Ich bin ein gay. Source: In content. 8 GETTING READY FOR THE WINTER LOLYMPICS OVER Bl RUSSIA. AND GERMANY JUST UNVEILED THEIR _‘_ Wall';’ CLORED OLYMPIC UNIFORM Ich bin ein gay Source: In content 8 GETTING READY FOR THE WINTER LOLYMPICS OVER Bl RUSSIA AND GERMANY JUST UNVEILED THEIR _‘_ Wall';’ CLORED OLYMPIC UNIFORM
Upload
Login or register

Ich bin ein gay

Click to block a category:GamingPoliticsNewsComicsAnimeOther
 
Ich bin ein gay. Source: In content. 8 GETTING READY FOR THE WINTER LOLYMPICS OVER Bl RUSSIA. AND GERMANY JUST UNVEILED THEIR _‘_ Wall';’ CLORED OLYMPIC UNIFORM

Source: In content

8 GETTING READY FOR THE WINTER LOLYMPICS OVER Bl RUSSIA.
AND GERMANY JUST UNVEILED THEIR _‘_ Wall';’ CLORED OLYMPIC UNIFORMS,
WHEN SEEM TO BE A SUBTLE PROTEST AGAINS: T RUSSIA' S LAWS.
YOU DAN TELL HOW MUCH THE WORLD HAS CHANGED WHEN GERMANS ME
THE ONES WHO ARE LIKE '' IS JUST WRONG.”
...
+1325
Views: 60779 Submitted: 10/13/2013
Hide Comments
Leave a comment Refresh Comments (227)
[ 227 comments ]
> hey anon, wanna give your opinion?
asd
#7 - xnotcreative
Reply -96 123456789123345869
(10/13/2013) [-]
The Germans are actually only doing it to spite Russia in retaliation for WW2.
User avatar #96 to #7 - elcreepo
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(10/14/2013) [-]
I'm pretty sure there's a board on /pol/ waiting for you.

Go.
#156 to #7 - macabrealucard
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/14/2013) [-]
damnyou ****** up *****
damnyou ****** up *****
User avatar #11 to #7 - ivoryhammer
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(10/13/2013) [-]
Didn't Germany attack Russia in WW2?
User avatar #135 to #11 - commontroll
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(10/14/2013) [-]
Yes, but Russia was also just as ****** up and brutal as the Nazis were. Probably worse actually. Besides, most historians agree that if Germany hadn't attacked, Russia would have. They had all their troops gathered on the border and just happened to be building an army right by their allies. And this is Stalin we're talking about.
User avatar #97 to #11 - elcreepo
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(10/14/2013) [-]
Yes.

So in reality the only one retaliating were the russians, who raped well... everything and everyone in Germany.
User avatar #9 to #7 - bigfriendlyginger
Reply +131 123456789123345869
(10/13/2013) [-]
if Germany was going to start acting out of spite from WW2 they would be pissing of A LOT more people than just Russia.
User avatar #10 - teoferrazzi
Reply +118 123456789123345869
(10/13/2013) [-]
>american jokes about germany's discrimination
>black segregation was a more recent affair than the holocaust
**** you
User avatar #59 to #10 - nigeltheoutlaw
Reply -2 123456789123345869
(10/13/2013) [-]
If we committed genocide against blacks then maybe you would have a point, but we didn't.
User avatar #12 to #10 - ivoryhammer
Reply +5 123456789123345869
(10/13/2013) [-]
America didn't send black people to death camps, murdering over 6 million blacks.
User avatar #13 to #12 - eddymolly
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(10/13/2013) [-]
Arguable in terms of the American slave trade. I'm not sure 6 million, but still quite a lot. You have to admit, pretty much every power in world history have been bastards, doesn't matter who they are now, every country was evil at some point.
User avatar #17 to #13 - impaledsandwich
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(10/13/2013) [-]
The vast majority of blacks taken in the slave trade ended up in South America. Only a few hundred thousand (if I remember correctly) were sent to America compared to the millions sent elsewhere. Either way, none of them were sent to death camps. That would be a horrible investment.
User avatar #21 to #17 - eddymolly
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(10/13/2013) [-]
A quick google says aprox. 600,000 in total, with at least 40% or so in the north, so a good 240,000 in the north.

And I didn't mean literally they were shipped over and killed, I meant it more in a sense of they were kept locked in a place till they die.

And it was more of a comment on the fact no nation really has a right to say another one is "more evil" or anything like that, all Nations have been evil at previous points in history.
User avatar #27 to #21 - impaledsandwich
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(10/13/2013) [-]
Oh no, I'm not saying we colonies were the holy paradises we're told to believe they were. However, I don't think slavery was quite as evil as the organized extermination of ten million people.
#29 to #27 - eddymolly
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/13/2013) [-]
No, true, the 6 million killed in the Holocaust was more than the slave trade, but if you're talking in terms of who is "more evil", how do you say who is more evil? Is it purely number based? Or i it methods etc? How does one judge Evil? It gets into a whole new ballpark then, and its a bit late to be getting into all this crap.   
   
I think this gif nicely sums up my feelings on the matter
No, true, the 6 million killed in the Holocaust was more than the slave trade, but if you're talking in terms of who is "more evil", how do you say who is more evil? Is it purely number based? Or i it methods etc? How does one judge Evil? It gets into a whole new ballpark then, and its a bit late to be getting into all this crap.

I think this gif nicely sums up my feelings on the matter
#31 to #29 - impaledsandwich
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(10/13/2013) [-]
Fair enough, though I think we can agree that Hitler's worst mistake was not finishing the job.   
   
 By reading this spoiler, you agree that this is only a joke, and that it does not necessarily reflect the views of its poster. You also agree to give impaledsandwich a hundred-year lease on your anus in exchange for the ability to fly (provided you get a pilot's license and an airplane).
Fair enough, though I think we can agree that Hitler's worst mistake was not finishing the job.

By reading this spoiler, you agree that this is only a joke, and that it does not necessarily reflect the views of its poster. You also agree to give impaledsandwich a hundred-year lease on your anus in exchange for the ability to fly (provided you get a pilot's license and an airplane).
#34 to #21 - yodawgiheard
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(10/13/2013) [-]
A cursory Google search reveals that the majority of slaves in the trans-Atlantic slave trade were sent to places other than the colonies.

Portugese America: 38.5%
British America (minus North America): 18.4%
Spanish Empire: 17.5%
French Americas: 13.6%
British North America: 6.45%

The reason that this happened is because the crops grown in South America and the Carribean were mainly cash crops like sugar and rice, and as such required a LOT more labor to produce and harvest. One of my textbooks said that the rate of attrition was so incredibly bad in Brazil that the slaves were dying off faster than they could be replaced, with an average life expectancy of 6 months to a year before conditions improved (done of course so that slaves could work for longer, not because the slave owners were nice or anything).

So, in short, sure, the Colonies did have slavery, and they did receive many slaves, and slavery IS bad, but to be oblivious to the millions of slaves that died in Brazil and elsewhere in South America within the same time period is ignorance that I just can't ignore.

Sources: My African American Studies class in college, and en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atlantic_slave_trade#European_colonization_and_slavery_in_the_Americas
User avatar #33 to #12 - ninjamyles **User deleted account**
Reply -2 123456789123345869
(10/13/2013) [-]
not that im dissagering but, a fun fact
during WW2 america sent a large portion of it's Asian citazins to concentration camps, under the guize of them being 'potential spy's'
User avatar #40 to #33 - trystanvierra
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(10/13/2013) [-]
*internment camps. We didn't KILL them. We released them all, as well.
User avatar #35 to #10 - oceanfrank
Reply +58 123456789123345869
(10/13/2013) [-]
except we didnt kill 6 million of them you *******
User avatar #229 to #35 - Tazdingo
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/14/2013) [-]
Hitler didn't kill 6 million blacks either.
#37 to #35 - anon id: bf2adc7b
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/13/2013) [-]
Neither of you killed anybody! Let's not argue about who's ancestor did what. we are all individuals children.
YOU ARE NOT YOUR COUNTRY.
#172 to #37 - golbot
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/14/2013) [-]
I killed a black jew once...
User avatar #61 to #37 - teoferrazzi
Reply -19 123456789123345869
(10/13/2013) [-]
I'm italian. just because I got riled up by american stupidity doesn't mean I have to be german.
all we did was gas a few ethiopians but who hasn't
User avatar #98 to #61 - thepandaking
Reply +15 123456789123345869
(10/14/2013) [-]
"american stupidity"
I was on your side until you sounded like a completely bigoted faggot. You have to realize that Americans, like me, also look down on dumb tv jokes like this, it's hipocritical, but it's just for the ratings to get a couple laughs at another country.
Calm the **** down and get off your high horse of calling every American stupid.
User avatar #99 to #98 - teoferrazzi
Reply -13 123456789123345869
(10/14/2013) [-]
huh, last time I checked, Jimmy Fallon was american.. so his is american stupidity..
User avatar #103 to #99 - thepandaking
Reply +5 123456789123345869
(10/14/2013) [-]
or just the stupidity of American media more like, the stupidity of the fact that these kinds of jokes get more views than others. He's actually a good guy, but anyway calling it "American stupidity" such as to generalize all Americans as stupid, is a pretty dumb thing to say in my opinion.
User avatar #106 to #103 - teoferrazzi
Reply -11 123456789123345869
(10/14/2013) [-]
I didn't mean to say all americans are stupid.
however, there is a certain brand of stupidity that is typical of americans [not all of them]
User avatar #109 to #106 - thepandaking
Reply +4 123456789123345869
(10/14/2013) [-]
see even that is still pointing fingers while turning a blind eye to the rest of the world, every country's media pulls this kind of crap where they have stupid hypocritical jokes just to make middle age mothers at home laugh. It's all around the world, there's American stupidity, but there's also Canadian stupidity, and English stupidity, and Italian stupidity.
Or we can all just be honest with ourselves and recognize that humans in general have a lot of stupid faults, and that we should stop pointing out extremes and saying "look, see how these people are?"

just saiyan man.
User avatar #111 to #109 - teoferrazzi
Reply -6 123456789123345869
(10/14/2013) [-]
oh, and Italy? it's the ******* worst.
User avatar #110 to #109 - teoferrazzi
Reply -9 123456789123345869
(10/14/2013) [-]
you can say what you want, but this kind of joke would never fly in the UK because they have a historical and geographical awareness that americans lack. sure other things about the UK are bad but ignorance of history isn't one of them.
User avatar #116 to #110 - thepandaking
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(10/14/2013) [-]
but those things would fly though, and they do. I've seen so many clips of that famous news broadcaster's show (forgetting his name completely) saying ignorant things all of the time. My point is that there really is no possible condition in which a boundary can make you a certain kind of stupid. There are different kinds of stupid everywhere.
I'm the kind of stupid who engages in long discussions on the internet from time to time.

It's everywhere, and I'd never venture to say that Americans as a whole aren't stupid, but I'd also never say Americans as a whole are. Nor would I say such a thing about another country, since I know that generalizations are highly invalid.
User avatar #105 to #99 - elcreepo
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(10/14/2013) [-]
Not all Americans are stupid, you naive little inbred.
User avatar #104 to #61 - elcreepo
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(10/14/2013) [-]
American stupidity? Get off your pompous ass and realize that what America did is in no way the same as what Germany did.

Also, desegregation ended only 20 years after the end of WW2. And most countries were just as racist at some point, even to the point of killing different races (in much smaller amounts than hitler).
User avatar #142 to #104 - northleech
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/14/2013) [-]
You do realize that Americans being stupid is a stereotype, right? Deal with it, your media and your presidents recently have been ******* awful, and your educational system is awful, so people make jokes about that, and the whole "god bless America" you hear all the time makes people laugh. That being said, of course you are not all stupid, and of course you are not all warmongers! It's a freaking stereotype, it's like namecalling. Would you, outside of the internet, say that every black person is a thief? Hell no!
#50 to #35 - byzantinian
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(10/13/2013) [-]
America didn't kill people in concentration camps,but it did and still does through airstrikes and even through funding terrorist groups in syria,formerly in libya,afghanistan,etc. and everyone knows that,lets not talk about that one time when us airforce killed 2500+ civilians in serbia in 1999 or the time when in gulf war it dropped a thermal bomb on an orphenage in iraq,burning 480+ people to death,yeah,that's democracy,so **** you both.
User avatar #68 to #35 - teoferrazzi
Reply -9 123456789123345869
(10/13/2013) [-]
if you're really going to say that slavery as a whole wasn't as bad as the holocaust, then you need to go back to whatever high school you dropped out of
#92 to #68 - teranin
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(10/14/2013) [-]
you... are aware that you didn't say slavery in your original comment, right?  Segregation is a ******* different than enslavement.  Both a terrible, sure, but segregation isn't even remotely ******* close to as bad as a massacre on the scale of genetically eliminating an entire group of people.  You should probably stop sniffing your own farts in your prius, it's giving you brain damage.
you... are aware that you didn't say slavery in your original comment, right? Segregation is a ******* different than enslavement. Both a terrible, sure, but segregation isn't even remotely ******* close to as bad as a massacre on the scale of genetically eliminating an entire group of people. You should probably stop sniffing your own farts in your prius, it's giving you brain damage.
User avatar #91 to #68 - oceanfrank
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(10/14/2013) [-]
It wasn't.... they got to live their lives and raise families that eventually got equal treatment. The jews in the concentration camps were killed for the sole purpose of eradication and ethnic cleansing.
User avatar #32 - killinkyle
Reply +25 123456789123345869
(10/13/2013) [-]
'GETTING READY FOR THE WINTER LOLYMPICS OVER Bl RUSSIA.'

Ah, lightbulb, might want to take a second look at that one buddy...
User avatar #49 to #32 - amuzen
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/13/2013) [-]
Man I would totally watch the winter Lolympics over by Russia.
#85 - smokingman
Reply +22 123456789123345869
(10/14/2013) [-]
german atlet's fw
#169 to #85 - lolibear
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/14/2013) [-]
What is that from, it looks familiar.
#148 to #85 - benderisgreat
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(10/14/2013) [-]
Is that an appletini ?
#15 - acidreign
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/13/2013) [-]
For anyone curious.
#16 to #15 - anon id: 992267d0
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/13/2013) [-]
Not really rainbow.
User avatar #38 to #16 - hyeroshi
Reply +22 123456789123345869
(10/13/2013) [-]
They still look pretty gay though.
#83 to #15 - desreversti
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/14/2013) [-]
i wasn't, but i am now.....look at those girls
User avatar #150 to #15 - gormless
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/14/2013) [-]
I think they look pretty cool.
User avatar #151 to #15 - missrainbowdash
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/14/2013) [-]
there's no purple or pink
#42 to #15 - anisbanana
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(10/13/2013) [-]
At first I thought why are they wearing turbans

mfw
User avatar #113 to #15 - elcreepo
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(10/14/2013) [-]
Maybe instead of being for gay rights they're doing it because they got a fabulous new costume designer.
#2 - superduperpuper
Reply +11 123456789123345869
(10/13/2013) [-]
*Ich bin ein Schwuler (Even if no one says it like that you would always just hear I'm gay so "Ich bin schwul" or if you really want to impress with your gramatical sk1ll0r sk1llz "Schwul bin ich")

You're welcome.
User avatar #3 to #2 - mudkipfucker [OP]
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(10/13/2013) [-]
I was going for a JFK Ich bin ein Berliner reference. I understand thats its wrong in every sense. But Thanks
#4 to #3 - superduperpuper
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(10/13/2013) [-]
Oh no you'd say "Ich bin ein Berliner". And it's not directly wrong. The sentence is correct. It's just that no one would say it. That's all. It's just a stupid senseless sideinformation.
User avatar #5 to #4 - mudkipfucker [OP]
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(10/13/2013) [-]
are, fair enough, mein german is pretty bad. thanks
#6 to #5 - superduperpuper
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(10/13/2013) [-]
Nah it's just like we Germans say: "Deutsches Sprache, schweres Sprache" "Germanic language, difficultic language"
User avatar #8 to #6 - blackstarshooter
Reply +4 123456789123345869
(10/13/2013) [-]
*Deutsche Sprache, schwere Strafe.

German master race reporting in. I shouldn't say that loud, should I?...
User avatar #220 to #8 - melwach
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/14/2013) [-]
Say it loud and proud, son.
#237 to #6 - superduperpuper
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/14/2013) [-]
Echt? Ich kenne den nur so. (wie ich es auch schon dann, bewusst falsch ins Englische übersetzt habe.)
#165 - dragonthorn
Reply +6 123456789123345869
(10/14/2013) [-]
German's faces if they win.   
   
   
   
(I hope they do.)
German's faces if they win.



(I hope they do.)
User avatar #52 - frozo
Reply -16 123456789123345869
(10/13/2013) [-]
Russia's anti-gay.
Big deal.
I'm Russian, and live in America. And I think that if that is what Putin and the Russian people want, then by all means go ahead and do what you want. No need to be some kind of Alcoholic Anonymous group where everyone shames the one guy that doesn't do what the majority does.
And my parents, and pretty much every Russian "old style" person is anti gay as well.
User avatar #90 to #52 - smokingman
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/14/2013) [-]
If there's a fraction of people who accept homosexuality, then that is not what the russian people want.
Putin's ideas on homosexuality are irrelevant, he isn't a moral authority.
User avatar #107 to #90 - heartlessrobot
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/14/2013) [-]
He has openly stated that he will not make allowances for the comfort of minorities, as all in Russia should be Russian and laws won't be changed to accommodate other languages or customs. Shouldn't that mean they shouldn't make laws AGAINST the minorities either?
User avatar #114 to #107 - smokingman
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/14/2013) [-]
But homosexuality has nothing to do with languages or nationality.
Russian homosexual people are Russian.

No one is talking about accommodating other customs.
And no, they shouldn't make rules against minorities, that is an idiotic idea.
The fact that a country doesn't have an official religion doesn't mean that it has to implement anti-religious laws.


He is simply suppressing homosexuality.
Who is he to decide that all Russians are and must be heterosexual?
User avatar #118 to #114 - heartlessrobot
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(10/14/2013) [-]
Well, considering all of his political opponents mysteriously disappear, 140% of Russia's population voted for him in the last election, and no one in his government opposes what laws he puts up to vote, whether or not it is right, he has the power to do these things. It's only a matter of time until he's assassinated, kicked out of office by a mob, or there's a full on revolution.
User avatar #119 to #118 - smokingman
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/14/2013) [-]
I know, he has the power to do pretty much whatever he wants, but that is not the point.
We aren't discussing what he can or cannot do, we are discussing the legitimacy of his actions, and I think you will agree with me on the fact that what he is doing is ethically wrong.
User avatar #120 to #119 - heartlessrobot
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/14/2013) [-]
I'm not exactly the best to consult when it comes to ethics, (being a rather slutty, bisexual furry, loli/********, zoophiliac kleptomaniac with sociopathic tendencies according to my psychologist) but I believe what he is doing is horrible and needs to change. In his position of absolute power, I'd probably abuse my power as well, but I'd be doing far different things with that kind of power. I'm merely acknowledging the fact that at this point in time we can't do anything about it.
#121 to #120 - smokingman
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(10/14/2013) [-]
perversion is good
perversion is healthy
User avatar #122 to #121 - heartlessrobot
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(10/14/2013) [-]
As long as I'm not fondling little boys or putting my dick in an animal too small to fight back we're good.
#173 to #122 - alexandervascus
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/14/2013) [-]
>in an animal too small to fight back

Wait, you'd try to put your dick in an animal that can try to fight back?

That's pretty metal
User avatar #236 to #173 - heartlessrobot
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/14/2013) [-]
Nah, I'd rather put their dick in me.
I prefer horses.
User avatar #66 to #52 - dashgamer
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(10/13/2013) [-]
If there are gay Russians, then clearly it is not "what the Russian people want."
User avatar #72 to #66 - neoexdeath
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(10/13/2013) [-]
To be fair, you're gay in Russia if you haven't throttled a bear to death by your 10th birthday
User avatar #76 to #72 - dashgamer
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(10/13/2013) [-]
You're gay in Russia if you're Russian and you have sex with someone the same gender as yourself. Nothing makes you gay but being gay, it's this whole attitude of having requisite masculinity for every male, the fear that acting a certain way makes you seem homosexual, that is the most detrimental to the idea of just seeing gays as the people they are.
User avatar #79 to #76 - neoexdeath
Reply +6 123456789123345869
(10/13/2013) [-]
Dude, it was a Russia joke. They've got this whole thing with bears and over the top acts of physical prowess that should probably kill whoever tries it. Also alcohol.
User avatar #69 to #66 - frozo
Reply -4 123456789123345869
(10/13/2013) [-]
Then they are the minority.
You're always going to have an outlier, such as the Republicans who wanted to secede Texas into Mexico. Doesn't mean the entire US wants to do that.

Don't see why so many people are mad about this. I'm sympathetic to gays, but if a country hates you so strongly you should probably move.
User avatar #73 to #69 - dashgamer
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(10/13/2013) [-]
This is not comparable to issues of state sovereignty or politics. People loving one another is not something any government should have control over.
User avatar #75 to #73 - SemiAnon
Reply -9 123456789123345869
(10/13/2013) [-]
Loving a person and loving the cock are two different things.
User avatar #78 to #75 - dashgamer
Reply +5 123456789123345869
(10/13/2013) [-]
Loving a person and loving a vagina are two different things.
User avatar #80 to #78 - SemiAnon
Reply -7 123456789123345869
(10/13/2013) [-]
Not if you practice.
#71 to #52 - spamzor
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(10/13/2013) [-]
When you say: 'No need to be some kind of Alcoholic Anonymous group where everyone shames the one guy that doesn't do what the majority does.' Do you mean when a group of people looks down on a gay person or when a pro-gay international community looks down on a country supressing gays? Because your shoddy argument works for both sides.

And I wholehartedly believe that most of Russia is ol d style and anti-gay and many other things, doesn't mean we have to condone what they do any more than how they treat others.

What you call old-style is simply the social code that remains from decades and centuries past, always changing, always with people trying to change it and people trying to cling to it. Meaning it doesn't really back up any argument well.
User avatar #77 to #71 - frozo
Reply -5 123456789123345869
(10/13/2013) [-]
The social code is very rustic and old. The pro-gay international community looks down on Russia, and some of the countries are even starting to tell them what to do or threatening them.

Why can't we condone what they do? It's their country, their laws, their rules, and their people. America does not have to mess with every single country in the world and tell them what to do. If the majority of people in Russia are against it, they can vote anti-Putin next time or hold massive protests.

I'm not PRO the anti-gay sentiment, but I really dislike all the countries telling Russia what to do.
User avatar #86 to #77 - xxhadesflamesxx
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(10/14/2013) [-]
that argument was horrible apply that to nazi germany before the war and you can see how quickly it falls apart
#84 to #77 - spamzor
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/14/2013) [-]
**** America The reason other countries are giving criticism on this subject is because of the insane laws. "The forbidding of all pro-homosexual progaganda." Do you realize how insanely fascist that is? Not even literature can be saved from such a law.

Hell, the whole reason there is such an anti-gay sentiment is because of certain figureheads or organizations telling the Russian people to behave and judge in certain ways, and these were undoubtedly internationial in some, if not most cases. You can't keep people from judging, either way.
#88 to #52 - teranin
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(10/14/2013) [-]
Y'know, or we could react with an annoyance when an ex-kgb agent pulls some return to the dark ages level **** in a country that is supposedly a democracy now. There wasn't any arbitrary vote on their new anti-gay policy, it was just Putin dropping the hammer for no good reason.
#100 - heartlessrobot
Reply +5 123456789123345869
(10/14/2013) [-]
This image has expired
Now if only they sparkled.
Nazi Germany is hottest.
#19 - turdofdoom
Reply -11 123456789123345869
(10/13/2013) [-]
i dont think russia is anti gay
i think they just dont give gays any special treatment.
if you go demonstrating about not being alowed to have a parade for your ******* sexuality you gon get ****** up.
straight people are at least decent enough to not demand a parade for their own sexuality.
dont hurt me
#93 to #19 - xxhadesflamesxx
Reply -3 123456789123345869
(10/14/2013) [-]
after reading all of your comments on this page I despise you even more than most people
I hope you have a horrible day you ******* scumbag
User avatar #112 to #19 - elcreepo
Reply -2 123456789123345869
(10/14/2013) [-]
You dumbass, gays AREN'T asking for special treatment. The reason they're marching in parades is because the black civil rights and woman's rights movement did the same.

All gays are asking for in russia is the right to be equal to straights. But they aren't. They can't marry, or have children, or adopt children. It's one step away from making sodomy a crime again.

Russia is anti-gay.

Also, this thread is not and never will be dead, until this post leaves front page and even after. It's not 4chan you twit.
User avatar #168 to #112 - existacne
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/14/2013) [-]
> gay couples can't have children
Well, no ******* ****.
User avatar #232 to #168 - elcreepo
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(10/14/2013) [-]
Through adoption or through artificial insemination, or through a surrogate mother if it's a gay male couple.
User avatar #48 to #19 - heroofkvatch
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(10/13/2013) [-]
"not anti gay"

Putin has openly accepted and implemented many proposals from the Orthodox Church.

"Days earlier, another law was passed, stating that those accused of promoting "propaganda of nontraditional sexual relations" (which supporters of the legislation defined as "relations not conducive to procreation”) will be subject to arrest. Anyone who argues for lesbian and gay equality, including judges, lawyers and lawmakers, could be fined."



TLDR;

The orthodox church has putins balls in a clamp and he's passing anti gay laws
#51 to #48 - turdofdoom
Reply -3 123456789123345869
(10/13/2013) [-]
k
but thread is dead already and this have already been told and i now see that thares soem anti gay stuff in russia and it should be fixed.
but please read first i was thumbing down newest uploads in animemanga
User avatar #53 to #51 - heroofkvatch
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/13/2013) [-]
then delete your comment if you don't want people to continue replying
#56 to #53 - turdofdoom
Reply -2 123456789123345869
(10/13/2013) [-]
i wouldnt do that ever
im not gonna take away something away just so people are gonna stop thumbing me down
i take red thumbs and i dotn fear them
User avatar #57 to #56 - heroofkvatch
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(10/13/2013) [-]
never said anything about red thumbs, i said replies.

Do you type just to be able to read what you wrote?
#60 to #57 - turdofdoom
Reply -2 123456789123345869
(10/13/2013) [-]
i just want people to get the whole picture before they say anything
#63 to #60 - heroofkvatch
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/13/2013) [-]
too bad, no one cares.

#64 to #63 - turdofdoom
Reply -2 123456789123345869
(10/13/2013) [-]
yeah :L
User avatar #22 to #19 - linktheherooftime
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/13/2013) [-]
They made it illegal for gay couples to adopt, and have started taking kids away from gay parents.
#47 to #22 - Sunset
+5 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #65 to #47 - linktheherooftime
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/13/2013) [-]
I must have mishear the news then.
Please forgive me Sunset senpai.
#23 to #22 - turdofdoom
Reply -6 123456789123345869
(10/13/2013) [-]
guess thats equality
happens to straight people too
User avatar #24 to #23 - linktheherooftime
Reply +5 123456789123345869
(10/13/2013) [-]
They take them away just for being gay. That's prejudice not equality.
#28 to #24 - turdofdoom
Reply -7 123456789123345869
(10/13/2013) [-]
i guess thats something else.
should be fixed soon.
i guess theyre gonna work on it as soon as they are finished with saving people from being bombed by america
#39 to #28 - trystanvierra
Reply -2 123456789123345869
(10/13/2013) [-]
Guess they can start working on it NOW, then. ********.
Guess they can start working on it NOW, then. ********.
#41 to #39 - turdofdoom
Reply -6 123456789123345869
(10/13/2013) [-]
nah i think theyre still trying to save syria from america so less civillians will get killed
User avatar #43 to #41 - trystanvierra
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/13/2013) [-]
That's wrong but whatever. They're still trying to figure out the debt ********. Not a big fan of the U.S. federal system right now. Syria is gonna have to wait, and Putin is gonna have to stop being a little bitch about gay people AND Syria.
#44 to #43 - turdofdoom
Reply -4 123456789123345869
(10/13/2013) [-]

have you heard about fallujah ?
www.globalresearch.ca/white-phosphorous-daisy-cutters-depleted-uranium-thermobaric-bombs-clusterbombs-napalm-the-us-uses-wmd-against-civilians/1239

and american soldiers had orders to kill any civilian if they heard any gunfire

User avatar #45 to #44 - trystanvierra
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/13/2013) [-]
*Gunfire starts*

"OMG GUYS KILL EVERYONE!"

Common sense, ********.
#46 to #45 - turdofdoom
Reply -4 123456789123345869
(10/13/2013) [-]
they justify it by saying that the civilians are alowing the us soldiers to be fired upon by not doing anything.
User avatar #54 to #46 - trystanvierra
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/13/2013) [-]
American soldiers are more aware of who they fire upon under the influence of rage because of the invention of the camcorder. That's why they got away with a lot of **** in the 60's and 70's.
#58 to #54 - turdofdoom
Reply -4 123456789123345869
(10/13/2013) [-]
well the stuff in fallujah happened in 2004
User avatar #281 to #58 - bluenebula
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/19/2013) [-]
We sold weapons to our ally, Osama Bin Ladan. Then, Osama decided he didn't like us anymore, and attacked us. Is it our fault that he changed his view? **** no. America fought against Germany in WWII. Does this mean we HAVE to ALWAYS hate the Germans? **** no. Germany and the US are on great terms now. That's all in the past. America and Russia were good ally's in WWII. After that was over, suddenly the cold war! So were were not ally's anymore. You need to learn that the world is not some set thing. It's not a daycare center. Countries will not always remain friendly, and they will not always remain enemies. We helped out an ally, and for it, we were bit in the ass. And don't ******* act like America was the only one helping Osama, because we weren't.

We didn't "invade" those countries. We didn't go into Pakistan because they were out ally's and they DO have WMDs. They said no. Ira, looking to get rid of Sadam, welcomed us. We freed Iraq, they formed their own government, and we stuck around to help build them up. Why? Because Iraq is an ALLY. (We eventually found Osama in Pakistan, and their government was made to look like a joke after all of that. So they were sorry in the end)

As a matter of fact, yes. There WOULD be more death. That thing you just said, us not going in, we already tried that.The last time we DIDN'T go to Iraq, do you know what happened? Sadam came to power, people died, war was made, and the world trade centers went down. Yeah, we're not making that mistake again.
#282 to #281 - turdofdoom
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/19/2013) [-]
first off america and germany is not really close friends
germany is one of the top spyed on countries by the NSA
and no i do not see osama as the devil king of all evil.
Obama wants to bomb Syria and help the "rebels" who are basically terrorists from many other countries that he sold weapons
also Americans are still getting thought hate propaganda in schools against Hitler.
yes there is a lot of bad things that happened in ww2 but Hitler did nothing wrong.
he helped Germany out of the oppression and gave them strength. America only wanted to defend their own interests as usual.
America have always been a corrupt country.
User avatar #272 to #58 - bluenebula
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/19/2013) [-]
I want proof that all those kids died. Then I want proof that it was American soldiers that killed them. Until then, all you're doing is spreading rumors and claims. This isn't high school, silly rumors don't fly in the real world. (Unless you're a Hollywood actor, in which case it makes up 90% of your life)

Iraq didn't claim to have WMDs. The terrorist group led by Osama Bin Ladan that attacked up claimed that they did. I don't know if we found any or not. It's very possible we took and destroyed whatever we found, and simply didn't tell the media about it. Maybe we didn't find any WMDs at all? I don't know for sure. I DO know that Osama threatened us saying that he has some. Oh, and remember, 10 other countried went into Iraq for the same exact reason. All 11 of us were looking for these WMDs. Some countries stayed all the way until last year. I know I already said this, but I feel like I have to repeat myself. Again.
#273 to #272 - turdofdoom
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/19/2013) [-]
www.youtube.com/watch?v=7FD1jHueZZc
watch the entire video
they are basically shooting anyone who are passing because 1 sniper took a pop at them.
then they are having fun afterwards buy bragging about who they killed
User avatar #274 to #273 - bluenebula
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/19/2013) [-]
I like how you chose to ignore the last part of the video.
#275 to #274 - turdofdoom
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/19/2013) [-]
just because people are armed doesn't mean they are gonna attack you.
this is a place where there is war. many have to have weapons so they can defend themselves. i doubt there is much law enforcement there.
so they are basically killing anyone that is passing by because one sniper took a pop at them.
User avatar #276 to #275 - bluenebula
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/19/2013) [-]
No unarmed people were hurt during shooting. The video itself says that. Is that true? I dunno. I can't see everything down there. I know that they were shot at first. Did a civilian get caught in the crossfire? Maybe. I saw the guy in the car run, but I don't know if he was hit. The video says he wasn't, but again, I didn't see it.

I've seen plenty of real videos, kid. I've seen US soldiers standing around and making it a game out of shooting a dog. Let's see how many times we can shoot it before it dies. We all take one turn. The one who kills it, loses. That's some ****** up ****. You know who else got ******? Them. Do you know who's not in the army anymore? Them. Do you know who may never be able to find a job now because they will always have that ****** up event on their records? Them. And rightfully so. That was some ****** up **** they did. But the military does not turn a blind eye to that kind of stuff. If they are caught doing something they shouldn't, they do get in trouble. The worse that thing is, the more trouble they are in. This goes for ANY military force in the world.

I stand by what I said. If a civilian wants to have a gun for self defense, that's fine. The moment you draw that thing though, you lose the right to complain for being shot.
#277 to #276 - turdofdoom
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/19/2013) [-]
they was not aiming the guns at anyone
why should they be shot?
they cant defend themselves if the guns are in a box in their homes
only murderers here are the americans
User avatar #279 to #277 - bluenebula
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/19/2013) [-]
Oh, I almost forgot to add the British bombing the **** out of Iraq using white phosphorus. That's a fun one.
User avatar #278 to #277 - bluenebula
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/19/2013) [-]
I carry a gun on me 50% of the time I leave the house. My fiancee carried one on her almost 100% of the time. Are we about to get shot by the US military? No. Because we're not ******* waving our guns around. We know how to use guns, and so we don't make those stupid choices. I don't walk around waving my gun around cops and saying "Ha ha you can't shoot me cuz I'm a civilian!" That's ******* retarded.

"only murderers here are the americans"
Yes, that's right, we are the only people in the world that kill people in Iraq. Let's totally forget the other 10 countries. let's totally ignore the terrorist group that straps bombs to children and kills whole towns just to make an ambush site for anyone who comes through, military or not. Let's ignore all the low end rape and murder that takes place there. Let's ignore the American soldiers who were shot while walking down the street doing nothing. Let's ignore all the killing in the world, and blame America for everything you don't like. That's obviously the logical thing to do.
#280 to #278 - turdofdoom
0 123456789123345869
(10/19/2013) [-]
lets imagine america didnt sell weapons to terrorist groups linked to alquaida
lets imagine they didnt invade all these countries
would there be more death ?
#258 to #58 - bluenebula
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/16/2013) [-]
How much money did I say we spent on Iraq again? Was it one trillion? Yeah, it was. It was two comments ago. Do you know how much money it costs for a gallon of gas here? $4. That means we better have gotten more than 250,000,000,000 GALLONS of gas from that ******* country, or we are NOT there for oil. Let me put that into perspective for you. There are 220,000,000,000 gallons of water in the Mediterranean Sea. You're going to tell me that America stole more oil then there is water in a SEA? You sir are bat **** insane.

As for war profiteering, do you really think America starts wars for money? Maybe I need to show you the 16 trillion dollars of debt we have. In the year 2000, America had $0 of debt. One 12 year old war later, we are 16 trillion dollars in debt. Please, tell me more about all this money we're making. Oh, and let's not forget that Europe is actually more guilty of war profiteering than us. We didn't use it to steal land from our own people, like the British did. They bought up most of Europe during World War I all thanks to some lies they spread about it. But hey, no one cares about what the British do when the Americans are eating a lot! That's obviously more important!
#259 to #258 - turdofdoom
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/17/2013) [-]
lets not forget that americans are killing mostly civillians in iraq.
here are a few examples of exeptional american people giving freedom to some civilians
www.youtube.com/watch?v=9RYvusljoWQ drones
www.youtube.com/watch?v=LF9P5vIzYyE part 1 killing civilians fun
www.youtube.com/watch?v=o2wvxcM6YN4 part 2 killing civilians fun
also americans tortured people a lot.
used a lot of radioactive waste bombs like in fallujah
they used white phosphorus that melts flesh on even whomen and children
as you can see in the video they fire on children from helicopters
they also fire on people with their hands up and no weapon.
i dont see how it was very important to kill sadam hussein becaus he began trading oil with euros and not us petrodollar.
i dont think im insane i just dont think americans should have fun killing civillians all day
#262 to #259 - bluenebula
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/17/2013) [-]
It was all over the news, actually. They were ecstatic about taking his face off the money. They wanted him gone just as much as we did. Saddam was trying to rage a war on Israel, and both Israel and Iraq were America's ally's. The problem is that when we refused to help Saddam, he took it as us betraying him. This is like what's going on in North Korea right now. North Korea wants to go to war with America, and they expect China to back them up. America and China are in good relations. There is no way China would back them up. So now, North Korea feels betrayed. It's stupid ******* logic that only stupid dictators come up with. Saddam was a stupid and cruel dictator, and the country of Iraq is 1000X better off without him. The problem is that other terrorist groups are trying to use this opportunity to size control of the country now that Saddam is gone. America has spent years in the country trying to protect it from these people so that they can grow large enough to defend themselves. America and Iraq are ally's now. We are not at war with a country we are helping.
#261 to #259 - bluenebula
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/17/2013) [-]
"also americans tortured people a lot." Because no other country in the world does that. Hey, let's take a trip to Russia, or Mexico, or Somalia, or anywhere in the middle east, or North Korea, or China, or some of the dozens of countries that REALLY tortures people. We water-board people. Do you know what Russia will do to you? They will literally make you stand to death. It's a ******* painful way to go.

"used a lot of radioactive waste bombs like in fallujah. they used white phosphorus that melts flesh on even whomen and children" Don't imply we target women and children. Again, that's a waste. Oh, and we didn't invent this ****. The British did, and used it plenty in the first two World Wars. And who did the British use it on? Oh, just Iraq during their revelation, before America was even involved in the middle east. Oh, and let's not forget the Russians who openly targeted civilian towns in Chechnya. Fun times. I'm not saying it's alright for America to use them because everyone else does, I'm saying that you better get your ******* facts straight before you hate a country for doing something others are doing far worse, and for much longer. So far, keeping with the reasons you hate America, you must hate every ******* country on earth by now.

"they also fire on people with their hands up and no weapon." I saw people with no weapons.... hanging out with multiple people with weapons. And like I said, they didn't see the kids. I sure didn't. I bet you didn't see them the first time either.

"i dont see how it was very important to kill sadam hussein becaus he began trading oil with euros and not us petrodollar." Oh, yeah, THAT was the reason we went after him. It had nothing to do with, oh I don't know, the many threats he made against us and the way he treated his own people? We didn't kill Saddam Hussein. He was handed over to the people of Iraq and they held an execution for him. They took down his government and set up their own.
#263 to #261 - turdofdoom
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/18/2013) [-]
i heard that americans use chemicals to torture
one time a guy died by being sprayed continously with pepperspray
americans also use electricity to torture.
i also heard of fingers being cut off and
drilling holes through legs with powertools. but i heard they did it for fun in iraq with no real reason

dont tell me americans only waterboard.
and isnt israel full of zionists and jews ? bet hitler would laugh in his grave if he knew
and helping iraq ? i think thats funny
america have spent more money on weapons than doing anything for iraq. not to mention all the killings of civilians..
and korea ...im not so informed about korea but didnt america cut all food trade transport to korea and now the starvation is much worse ?
User avatar #267 to #263 - bluenebula
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/18/2013) [-]
And his son, Kim Jung Un, was thought to be better. He started letting women wear jeans and did all kinds of nice things for his people. However, it didn't take him long to fall into the same habits of his father. Before long, he was threatening America to cry for attention, saying he has missiles pointed at us and **** like that. Again, North Korea shows no real threat to us, so we just kind of laugh and ignore him. Now, if America was this large bully like you think we are, why wouldn't we go into this war that Kim Jung Un wants so badly? It's because we are not the big bully you with we are. You just need someone to blame for all the worlds problems, and you just decide to blame us because, well, that's what all the cool kids at school are doing, huh? It's just too ******* hard to accept that bad things happen because people are simply bad. No, we need some kind of boogeyman of a country to blame all evil in the world on. God forbid anyone stands the **** up and takes responsibility for their own actions anymore.
User avatar #266 to #263 - bluenebula
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/18/2013) [-]
I heard this and I heard that. Because I heard of it, that MUST make it true. You know, I heard that I am the most sexy, smart, and awesome person to ever walk the face of this earth. And because I heard it, that MUST make it true. Have facts, or quit with this speculation ********. Assumptions mean nothing in a real conversation.

Jewish is a religion. Just like with any religion, they are everywhere. Just like Muslims and Catholics. No matter where you go, there will be people of the Jewish religion. Now what does that have to do with Israel?

I know I've only repeated myself twice, but I guess I need to reiterate for a third time. The American government has spent $1,000,000,000,000 on the country of Iraq alone. That is more money than Norway is worth. That's right, with all the money we spent trying to get Iraq back up on its feet, we could have BOUGHT your country. Please, tell me more about all this profit and all these nice things we've gotten out of this war. You keep telling me all this **** that is not rooted in logic. What in the world makes you think we're going to waste millions of dollars killing three random ***** that we know are innocent people? Are you losing your mind? No one, not even a dictator, will spend that much money to kill random people for no reason. That's ******* stupid.

"im not so informed about korea" I can tell. We did not cut off much from North Korea. Because of their dictator, Kim Jung Il, we have not been on good terms with that country for a long time. They have made literally thousands of death threats to America and a few other countries, including America's ally's. We usually ignore him though, seeing as it's a very small country and they can't really do anything. As for that food thing, that is because of their dictator. I remember seeing some PSA's they sent out a few years back teaching their people what kinds of tree bark they can eat to minimize the amount of food they eat. Kim Jung Il was a horrible dictator.
#260 to #259 - bluenebula
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/17/2013) [-]
The very reports you showed me are contradicting a lot of things. First off, he makes it very clear that it's very hard to count bodies or believe either government claims of how many people have died. He also says that the media will bend what the governments (Both America and Iraq) will tell them, and report whatever gets more views. "The ratings raise with the body count" This man keeps shooting down her implications, and she just ******* ignores some of his points. She knows what she wants out of him. The whole interview is bias from the start. One man's claims are not enough to prove anything. When I see proof that we have killed in the hundreds of civilians, than I will admit I was wrong. Until then, a claim is only a claim. We are not spending 12 million dollars per drone to blow up random *************. That's insane. There is no advantage to that.

Now the other two videos. Where do I begin. First off, I want you to pretend you don't get a cute little reply. I want you to pretend you are the guy watching all of this through that drone camera. What did you see? AK-47s and an RPG. Yeah, I can see where they would want to take out a guy with a ******* RPG. This video is also bias. If it simply said "Americans kill people" that's one thing, but it doesn't. It says "US Military Killing Innocent Civilians" How the **** do you know those people were innocent? And innocent civilians is a redundant term. They only say it like that to further victimize the people who died. We do not know how many of those people were real terrorists. We saw guns, and we saw an RPG. You could see it in the guys hands. Funny how the video just decided not to zoom in on that part, huh? They were 100% justified in shooting. Now, about the kids. First off, I didn't even see them in the van until the replay. What makes you think he did? And for that matter, people just got shot. WHY are you dragging kids to a ******* battlefield? I do not blame the US for those. Those 2 were a mistake.
#264 to #260 - turdofdoom
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/18/2013) [-]
i belive america have killed civilians by the thousands in iraq.
it could have been a few people who had weapons and the rest didnt.
so most of them have to be civilians. even the guys with weapons could be civilians who knows ? in a place of war people need a way to protect their families.
and how do you not see the point where it sais that they shot 2 reporters there.
also it isnt a videogame. the guy in the helicopter seems to think so when he wants to shoot everything so much. and where else could the kids have been you say? the americans bomb houses before checking.
in a cave? yeah if they find one maby.
truth is that they are probably just as safe getting protected by adults.
they killed reporters ans some more civilians there and they also attacked people that didnt even have weapons in other videos. people with their hands up.
User avatar #265 to #264 - bluenebula
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/18/2013) [-]
I want proof that America has killed that many people. You can not simply claim somersetting and expect me to believe it as fact. You are not that important. I can claim that you have personally kidnapped and skinned 100 Jewish babies because you are a sick **** that gets off on it. There is NOTHING you can do to convince me otherwise. Anything you say against that is just your self defensive cover up. I believe you skin and rape little Jewish babies.

If they have a weapon drawn, they are no longer a civilian. The definition of a civilian is being unarmed, not being a random ****. They has weapons drawn, and one was an RPG. The drone pilot was protecting a $12,000,000 piece of equipment from an RPG. I don't care who you are, if you are carrying auto rifles and RPGs, you are NOT a civilian.

They did not see the kids. You can not chastise someone for what they could not see. Looking at the video, I still can't see them. They just look like two white dots. That van should not have been there, but drove up anyway. The **** did they think would happen?
#268 to #265 - turdofdoom
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/18/2013) [-]
i want proof america didnt kill all those people. you cannot simply claim something and expect me to belive it as fact. you are not that important. i can claim that you have a fetish for *********** and kidnap a lot of ******* and cut of their boobs and then put the boobs in a meatgrinder and then takes that meat and make a boob fleshlight out of it. there is nothing you can do to convince me otherwise. anything you say is just your self defence coverup. i belive you cut of boobs and make fleshlights out of them.

if americans in america have a weapon they are no longer a civilian. they have weapons drawn and a lot of them have ar 15's and glocks. if you are carrying ar 15's and glocks you are not a civilian. here i am implying that any american in america that have a weapon should be shot from a helicopter

they didnt see who was in the van. they cannot chastise the people in the van because they could not see them. looking at the video, it seems as they were trying to save some lifes. the helicopter shouldnt have been there, but was there anyways. POOTISPENCERHERE

User avatar #269 to #268 - bluenebula
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/18/2013) [-]
Funnily enough, I never claimed that America doesn't kill civilians. We do. We make mistakes. I said we don't kill random ***** for no reason. I said we don't intentionally kill civilians. I said we don't know who can be considered a terrorist or not when a group of eight people are walking around with automatic rifles and explosives. So you best reread my comments before you try to use them against me.

When an American in America is being chased by the police, they don't fire on him. The moment that criminal pulls a gun, he is no longer a civilian, and the police take him down. The moment an American pulls a gun, they are no loner a civilian, and they DO get shot down. Having a gun near cops here is scary, because if you pull it, they WILL shoot you. This is how it's always been. So how about you do some research on America before you act like you know everything about it.

People with weapons were taken down. Other people drove up shortly after to collect the bodies and whatever else there was. Right off the bat, even before they got out of the van, the man said that they could be there to grab the guns and bodies. Sure enough, we saw one body go. A body we needed to confirm. They were running away with what could be an important person in a criminal or terrorist organization. Those kids were not hanging out of the window for everyone to see. Even past all of that, it's not unlike these terrorists to use children as human shields. Hell, they even use kids as IEDs. I personally know a man who's convoy was blown up by a 7 year old girl. Someone put a bomb on her, made her run at the convoy, and blew her up. He lost his leg in that attack.
#270 to #269 - turdofdoom
0 123456789123345869
(10/18/2013) [-]
but they also fired upon peope that had their hands in the air and no weapon.
also they fired upon some kids diggin for potatoes or something.
they shot a hellfire missile at a couple of kids.
im not sayin all americans are killing kids for fun but in war there are too many of them.
iraq didnt even have wmd in the first place
User avatar #145 to #58 - bluenebula
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/14/2013) [-]
What country are you from? I want to point out all the innocent people you people have killed too. God help you if you're from Europe or Russia. I get to play with thousands of years of war and torture if you are.
#233 to #145 - turdofdoom
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/14/2013) [-]
europe isnt a country -_-
User avatar #240 to #233 - bluenebula
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/14/2013) [-]
I know. That's why I asked what country you are from. Because I don't know what country you are from. If you are from anywhere in Europe, you live in a place that has been in war longer than America has been a nation. That is, if you live anywhere in Europe. If you live somewhere else, I'll tell you who else your people murdered in the last 500 years. Don't be shy, let's play the "Hate on people because of their movement" game. It's the same as my other favorite game, "Hate on people because they watch a TV show I don't watch"
#244 to #240 - turdofdoom
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/15/2013) [-]
i hate my own country too so it doesent matter
norway
but i dont think we can compare to america when where talkin numbers.
the amount of money americans spend on killing civilians is kinda spooky.
#245 to #244 - bluenebula
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/15/2013) [-]
It's not about your country, it's about what blood was spilled on it. People tend to blame America for all the dead Native Americas that died when we first came here, but if I remember right, it was the British and the Spanish that did that. It wasn't for a hundred years or more that we got sick of their **** and became America. So, what blood was spilled on your soil before you were the country of Denmark? Well, I'm sure you know better than me. I'll assume you take a history class in school, yes? There were the dark ages, that were all over Europe at the time. Back in the 1000s to 1600s, millions of people were caught, tortured, and executed for whatever reasons the government/church of the time could come up with. It was the ultimate in political corruption. You guys also had that fun little bubonic plague that wiped out 1/3 of the whole world back in the 1300s. That must have sucked. Still, I think a lot more good came out of that than bad. After all, the massive drop in people gave us the renaissance of the 1500s and 1600s.

Enough about the past, what's going on today? Well, we are still pulling out of the middle east. By we I mean America. People complain that we re still there, but did you know that 10 other countries went in with us? Yeah, and most of them stayed all the way until 2008. Our biggest ally in that war was Iraq. People don't realize that we went to war with terrorist groups. Not the country of Iraq. We helped train thier people. We spent one trillion dollars on Iraq in the last 12 years. Be it rebuilding or training, $1,000,000,000,000 have gone into that country. It's hard to think we're only there to beat up someone for their lunch money with numbers like those.

I don't think America is some great country or anything. I think it's just as bad as all the others right now, if not a bit less. If there was a better place to live, I would have gone there already. Why do you think so many people keep coming here?
#247 to #245 - turdofdoom
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/15/2013) [-]
i think they keep coming because america destroys their country with war and earning money on other peoples war by selling everyone more weapons that creates more destruction ?
User avatar #256 to #247 - bluenebula
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(10/15/2013) [-]
I'll assume you agree with me on everything else then, if you don't want to address it.

We have more illegal immigrants living in America right now than Australia has PEOPLE in their country. If we replace every Australian with one of our illegal immigrants, we would still have many left over. That's only illegal, that doesn't count how many legal immigrants come here from all over the world every day. And you know what? They stay. Why? Because this country has the ability to make anyone an amazing person, if all they're willing to do is wok long and hard enough. Some people in other countries will never have that kind of opportunity. That's what they call America you know. The Land of Opportunity. It's quite fitting, wouldn't you say?

If you are going to sit there and tell me America is beating the **** out of the whole world all at once, just to steal your people, than I see no point in continuing this (what I was hoping could be a decent) conversation. No matter how bad you need someone to blame, America is not the world wide boogeyman.
#257 to #256 - turdofdoom
0 123456789123345869
(10/16/2013) [-]
im not saying america does it to steal people.
i think america does it because america earns money on war and america needs more war to earn money on. also oil has a lot to do with it.
#25 to #23 - blubblablub
Reply -2 123456789123345869
(10/13/2013) [-]
do you happen to be retarded?
#26 to #25 - turdofdoom
Reply -4 123456789123345869
(10/13/2013) [-]
thats not nice