS. WOW I CANT BELIEVE I READ THIS. THERE IS NO POLITICAL REASON?
ARE YOU AN IMBECILE? ONE ******* MISSION IN 40 YEARS? -NO POLITICAL REASON. WHY IS IT ONLY AMERICA CLAIMING THAT THEY LANDED? -NOBODY ELSE IS CAPABLE OF ACHIEVING WHAT AMERICA DID 50 YEARS AGO. NO FOOTAGE MORE THAN 240 PIXELS EVEN THO TOURISTS HAD BETTER CAMERAS? -THE CAMERA WILL GET RADIATION SO IT MUST BE SMALL. NO VIDEO OF LANDING BACK ON EARTH? -IT WAS NOT IMPORTANT.

Why am i here with all these americunts and more importantly how can they posibly be this stupid, how? Please god just wipe them all out from existance.
User avatar #57 to #46 - oosime
Reply +4 123456789123345869
(07/04/2014) [-]
not to mention that im still waiting on your counter argument for my initial bit of evidence. i think i can assume that you simply dont have one at this point.
User avatar #53 to #46 - oosime
Reply +4 123456789123345869
(07/04/2014) [-]
dude, the entire space race was political. of course no one is going to do it anymore, no one in power cares to go to the moon. why would they? how would it benefit them?

one mission in 40 years? try six landings and four lunar orbits.

why is america claiming they landed? because they remain the only ones to have done so.

as to your other arguments (which were clearly pulled straight out of your ass) there is a metric **** tonne of high quality apollo photos. heres my source: www.apolloarchive.com/apollo_gallery.html

you want a video of them splashing down on earth? here you go, apollo 15 splashdown: www.youtube.com/watch?v=E-Vd75Ptg9I

anything else you need?
User avatar #54 to #53 - dingdongpancakes
Reply +4 123456789123345869
(07/04/2014) [-]
At least the russians tried, but they ****** up and crashed and all died.
#56 to #54 - dingdongpancakes
+6 123456789123345869
(07/04/2014) [-]
Ah, thanks mate. The aircraft carrier that picked up Apollo 11 (USS Hornet) still has the little trailer they put the astronauts in in case they had "Moon viruses"
User avatar #55 to #54 - oosime
+2 123456789123345869
(07/04/2014) [-]
they never put humans aboard their moon rocket, the n1. it exploded on all attempts.
User avatar #52 to #46 - deltoraquest
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(07/04/2014) [-]
I just want to see what you think right now so I'm gonna ask you two questions.

1. how much money do you reckon it takes to get and construct all the necessary resources to build a rocket/lander capable of going to the moon and back.

2. how does one go about getting to the moon? You don't have to explain in great detail, just step by step.
#47 to #46 - crocodilorage
Reply -5 123456789123345869
(07/04/2014) [-]
I am so ******* done, I AM SOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO DONE HERE.
#51 to #47 - dingdongpancakes
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(07/04/2014) [-]
calm down son
User avatar #43 to #38 - dingdongpancakes
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(07/04/2014) [-]
Ever sense the time of Nixon, almost every time NASA goes to ask for more funds, they get their budget slashed. Also they were working on the space shuttle project and then later on the ISS. There are plans to go back to the moon.
#44 to #43 - crocodilorage
Reply -7 123456789123345869
(07/04/2014) [-]
Oh that's ******** alright;
They haven't made a single lunar flight in more then 40 years.
They were working on my ass, they have enough funds for 1000 lunar flights.
NASA (lying *****) had way more money than back then and more resources to make better rockets.
Also nobody was on the moon except USA?
Gimme a break
#59 to #44 - bvsfang
Reply +4 123456789123345869
(07/04/2014) [-]
#61 to #44 - lucariopwnz
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(07/04/2014) [-]
User avatar #50 to #44 - dingdongpancakes
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(07/04/2014) [-]
okay, i was wrong about NASAs budget, the last apollo mission was on 7 December 1972, and lasted 12 days or so. The space shuttle program started that same year and lasted of course, until 2011. I also can say you might need to calm down a tad.
#89 to #50 - crocodilorage
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(07/04/2014) [-]
Americunts is all i have to say.
Did you ever look at a hamster and just think how can he be so stupid.
Well, that is the way i look at all of you, you are nothing but delusional stupid
***** that have no evidence of anything yet they believe it. You are a stain on this
world, and you are nothing but insects. Stupid ***** thinking they are smart.
Give them evidence and theyll just dislike the comment. God i hate you all you
******* little american *****.
#92 to #89 - dingdongpancakes
0 123456789123345869
(07/04/2014) [-]
calm down son, how many times must I ay it?
#91 to #89 - fagetpolice
0 123456789123345869
(07/04/2014) [-]
Comment Picture
User avatar #74 to #44 - mistercookie
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(07/04/2014) [-]
Everyone is also missing the fact that there is absolutely no reason to spend millions of dollars on going to the moon. There is literally nothing worth going to the moon for. We got all the sample of space rocks we needed from the previous landings, and there isnt anything else interesting up there, so WHY do you think they should continue using millions of dollars to go to the moon? Just so you crazy nutjobs can get proof it isnt the ilerminaty?
User avatar #42 to #33 - dingdongpancakes
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(07/04/2014) [-]
just cause a few tinfoil had idiots say the landings are false doesn't mean they're correct.
#70 to #28 - malifforas
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/04/2014) [-]
I think you answered your own question there.


If it was fake, don't you think they would easily just make a "HD" video and say its real. With todays technology it would be really easy, yet they dont.
#26 to #11 - armsdealer
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(07/04/2014) [-]
Ummm, because I can use my telescope tonight and most likely find the **** they left behind...?
Ummm, because I can use my telescope tonight and most likely find the **** they left behind...?
User avatar #66 to #9 - xxbandwagonxx
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/04/2014) [-]
I thumbed you for being a faggot honest
User avatar #90 to #9 - durkadurka
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(07/04/2014) [-]
I think it's safe to say that the people thumbing this down or responding with rage posts are retarded. Nice job troll, you've earned it.
User avatar #88 to #9 - talonhalfstar
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(07/04/2014) [-]
I see you've been practicing.
#25 to #9 - foelkera
Reply +106 123456789123345869
(07/04/2014) [-]
The Magna Carta was never signed, the entire world is governed by King Jobbo the Insufferable
User avatar #39 to #25 - psykobear
Reply +10 123456789123345869
(07/04/2014) [-]
I like this bait picture.
User avatar #3 - charagrin
Reply +17 123456789123345869
(07/03/2014) [-]
The "CONFIDENTIAL" stamp is what makes this even better. Poop. Serious Business.
#1 - schnizel
Reply +17 123456789123345869
(07/03/2014) [-]
Comment Picture
#68 - fuckallthelobsters
Reply +8 123456789123345869
(07/04/2014) [-]
i think you missed the chance in the title to say inturder alert.
#84 to #68 - anon id: 9258cc95
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/04/2014) [-]
**anonymous rolled image**
space *******
#85 to #68 - anon id: 9258cc95
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/04/2014) [-]
**anonymous rolled image**   
APPOOPLE 11
**anonymous rolled image**
APPOOPLE 11
User avatar #62 - mrnpc
Reply +4 123456789123345869
(07/04/2014) [-]
if you **** in space, do you need to wipe your ass
User avatar #63 to #62 - shogg
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(07/04/2014) [-]
**** works the same way as pencil lead.
Some are hard and leave little residue, and are easy to erase, some are soft and leave lots of residue and are harder to erase.
You can still erase pencil lead in space.
#75 to #63 - lordnerevar
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(07/04/2014) [-]
Technically, we only need to wipe because we **** wrong. We're not designed to **** sitting down, and neither is anything else. We're squatters! If we put our feet on the toilet bowl and squatted how we're supposed to, we'd never spend money on TP again.
User avatar #76 to #75 - shogg
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(07/04/2014) [-]
I don't know, man, I've squatted on normal toilets and squatted in the woods before and I still had to wipe. The **** came out easier and was a lot faster than sitting, but it still left marks.
User avatar #79 to #76 - lordnerevar
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(07/04/2014) [-]
Not saying you're fat, 'cause I'm no beefcake, but...
Humans have huge buttcheeks. The muscles are more pronounced, and we collect a lot of fat. If a healthy, model human squatted right, it should separate the cheeks and, unless it's a monstrous loaf, shouldn't need to wipe.
I've admittedly tried pulling my cheeks apart before ******** a few times to see for myself, and all but one time, when I wiped, there was nothing on the TP.
This is such a ****** up nasty conversation
User avatar #83 to #79 - shogg
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(07/04/2014) [-]
I dont think my weight would be an issue as I'm like 20-30 pounds underweight
You're probably right, and I've just not been squatting right or there was another factor, like diarrhea and such. I'm really not that good when it comes to ******** as I don't enjoy it and frankly want to get it over with as quickly as possible.
User avatar #80 to #79 - MegaAwesomeSauce
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(07/04/2014) [-]
I agree but,

I tend to like not having a filthy asshole
#81 to #80 - lordnerevar
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/04/2014) [-]
Same, why do you think I wipe?
#36 - bluwizard
Reply +4 123456789123345869
(07/04/2014) [-]
**bluwizard rolled image** my turds
**bluwizard rolled image** my turds
#72 to #36 - zerodate
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(07/04/2014) [-]
THAT ROLL WORKS SO WELL
THAT ROLL WORKS SO WELL
#13 - anon id: da7dd599
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/03/2014) [-]
>tfw blame it on the dog
#40 to #13 - psykobear
0 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #21 to #13 - hellomynameisbill
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(07/04/2014) [-]
jesus dog died for our sins
User avatar #41 to #13 - psykobear
Reply +4 123456789123345869
(07/04/2014) [-]
>tfw I cum in pies
#6 - anon id: dbf3c581
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/03/2014) [-]
So there were Kerbals on that mission?
So there were Kerbals on that mission?
#12 to #6 - eddymolly
Reply +4 123456789123345869
(07/03/2014) [-]
[ 89 comments ]
Leave a comment