Guess what I'm buying!?
50 CALIBER ""
FOR WHEN THEM IS H . M
BEHIND THE YOUR
NEIGHBORS HOUSE
FOR WHEN THEM IS H . M
BEHIND THE YOUR
NEIGHBORS HOUSE
...
| |
Anonymous comments allowed.
196 comments displayed.
#14
-
anlbomber (09/24/2015) [-] 
>press trigger
>both shoulders dislocated
>burglar has no shoulders anymore
>both shoulders dislocated
>burglar has no shoulders anymore
#23 to #14
-
potatorgue (09/24/2015) [-] I think it has less recoil than the desert eagle, i think its a little heavier, so its pretty manageable if you know how to use it properly
#33 to #23
-
mooghens (09/24/2015) [-] Standard .50 AE (Desert Eagle) 300gr. bullet has a muzzle velocity of 450 m/s from a 6 inch barrel. Mind you however, a Desert Eagle also utillizes a lot of the recoil energy to cycle the action of the gun, thus mitigating some of it. Overall resulting in 1,965 J of energy.
Similar projectile weight of a .500 S&W moves at around 632 m/s. Mind you that the .500 S&W has a cylinder gap between the revolving drum and the barrel, so some of the propellant gas manages to escape. And the muzzle energy is still 3,888 J. While it has no moving parts that help to mitigate it
tl;dr: It has double if not more recoil than a Desert Eagle.
Similar projectile weight of a .500 S&W moves at around 632 m/s. Mind you that the .500 S&W has a cylinder gap between the revolving drum and the barrel, so some of the propellant gas manages to escape. And the muzzle energy is still 3,888 J. While it has no moving parts that help to mitigate it
tl;dr: It has double if not more recoil than a Desert Eagle.
#158 to #33
-
notblindguy (09/25/2015) [-] I have fired both, and own the .500 S&W and firing that ******* cannon more than 4 times is intense
#36 to #33
-
heartlessrobot (09/24/2015) [-] Yeah but you don't look like a cod playing kike when you level it on someone.
#223 to #33
-
demonofthepale (09/25/2015) [-] Having shot both, the desert eagle in .50 is about the same as a .44 magnum out of a revolver in terms of recoil. Very easily managed honestly. The fireball and the boom however, is quite the show. The .500 magnum out of a 7" (or was it an 8"?) barrel with a muzzle brake is like a little less than twice that recoil. Not wrist breaking but its quite the thump
#157 to #33
-
JoshOwnsAll (09/25/2015) [-] that S&W M500 has a muzzle brake too.
or a compensator, I'm not 100% sure what the difference is
or a compensator, I'm not 100% sure what the difference is
#56 to #23
-
containlettersonly (09/24/2015) [-] It has less than a 44 for sure, it has a compensator
#109 to #69
-
tenaciouslee ONLINE (09/25/2015) [-] >Be guy with .500
>Try and impress friends about how strunk I am by limp-wristing it.
>MFW gotta play it cool.
>Try and impress friends about how strunk I am by limp-wristing it.
>MFW gotta play it cool.
#225 to #109
-
demonofthepale (09/25/2015) [-] He didnt even come close to limp wristing it. Get out and shoot one, then come back and say he limp wristed it. Out of a 4" barrel, that recoil is stout. One handed is doable. But you have a lot of muzzle flip to overcome. The muzzle is going to climb up some no matter what you do, but had he limp wristed it, his wrist would have violently went upward, twisted around and he more than likely would have dropped the gun from the force.
#293 to #261
-
bitchitroll ONLINE (09/25/2015) [-] Great now I'm gonna have to go out in the woods and record my self screaming that when I shoot
#275 to #3
-
kristovsky (09/25/2015) [-] It would still look the same if you hadn't, except with blood.
#271 to #255
-
enslavedyouth (09/25/2015) [-] >People responding to people responding to people who responded to levvy
#273 to #271
-
thegreentornado (09/25/2015) [-] >People responding to people responding to people responding to people who responded to levvy
And the train will go on and on
And the train will go on and on
#138 to #128
-
loljkisback ONLINE (09/25/2015) [-] Levvy is our resident cunt, just keep their thumb count at 0 and they gain nothing.
#145 to #142
-
abesimpson (09/25/2015) [-] But its very hard to keep people from thumbing him down. Like seriously, its like if people don't even read the username when someone comments, no matter how obvious they are trolling.
#155 to #145
-
coffinsalesman (09/25/2015) [-] He's at 0 right now, 40 minutes after he submitted his comment. Keep it up guys!
#150 to #127
-
twystedtail (09/25/2015) [-] I'm not even upset about the post itself, it's you using Maki that depresses me.
#248 to #127
-
bjornkrage (09/25/2015) [-] >needing to "troll" lmao ***** at this point you're not even trying anymore to get attention
#193 to #3
-
dirtypizza ONLINE (09/25/2015) [-]
Ok semi related story to this picture. This one time a few years back i was playing a match on Modern Warfare 2 (yeah i know but this was when the franchise was still good) online and I was using some kind of automatic sniper rifle M14 i think. I was on a roll gunning everyone down and getting kill streaks. So anyways I start shooting at this one guy and only manage to him him once before he quickly ran inside a building to take cover. I had an idea of where he was hiding though. It was in a small corner room that players usually hid in to heal or camp. So I aim while outside to the wall he went behind and I estimated and basically guessed where might be. My crosshairs are at head height and I fire. "Headshot" immediately appears on the screen. It was a total skill and luck. He could've been anywhere behind there. I could've been like 5 feet or 5 in off or he could've been in a different spot altogether. It was basically a blind shot. It was awesome I felt immortal and the fact there was also a kill cam after you died to show who killed you and how made it even better. He saw me get a head shot on him through a goddamn wall and then he knew to fear me. One of my best gaming moments ever.
#289 to #251
-
myreadyassyolk (09/25/2015) [-] I would never try to tackle anyone trying to rob me with that.
#44 to #19
-
Whaaaaaaaaa [OP](09/24/2015) [-] you're talking like I don't have a good paying job. Pfft I own my own business.
#68 to #19
-
bitchitroll ONLINE (09/25/2015) [-] how much are you paying? cost me around $2.80 per round right now
#34 to #25
-
heartlessrobot (09/24/2015) [-] Well, pretend you smoke. Every time you'd buy cigarrettes, buy some bullets instead.
#226 to #25
-
demonofthepale (09/25/2015) [-] Thats if youre lucky. Most from what I see is around $1.50-$2 even online
#26 to #25
-
youxbarstard (09/24/2015) [-]
Considering what you're paying for, I'd say that it's worth it.
#70 to #13
-
bobtombobbob (09/25/2015) [-] 12,7 AKA 50 cal are not tank busters.
They are for disabling vehicles and light equipment.
They are for disabling vehicles and light equipment.
#95 to #91
-
amsel (09/25/2015) [-] No, I'm saying the .500 S&W in the picture wouldn't be capable of disabling vehicles and light equipment, you're thinking of a .50 BMG, which is a high velocity rifle round and would blow that revolver to pieces. And the gun in funnyhard's picture shoots a round even smaller than the .500 S&W in the original picture. None of them are tankbusters, and only the .50 BMG is even meant to be used on vehicles.
The .500 S&W was released as a hunting round, but is really just a collector's item for men who feel the need to overcompensate. It has to be one of the least practical weapons on the planet, considering the price of a round and the relatively minor performance gains over a .44 magnum compared to the humongous difference in recoil and shootability.
The .500 S&W was released as a hunting round, but is really just a collector's item for men who feel the need to overcompensate. It has to be one of the least practical weapons on the planet, considering the price of a round and the relatively minor performance gains over a .44 magnum compared to the humongous difference in recoil and shootability.
#160 to #95
-
notblindguy (09/25/2015) [-] not a hunting round?! what you gonna reach for your trusty 9MM when a 400 pound black bear is coming toward you? get the **** out of here. With how nervous and how much adrenaline runs through you, you only have one shot to make it count
#165 to #160
-
amsel (09/25/2015) [-] You sort of said it yourself - with so much adrenaline running through, you're going to grab some behemoth of a gun that's difficult to aim, difficult to shoot, and not particularly reliable? You can take that black bear down with a .44 magnum just as easily, and you're much more likely to hit your target, plus you won't be dropping a few dollars per round at the range getting practice.
#169 to #165
-
notblindguy (09/25/2015) [-] the gun is surprisingly easy to aim for the shot that counts, the barrel is heavy enough that you can easily stabilize it straight in front of you. Also it is not difficult to shoot, the double/single action trigger is impressive for the size. Lastly the only comparison in reliability would be a glock, revolvers have forever been more reliable that most
#180 to #169
-
amsel (09/25/2015) [-] I don't know, I think it's just goofy. I mean, look at the picture. That gun on the bottom is the .44 magnum model from Dirty Harry. That .500 S&W is just laughably huge - I could never imagine carrying it around as a backup weapon while hunting or hiking. Maybe if you're some sort of serious pistol-hunting enthusiast then you see it differently, but I just can't imagine any practical reason to carry that thing around. I've never heard of a .44 magnum having problems taking down a black bear.
#97 to #95
-
bobtombobbob (09/25/2015) [-] Have you seen what a 12.7 does to a person?
That is not a hunting round.
it's a shoot at one guy and the bullet goes through all the mud huts then into the side of a hill and bounce on type round.
a weapon above 11mm is just a "Hey look at my gun, not my penis" type gun
That is not a hunting round.
it's a shoot at one guy and the bullet goes through all the mud huts then into the side of a hill and bounce on type round.
a weapon above 11mm is just a "Hey look at my gun, not my penis" type gun
#108 to #106
-
bobtombobbob (09/25/2015) [-] When Trump is elected, he claimed he would get rid of restrictions on weapons.
So I am going to buy a mortar and nerve gas shells.
I want you to stand down wind of me
So I am going to buy a mortar and nerve gas shells.
I want you to stand down wind of me
#228 to #114
-
demonofthepale (09/25/2015) [-] >lurk /k/
As if he wont get more ******** and wrong opinions lurking /k/
Coming from a regular /k/ lurker bruh
As if he wont get more ******** and wrong opinions lurking /k/
Coming from a regular /k/ lurker bruh
#130 to #126
-
bobtombobbob (09/25/2015) [-] I never said that.
The three Americans the five Guatemalans the two Hondurans 9 Russians and 11 Colombians and two Iraqis were dead wrong probably allot more due to using a 50cal for suppressing fire
The three Americans the five Guatemalans the two Hondurans 9 Russians and 11 Colombians and two Iraqis were dead wrong probably allot more due to using a 50cal for suppressing fire
#133 to #130
-
iamkagji (09/25/2015) [-] Being able to shoot does not mean you know about ballistics, mechanical theory or the merits of various designs and calibers. Ex-military or active, doesn't really matter which people tend to know very little about the firearms they used because they're only taught which cartridges the weapons use and how to maintain said weapons.
#229 to #106
-
demonofthepale (09/25/2015) [-] Actually the 7.62x54r is only a little more powerful than the 500 mag. 500 mag runs around 2300ft/lbs and the 54r runs around 2500 (roughly, those numbers can vary wildly based on the load)
But to your point yes the 500 mag is still not as powerful as a high powered hunting rifle
But to your point yes the 500 mag is still not as powerful as a high powered hunting rifle
#227 to #104
-
demonofthepale (09/25/2015) [-] Handgun hunting is pretty popular in america now, and a. 500 mag is good for elk up to brown bears with the right loads. Some people hunt bear with a. 50 beowulf rifle, which is even more potent than a 500 mag. Its not the dinosaur gun people seem to think it is. Its defintely beastly for a handgun
#123 to #105
-
thatoneiranianguy ONLINE (09/25/2015) [-] >Advocating for buying a Mosin outside of historical collection
>Misspells Mosin
>Calls it a "big gun." (Maybe if you have little bitch syndrome.)
Confirmed no-gunz.
>Misspells Mosin
>Calls it a "big gun." (Maybe if you have little bitch syndrome.)
Confirmed no-gunz.
#283 to #257
-
thatoneiranianguy ONLINE (09/25/2015) [-] Even your basic 1940's Izveshks will run you a general minimum of $200 USD now.
Mosins are no longer "cheap." Mostly because Bubba keeps getting their hands on them and sporterizing them, plus the majority of imported stockpiles comes from Ukraine - and they need them right now for their civil war.
Mosins are no longer "cheap." Mostly because Bubba keeps getting their hands on them and sporterizing them, plus the majority of imported stockpiles comes from Ukraine - and they need them right now for their civil war.
#258 to #110
-
lilmikemur (09/25/2015) [-] I literally cried i laughed so damn hard at that "his chest explodes, demolishes tv" XD OMG a post never made have breathing problems before XD
#7 to #4
-
lean (09/24/2015) [-] See them holes towards the end? That's a muzzle brake. The recoil of one of these, while substantial, is manageable. These newer heavier guns aren't really that bad in the big calibers. **** that sucks to shoot are .375 mag snub revolvers, .45 subcompacts, and anything large/ magnum caliber in autos with a "space age" lightened frame. You want a big heavy gun for large caliber
#15 to #7
-
brisineo (09/24/2015) [-] Lol, I know. It's supposed to be a joke. _ However, muzzle brake or not, the type of rich kids that go out and buy a large caliber handgun like the ones they see in CoD before training on anything lighter are likely to be limpwristed faggots that injure themselves from their own inexperience.
#8
-
secretmouse (09/24/2015) [-] I'm not exactly a supporter of guns (not that I'm vocal about that, live and let live), but I do like the look of some of them. And, the mechanics are pretty neat, as well as what they can be capable of. Nasty weapons, but interesting ones.
#21 to #8
-
anon (09/24/2015) [-]
personally I think firearms should be allowed in houses, so people can protect themselves, and another permit to conceal carry them but for the permit it'd be nice to require a psychological evaluation as well as a training course on proper handling. my reasons are because whenever I look at a crime where a person was killed or a store robbed I always think "damn, if honest people around had weapons, the criminal might be dead instead." and in my opinion if you flagrantly commit a violent crime, you can't complain if someone kills you.
#196 to #21
-
anon (09/25/2015) [-]
As nice of a dream as it would be, people with CCs very rarely do any good in crisis situations. More often than not, they are injured or injure someone innocent while only escalating the situation. You are no more safe next to person with a CC than you are in a gun free environment. Those are just the facts. I think people should be able to own guns with universal registration and background checks but I am tired of the false argument that people with CCs are going to actually stop crime in progress.
#231 to #196
-
demonofthepale (09/25/2015) [-] Anon you're so wrong it hurts, a trained concealed carrier almost always does more good than bad in a crisis situation. Do a little more research than just the ******** you read on the huffington post or the news man. For every one story you read about a carrier ******* up and doing bad theres like 15 where they saved lives and stopped a bad guy. Many who never even had to pull the trigger to do so. I get that I'm a little biased as a gun owner working for his ccw but I hate seeing people spout their opinions as facts, even among gun owners people spout lies and propaganda as fact and I can't stand that. I hate seeing gun owners lower our cause to that level, especially when the facts support us.
#200 to #146
-
nightmarexnxnxnxnx (09/25/2015) [-] This world has many Archers, not one of them alike...
#151 to #146
-
thismustbeseen (09/25/2015) [-] **thismustbeseen used "*roll picture*"**
**thismustbeseen rolled image** This is how much I understand the world.
**thismustbeseen rolled image** This is how much I understand the world.
#10
-
fjtv (09/24/2015) [-] >fire gun
>breaks your arm and flies off to the other side of the town
>success.jpg
>breaks your arm and flies off to the other side of the town
>success.jpg
#12 to #10
-
heartlessrobot (09/24/2015) [-] Apparently, there's not much recoil due to the weight of the gun.
#45 to #32
-
Whaaaaaaaaa [OP](09/24/2015) [-] Plus if you were robbing someone and they had this would you want to stay?
#47 to #45
-
heartlessrobot (09/24/2015) [-] Definitely not. Even if the criminal had a gun, they'd **** off when you pulled this out. Your common criminal is gonna think a bigger gun is more deadly.
#51 to #49
-
heartlessrobot (09/24/2015) [-] And an added laser sight would be better for intimidation. Or making the behemoth easier to aim.
#113 to #12
-
saltyfries ONLINE (09/25/2015) [-] plus S&W .500's normally have rubber grips and compensators for the recoil as well.
#18
-
syfygeek (09/24/2015) [-] >be me chilling in my own private domicile late at night
>hear rustling downstairs and grab my [above firearm]
>see two nignogs tryna snatch my TV
>Take a shot at one and hit him square in the chest
>He explodes and my wrist is broken
>take a shot at the other with other hand
>miss but put a grapfruit sized hole in my wall
>Cops arrive on the scene 20 minutes later with my house flooded with the vaporized remains of the nignog I shot and me with two swollen hands
>surgury to fix my hand is $20k and had to fix wall
>worth
>hear rustling downstairs and grab my [above firearm]
>see two nignogs tryna snatch my TV
>Take a shot at one and hit him square in the chest
>He explodes and my wrist is broken
>take a shot at the other with other hand
>miss but put a grapfruit sized hole in my wall
>Cops arrive on the scene 20 minutes later with my house flooded with the vaporized remains of the nignog I shot and me with two swollen hands
>surgury to fix my hand is $20k and had to fix wall
>worth
#27
-
savageoro (09/24/2015) [-] better alternative for home security if ya want to really get rid of every criminal EVER
#116
-
thempc (09/25/2015) [-] remember, if it took more than one shot, you weren't using a jakobsmodel 500
#39
-
ShadeElement (09/24/2015) [-] Personally, I carry the Ruger SRH Alaskan. I like the "compact" (relative) package it comes in, making it an easy carry, and if a .454 Casull won't save you from a Brownie, nothing else will either.
However, I've known many who do carry the SW500 (pictured by OP). Sure it might provide you with a bit more confidence in the bush, but is that tank barrel constantly swinging into your chest (or gouging you in the side) really worth it?
Personal preference I suppose.
It should be mentioned that I live in Alaska, and spend a fair amount of time in the bush with pissed off bull moose and hungry brown bears for company.
If you are buying such a serious piece of hardware for home protection or defensive carry, then from one gun guy to another, I'd like to respectfully say you're a ******* moron and if there were ever a poster child for gun control, it would be you.
However, I've known many who do carry the SW500 (pictured by OP). Sure it might provide you with a bit more confidence in the bush, but is that tank barrel constantly swinging into your chest (or gouging you in the side) really worth it?
Personal preference I suppose.
It should be mentioned that I live in Alaska, and spend a fair amount of time in the bush with pissed off bull moose and hungry brown bears for company.
If you are buying such a serious piece of hardware for home protection or defensive carry, then from one gun guy to another, I'd like to respectfully say you're a ******* moron and if there were ever a poster child for gun control, it would be you.
