Upload
Login or register
x

HALP

It days age I.
What is wrong with me???
I) They did not and cannot net understand New Particles in Old Mind Set Physics!
2) They cannot imagine Space different frem Hyper space, different hem Black Hole Space, different frem essential space,
different frem Big Bang Space, different to all space LHC knern peters
3) Time is not 24 Hews, the Time LHG cannot find in regular physics
4) 1? particles are tee little in Universe m Trillions Trillions m Particles, funny.
ti) Higs Field is wrong in Particles Filed . . . .
ti) "Energy is neither created her destroyed" is lenger a true statement in “Space is neither created ner '' dynamically
If Result is tee little campare cost of 10' s Billions USD and time.
8) Ne way LHC can increase its Kinetic energy.
9} LHG canned see anither dimension beside X y Z , If D
IO) There are cheaper ways and mere efficiency and mere results than LHG way. . . .
LHC needs Particles Field; otherwise, they jump hem conclusion to conclusion hem Particles to particle. . . .Let me give a 'lokti: tto
explain sheet the way Universe and the way LHG
there is a boy fishing in Ocean for 50 years he picked ens by ene fish, until he fished the 17th fish, he is getting old and tired,
then he concluded there are 17 fish in the Ocean only, he got them all and happy go home" (Smile, it is just adelle}
A V Reply Share,
...
+22
Views: 3223
Favorited: 2
Submitted: 12/07/2015
Share On Facebook
submit to reddit +Favorite Subscribe to simonhatesfj

Comments(13):

Leave a comment Refresh Comments Show GIFs
Top Rated Controversial Best Lowest Rated Newest
Anonymous comments allowed.
13 comments displayed.
Reply
+8
#1 - TrekieTwo ONLINE (12/07/2015) [-]
GIF
There's so many things wrong with this, I don't even know where to start in tearing his "theory" apart. Also "Physical Conditions Universe or Environment, it is more or less make we are all as Physicists who are living in Physical Conditions Universe in his or her own right!"? Unless this guy made a typo, my English is failing me, or this guy is just rambling on, thinking that what he's saying is profound or something.
Reply
+1
#7 to #1 - woodoo (12/08/2015) [-]
I THINK he was seriously trying to argue that since we are all experiencing a "physical" existence, we are all "physicists", and therefore know enough about "our" physics to make the LHC irrelevant.

That is, he seriously tried to argue feelings over facts in a discussion based entirely around scientific facts.
Reply
+2
#2 to #1 - simonhatesfj [OP]ONLINE (12/07/2015) [-]
**simonhatesfj used "*roll picture*"**
**simonhatesfj rolled image**
I asked him if he was okay, but he didn't answer me.
Reply
+3
#5 - jeanmariegrangon (12/07/2015) [-]
It's always funny to see people stating that the current physic theories are wrong while they clearly don't understand them.
Reply
+1
#6 - chizzack (12/07/2015) [-]
I think we're all overlooking the real questions that need to be answered..
Reply
0
#10 to #6 - simonhatesfj [OP]ONLINE (12/08/2015) [-]
**simonhatesfj used "*roll picture*"**
**simonhatesfj rolled image**
It all makes sense now...
Reply
+1
#3 - teevee (12/07/2015) [-]
our puny minds cannot comprehend his greatness
Reply
+1
#4 to #3 - simonhatesfj [OP]ONLINE (12/07/2015) [-]
**simonhatesfj used "*roll picture*"**
**simonhatesfj rolled image**
Imagine how is touch the sky.
Do I get a cookie?
Reply
0
#8 - woodoo (12/08/2015) [-]
You know, it's funny, but i think i actually get what he's on about, and why. First of we need to establish something about "Thoithe", he views science like a dumb man might view his religion(and no other religion), that is to say, it cant be wrong. He is the type of man who would dismiss a new theory because he doesn't like change. Having stated that:
1: "The old mindset" being how elementary particles fit into the universe, and what defines them. What defines an elementary particle is the number of electront hat circles its nucleus. As such, all particles have a designated space on the periodic table, and is technically not "new" as such. If we were to create one that DIDN'T fit on the periodic table, actual scientists the world over would rejoice, as this is something NEW and EXITING, while people like "Thoithe" would deny that it happened, and demand more and more proof for the rest of their lives.
2: He seems to think that LHC was made to discover "new space", i can only assume he means dimensions, and his point is that since we can't visualize further dimensions, they of course can't exist. He would have used the same argument against ultraviolet light.
3: He seems to think the concept of time as a 24 hour cycle is directly rooted in science. It is not. It's just a very handy way to measure things that we as a species have grown used to.
4: He seems to believe that we need to use more particles, what else is there to say?
5: ... I have no idea.
6: I think he thinks that the LHC is meant to create a new dimension, which would go against the theory that energy can neither be created nor destroyed, of course, had he actually read the theory in question, he'd know that's not what it means.
7: He shows a lack of understanding of economics, i am not surprised, he fails to realize that the issue with the economy is that money stagnates, and fails to see that spending is a GOOD thing, provided that money KEEPS being spent.
8: He claims that the LHC can't accelerate a particle fast enough to make a difference, he bases this on... i don't know, maybe he read it on a forum somewhere.
9: He seems to think that, as we can't see more than 3 dimensions(actually 4, as time is stated as the fourth dimension), nothing we build could do so either. He would have said it was impossible to build a camera that can see ultraviolet light as well, had he ever believed ultraviolet light existed.
10: He seems to think that investment in the LHC was done despite the existence of better options. While i do believe that this experiment probably could have been done cheaper, i don't think it should, as stated, money in circulation is good.

Then he tells a joke whose grammar makes unreadable, although its meaning is quiet clear, he states that more research should be done before drawing a conclusion(despite the LHC doing more research and actively stating that they have yet to conclude this experiment).

He the says that he never claims to know more about physics than physicists, 5 sentences later he directly says that he knows more about physics than physicists. He proceeds to state that he does SCIENCE and not physics, seemingly believing that physics is not a part of science. He then seems to imply that he has discovered a "new" science, which he claims for his own, which will revolutionize the world, and make PhD's irrelevant(actually he seems to imply that they will be detrimental, but he probably means irrelevant).

He then asks who really has a right to call themselves physicists, the answer of course are people who dedicate their lives to the research of physics.

He then proceeds to state that living in a physical universe, EVERYONE is their own physicist. He is seriously arguing feelings>facts.

He claims to know more "universe" then what conventional science can tell us is there, which makes me think that either he takes part in hallucinatory drugs, or he has no idea of the concept of "imagination".

Cont:
Reply
0
#9 to #8 - woodoo (12/08/2015) [-]
He then tries to say he is not covering behind a fake name, this is probably the first good point that i agree with him fully on. Although his choice of vocabulary and punctuation leaves much to be desired.

He then claims that everything he has claimed is an objective truth that can't be challenged.
Reply
0
#11 to #9 - simonhatesfj [OP]ONLINE (12/08/2015) [-]
**simonhatesfj used "*roll picture*"**
**simonhatesfj rolled image**
Huh.
In the last one he said something about living in the physical realm, so he thinks that he can be an expert on it by living in it.
Reply
0
#12 to #11 - woodoo (12/08/2015) [-]
Exactly, he seems to state that as he lives and experiences physic, he obviously knows more about it than someone who isn't him. Or rather, he thinks that his feelings matter more than someone elses facts.

Also, oddly fitting roll.
Reply
0
#13 to #12 - simonhatesfj [OP]ONLINE (12/08/2015) [-]
**simonhatesfj used "*roll picture*"**
**simonhatesfj rolled image**
Lol thanks!
 
Leave a comment

Top Content in 24 Hours

<
>
 Friends (0)