I wonder who's behind this

Reply+97

(07/22/2014)[+](10 replies)

stickied by economic

For those of you that are calling this an "Slippery slope" argument, it's very clearly not, it's a "Jews are ******* **** up again" point.

#87 to #24 - feelythefeel

Reply+3

(07/22/2014)[-]

Really? I thought this was a parody.

Obviously I put too much faith in you.

#75 to #24 - dancingturnip

Reply+1

(07/22/2014)[-]

#167 to #24 - squidgy

Reply0

(07/23/2014)[-]

**** you, you massive comment-deleting cuntflap

#168 to #167 - economic [OP]

Reply0

(07/23/2014)[-]

Had to, sorry m8. Noting against you.

#100 to #24 - anon id: bb896cfb

Reply0

(07/22/2014)[-]

dat gif

#99 to #24 - anon id: 2822ab48

Reply0

(07/22/2014)[-]

What do Jews have to do with recognizing basic human rights?

#111 to #99 - aussiepridevil

Reply0

(07/22/2014)[-]

git out of here JIDF

#92 to #24 - Rockaman

Reply0

(07/22/2014)[-]

think it's both really...

#40 to #24 - torchrose

Reply0

(07/22/2014)[-]

Well they ARE

#41 to #40 - economic [OP]

Reply-1

(07/22/2014)[-]

Great argument.

#8 - andovaredoras

Reply+82

(07/21/2014)[-]

I don't quite understand why people always lump together homosexuals and zoophiliacs. They are 2 completely different things.

#76 to #8 - blueflags

Reply+5

(07/22/2014)[-]

Because, regardless of what anyone believes is "natural", zoophiliacs and pedophiles both use the same arguments homosexuals use for same sex marriage. I think the pedophiles have a point. not that I agree with them or anything

#77 to #76 - andovaredoras

Reply+1

(07/22/2014)[-]

I personally think it just comes down to personal moral and common sense.

We have reasons why pedophilia and zoophilia aren't accepted (aka as people say: the kid or animal is not developed enough to understand the ''horrible things'' you do to them) so i understand that the desire to 'protect the innocent' is there,
but pretty much the most common (and absolutely stupid) thing that is stopping homosexuals on is ''homosex is sin, thou shalt not lie with a man, you are going to hell, convert now and accept jesus''... Kinda makes me wonder, if abrahamic religions didn't exist, would there still be so much homophobia?

#101 to #77 - hurzg

Reply0

(07/22/2014)[-]

Korea also culturally doesn't recognize homosexuality. And It's really cool that some people think killing animals are okay but making 'love' to them is bad.
I'm not a bestial. Just try to look at from others' perspective

#91 to #77 - iridium

Reply0

(07/22/2014)[-]

There sadly would. It hasn't stopped China and Russia from being anti-homosexual.

It has to do with culture and philosophy, not just religion.

#110 to #91 - arandomanon

Reply0

(07/22/2014)[-]

Except Russia follows an abrahamic religion, they are christians. But yeah, thing is society has traditionally encouraged the concept of "family" as a way to make kids and since homosexuals can't do that... no wonder there's so much homophobia.

#164 to #110 - iridium

Reply+1

(07/22/2014)[-]

Hm. I must have been thinking of somewhere else actually. But the point stands when it comes to China.

#78 to #77 - andovaredoras

Reply0

(07/22/2014)[-]

i just noticed the random 'on' word in the 3rd row -_-

#165 to #77 - blueflags

Reply-1

(07/22/2014)[-]

Right, there are arguments against pedophilia and zoophilia that I didn't bring up, it's just the argument presented by OP is that if governments allow homosexual couples to be within legal jurisdiction, the next thing, based on the logic of why governments are accepting homosexual couples, will be zoophiliacs and pedophiles.

I believe that "the slippery slope" is actually a logical idea; if you can use the exact same logic for both idea "A" and idea "B", why should one of those ideas be accepted and not the other? So, if you want to argue "A" is okay and "B" is not, you're gonna have to come up with a new logical path to come to that conclusion, which there are many logical paths to say homosexual couples should be legal other than "we both consent to it".

#66 to #8 - bothemastaofall

Reply0

(07/22/2014)[-]

perversion

#16 to #8 - LazierThanThou

Reply0

(07/22/2014)[-]

They're both aberrant sexualities.

#15 to #8 - anon id: 5ab3d92b

Comment deleted by economic [-]

#9 to #8 - andovaredoras

Reply0

(07/21/2014)[-]

aka ''we cant allow gays to marry! next thing you know, people will want to be able to marry their dogs and horses!''

#98 to #8 - demigodofmadness#448 on commentsRank#448

Reply-1

(07/22/2014)[-]

Because if we make homosexual marriage legal the homosexuals wont have a cause to fight for anymore, so they'll become zoophiliacs, is what I would say if I was some asshole against homosexual marriage.

#1 - fourtwentt

Reply+63

(07/21/2014)[-]

Yes, i wonder who

#13 to #1 - regimentbluefly

Reply+1

(07/21/2014)[-]

#14 - squidgy

+41

Comment deleted by economic [-]

#56 - fandomsexual

Reply+18

(07/22/2014)[-]

Yes, because if society becomes more welcoming and supportive towards LGBT individuals, that's going to lead to people being legally allowed and even encouraged to **** animals and children...

That is some of the lamest **** I've heard in a while.

#71 to #56 - nimithecat

Reply+7

(07/22/2014)[-]

Too late, I'm already a horse ******!
If you say anything against it, you're a "bigot".

#85 to #56 - anon id: 63b9ed6d

Reply0

(07/22/2014)[-]

It is. Because when you give liberals an inch they take a mile.

#70 to #56 - nimithecat

has deleted their comment [-]

#60 to #56 - newmanbiggeo

Reply0

(07/22/2014)[-]

have you not heard of the pedo acceptance movement ?

#68 to #60 - anon id: 5a99837a

Reply0

(07/22/2014)[-]

Yeah, we call them MRAs now.

#62 to #60 - fandomsexual

Reply0

(07/22/2014)[-]

No... I'm not sure I really want to... Please tell me this isn't really a thing. Still, I don't believe that gay acceptance would lead to such depravity being accepted later on. It's completely different.

#63 to #62 - newmanbiggeo

Reply0

(07/22/2014)[-]

it is

#64 to #63 - fandomsexual

Reply0

(07/22/2014)[-]

#50 - zaggystirdust

Reply0

(07/22/2014)[-]

can someone explain what this comic is trying to portray?

#53 to #50 - illogicalvulcan

+13

Comment deleted by economic [-]

#97 to #53 - anon id: bdc52e13

Reply0

(07/22/2014)[-]

Groups are already beginning to host public fundraisers and legitimately lobby for pedosexual rights in the face of the recent pro fag legislation.

Hate to break it to ya, but that slippery slope you guys like to harp on about is looking more and more like a vision of things to come.

#80 to #53 - bendoverson

Reply0

(07/22/2014)[-]

Oh that was a child...

I thought it was just someone married to a dwarf

#72 to #53 - tonkkax

Reply0

(07/22/2014)[-]

There are more states where you can get married with an animal than with another man/woman.

#74 to #72 - illogicalvulcan

Reply0

(07/22/2014)[-]

Umm... ok? I knew this. I was just answering this guys question.

#59 - heartlessrobot#128 on commentsRank#128

Reply+11

(07/22/2014)[-]

People a thousand years ago would be disgusted by the fact that you people listen to music and work on sundays. The world is going to change, and people will adapt to the change. How the world will be in a thousand years, none of us can truly know. A disease could pop up and eliminate anyone with Asian bloodlines for all we know. Aliens could shoot the earth with a ray that destroys female ovaries, forcing us to mate with them instead. Nobody knows, so don't try to predict how society will develop unless you're getting paid to do so. You don't like how things are going? There's thousands of others that agree, and thousands that disagree. Everyone wants something different, nobody will ever totally agree on everything. Ok, yeah, I'm against marrying children and animals. I'm against having sex with children. But if the animal is clearly mounting someone or is not visibly upset, then that's the closest to CONSENT an animal is capable of. Children are not truly capable of consenting to sex as they are not fully aware of the potential ramifications of their actions. Now, if we eliminate EVERY STD, that changes things. Doesn't mean you'd be allowed to sodomize an infant, but I imagine there would be less of an issue if a 15 year old wanted to bang an 18 year old.

#166 to #59 - anon id: 315f0125

Reply0

(07/23/2014)[-]

this is kinda ****** up.... but human children would know it way better what sex could lead to than animals...

#84 to #59 - anon id: 63b9ed6d

Reply0

(07/22/2014)[-]

yes and this is the internet where opinions are allowed. things may be changing but clearly, if you read the news and pay attention to every day life, not in a positive way.

#69 to #59 - anon id: 0fa32c40

Reply0

(07/22/2014)[-]

go **** yourself you nuerotic freak

#103 to #59 - economic [OP]

Reply-1

(07/22/2014)[-]

A 8 year old ******* a 30 year old more like.

#36 - Edensfire

Reply+9

(07/22/2014)[-]

****, forgot dogs and children can give legal consent.

#37 to #36 - economic [OP]

Reply-8

(07/22/2014)[-]

Laws change you retard. I can see the Americans are logging on.

#38 to #37 - Edensfire

Reply+6

(07/22/2014)[-]

Alright, so then rape will be fine in the near future if consent doesnt matter

#39 to #38 - economic [OP]

Reply-4

(07/22/2014)[-]

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_consent

The ---->LAW<----- that ALLOWS people to consent can be changed to a lower age you retarded american twat. Why are you talking about rape?

How the **** are you that stupid?

#42 to #39 - Edensfire

Reply+5

(07/22/2014)[-]

Ah, I forgot, if you change the age of consent, that'll allow dogs to consent. Thanks for opening up my eyes.

#45 to #42 - economic [OP]

Reply-6

(07/22/2014)[-]

We're talking about kids you stupid ******. Wow, Americans.
Can't wait for the next 9/11.

#46 to #45 - Edensfire

Reply+4

(07/22/2014)[-]

Nah, you were keen on kids, I brought up animals as well in the first comment. Should go clean the sand out of your vagina. Im also not American. Just because you really want that law to be changed, doesnt mean the rest of the world does. Good luck with your kid wife in the future.

#47 to #46 - economic [OP]

Reply-7

(07/22/2014)[-]

" Just because you really want that law to be changed, doesnt mean the rest of the world does."

Wow, I'm not trying to change it for that you retard. So blocked. Castrated yourself.