Upload
Login or register
Anonymous comments allowed.
#57 - gurubear
Reply -1
(03/05/2014) [-]
As always i going to leave this
#123 to #57 - anon
Reply 0
(03/06/2014) [-]
i dont mind that, but dont limit the magazine size. noone really needs a V8, but when theres 4 or five people doing a smash and grab on your house and youre home alone, it helps to have more ammo.
#82 to #57 - oceanmist
Reply +3
(03/06/2014) [-]
But cars Don't need any of that unless you use them on public roads. Just like you usually need a training, permit , ect. to carry a gun in public areas.
#67 to #57 - vonspyder
Reply +1
(03/06/2014) [-]
Sorry but there is no Right to have a car. There IS however a right to have a firearm.
#69 to #67 - gurubear
Reply -3
(03/06/2014) [-]
But don't the idea of maybe a little requirements for a gun sound a little appealing?
#81 to #69 - SteyrAUG ONLINE
Reply +1
(03/06/2014) [-]
That's why we have FBI background checks performed at the time of a weapons purchase.
#170 to #81 - gurubear
Reply -1
(03/06/2014) [-]
Yes, i think that's a good idea, in my mind we need more of it.
#187 to #170 - SteyrAUG ONLINE
Reply 0
(03/06/2014) [-]
I don't see why, it covers all of the federal and state requirements to buy a gun, including not being a felon or having a court recognized mental illness. The FBI also has the ability to put a 7 day waiting period on you if they think you are high risk to commit some sort of crime but still are legally allowed to purchase a gun.
#70 to #69 - vonspyder
Reply +1
(03/06/2014) [-]
No, actually I find the idea horrible.
#71 to #70 - gurubear
Reply -1
(03/06/2014) [-]
Horrible?? What is so wrong about it?
#72 to #71 - vonspyder
Reply -1
(03/06/2014) [-]
I like my freedom. I like others having freedom. Simple as that.
#73 to #72 - gurubear
Reply -2
(03/06/2014) [-]
Given that you are a decent person, this will not affect you, other that you have to do some cheks and get an insurance, but no biggies..
#74 to #73 - vonspyder
Reply +1
(03/06/2014) [-]
It will affect me in the sense that I am essentially allowing someone else to decide who can and cannot have a firearm. I have an issue with that.
#75 to #74 - gurubear
Reply -2
(03/06/2014) [-]
But at the same time you will properly prohibit an idiot for killing someone! Is't that a fair tradeoff?
#76 to #75 - vonspyder
Reply -1
(03/06/2014) [-]
Not to me it isnt.
#77 to #76 - gurubear
Reply -1
(03/06/2014) [-]
I see