Hillary Wins Nobel Participation Prize

#53 - anon id: 0c74128e

Reply +14 123456789123345869

(12/02/2016) [-]

stickied by matamoros

And the award for WORLDS WORST CUNT goes to...

JAY Z!!
(Audience gasps)
Just kidding... it's Hillary Clinton.

#2 - numbmind

Reply +91 123456789123345869

(12/01/2016) [-]

**numbmind used "*roll picture*"**
**numbmind rolled image**Better than obama getting one even though he caused massive amounts of bloodshed...

#44 to #2 - levvy

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(12/02/2016) [-]

Bash The Fash

#35 to #2 - Haugi

Reply +2 123456789123345869

(12/02/2016) [-]

while I think giving Obama the peace price is some of the dumbest **** we've done.

It was supposed to be an incentive towards being more peaceful and sticking to his election promises.

#70 to #35 - anon id: 8a615466

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(12/03/2016) [-]

11 days after accepting the Nobel Peace Prize, Obama sent 30,000 troops into Afghanistan.

Yay Obama...

WTF?

#3 to #2 - kharmelion

Reply +3 123456789123345869

(12/01/2016) [-]

Wew that roll

#15 to #2 - thylacine

Reply +3 123456789123345869

(12/01/2016) [-]

Sweet roll!

#41 to #15 - anon id: e29e2e35

Reply +1 123456789123345869

(12/02/2016) [-]

#57 to #41 - corndawg

Reply +1 123456789123345869

(12/02/2016) [-]

#58 to #57 - yaybacon

Reply +1 123456789123345869

(12/02/2016) [-]

#10 - wisdomspider

Reply +60 123456789123345869

(12/01/2016) [-]

god damn 2016. I actually googled to make sure this was a joke and not real.

Quality joke, though, since it's participation prizes that ****** up the left milenials to think they deserve money for who they are rather than what they do.

#22 to #10 - anon id: dc1dfb42

Reply +2 123456789123345869

(12/01/2016) [-]

As a norwegian I was thinking "Ooh no! Labour Party did it AGAIN!" Nothing against Obama, but giving him the prize for having done nothing was such an embarisment.

That is 2016 for you.

#23 to #22 - vigilum

Reply +1 123456789123345869

(12/01/2016) [-]

... You realise our political parties have absolutely nothing to do with the Peace Prize, right? They're their own thing.

#21 - tanditsky

Reply +28 123456789123345869

(12/01/2016) [-]

To everyone in the comments, this is satire

#25 to #21 - cultistjesus

Reply +1 123456789123345869

(12/01/2016) [-]

**cultistjesus used "*roll picture*"**
**cultistjesus rolled image**
I dunno, Their like emmies. If you can afford it.
Obama got one and he did nothing to ******* earn it so it means he bought it.

All through Obama's terms he went on vacations, visited t.v shows, seen celebs, appeared in some movies. He acted more like a sensational celebrity but a luke warm politician with butterfingers (Operation Fast and Furios, Deficit - No many people remember he was to blame for that **** storm). Obama is prolly the worse Peace time president we've had but definitely not the absolute worst cause if anything he was more meh about everything he did. I will give him this he was Charismatic and had a lot of energy but just a big disappointment.

#39 to #25 - funnyjunkxplain

Reply +3 123456789123345869

(12/02/2016) [-]

I see your points.

#42 to #39 - reiksman

Reply +1 123456789123345869

(12/02/2016) [-]

Was that an intentional joke because Tomb raider pointy boobs?

#48 to #42 - unlimitedderpworks

Reply +3 123456789123345869

(12/02/2016) [-]

Well now, aren't we the sharp one.

#28 to #25 - tanditsky

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(12/01/2016) [-]

Okay yeah, but there's no such thing as the Nobel participation prize

#29 to #28 - cultistjesus

Reply -1 123456789123345869

(12/01/2016) [-]

Ah; hard to tell. I see so much stupid **** that is legitmate it is hard to tell when **** is satire anymore.

#30 to #29 - tanditsky

Reply +1 123456789123345869

(12/01/2016) [-]

I find just assuming everything I see online is fake, if it looks interesting I'll google it to see if there's any good sources

#34 to #21 - anon id: c4a4697f

Reply +1 123456789123345869

(12/02/2016) [-]

It still pisses me off that this idea can exist.

#19 - whyjoseph

Reply +10 123456789123345869

(12/01/2016) [-]

She deserves a nobel peace prize for all the wars she stopped by failing to win.

#5 - arkis

Reply +8 123456789123345869

(12/01/2016) [-]

I'm gonna need to see some sources, because that sounds like ********

#7 to #5 - anon id: 8e04b471

Reply +1 123456789123345869

(12/01/2016) [-]

**anonymous rolled user mondprinzessin ** eat the pain

#8 to #7 - mondprinzessin

Reply +1 123456789123345869

(12/01/2016) [-]

HILLARY IS A LICH AND FEEDS ON THE BLOOD OF HAMSTERS

#9 to #8 - holdup

Reply +1 123456789123345869

(12/01/2016) [-]

no she doesn't! she feeds on the blood of children.

#13 to #5 - brainbug

Reply +1 123456789123345869

(12/01/2016) [-]

It sounded more like a joke to me.

#24 to #5 - heyzeus

Reply +1 123456789123345869

(12/01/2016) [-]

yeah it is fake. just google search anything on the subject and nothing will pop up of this

#36 - theguywhoaskswhy

Reply +7 123456789123345869

(12/02/2016) [-]

HOLD UP A ******* SECOND
You mean to tell me that a prestigious collective, responsible for handing out acknowledgements for the greatest achievements in human history, within the fields of science, have a ******* Participation Prize???
How ******* retarded is that? Participation awards are garbage that **** up kids, turning them into irresponsible, self-absorbed, unmotivated cowards. Handing out participation awards for every little thing leaves kids unable to succeed because, given that they got the same praise for merely showing up, they end up expecting every to be just handed to them.
LOSING and KNOWING you've lost is a good thing. It builds character, it provides motivation for one to seek to better ones self.
And this organisation, which exists to acknowledge the discoveries of those who are the BEST in their respective fields, has a ******* Participation Prize?
If I had any faith left in humanity at all i've no doubt it would have left me in this moment.
**** this generation, and the last one too.