I get it....
| |
Anonymous comments allowed.
158 comments displayed.
#115 to #114
-
masteroffj (11/09/2015) [-] **masteroffj used "*roll picture*"**
**masteroffj rolled image**You put as much effort into bait as your parents did in raising you
**masteroffj rolled image**You put as much effort into bait as your parents did in raising you
#125 to #115
-
nickelakon (11/09/2015) [-] Meh
I can see it.
Bethesda's focus has never been to graphically push a console. They don't really care about giving it that one little graphical touch to make it look REALLY next gen.
Bethesda focuses more on story and gameplay. Not that the graphics are terrible. They're actually really good imo.
I can see it.
Bethesda's focus has never been to graphically push a console. They don't really care about giving it that one little graphical touch to make it look REALLY next gen.
Bethesda focuses more on story and gameplay. Not that the graphics are terrible. They're actually really good imo.
#129 to #127
-
nickelakon (11/09/2015) [-] Yea
That's the gist of what I'm saying.
Thanks for repeating it and then stapeling sarcastic hate to it. It really freshens it up.
That's the gist of what I'm saying.
Thanks for repeating it and then stapeling sarcastic hate to it. It really freshens it up.
#26
-
dehumanizer (11/09/2015) [-] your son is the vilian and you have to either kill him or nuke boston
#102 to #99
-
tehflamintaco ONLINE (11/09/2015) [-]
Let me correct, I'm gonna log in to say, " **** you".
#126 to #26
-
stonetomcat (11/09/2015) [-] There's informing people of a bad decision, and then there's being a faggot.
And at this point, you're just being a faggot.
I've never cared about Bethesda stories, but you didn't even use a genuine argument. All you did there was go "hurr durr snape kills dumbledore lol". That doesn't strengthen your points, that just makes people say "Oh, it's that cunt again".
And you seem to be the only one doing it, other than trolls. Are you sure the idiot isn't you?
And at this point, you're just being a faggot.
I've never cared about Bethesda stories, but you didn't even use a genuine argument. All you did there was go "hurr durr snape kills dumbledore lol". That doesn't strengthen your points, that just makes people say "Oh, it's that cunt again".
And you seem to be the only one doing it, other than trolls. Are you sure the idiot isn't you?
#159 to #137
-
stonetomcat (11/11/2015) [-] I got the game, and I like it.
However, I can definitely see why you hate it. It is rather different, and I can't fathom why they got rid of skills and weapon durability.
But I still can't see what's wrong with the graphics. Is it the polygon count, or the cartoonish look?
Maybe I can't see it because I played the PS2 until 2012.
However, I can definitely see why you hate it. It is rather different, and I can't fathom why they got rid of skills and weapon durability.
But I still can't see what's wrong with the graphics. Is it the polygon count, or the cartoonish look?
Maybe I can't see it because I played the PS2 until 2012.
#161 to #159
-
dehumanizer (11/11/2015) [-] The casualisation is why i hate it and the usual lack of polish, aka the bilion of bugs.
Im normaly not the one to care about graphics but considering what heavy hardware you need to run these graphics, makes me want to scream.
Im normaly not the one to care about graphics but considering what heavy hardware you need to run these graphics, makes me want to scream.
#51 to #50
-
dehumanizer (11/09/2015) [-] yeah same ************ engine is easier to mod than it is to post a comment on this website
#65 to #60
-
dehumanizer (11/09/2015) [-] to go around and shoot orcs and zombies? The world is really small you know compared to skyrim and fallout 3 its ******* tiny
#111 to #65
-
schneidend (11/09/2015) [-] There's the other side quests, which were basically the best part of FO3. And, no, the FO4 map is bigger than FO3's, and not that much smaller than Skyrim's.
#139 to #111
-
dehumanizer (11/10/2015) [-] what are these sidequest you speak of? almost all of the stuff made me cry
>world is bigger than 3's
proof?
>world is bigger than 3's
proof?
#143 to #139
-
schneidend (11/10/2015) [-] Harold? The Lincoln Memorial? Antagonizer Vs. The Mechanist? Vault 106 with the trippy hallucinations? The bandit headquarters with the super mutant behemoth? Fallout 3 had some pretty great stuff. I'd probably remember more, but I have played it in about seven years.
Have you not seen the map? 3's is only about 3/4ths the size of 4's, if that. Actually rather appropriate ratio, come to think of it.
Have you not seen the map? 3's is only about 3/4ths the size of 4's, if that. Actually rather appropriate ratio, come to think of it.
#145 to #143
-
dehumanizer (11/10/2015) [-] it was really meh for me
i heard that it only took 11 minutes to get from side to side, is it really as big?
i heard that it only took 11 minutes to get from side to side, is it really as big?
#146 to #145
-
schneidend (11/10/2015) [-] I'll let you know in a couple hours. But, according to comparisons made on FJ, the FO4 map is bigger.
Even if the 11 minute figure is accurate, it'd probably be without looking at a goddamn thing and just sprinting whenever you can, probably with a max Agility, max Endurance character.
Even if the 11 minute figure is accurate, it'd probably be without looking at a goddamn thing and just sprinting whenever you can, probably with a max Agility, max Endurance character.
#148 to #146
-
dehumanizer (11/10/2015) [-] tbh the game was shilled out the ass on this website, ******* Todd
#150 to #148
-
schneidend (11/10/2015) [-] People are excited. It doesn't affect you at all. Why do you care?
#69 to #67
-
dehumanizer (11/09/2015) [-] yep fallout 4 is hardly an rpg, more like post apocalyptic CoD
#75 to #70
-
dehumanizer (11/09/2015) [-] its really bad that they are pandering the game for casuals like you
#109 to #75
-
ThatsSoFunnyHeHe (11/09/2015) [-] I want to dislike you for the spoilers but I can't because of the accuracy of everything else you said
#141 to #109
-
dehumanizer (11/10/2015) [-] pirate the game instead of buying it, dont give those bastards a cent
#98 to #95
-
dehumanizer (11/09/2015) [-] go away jew, stop trying to justify such pathetic money laundring
#97 to #78
-
dehumanizer (11/09/2015) [-] the story is whats supposed to make the gameplay even better
also there are like 5 quest lines in the whole game
>implying i'll give hard earn money for this trash
also there are like 5 quest lines in the whole game
>implying i'll give hard earn money for this trash
#104 to #101
-
dehumanizer (11/09/2015) [-] immersion is very important you feel like you are in the game and the gameplay comes natural
No not really, you would complete them and it will probably make no differance just like in skyrim.
>why i bitch about it
because they took a game i liked for tes Morrowind for fallout New Vegas, and instead of making it better THEY **** UP
if this was a seperate title called wastelandguy or something i would not care, but they are ******** on these pervious games, disabling the possibility for a true sequel instead of some simplified cash in
No not really, you would complete them and it will probably make no differance just like in skyrim.
>why i bitch about it
because they took a game i liked for tes Morrowind for fallout New Vegas, and instead of making it better THEY **** UP
if this was a seperate title called wastelandguy or something i would not care, but they are ******** on these pervious games, disabling the possibility for a true sequel instead of some simplified cash in
#106 to #104
-
Bruda (11/09/2015) [-] Immersion is important to some degree. A non-silent protagonist already removes the immersion since you're not that guy you don't blend with him.
I like the rewards they give me. The betrayal in Dark Brotherhood is better than the story of Skyrim.
Go on an bitch it won't make a difference you know what will? Not buying the game. Enjoying the ones you have. Why or how? It preserve the love for a game you have and when people like you do that they realize their mistakes. Most importantly bitch to the developer not the fans. You ruined a story for people that actually cared about it. You think you're saving people from "disappointment" all you're doing is ruining someone experience. It's not going to help your cause it's not going to make the game better you're just another asshole on the internet just like me.
It's the developer's IP they choose what they want to do with it. It's unfortunate that they don't cater to you and what you want but they can't cater to just one person.
I like the rewards they give me. The betrayal in Dark Brotherhood is better than the story of Skyrim.
Go on an bitch it won't make a difference you know what will? Not buying the game. Enjoying the ones you have. Why or how? It preserve the love for a game you have and when people like you do that they realize their mistakes. Most importantly bitch to the developer not the fans. You ruined a story for people that actually cared about it. You think you're saving people from "disappointment" all you're doing is ruining someone experience. It's not going to help your cause it's not going to make the game better you're just another asshole on the internet just like me.
It's the developer's IP they choose what they want to do with it. It's unfortunate that they don't cater to you and what you want but they can't cater to just one person.
#142 to #106
-
dehumanizer (11/10/2015) [-] ye exactly no matter what character you make hes always gonna have the generic white guy voice
>want to play as Todd
>game character is too tall
>game character's voice is too deep
hmm maybe they did it on purpose
idk skyrims rewards were pritty weak since from the leveled loot you would probably have found something better to use or make your own, also gold was pritty worthless
every one is shilling for this game and todd is lying through his teeth about it, just look at this site everyone except me was praising it like its gonna be the best **** ever, do you really think Todd cares about player bases or money? Hint its the money.
>carter to one person
oh please thats ******** , they could have fixed all the things i bitched about and they would have still made money and it would have actualy good, but no it has to be dumbed down and sold to more people, i mean they would get the people who have played the pervious ones so they must simply **** it up for the people for whom it was too complicated
vid related, who the new fallout is pandering to www.youtube.com/watch?v=d9O6sApVH3o
>want to play as Todd
>game character is too tall
>game character's voice is too deep
hmm maybe they did it on purpose
idk skyrims rewards were pritty weak since from the leveled loot you would probably have found something better to use or make your own, also gold was pritty worthless
every one is shilling for this game and todd is lying through his teeth about it, just look at this site everyone except me was praising it like its gonna be the best **** ever, do you really think Todd cares about player bases or money? Hint its the money.
>carter to one person
oh please thats ******** , they could have fixed all the things i bitched about and they would have still made money and it would have actualy good, but no it has to be dumbed down and sold to more people, i mean they would get the people who have played the pervious ones so they must simply **** it up for the people for whom it was too complicated
vid related, who the new fallout is pandering to www.youtube.com/watch?v=d9O6sApVH3o
#28 to #26
-
heartlessrobot (11/09/2015) [-] So? The main plot is only worth 5% of a fallout game.
Might as well told us you gotta fight Alduin in Skyrim.
Might as well told us you gotta fight Alduin in Skyrim.
#29 to #28
-
dehumanizer (11/09/2015) [-] phahaha not only are you a legit faggot but you are also a bethesda drone
#30 to #29
-
heartlessrobot (11/09/2015) [-] I just like most of the games.
I mean, Oblivion was OK, and skyrim was in serious need of mods.
I mean, Oblivion was OK, and skyrim was in serious need of mods.
#32 to #31
-
heartlessrobot (11/09/2015) [-] I saw a 60 minute gameplay of it, it didn't seem so bad.
The talking animation is god awful and some of the shadows/textures are **** .
Also, your gif looks to be a compression issue, it wasn't quite that bad. It was bad tho.
The talking animation is god awful and some of the shadows/textures are **** .
Also, your gif looks to be a compression issue, it wasn't quite that bad. It was bad tho.
#33 to #32
-
dehumanizer (11/09/2015) [-] no its the animation just look how he locks out after it
the ai somehow got even worse but the real problem is that you see notihng wrong with the dialogue wheel and single voiced protag
also arent there like 40 quests total?
the ai somehow got even worse but the real problem is that you see notihng wrong with the dialogue wheel and single voiced protag
also arent there like 40 quests total?
#34 to #33
-
heartlessrobot (11/09/2015) [-] Oh I hate how the dialogue is super limited now, that's gonna bug me if I can ever actually afford the game.
And I have heard nothing about the number of quests.
And I have heard nothing about the number of quests.
#35 to #34
-
dehumanizer (11/09/2015) [-] why would you pay for this buggy mess? Why not just pirate it? I mean look its a piece of **** , todd doesent deserve money
all he does is pandering to sjws casuals and normies
www.youtube.com/watch?v=d9O6sApVH3o
www.youtube.com/watch?v=u5gDtJjtJJc
like seriously most of the invited guests have never even heard of fallout
all he does is pandering to sjws casuals and normies
www.youtube.com/watch?v=d9O6sApVH3o
www.youtube.com/watch?v=u5gDtJjtJJc
like seriously most of the invited guests have never even heard of fallout
#54 to #35
-
improbablyyourdad (11/09/2015) [-] You're extremely pathetic.
Please try to control your autism better.
Please try to control your autism better.
#57 to #55
-
improbablyyourdad (11/09/2015) [-] Not in the least, I just think its sad.
Have a nice day.
Have a nice day.
#59 to #57
-
dehumanizer (11/09/2015) [-] how butthurt you are over some stupid piece of **** game ?
#128 to #59
-
stonetomcat (11/09/2015) [-] You're the most butthurt one here, considering that you started the whole thread with, "snape kills dumbledore lol"
I know you're not supposed to reply twice in the same thread, but I just couldn't let that slide.
I know you're not supposed to reply twice in the same thread, but I just couldn't let that slide.
#136 to #128
-
dehumanizer (11/10/2015) [-] did you not see how that idiot just came at me with baseless insults?
#160 to #158
-
dehumanizer (11/11/2015) [-] unlike his posts, my criticism actualy makes sence
stop shillin fallout4 its not that good
stop shillin fallout4 its not that good
#63 to #59
-
improbablyyourdad (11/09/2015) [-] Can't wait to play on ultra at 60fps, its looking pretty good despite some bugs.
#61 to #59
-
improbablyyourdad (11/09/2015) [-] Why are you?
I'm getting a new cpu on the 11th and will be playing pretty much all games at 1080p on ultra at 60fps minimum and it will be stable, there is nothing you can say or do to make me mad tbh fam
I'm getting a new cpu on the 11th and will be playing pretty much all games at 1080p on ultra at 60fps minimum and it will be stable, there is nothing you can say or do to make me mad tbh fam
#66 to #61
-
dehumanizer (11/09/2015) [-] Well thats nice for you even if fallout 4 looks like a fallout 3 mod
#43 to #41
-
dehumanizer (11/09/2015) [-] well yeah fallout 3 sucked but then we had Obsidian who took it and turned it into a good game aka new vegas
#112 to #43
-
schneidend (11/09/2015) [-] Fallout: New Vegas was pretty light on the non-main quests that were actually cool, and had maybe three dungeons worth exploring compared to FO3's many neat dungeons.
New Vegas had the better overall story and main questline, and better gameplay, but lets not act like it was 100% superior in every way.
New Vegas had the better overall story and main questline, and better gameplay, but lets not act like it was 100% superior in every way.
#138 to #112
-
dehumanizer (11/10/2015) [-] huh watchu talking about willis
new vegas had a ton of cool side quests and vaults to go in and caves to get actualy UNIQUE weapon versions, instead of just the same weapon with +3 damage
new vegas had a ton of cool side quests and vaults to go in and caves to get actualy UNIQUE weapon versions, instead of just the same weapon with +3 damage
#144 to #138
-
schneidend (11/10/2015) [-] Vanilla New Vegas had a couple cool side quests, and like three good Vaults (34, 22, and then the Lottery one?), but most of its exploratory content consisted of very short animal caves and minor side quests. There wasn't much for the spelunker accustomed to Morrowind, Oblivion, or FO3 to really delve into.
Most of New Vegas' unique weapons were the originals with the mods pre-equipped and unique skins. Granted, the unique skins were pretty sweet, but even that didn't really go full-bore until the DLC packs with stuff like Cleansing Flame having blue flames and cool orange tubes. Not sure why you brought this up, though. I did admit New Vegas is plenty good and better in a lot of areas. But, Bethesda does excel at dungeons and memorable sidequests, which I felt New Vegas was lacking.
Most of New Vegas' unique weapons were the originals with the mods pre-equipped and unique skins. Granted, the unique skins were pretty sweet, but even that didn't really go full-bore until the DLC packs with stuff like Cleansing Flame having blue flames and cool orange tubes. Not sure why you brought this up, though. I did admit New Vegas is plenty good and better in a lot of areas. But, Bethesda does excel at dungeons and memorable sidequests, which I felt New Vegas was lacking.
#147 to #144
-
dehumanizer (11/10/2015) [-] i dont knwo fallout3's dungeons seemed useless to me as there was notihng to important to find in them, by level 12 i had all the available guns and i didnt care if there existed some version with +2 damage, bobbleheads and skill mags were meh because fallout 3 had really **** perks and it seemed like every interiour there was one mag to be found plus the skills werent as fleshed out
#149 to #147
-
schneidend (11/10/2015) [-] Skills were basically the same in New Vegas, Perks were mostly the same in New Vegas, barring a few of New Vegas' much improved ones and a couple additions. Adding Traits was obviously a genius move. Ninja still didn't work right, though. Again, New Vegas made improvements, I never denied that, but it lacked much in the way of compelling stuff to DO with all of these improvements except for the main story and a handful of dungeons.
#151 to #149
-
dehumanizer (11/10/2015) [-] wha? i found that most of the perks if not all in 3 were useless that just gave you +2 of two simular perks and what not, in it i was just filling up special and waiting to unlock something worthwhile, in new vegas almost all of the time i was wondering what to get because there were many good opertunities
you could still go around and explore the wasteland, its not like fallout 3 had anything better going for it
you could still go around and explore the wasteland, its not like fallout 3 had anything better going for it
#153 to #151
-
schneidend (11/10/2015) [-] There's just not as much to find in New Vegas. Again, small animal caves were most of the wasteland content. There were some exceptions, like the cave with the giant Cazadore at the end, but even that was pretty short. If more time had been spent on things like the Gecko/Nightstalker caves, raider hideouts, and more Vaults were added, New Vegas would have felt a lot meatier.
New Vegas cut the perk rate in half, which created perk scarcity the game genuinely needed to be balanced. But, most of the perks were the same, or also provided static bonuses. Only a handful of perks, like the VATS speed perks, Meltdown, Super Slam, and Terrifying Presence really stood out. If you can think of an example of one of New Vegas' great perks I'm forgetting, feel free to jog my memory.
And, again, ultimately, I'm not saying FO3 is the better game. I prefer New Vegas, but I'm not going to just act as if it's perfect and didn't fall short in areas where FO3 excelled.
New Vegas cut the perk rate in half, which created perk scarcity the game genuinely needed to be balanced. But, most of the perks were the same, or also provided static bonuses. Only a handful of perks, like the VATS speed perks, Meltdown, Super Slam, and Terrifying Presence really stood out. If you can think of an example of one of New Vegas' great perks I'm forgetting, feel free to jog my memory.
And, again, ultimately, I'm not saying FO3 is the better game. I prefer New Vegas, but I'm not going to just act as if it's perfect and didn't fall short in areas where FO3 excelled.
#154 to #153
-
dehumanizer (11/10/2015) [-] and f3 had 20 square miles of copy pasted subway tunnels with raiders and ghouls, big whoop
Yes it did 3s perks were alot more generic while NV's spiced up the gameplay, the ones that allowed you to carry more **** were really useful, Viligiant Recycler is fun and the achivement ones were nice too. I already had max stats so why would i get perks that would give me more stats i didnt need or didnt use?
Also with no hardcode mode i found 3 way too easy and boring, at level 30 i just gave up because no one stood a real chance against me and the land was riddled with those annoying 10 gorilion hp scorpions.
Yes it did 3s perks were alot more generic while NV's spiced up the gameplay, the ones that allowed you to carry more **** were really useful, Viligiant Recycler is fun and the achivement ones were nice too. I already had max stats so why would i get perks that would give me more stats i didnt need or didnt use?
Also with no hardcode mode i found 3 way too easy and boring, at level 30 i just gave up because no one stood a real chance against me and the land was riddled with those annoying 10 gorilion hp scorpions.
#155 to #154
-
schneidend (11/10/2015) [-] Ah, I forgot Vigilant Recycler, which was a favorite of mine. But, again, the games had very similar perk lists. New Vegas just added a few extra neat ones. But, they had the benefit of hindsight and not having to make the whole game from scratch. Most of the perks added things stats simply didn't do, even for the very static perks. No amount of statistical prowess will make all fire weapons deal 50% more damage (including burn damage), increase critical hit damage bonuses, or increase VATS accuracy.
New Vegas improved things, and many of FO3's perks were indeed pretty boring. But, there wasn't as much stuff to use New Vegas' new perks to play with, fewer challenges to overcome that were not involved in the main quest. As much as I liked Vigilant Recycler, there wasn't really enough to shoot to make it necessary until the DLCs came out and not only provided a much more robust suite of quests, but improved the functionality of the perk itself.
New Vegas improved things, and many of FO3's perks were indeed pretty boring. But, there wasn't as much stuff to use New Vegas' new perks to play with, fewer challenges to overcome that were not involved in the main quest. As much as I liked Vigilant Recycler, there wasn't really enough to shoot to make it necessary until the DLCs came out and not only provided a much more robust suite of quests, but improved the functionality of the perk itself.
#156 to #155
-
dehumanizer (11/10/2015) [-] well you could have still gone out into the wasteland to shoot, became an enemy of the NCR and see how that turns out
fallout3 was mostly just a mindless shooter going through the same old ruins shooting the same old orks and from time to time you would see a random scavanger who totaly shouldnt be there
fallout3 was mostly just a mindless shooter going through the same old ruins shooting the same old orks and from time to time you would see a random scavanger who totaly shouldnt be there
#44 to #43
-
anon (11/09/2015) [-]
I knew it. "It got better when someone else got it because it isn't Bethesda and I hate Bethesda."
New Vegas wasn't any better. It was the same thing with additional fluff. Character animation is identical to FO3 base. It was more of the same, just additional fluff because they didn't have to actually build the core of the game. It was a paid mod of FO3.
New Vegas wasn't any better. It was the same thing with additional fluff. Character animation is identical to FO3 base. It was more of the same, just additional fluff because they didn't have to actually build the core of the game. It was a paid mod of FO3.
#62 to #45
-
LordRaymond (11/09/2015) [-] It's almost like it was a sequel to the original game and they had the opportunity to see what worked and what didn't :^)
Skyrim was made by Bethesda and it had basically all the **** that you're hyping up Fallout NV for, in addition to other more developed systems. I guess 7/10 bait because I replied, since I'm pretty sure you're just an angsty counter-hyper.
Skyrim was made by Bethesda and it had basically all the **** that you're hyping up Fallout NV for, in addition to other more developed systems. I guess 7/10 bait because I replied, since I'm pretty sure you're just an angsty counter-hyper.
#71 to #64
-
LordRaymond (11/09/2015) [-] > Better stealth mechanics
> Better combat system
> More interesting map than NV (New Vegas was basically 100% desert)
Complaining about city size in Skyrim is ******** if you're gonna hype that New Vegas was good, because Skyrim's cities were bigger than New Vegas's (all the major settlements in NV were typically like 10 NPCs and three or four buildings).
90% of this whole picture is people bitching about game mechanics that are necessary for the ******* game to function properly. If you could sneak into Ulfrics palace and steal 9000 gold at level 2, that would break the game. If you could invalidate the entire Imperial vs Stormcloak quest by walking up to General Tullius and shanking him, it would break the game. Level scaling was a preventative measure to stop people from doing what they did in previous games, which was to sprint straight for the hardest dungeon and YOLO loot all the high end gear from it.
If you think Skyrim was legitimately worse than either Fallout game, you might have legitimate autism I'm sorry buddy.
> Better combat system
> More interesting map than NV (New Vegas was basically 100% desert)
Complaining about city size in Skyrim is ******** if you're gonna hype that New Vegas was good, because Skyrim's cities were bigger than New Vegas's (all the major settlements in NV were typically like 10 NPCs and three or four buildings).
90% of this whole picture is people bitching about game mechanics that are necessary for the ******* game to function properly. If you could sneak into Ulfrics palace and steal 9000 gold at level 2, that would break the game. If you could invalidate the entire Imperial vs Stormcloak quest by walking up to General Tullius and shanking him, it would break the game. Level scaling was a preventative measure to stop people from doing what they did in previous games, which was to sprint straight for the hardest dungeon and YOLO loot all the high end gear from it.
If you think Skyrim was legitimately worse than either Fallout game, you might have legitimate autism I'm sorry buddy.
#82 to #71
-
dehumanizer (11/09/2015) [-] >better stealth mechanics
>shoot a guy in the head with a bow
>arrow is sticking through his face
"must have been my imagination"
>bettar combat system
what exactly?
>more intresting map
except you are wrong bud, nice to show you didnt explore it enough even if you think its all desert
>could sneak into Ulfrics palace and steal 9000 gold at level 2
ofcourse the settlements outisde of vegas are small, its an irradiated desert fillled with mutants radiation and raiders, unlike skyrims "huge" cities where no nukes have been dropped or any serious war took place, there are very few houses and npcs, and unlike in a fallout game this doesent make sence in this setting
who are you to say it would break the game? If a character can murder him at level two why shouldnt he be allowed to? I mean if you can why wouldnt any high level assasian do it? Its a single player game what balance are you talking about?
>If you could invalidate the entire Imperial vs Stormcloak quest by walking up to General Tullius and shanking him
well maybe DONT allow the player to kill him so easily? I mean its not like hes the only imperial representitive, same thing for ulfric
>Level scaling was a preventative measure to stop people from doing what they did in previous games, which was to sprint straight for the hardest dungeon and YOLO loot all the high end gear from it.
exactly whats wrong with that? if you could get the **** and survive why not? this is not an mmo
>shoot a guy in the head with a bow
>arrow is sticking through his face
"must have been my imagination"
>bettar combat system
what exactly?
>more intresting map
except you are wrong bud, nice to show you didnt explore it enough even if you think its all desert
>could sneak into Ulfrics palace and steal 9000 gold at level 2
ofcourse the settlements outisde of vegas are small, its an irradiated desert fillled with mutants radiation and raiders, unlike skyrims "huge" cities where no nukes have been dropped or any serious war took place, there are very few houses and npcs, and unlike in a fallout game this doesent make sence in this setting
who are you to say it would break the game? If a character can murder him at level two why shouldnt he be allowed to? I mean if you can why wouldnt any high level assasian do it? Its a single player game what balance are you talking about?
>If you could invalidate the entire Imperial vs Stormcloak quest by walking up to General Tullius and shanking him
well maybe DONT allow the player to kill him so easily? I mean its not like hes the only imperial representitive, same thing for ulfric
>Level scaling was a preventative measure to stop people from doing what they did in previous games, which was to sprint straight for the hardest dungeon and YOLO loot all the high end gear from it.
exactly whats wrong with that? if you could get the **** and survive why not? this is not an mmo
#46 to #45
-
anon (11/09/2015) [-]
Again, the core is exactly the same damn thing. They didn't have to do anything other than build characters, textures and the quests.
The faction thing is stupid.
And the quest isn't just one main line to the end. There are different choices to make that decide how it will end.
If Obsidian had to build from the ground up, it would have been less than half the content they had the time to build.
The faction thing is stupid.
And the quest isn't just one main line to the end. There are different choices to make that decide how it will end.
If Obsidian had to build from the ground up, it would have been less than half the content they had the time to build.
#52 to #46
-
dehumanizer (11/09/2015) [-] There is litteraly no reason why fallout 3 couldnt have a retarded story and quests, they made a ton of money from oblivion
>the faction thing is stupid
no its not, or a world with more cloeors than black (enclave) and white (brotherhood) is too complicated for you?
Lel there is hardly any differance in 3's quests. Either you or whore dies but oh if you pay money no matter what both of you survive!
How do you know Obsidian would have performed worse exactly? Look at pic related.
>the faction thing is stupid
no its not, or a world with more cloeors than black (enclave) and white (brotherhood) is too complicated for you?
Lel there is hardly any differance in 3's quests. Either you or whore dies but oh if you pay money no matter what both of you survive!
How do you know Obsidian would have performed worse exactly? Look at pic related.
#108
-
ogthegreat (11/09/2015) [-] The tightness of that suit makes me uncomfortable. I bet it feels like he's wearing nothing at all.
#10
-
daemonicdemeanor (11/09/2015) [-] **daemonicdemeanor used "*roll picture*"**
**daemonicdemeanor rolled image**Something about calling your dog a faggot makes me laugh every time.
**daemonicdemeanor rolled image**Something about calling your dog a faggot makes me laugh every time.
#81 to #74
-
Onemanretardpack (11/09/2015) [-] I get home at six, gonna get a couple hours of sleep so I can pull an all nighter and go to work the next day
#86 to #85
-
darksideofthebeast (11/09/2015) [-] 2+10 is 12.
It was just about 2 PM when I wrote that.
It was just about 2 PM when I wrote that.
#87 to #86
-
grovesimus (11/09/2015) [-] It was 30 minutes ago when you wrote that. The game releases in 6 hours.
#89 to #88
-
grovesimus (11/09/2015) [-] Weird, would have expected it to be released everywhere at the same time.
#90 to #89
-
darksideofthebeast (11/09/2015) [-] Is this your first time being awake for a midnight release or?
#91 to #90
-
grovesimus (11/09/2015) [-] It's not even late and I don't even have the game, let alone be able to run it.
