So it would be fine if she had paid them for favors then? The only issue is that she used sex to get her way, not the actual corruption, but the sex?
I've seen dozens of people slut shaming her, when the problem isn't the sex, the problem is corruption. The methods don't ******* matter, the end result does.
Tbh, if you keep slut shaming her she's just going to get her way another way.
Corruption needs to be confronted head on, because slut shaming her and calling her a whore is sending out the wrong message, and making people look like neckbeards, so obviously they're going to play on that and turn it around.
Stick to logic, and stop letting hate fester you. Yeah she's a slut, but that's NOT WHAT IT'S ABOUT.
You don't understand. I'm not white knighting, I ******* hate the bitch, just not for being promiscuous. By slut shaming her, we're giving the SJWs valuable fuel to use against the GamerGate movement, a fuel that people will rally behind.
Slut shaming is basically "acceptable" bullying, to call it anything else is just lying. It's an equality issue. We don't slut shame men, we only slut shame women. So by slut shaming Zoe, we're playing right into the SJW's hands by proving exactly what they say about us, that we're misogynistic.
The personal attacks have to stop if we want the movement to be seen in the right light. No death threats, no calling her dad to tell him her daughter is a whore, none of it.
Again, I ask, would the corruption have been fine if she had paid the men several thousand dollars for favors (as opposed to having sex with them)?
If no, then the method of the corruption doesn't functionally matter, and calling her a slut isn't helping the situation at all. Acknowledge the sex, sure, but don't condone the sex itself, condone the corruption.