Gun Control. . How Liberals want it How Conservatives want it. Psst, very few liberals actually want to eliminate guns. Most are reasonable and want basic restrictions on gun ownership, such as closing loopholes that allow
Click to expand
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
User avatar #31 - snerus (11/21/2013) [+] (8 replies)
Liberals want to put restrictions on firearms in place to make sure citizens can't start a firefight in the middle of a crowded, packed and dark movie theatre. The guards (in this comic) are trained and able to wield their swords, just like the police are trained and able to use their guns. I really wouldn't be comfortable with fat self righteous 'Murica lardwhales wielding weapons as they holler and scream for food in McDonalds, and frankly why anybody would believe otherwise scares me.
#34 to #31 - subgunner (11/21/2013) [-]
I know right!? They should have made the theater a gun free zone so you couldn't take guns in there at all!!!.......oh wait....
#1 - Ken M (11/20/2013) [+] (24 replies)
except that doesn't work with a gun you absolute moron.
User avatar #4 to #1 - malhaloc (11/20/2013) [-]
Funny. Because Switzerland the country with the lowest crime rate in the world has only these restrictions on guns:

All men are required to own at least one, women are not required but are urged by the government.

All citizens must attend a 2 day convention where they learn gun safety and use. (ammo is provided by the government)

The gun you own may not be automatic.

Those are the only laws having to do with guns in that country. And their crime rate is so low they don't even waste the time, effort, or money to keep track of it.

Sauce provided (where's yours?)
#24 - jakatackka (11/21/2013) [+] (7 replies)
Psst, very few liberals actually want to eliminate guns. Most are reasonable and want basic restrictions on gun ownership, such as closing loopholes that allow felons to buy guns.

Guns don't kill people, people kill people. Most liberals just want to keep the guns away from those people who do kill, whether on accident or on purpose.
User avatar #45 - fistymcbutthole (11/21/2013) [+] (3 replies)
It sounds really stupid, but if everyone had a gun... the crime rate might go down. A mugger/ rapist/ jehovas witness would really think twice about harming someone if there was a good possibility of them having a gun. And if there ever was a robbery or something, people would just shoot them.
#42 - Yojimbo (11/21/2013) [+] (1 reply)
I'm a liberal, and I love guns
I'm a liberal, and I love guns
#62 - yeorey (11/21/2013) [-]
I really don't like the idea of the centralization of firearms to an entity that is very susceptible to corruption.

Statism will not set you free.
User avatar #30 - enkmaster (11/21/2013) [+] (5 replies)
I think Canada has a nice balance when it comes to gun laws. Only non-fully auto center fires (there are people who have them, but the only way is through the grandfathering program so dont bother trying yourself), 5 round magazine caps for semi automatics. Rimfires can have as large a magazine as you want. No AK or AR platforms or variants, for some reason I havent found yet.

Must have a restricted permit for certain platforms and handguns/revolvers, can only bring restricted firearms to a gun club you have registered with.
User avatar #20 - mexicandudeinsd (11/21/2013) [+] (1 reply)
i dont get it damm im not smart today
User avatar #21 to #20 - sketchysketchist (11/21/2013) [-]
Liberals want to ban guns, which make the soldiers unable to fight the monkey who only gets more violent.
Conservatives want people to stay armed so when the monkey attacks, they can fight back, then it's too scared to do much after that.
#64 - dandamanzx ONLINE (11/21/2013) [-]
Let me give my testament as to why I'm against gun control. First off, I'm a college Sophomore working to become a cop, and I have in my home but one single gun: an AR-15. OOH THE DEVIL'S GUN. **** off.

I live in NY, the second most anti-gun state in the country. I managed to get my rifle before the SAFE Act was passed while I was in my working phase. Now I can't even buy magazines for it anymore, I have to register it with the state like some god damned sex offender, and if I load 8 rounds into it I'm suddenly a criminal. Here, if you own a 30 round magazine, it's Class D Felony which is a higher crime than 3rd degree rape. That's right, for owning a metal box with a spring you're suddenly worse than a rapist.

This is the only gun I have, and it's exactly the one they're trying to ban. If they succeed, then I have nothing left. I'm struggling my way financially through school right now, and I can't afford to buy a shotgun or register for a pistol permit, let alone buy a pistol and ammo. The situation I'm in isn't exactly uncommon.

If this gun is taken from me, I'm left with nothing to reliably defend myself with. I'm ****** if anyone ever decides to try to break into my home (which is quite possible given my area). So if you think that it'd be just "common sense" to say "no you can't have that" when I put my sweat and money into that gun, please refer to the picture to the left and have a nice ******* day.
#63 - Ken M (11/21/2013) [-]
adding an additional gun to a situation where there is a gunman increases the chances of someone getting shot by over 500%

waving your .357 penis surrogate around like a ******* retard isn't going to make someone back down, it's gonna make them panic and go nuts
User avatar #59 - heretofuckshitup (11/21/2013) [-]
i'd rather have cops use non-lethal rubber bullets, bean bags, tasers, and tranquilizers. these are the best ways to subdue a criminal in the eyes of any officer without actually killing them.

If a cop is afraid of some kid or a barking dog the reaction should be to pump them with lead even if the officer fears for their life. Cops become cops knowing that they put their life at risk, its called to protect and serve not to enforce and ticket. i commend them when they do their jobs because i get how stressful it can be but if a cop is abusing their power than they aren't in the right profession
#57 - mondprinzessin (11/21/2013) [-]
gettin political in the comments
gettin political in the comments
#55 - cactusupthebutt (11/21/2013) [+] (1 reply)
Here's the thing about the whole Obama/gun thing...

He only wants to remove assault rifles and shot guns. He believes people should own pistols only through an extensive period of tests. Really, it's a good idea. And shouldn't be treated as a way to remove all of our Right to Bear Arms rights.

If you remove the Assault Rifles and Shot guns from the picture, police officers can manage to remove a person threat using their own Assault Rifles and shotguns.

Just so you know.
User avatar #58 to #55 - dandamanzx ONLINE (11/21/2013) [-]
Assault rifles have never been legal. What you refer to are Semi-automatic rifles which can only fire one round per pull of the trigger, and have been cleverly nicknamed "assault weapons" to make them sound scary. It's guilt by association. If you look at actual gun crime statistics, "assault weapons" account for less than a percent of gun murders. As for shotguns, you can just **** off on that one. They're incredibly good for home defense. Especially because just the sound of one cocking will make a burglar **** their pants and run. Not to mention all the hunting uses.
User avatar #49 - failtolawl (11/21/2013) [+] (1 reply)
Obama must be a pretty **** liberal if you think he wants to get rid of your guns.
 Friends (0)