Obviously you're not aware that they're Russian soldiers preparing for a false flag attack on Russia, allowing Russia to invade and conquer Poland. The Germans did it to overwhelming success.
also the knob he used only compensates for windage, and you have to adjust that knob every single (unless your shooting the same exact direction every time) time while the elevation could stay relitavely the same.
I don't know who they are fighting. When ever i see brown people in a war i will immediately assume they are fighting the US. 80% of the time that is the case.
You know about anti-personnel weapons?
Well Anti-Material are for Structures and vehicles/equipment hence "Material" instead of "Personnel". They are devastating when it comes to killing people. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-materiel_rifle
Sometimes spelled materiel. Practically the same meaning.
Also other brown people. The US is allied with Syrian rebels and partly allied with Kurdish rebels in the area, if I'm correct. I think Iraqi soldiers fighting ISIS have US support, but I'm not sure
Go to liveleak and check it out. There are tons of vids where people are shot, maimed, burned alive etc. But there are also **** videos and funny stuff like this.
Adversity, like the rest of the internet.
I was at a school on a music workshop and we had to teach handicapped kids how to play music. They didn't understand **** . But it wasn't that bad, we could just mute them. But one of them played with the tuners on my 5 string Ibanez i had been stupid enough to bring, with LaBella strings i had just put on(45 usd) and snapped three of them, i was so mad.
ibanez makes some visually beautiful instruments. i love my 6 string AEF. Most of them sound amazing too. I almost pulled the trigger on a hollow body electric over the summer (on sale for $200 flat) and im kicking myself for not doing so.
Do strings affect the sound that much? i still have the stock strings on my guitar and i havent really delved into getting "high quality" strings since i A) am not very good and B) dont even play for shows or gigs. i am the guy that brings his guitar to the bonfire who can kinda play all the songs
tl;dr: pleb
You should change strings after a while, especially if you touch your instrument with dirty hands.
The basic strings are only for looking good on the guitar, that should be changed immediately whne buying a guitar.
But you don't need to spend 20 dollars on a ****** coated string set, just buy some basic Dean Markley, Earnie Ball, Rotosound.
In playing music the tone is almost as important as technical knowledge. The real importance is in the feels you put in the music, yourself.
no need for name calling. i said it myself i play guitar strictly as a hobby. i know im not good enough to care about whatever the **** difference there could be. I've been satisfied with the way my guitar plays and sounds thus far so i havent seen a need to switch out strings (unless they were to break). i'm just wondering if different quality/brand of strings really make a noticable difference in how the instrument plays and sounds
Strings do really affect the sound and playability of an instrument. my band plays tuned down a half step, so i buy heavy gauge strings for my bass to retain tension.
If i play with medium or light strings, i end up with unplayable floppy rubber band like strings.
Certain brands of strings will hold their tonal quality for longer than other brands, cheap strings will go out of tune faster as well.
I live on the Oregon coast, so most cheap strings i buy for my instruments will rust within weeks of putting them on. especially acoustic guitar strings.. the salty air just bends them over and ***** them raw.
I play bass, not sure about how strings work on guitar. But Higher tension strings allows you to tune your instrument really deep, like C# deep. And on bass there are different kinds of strings, most notably flatwound and roundwound. Strings also affect tone, but that's more a personal thing like the wood of the instrument is. But there is a big difference between flatwound and roundwound tone, and i just like LaBella Flats
Sniper looks down at ankle biter with AK
Ankle biter ***** with alt on scope
Growls
Ankle biter goes again **** off
Ankle biter goes for third time, video cuts off
I can only assume sniper knocked him with his rifle butt
Isn't that just gas from a blank round? Does the military actually caries 'hot' weapons into parades and such? What about the good old cliche of american movies - the military funeral with all the honors where they fire into the sky?
They probably just twisted the cap around. On my scope you have to take the cap off the scope to adjust the elevation. But that's just mine, it's a military model, but it's also like 25 years old. I don't know what how they're doing it now.
not the same a microscope but close. microscope you can just adjust it back to focus, no prob. a rifle its trial and error. you put it to where you think you need it, hope, then shoot. then adjust it a bit more to where you think, shoot, then adju... repeat a bunch of times untill you finally get it proper. ohhh and also when you do that you have to make sure its adjusted to 0 wind, so you technically cant even adjust it to center, need to adjust it to the appropriate off center notch. takes me atleast 5-20 minutes to do it properly.
and lining up your sights with the lazer that goes in the barrel, its never really worked properly with me, it always seems to be off
Laser boresighting is good for things like ACOGS where you have a few inchs of wiggle room (due to it being a close range optic) to still hit on target, where as long rifles and high zoom scopes a bullet hole is your best guide.
the focal point of the laser and your crosshair would change depending on how far down range your target is. if you have a laser coming out of the scope of the barrel i suspect you could just use the scope as a telescope to find the dot on your target (minus effects of wind/ Coriolis effect). if anything the laser really provides you a side-to-side centering of your scope and your elevation would change depending on distance to target.
(this is just my theoretical thinking behind it. I dont own anything but a BB gun with ironsights)
The scopes they use have incremental cross hairs for different ranges. The middle one is for closest, the second one is for further away and so on and so forth. Some of them even have a little measuring device that will let you measure a person and make it easier to decide how far away you are so you know what set of crosshairs you need to use. Bore sights come with a gauge you clip to the end of the barrel so that you can zero your rifle in to a specific range. It's not perfect, because real world, but it'll get you within a couple feet of a target at 100 yards. Then the real work of personally zeroing in the rifle. Everyone's going to have different personal settings on a rifle.
TLDR Bore sighting is kind of an every size fits all version of zeroing a scope.
It also depends on the type of rifle and the distance. For instance the M16 fires in an arch, so the round is at the same elevatio at 36 and 300 yards.
To be fair, any scope that is at all suitable for military work has some form of numbering system on those knobs and any sniper with any business being out there has his zeros for dozens of ranges and conditions recorded and probably strapped to the gun or his arm somewhere. It would barely take two seconds to fix it.
I thinkthat's one of the knobs used to adjust the reticle in the scope so now the sniper has to take some time zeroing it again otherwise the bullet will go way off target from wherever he's aiming
You sure about that? I'm in the US Army and every optic we have had (had ******** ones in basic before getting an ACOG at my unit) requires you to get some sort of flat object to adjust your zero and even then it was slightly difficult to turn. It is to prevent your zero getting knocked off from stupid **** like falling or rubbing against your gear. I don't think this is for his zero. If it is then that is a horribly designed optic.
Every optic I've ever used was as easy to turn as in the content. There's the bare knob that you need something flat, then there's the cap you fit on that is used for adjustment.
The ACOG is about the only opric you've used isn't it?
I agree the ressesed adjusted knobs for the ACOG are a great idea but remeber that is a cl9se combat optic. Snipers will be make on sight adjustments to their optic while sighting a target.
The ACOG is also desinged with a prism that must be rattled (useually a good lottle knock with the palm of the hand) in order to set the adjustments made to it, we can talk practicality and desing flaw all day.
Like the fact that the tritium container on the ACOG is very flimsy and its breaking has caused several eye irritation problems on the fields of Iraq and afghanistan.
So it may not look like an ACOG or act like an ACOG but trust me. That is a decent scope and that was his elevation adjustment knob.