Upload
Login or register
Anonymous comments allowed.
#13 - mikemeiers
Reply +245
(07/31/2014) [-]
I can't possibly believe this to be real.
#105 to #13 - anon
Reply 0
(07/31/2014) [-]
I would think it's set up.
He slid too well on that roof.
That roof should have stopped him from sliding...
It would have made sense if he rolled off of it due to the impact of the landing
#94 to #13 - lolme
Reply +4
(07/31/2014) [-]
I just don't get how he managed to land without breaking something in his legs.
#133 to #94 - flipke
Reply +5
(07/31/2014) [-]
GoPro: Epic Roof Jump Apparently he has protections.
#247 to #133 - lolme
Reply 0
(08/01/2014) [-]
Yeah, I saw that. But that will only help him when he's sliding down the roof our if he smacks his legs into something. It won't takeaway the force of landing on metal stairs.
#157 to #133 - Gellfling
Reply -1
(07/31/2014) [-]
that only further makes it hard to believe with it being clearly editted
#177 to #157 - jsereturns
Reply 0
(07/31/2014) [-]
Whatever, the gopro his head looking down sort of distorts the height of the drop. The gopro on the roof however shows that its like a 10 foot drop to the roof which he slid down (which slowed his descent) and then he was able to land on his feet without hurting himself.
#178 to #177 - Gellfling
Reply +2
(07/31/2014) [-]
it was more that he was slowed down, yet the train in the background was unhindered. that means there was video layering. so either the train was layered in, or he was, and if hes layered in, that completely ruins the legitimacy to it
#183 to #178 - jsereturns
Reply +1
(07/31/2014) [-]
I see your point, I didn't really notice that. Maybe they did it for effect or something?
#191 to #183 - Gellfling
Reply 0
(07/31/2014) [-]
i dont know much about actually doing parkour, so i cant 100% say this is fake, but i know a little bit about video editing, and i can say that what i see is suspicious. either way. i still found it entertaining
#210 to #191 - sheepysquirrel
Reply 0
(07/31/2014) [-]
Almost 6 years parkour experience, I can say this is possible, and I actually got linked the video by a friend this morning, but I'd have to watch the video again to check for editing.

I've seen crazier **** in person so I wouldn't doubt it though.
#208 to #191 - mazvaddox
Reply 0
(07/31/2014) [-]
Watch until the end. It shows the unedited version. Also this is the YT channel of the guy who did it. www.youtube.com/user/ethantswanson/featured ( Hopefully this comes out right. I apologize if it does not.)
#209 to #208 - Gellfling
Reply +1
(07/31/2014) [-]
oh i suppose it does, i ended it at where it says the gopro logo because i assumed the rest was just advertisement for their product and channel lol
#134 to #133 - flipke
Reply 0
(07/31/2014) [-]
Also, sauce.
#15 to #13 - crackmaster
Reply +946
(07/31/2014) [-]
no, it's reversed
#216 to #15 - shadowxvoltage
Reply 0
(07/31/2014) [-]
I thought you were telling the truth until I remembered he would be walking backwards up the stairs and ******* start flying for some reason
#142 to #15 - jellybob
Reply 0
(07/31/2014) [-]
Comment Picture
#113 to #15 - crellow
Reply +3
(07/31/2014) [-]
and now, we wait for someone to reverse it
#130 to #113 - flipke
Reply +37
(07/31/2014) [-]
Don't thank me.
Don't thank me.
#227 to #130 - woxyman
Reply +1
(07/31/2014) [-]
thank you.
#222 to #130 - exotic
Reply 0
(07/31/2014) [-]
god damn it spiderman
#202 to #130 - strelokkk
Reply +5
(07/31/2014) [-]
[Insert well-known quote there]
#244 to #202 - apylon
Reply +1
(08/01/2014) [-]
I cum in pies? reallu hope someone gets this reference
#255 to #244 - strelokkk
Reply 0
(08/01/2014) [-]
I honestly had to look it up, thank you for the laugh !
#205 to #202 - flipke
Reply +2
(07/31/2014) [-]
Looks more like he's being abducted by aliens, héhé.
#170 to #130 - crellow
Reply +3
(07/31/2014) [-]
thanks mate
#25 to #15 - zzjames ONLINE
Reply +170
(07/31/2014) [-]
THAT JUST RAISES FURTHER QUESTIONS
#96 to #25 - aleksandurr
Reply +19
(07/31/2014) [-]
its like you're yelling in the distance
#70 to #25 - lifeanddeath
Reply +33
(07/31/2014) [-]
#92 to #70 - anon
Reply 0
(07/31/2014) [-]