Upload
Login or register
x

Good Guy Bioware

at Fellow
Congratulations to (ilj) bethesda on the
launch of #_ We' re celebrating with
a Nuke Cola.
1( AM -12 Nou 2015
ibit
Replete tripwire bethesda
Bethesda Nov 12
t) howare thanks guys - turpa we dtm' thave a mass attact on your
whiner ether replies
bethesda For mute reatrd, everyone decided to take venetian this week.
...
+1895
Views: 59640
Favorited: 103
Submitted: 11/20/2015
Share On Facebook
submit to reddit +Favorite Subscribe to crixuz

Comments(179):

Leave a comment Refresh Comments Show GIFs
Top Rated Controversial Best Lowest Rated Newest
Anonymous comments allowed.
178 comments displayed.
Reply
+193
User avatar #10 - freaxxshow ONLINE (11/20/2015) [-]
i wish for a world in which BioWare isnt getting ****** by EA....
Reply
+5
User avatar #127 to #10 - denniswilles (11/21/2015) [-]
That's the day we will get Knights of the Old Republic 3.
Reply
+18
User avatar #32 to #10 - kurbeh (11/20/2015) [-]
Hey, if everyone boycots EA for being **** and they run out of money, Bioware might be free once again.
But nah, gotta buy that 50$ Battlefront Season Pass .___.
Reply
+11
User avatar #81 to #32 - tangedal (11/21/2015) [-]
Nah brah. Their real revenue I think is from the mindless sportgames.
How many of those don't they sell vs production cost, hmm.
Reply
+6
User avatar #82 to #81 - kurbeh (11/21/2015) [-]
Good point, actually.
Reply
+4
#111 to #81 - anon (11/21/2015) [-]
Both. Do you think for one second that EA would publish something and not make profit?
Reply
+15
User avatar #52 to #10 - brobafett (11/21/2015) [-]
>Bioware
>Not pandemic

The irony that company that destroyed Battlefront's original dev is now destroying one of their best games is unbelievable.
Reply
+18
#83 to #10 - anon (11/21/2015) [-]
Bioware is already dead. Compare the credits of Mass Effect 2 and Mass Effect 3. Lot of good people left/got fired inbetween games.
Reply
+724
User avatar #1 - devilicious (11/20/2015) [-]
Yup, everyone is playing Rise of Tomb Raider
Reply
+4
#144 to #1 - satoshimiwa (11/21/2015) [-]
All of the 50,000 people who bought it yes
Reply
+5
User avatar #129 to #1 - gragasvlad (11/21/2015) [-]
Well no... u need an xbox for that
Reply
+1
User avatar #150 to #129 - kageshi (11/21/2015) [-]
I can wait tell 2016, at least its coming to PC
Reply
+7
#123 to #1 - mcegear ONLINE (11/21/2015) [-]
you've earned my pinkie you slut.
Reply
+216
User avatar #3 to #1 - belshir (11/20/2015) [-]
"black ops 3 will contest fallout 4 in player number" i have never laughed so hard, my childrens sides are going to hurt from that one
Reply
+129
#11 to #3 - anon (11/20/2015) [-]
i thought black ops would definitely outsell fallout 4..
am i wrong?
Reply
+207
User avatar #12 to #11 - cagetheelophant (11/20/2015) [-]
You're not. Call of duty is far and away more popular, regardless of what the internet gaming hugbox would say.
Reply
+27
User avatar #19 to #12 - angelious (11/20/2015) [-]
and call of duty would have gotten away with it (most likely) had it not been for the terrible launch..on pc atleast..
Reply
+51
#55 to #19 - thegamepixel (11/21/2015) [-]
>assuming CoD would have a good PC launch
Reply
+18
#68 to #55 - alfrsa (11/21/2015) [-]
I think this is the first time I see the uncropped picture on FJ
Reply
+7
User avatar #102 to #55 - garymotherfingoak (11/21/2015) [-]
muh cod4
Reply
+3
User avatar #118 to #102 - anotherponyaccount ONLINE (11/21/2015) [-]
"Balanced for lean"
Reply
+21
#26 to #19 - theonewhoanswers (11/20/2015) [-]
Did I miss something?
Reply
+16
User avatar #28 to #26 - afuckinmazing (11/20/2015) [-]
Game was terribly optimized and even people with beast machines had problems running it.
Reply
+18
User avatar #35 to #28 - scowler (11/20/2015) [-]
I'm getting the feeling that computer hardware companies are bribing game developers to under-optimize their games, in order to force players to pay for more advanced hardware.

There needs to be an organization that enforces quality standards in software and game development...
Reply
0
User avatar #47 to #35 - voltkills (11/21/2015) [-]
I think you dropped your tinfoil hat around here somewhere m8.
seriously, those issues affected i5 users and was a plain error, that was fixed in like 2 days, there is no conspiracy.
Reply
0
User avatar #105 to #47 - scowler (11/21/2015) [-]
Two days is more than enough time for someone to go off the deep end and buy a new GPU/CPU, but not enough time for someone to actually investigate.

If there is a conspiracy, it's in it's infancy.
0
#104 to #47 - scowler has deleted their comment [-]
Reply
-6
#54 to #35 - thegamepixel (11/21/2015) [-]
if anything it would be console selling companies, but you're conspiracy theorizing too hard.
Reply
+1
User avatar #103 to #54 - scowler (11/21/2015) [-]
Why would it be them? I see no logical reason that Microsoft would be okay with companies damaging Microsoft's stake in either the PC or Xbox market. Although I'd love it if they'd drop Xbox and start making their own Gaming PC hardware and fixing their OS, or maybe just developing an OS with gaming in mind, since most of their customers are gamers.
Reply
+1
User avatar #29 to #28 - theonewhoanswers (11/20/2015) [-]
Wait what? My AMD 3.7 GHz Nvidia 970 GTX ran it release night just fine. Is there a news site that reported this?
Reply
+4
User avatar #66 to #29 - grumpythefirst (11/21/2015) [-]
Yeah but the 970 is rather high end for most users.
-1
#30 to #29 - afuckinmazing has deleted their comment [-]
Reply
+8
User avatar #33 to #30 - theonewhoanswers (11/20/2015) [-]
Oh! I thought you said Fallout 4, that's what 3 nights of two hours sleep will get you! CoD has always had ****** launches for PC, I don't play it either. Haha, I feel kinda dumb. Thanks bro!
Reply
+4
User avatar #39 to #33 - LePedobear (11/21/2015) [-]
to be fair FO4 has the stuttering issue. Im at 60fps most of the time but if I'm high up looking down on the not too impressive looking city it drops to 30 or less, and walking around in big cities it gets stuttery in places. For it's average graphics it shouldn't be struggling on my 4GB 290 Gaming, and 3770k.
Reply
+2
User avatar #67 to #39 - grumpythefirst (11/21/2015) [-]
I play on max settings with a fx-6350 and R9 270 and have no lag or stuttering issues.
Reply
+2
#79 to #67 - anon (11/21/2015) [-]
How? I'm playing with an i5 4670k OC'd to 4.1ghz with an r9 270x and I can only get consistent fps at 1080p on medium settings
Reply
+3
User avatar #80 to #79 - grumpythefirst (11/21/2015) [-]
I don't know how, but I am.
Reply
+1
#133 to #79 - anon (11/21/2015) [-]
Non-GeForce cards have always been bad with newer games for me.
Reply
0
User avatar #166 to #67 - LePedobear (11/22/2015) [-]
But your getting what? a steady 30fps? A 270 is massively lacking in power to run this on ultra at 60fps. it just cant be done. I'd be shocked you get a smooth 30fps on ultra with it. unless the game isn't on ultra at all and you just think it is. the auto detect thing must have screwed up.
Reply
0
User avatar #167 to #166 - grumpythefirst (11/22/2015) [-]
No, its on ultra. I'll check later what the FPS is.
Reply
0
User avatar #168 to #167 - LePedobear (11/22/2015) [-]
Kotaku tested a 270x at least, but paired with a beastly i7-6700K, averaged 43fps. Obviously your cpu is weaker than that, and your gpu is just a little bit less. maybe yours is running a consistent 30fps which is smooth enough to play. What's annoying is it's vsync seems to be a bit gimped. So instead of it running at 60fps all the time and if it needs to drop, going straight to 30, it goes somewhere in between and since any other framerate that can't fit into the 60hz my screen is running at smoothly, like 15/30/60, you will get the stutter where it does 2 smooth frames and one off. making it jerky. That's why I always use vsync on games so it's smooths it. and also you get page tear without vsync. But yeah. Tried forcing vsync on in driver settings but it still goes like this. little annoying but still perfectly playable.
Reply
0
User avatar #169 to #168 - grumpythefirst (11/22/2015) [-]
It looks like its staying around 37-40 fps.
Still, can't complain on an aging build (Almost 5 years old now)
My new build (coming in February) should have a much better yield.
pcpartpicker.com/p/PMGz4D
Reply
0
User avatar #171 to #169 - LePedobear (11/23/2015) [-]
Go for a bigger SSD man, Games like GTA are about 60GB so it will fill in no time. I use a BX250 and I'm nearly outta space and waiting to finish some games so I can uninstall to add new ones. Could add to my HDD's but but but.. speed. Also you don't need such a powerful power supply for that. If you were running 2 cards yeah. but a 500w would handle that fine. tbh could go for cheaper board too.. no point getting an sli board if using 1 card. sli is pretty pointless anyway, unless you are putting in 2 of the highest end cards.. people stick like 2 mid ranges in there and for the cost they could have bought 1 high end card. especially given sli is very poor in many games.. anyway save yerself a bit of cash and get a cheaper board and weaker supply but get a 250GB SSD. The EVOs and BX/MX ones are most reliable.
Reply
0
User avatar #174 to #171 - grumpythefirst (11/23/2015) [-]
Now that I am on a computer, lets try this again.

The SSD isn't for storing games, its for windows boot and IMPORTANT programs.

I need a 750 watt so I can run SLI later on, I just can't afford to put it in my build right now.
I specifically shopped for a board that can handle SLI - and my GPU is high-end enough for it to be worth it.

I don't generally think its a good idea to stray away from higher-end components to lower-end when I've already added them to my budget
0
#172 to #171 - grumpythefirst has deleted their comment [-]
0
#173 to #172 - grumpythefirst has deleted their comment [-]
Reply
+3
#73 to #12 - pentol (11/21/2015) [-]
That's just selection bias or something. lets say that 50% of the people who are interested in FO post on the internet about it, then i find it reasonable that maybe 20% of the people who buy BO3 are gonna discuss it online. these numbers are just asspull, but the point is that a yearly installment is gonna generate a lot less buzz than something that gets two installments a decade. also, fallout being a more PC focused franchise ties into how many people write out posts on it online. nobody really likes using the console web browsers.
and thirdly: nobody cares if you spoil the ending of CoD, but lots of people lose their **** if you spoil that you either nuke your son, or kill boston
Reply
+1
User avatar #108 to #73 - valigar (11/21/2015) [-]
See, this doesn't stop spoilers now does it?!
Reply
+1
User avatar #74 to #73 - cagetheelophant (11/21/2015) [-]
I'm not talking about buzz I'm talking about sales. But cool rambling buddy.
Reply
+1
#59 to #12 - anon (11/21/2015) [-]
yeah except there are already sales figures and fallout outsold the **** out of black ops...check your facts there bro
Reply
+4
User avatar #64 to #59 - cagetheelophant (11/21/2015) [-]
You're wrong and you're anon... Which begs the question why am I even replying??
Reply
+4
User avatar #69 to #11 - ADeadlYLepricoN (11/21/2015) [-]
Nah. Fallout was a niche product of sorts at first, with Fallout 4 being the first in the series to be huge (regardless of the game of the year status', the sales weren't outstanding), mostly because everything about the games became memeable at some point.. COD on the oher hand, has always been huge, so even though I think Fallout technically outsold BO3 (Which is pretty ****** good by the way), COD will always be more popular.
Reply
+3
#113 to #11 - sirlorge (11/21/2015) [-]
Actually, you are:

"Both these games have enjoyed record opening weekends, making over $1 billion (£655 million) combined on their opening days.

Black Ops III made $550 (£361) million in the the first three days of its release, outperforming last year’s Advanced Warfare.

Fallout 4, however is the bigger blockbuster in terms of sales as it made over $750 (£492) million in the opening 24 hours alone.

Bethesda on the other hand announced that they shipped 12 million copies on the launch day alone. They had record sales, as Fallout 4 was dubbed the most pre-ordered game of 2015 with digital sales breaking records.

It set a record number of concurrent players on steam with 470 000 players on the launch day alone. They also sold 1.2 million copies on steam in its first 24 hours of release. Thus making it one of the biggest games of the year."

Dunno why they included the "one" in that last phrase, I'm pretty sure nothing has done that good this year except fallout. fortune.com/2015/11/16/fallout4-is-quiet-best-seller/ www.desiblitz.com/content/call-duty-black-ops-iii-vs-fallout-4

Strangely though, polls seemed to unanimously point to BOPsIII being the more anticipated, though likely the gamers that answered these polls included a lot of people who have never played fallout or are COD fanboys, considering that previous FO games had combined sales of under 20 million copies. Still, cash flows in favor of Bethesda.
Reply
+2
User avatar #45 to #11 - killjoyus (11/21/2015) [-]
as it stands it hasn't, but not by much. i think its like a million copies behind or so
Reply
0
#41 to #11 - anon (11/21/2015) [-]
After the disappointment that was BO2, unlikely.
Reply
+24
#7 to #3 - anon (11/20/2015) [-]
To be fair, they both sold exceptionally well at launch, and Call of Duty is much more recognizable brand to the mainstream. The assumption has some water to it.
Reply
+5
User avatar #49 to #3 - sharklazers (11/21/2015) [-]
Why laugh? That's the truth by far and large, Call of Duty is a way more popular franchise and you obviously can't deny that
Reply
+3
User avatar #65 to #49 - belshir (11/21/2015) [-]
popular because its bought by underaged fanboys who will throw money at anything that shows a flashy enough trailer, fallout 4 has a large fanbase that has been waiting years not months for the next release
Reply
+1
User avatar #117 to #65 - anotherponyaccount ONLINE (11/21/2015) [-]
Let's say the games were swapped, with Fallout having 3 teams/studios/whatever-you-call-em and got released on a regular basis, while COD takes a few years to create it but you can see each little change in either its ugliness or charm.
Would you still stand by your argument?
That said I'm enjoying Fallout more than BO3
Reply
0
User avatar #161 to #65 - sharklazers (11/21/2015) [-]
You seem pretty salty. Yes, Black Ops 3 isn't as "respected" a franchise as Fallout 4, but that doesn't change the fact that it's a more popular one. Plus, the Black Ops game were often better than the others (Ghosts, advanced warfare, MW3) although MW2 and games before it were pretty fun.
Reply
0
User avatar #162 to #161 - ninjaspartan (11/21/2015) [-]
fortune.com/2015/11/16/fallout4-is-quiet-best-seller/

Dunno man. Salty or not, you'd think the more popular franchise would sell more, right?
Reply
+2
User avatar #135 to #78 - fadetometallica (11/21/2015) [-]
I have both games. I mean, I like Fallout better, but...

www.metacritic.com/game/xbox-one/rise-of-the-tomb-raider

www.metacritic.com/game/pc/fallout-4

Technically Tomb Raider has better reviews. Obviously hasn't sold better, but yeah.
Reply
+2
User avatar #159 to #135 - devilicious (11/21/2015) [-]
That's why I made that comment (Holy **** top comment), I feel bad for that game... Is really good! but against fallout and cod hype? hmmm...
Well, I blame the xboxone only release
Reply
+2
User avatar #136 to #135 - mikli (11/21/2015) [-]
metacritic is ****
it doesn't even require you to have the game
on launch day there was just a bunch of 0/10 reviews for FO4, from reviewers named I **** you not stuff like "Fallout4Sucks" or "IHateBethesda"
Reply
0
User avatar #142 to #136 - fadetometallica (11/21/2015) [-]
Okay but ignore the user score, because obviously that's ******** . The actual Metascore is all pro reviewers. I'm not saying Tomb Raider is a better game - I don't think it is - it's just a really, really good one.
Reply
+1
#146 to #142 - holmborn (11/21/2015) [-]
Metacritic is terrible, it doesnt matter which score you look at. Each reviewer has different standards and some reviewers have diffferent score systems.
Metacritic is just a mishmash of random reviewers. Big names stuffed into some small names in attempts to create traffic.

Reply
+1
User avatar #152 to #135 - notsohappygamer (11/21/2015) [-]
screw the reviews and just play da games if you think they are good
Reply
+1
#148 to #135 - inghamtwoten (11/21/2015) [-]
If you're going to compare, why not compare them on the same console?
Reply
0
User avatar #163 to #148 - fadetometallica (11/21/2015) [-]
Didn't think about it since TR is Xbox only right now and I'm playing Fallout on PC.
Reply
+1
User avatar #151 to #135 - dinonator (11/21/2015) [-]
>watches reviews
>metacritic
Reply
+1
#143 to #135 - voltkills (11/21/2015) [-]
>using metacritic
>ever
Reply
-42
#4 - lucariopwnz (11/20/2015) [-]
bioware will never be a good guy again after they failed the mass effect trilogy so hard
Reply
+1
#141 to #4 - kolya (11/21/2015) [-]
you forget that Bioware made the best games in the history of gaming,Kotor,Dragon Age and Neverwinter Nights
Reply
+2
User avatar #130 to #4 - smartythechicken (11/21/2015) [-]
i could have roasted you so hard, but i would be late because your chromosomes have already roasted you
Reply
+3
User avatar #71 to #4 - fatbutler (11/21/2015) [-]
Technically there should be a fourth, dead Eevee.
Reply
+3
User avatar #112 to #4 - playerpants (11/21/2015) [-]
one of a kind shiny eevee's > any eeveelution
Reply
+27
#23 to #4 - anon (11/20/2015) [-]
Just stop listening to ******* marketing **** and promises, you'll always be disappointed.
Also don't listen to people bitching about games online or you'll never enjoy a game again.

I loved the trilogy. And the DLC made me love the ending.
Reply
+16
#37 to #23 - skebaba (11/21/2015) [-]
Citadel best DLC in the entire franchise. Drunk Tali best grill.
Reply
+70
#5 to #4 - TheJailerPedo (11/20/2015) [-]
They really just built up the Reapers into an undefeatable enemy. After having developed the Reapers into such unstoppable monsters there was no way for them to resolve the story in way that actually made sense.
Reply
+10
User avatar #18 to #5 - paddypancake (11/20/2015) [-]
Would still prefer if they kicked space kid out of the game or the entire kid but thats just my opinion and i understand why people might disagree here and made it more into a "you are in charge" decision. The crucible idea made sense. You could get the red ending without any space magic, only humans and aliens getting their **** together and fireing an emp like weapon which ***** their development by a century but gets them safe for rebuilding. The Synthesis ending could just get canceled out. You might try to get an ending where you slowly manage to use the crucible to override reapers just for them to kill the overriden ones quickly until none are left meaning that you win in the end but with higher casualities due to people dieing to defend the citadel but with the geth (and EDI) alive. Also you managed to kill a reaper in ME1 with your human fleet so i would imagine that some of them at least could be killed in combat. You could have scenes where the allies you picked are in a battle and you choose what combat maneuvers they take: Fight agressively and help more in the fight -> high chance to die or fight defensively and risk the outcome of the battle being worse.
By the way i find the reaper reason terrible. Basically it says "syntethics and organics don't get along, lets regularily kill all of them". Saves them from killing each other. I would much more prefer something like "The sentient races would wastefully emit high amounts of energy that they can't retrieve through wasteful useage which would finally cause the death of all life if it weren't for the reapers regularily intervening to stop them from being that wasteful by killing them all. It is still a bad thing but less senseless. Or just let them be the BBEGs.
Reply
+1
#38 to #18 - skebaba (11/21/2015) [-]
They are just doing what their programming parameters say they should do. Blame the Leviathans and the Catalyst.
Reply
+2
#40 to #25 - skebaba (11/21/2015) [-]
Holy **** I didn't know Nexus had a ME3 mod section, or that the game had mods.
Reply
+2
User avatar #44 to #40 - hourlyb (11/21/2015) [-]
Me neither, but that mod made the entire series so much better.
Reply
+12
User avatar #9 to #5 - asdasdzxczxc (11/20/2015) [-]
It's not that they couldn't, it's just that they did it terribly. All three endings would've work had they actually had some thought and good writing behind them. I still remember being so butthurt when the game consistently told me the reapers were bad and how siding with the Illusive Man would be the paragon route, yet the "destroy the reapers" ending was the paragon ending. **** Bioware and **** EA.
Reply
+1
User avatar #147 to #9 - severepwner (11/21/2015) [-]
No one ever implied Controlling the Reapers was the paragon decision. The Illusive Man was indoctrinated, how could he possibly be the paragon guy?
Reply
+3
User avatar #124 to #5 - lapsushominum (11/21/2015) [-]
Possible resolution that makes sense:

The Reapers win like they have every time before; makes sense but it's just a little bit of a downer ending.
Reply
+2
User avatar #115 to #5 - luqmanr (11/21/2015) [-]
I've no problem with bioware's vision of the reapers, I respect their decision. BUT imho what makes the ending ****** was that all choices was practically the same, it's as simple as that. I want to really feel the differences I would make by making the different decisions. Instead all I get is pretty much geth or no geth. Though the journey up to there was awesome, one of the best experience I've ever had in gaming, or in entertainment overall.
Reply
+1
User avatar #24 to #5 - trapposternohomo (11/20/2015) [-]
Lol I got bigger problems than how ****** the endings may have been
Reply
+9
User avatar #51 - pistachioofdoom (11/21/2015) [-]
Everyone is talking about Fallout, and i'm here trying to git gud at Starcraft 2.
And failing miserably
Reply
0
User avatar #109 to #51 - kevinzheng ONLINE (11/21/2015) [-]
You should probably stop trying, you seen those starcraft korean players? **** crazy yo
Reply
+1
User avatar #85 to #51 - adunsaveme (11/21/2015) [-]
do or do not, there is no try

which means if you don't try, you can't fail B)
Reply
0
User avatar #155 to #85 - exotic (11/21/2015) [-]
starcraft 2 has the worst ladder anxiety i have ever seen
Reply
+9
User avatar #22 - heretofuckshitup ONLINE (11/20/2015) [-]
I'm hoping that when Mass Effect comes out they'll put the original trilogy up for backwards compatibility on xbox one.
Reply
0
User avatar #60 to #22 - darksideofthebeast (11/21/2015) [-]
Mass effect 1 is.
Reply
0
User avatar #75 to #60 - heretofuckshitup ONLINE (11/21/2015) [-]
i know that but fallout 4 came with fallout 3, and gears came with every gears game before it. i figure mass effect having a digital version of all mass effects with the dlc included would be the best selling point for the game. having mass effect 1 would be good but since i had all the dlc i can't return to my save file because the dlc weren't transferable. i'd have to reset my entire game. It'd basically be effortless on their part because it'd just be giving out everything for free digitally. all EA would have to say is yes.
Reply
+33
User avatar #13 - motherfuckingkenji (11/20/2015) [-]
I'd rather play Mass Effect 4 than Fallout 4.
Reply
0
#106 to #13 - Glitched (11/21/2015) [-]
Bioware said there would not be a Mass Effect 4
Andromeda is just a new story.

Mass Effect 1-3 = Shepard Trilogy

Mass Effect : Andromeda


That's like calling everything that has a series a number.

There were no Ironman movies or Thor etc.
Just Marvel 1, Marvel 2, Marvel 3, etc.
Reply
-1
#139 to #106 - anon (11/21/2015) [-]
nobody gives a **** you pedant
Reply
0
#170 to #139 - Glitched (11/23/2015) [-]
You took the time to respond as an anon.
That means that you care and you also care about getting red thumbs for being wrong.
Reply
+2
User avatar #14 to #13 - letting (11/20/2015) [-]
Wasn't Mass Effect - Andromeda just announced?
Reply
+7
User avatar #15 to #14 - motherfuckingkenji (11/20/2015) [-]
It was announced earlier this year, but I'd rather call it ME4 than Andromeda, even though it's no longer part of the "series" so "4" wouldn't fit.
Reply
+3
User avatar #16 to #15 - letting (11/20/2015) [-]
Ah, I see.

Never played the Mass Effect series. Most people that I know have told me 2 was the best.
Reply
+12
User avatar #17 to #16 - motherfuckingkenji (11/20/2015) [-]
And I would be one of them.
ME1 was good, but like Halo 1, "unrefined".
ME2 was the pinnacle, good combat, badass guns, less ****** weapon and armor customization, and they actually swore, which kinda felt... necessary in that type of game.
ME3 was good, I prefer it over ME1, but it tries too hard to be like ME2 and just ends up being all over the place. Like, they try to be super serious, but then immediately descend into jokes and one-liners. Sure the other 2 had humor (mostly ME2), but at least it was appropriate. Also, while everyone gives it **** for only having 3 endings, everything leading up to that was where all your choices throughout the trilogy showed. For example: if you spared the Rachni in the first game and again in the second (or third, I don't remember) then some of their ships will be at the final battle, even if they only show for a few moments.
Reply
+2
#36 to #17 - fcrocker (11/21/2015) [-]
I totally agree. ME3 could have really benefited from a tonal shift to feel more gritty. Don't even get me started on the Citadel DLC, that completely destroys any pacing with fangirl pandering ******** .

3 had some pretty intense feels though, and wasn't bad overall. Mass Effect 3 - Mordin's Death (Full Paragon) w/ Singing
Reply
+1
#43 to #36 - skebaba (11/21/2015) [-]
I liked Citadel DLC. Drunk Tali best grill
Reply
0
User avatar #42 to #36 - killjoyus (11/21/2015) [-]
to be fair i think the Citadel DLC has merit for being that silly and **** , like it starts off as a "hey we are all probably gonna die super hard" party, so the silliness was nice, would have worked better if the rest of the game was more gritty and serious
Reply
+1
User avatar #89 to #17 - adunsaveme (11/21/2015) [-]
Also, ME3's story was weak as **** . Not because of the ending, but just the entire thing in general. It was weak.
Reply
+1
User avatar #72 to #16 - charizarddad (11/21/2015) [-]
ive done a few playthroughs of every game. me1 is my favorite when it comes to single player, and me3's multiplayer was the ******* bomb. im going to be severely disappointed if they dont have an equally good or better multiplayer for Andromeda. me2 is probably my least favorite just by those considerations, but its still a great game to me.
Reply
+2
User avatar #87 to #13 - adunsaveme (11/21/2015) [-]
Y'know, I'll be the one to say it

DA:I in space would be ******* awesome and we all know it
Reply
-3
User avatar #94 to #87 - motherfuckingkenji (11/21/2015) [-]
I played DA:I because it was free and I had heard that it was the best DA game.

It was **** .
Reply
+3
User avatar #62 to #13 - mechgeek (11/21/2015) [-]
I'd rather play Mass Effect 4 then Fallout 4.
Reply
-2
User avatar #76 - donatelo ONLINE (11/21/2015) [-]
fallout 4 was way overhyped. it was like an alternate fallout 3, but even then fallout 3 is still better.

yet people are commenting about it like if its the game to end all games....its not a bad game, but people are still exaggerating about it.
Reply
+1
User avatar #134 to #76 - asmodeu (11/21/2015) [-]
I for one liked it.
Liked it so much that I decided to uninstall tpb version and am waiting to get into more money to actually buy it. (or a grand steam sale sometimes in the distant future)
For now I'm working on getting a better gpu just to so I can play this game..

Is it overhyped ? Sure, but then again that's a good sign.
Is it good ? Goddamn right it is.
Reply
+13
User avatar #84 to #76 - adunsaveme (11/21/2015) [-]
"[insert game here] was overhyped" is the most pointless comment you can make

everything is overhyped
Reply
+1
User avatar #119 to #84 - batterybun (11/21/2015) [-]
"Aliens: Colonial Marines was overhyped" ?
Reply
+1
User avatar #121 to #119 - adunsaveme (11/21/2015) [-]
That one does work, but kinda for different reasons
Something like Fallout 4 was hyped but wasn't as good as they thought, whereas ACM was completely different to what people thought it would be
Reply
-3
User avatar #88 to #84 - donatelo ONLINE (11/21/2015) [-]
lol? the common game is not overhyped to the levels fallout 4 was.
Reply
+4
User avatar #90 to #88 - adunsaveme (11/21/2015) [-]
Gee, a sequel to a very popular game was hyped up a lot by fans of that game? What a shocker
Reply
-3
User avatar #91 to #90 - donatelo ONLINE (11/21/2015) [-]
overhyped. learn to read lad.
Reply
+1
User avatar #92 to #91 - adunsaveme (11/21/2015) [-]
>>#84,
Reply
-4
User avatar #93 to #92 - donatelo ONLINE (11/21/2015) [-]
no. call of duty was not hyped at the same level as fallout 4. you can clearly see two different kinds of hype here. fanboy doesnt want to admit the game sucks
Reply
+1
User avatar #95 to #93 - adunsaveme (11/21/2015) [-]
ah yes, the good old "imply he's a fanboy because i don't have a proper argument" tactic

overhyped is an opinion, and i didn't say whether i agreed with it or not
Reply
-2
User avatar #96 to #95 - donatelo ONLINE (11/21/2015) [-]
yea over hyped is subjective....but one would be retarded to not see a clear difference in hype between a sequal like call of dutyBO3, and fallout 4.
Reply
+1
User avatar #97 to #96 - adunsaveme (11/21/2015) [-]
you were the one to mention cod, not me
also consider cod has more games in the series so a new one is essentially less special, though they were both marketed as much
Reply
-4
User avatar #98 to #97 - donatelo ONLINE (11/21/2015) [-]
lel? i never accused you of mentioning cod...i mentioned cod to show you how dumb your sequel argument is.

im not saying cod is better, im saying the HYPE levels varry...this is used to illustrate how falloutout was overhyped, simply by comparing hype levels. consider aristotles basic view of physics in movement...if you were in a car travelling 30 mph, you would clearly see a difference in a car travelling 60, even after subtracting 30 using aristotle principles.
Reply
+2
User avatar #99 to #98 - adunsaveme (11/21/2015) [-]
firstly, your analogies are terrible
secondly, i literally just offered a point as to why there's such a difference
Reply
-3
#100 to #99 - donatelo ONLINE (11/21/2015) [-]
ok. nice try.
Reply
+2
User avatar #101 to #100 - adunsaveme (11/21/2015) [-]
a stellar counter argument
you got me
Reply
0
User avatar #116 to #96 - anotherponyaccount ONLINE (11/21/2015) [-]
Wait are you saying BO3 deserved more hype than FO4?
I ain't trying to start anything, I just don't get what you mean?
Reply
0
#107 to #93 - turbanmasher ONLINE (11/21/2015) [-]
call of duty wasn't hyped at all cause it's been the same **** for years.
Reply
+1
User avatar #120 to #107 - adunsaveme (11/21/2015) [-]
to be fair, they do at least try to change **** up sometimes
AW would probably be the last one that made a significant change
Reply
-4
#2 - peanutsaurusrex (11/20/2015) [-]
Obviously everyones playing League
Reply
-4
#6 to #2 - killorpie (11/20/2015) [-]
**killorpie used "*roll picture*"**
**killorpie rolled image** ******* teemo, satan satan
Reply
-4
#8 to #2 - SpankThePanda (11/20/2015) [-]
Of course im playing league, ADCs are actually useful right now
Reply
-4
#20 to #8 - anon (11/20/2015) [-]
All AP mids got nerfed with the itemization changes Unless you play Brand . Yi/Rengar/Jax/Yasuo/Mundo/Tahm must bans, if any get through then no one will have fun.

I think I'll pass and wait for some blance
Reply
+5
#21 to #2 - anon (11/20/2015) [-]
league of plebs

gtfo scum
Reply
+8
User avatar #48 - esmebuffay (11/21/2015) [-]
I'm so ******* hyped for Andromeda. As long as they don't **** things up by trying to change things too much it should be awesome.
Reply
+1
User avatar #77 to #48 - TheHutchie (11/21/2015) [-]
I'm really curious as to where exactly they'll go with it. On the one hand, I'm really worried, because the civilisations and cultures they developed in the Milky Way was a big part of what made the original trilogy - particularly ME2 when you get to see more new areas in-depth like Omega and Illium - great.

On the other hand, it's ******* Mass Effect. I'm sure they'll have me falling in love with fictional characters all over again.
Reply
+2
User avatar #63 to #48 - gittons (11/21/2015) [-]
mass effect mixed with a little of what fallout 4 did would be godly.
you know the whole base building stuff?
i mean it would fit, you are taking a whole new galaxy to yourself like some like of space settler.
Reply
+4
User avatar #50 to #48 - The Last Templar (11/21/2015) [-]
Same here, Mass Effect is one of my top 3 favorite game series. C:
Reply
+4
User avatar #58 - darksideofthebeast (11/21/2015) [-]
Get a room already.
Reply
+1
User avatar #137 - theoldfritz (11/21/2015) [-]
Congratulations to bethesda on making #Fallout4 a #biowarerpg.
Fists the Witcher, than Fallout, sooner or #later, every RPG will be watered down
Reply
0
#177 to #137 - anon (12/01/2015) [-]
Witcher 3 is 100x better than anything from bethesda
Reply
0
User avatar #178 to #177 - theoldfritz (12/01/2015) [-]
nice bait anon
Reply
+1
User avatar #149 to #137 - chenn (11/21/2015) [-]
>BioWare
>watered down
I agree that with DA2 the whole thing went down, but that's partly because of EA, and apart from that I wouldn't call any of their games watered down. You gotta admit that Dragon Age: Origins was legendary, Inquisition was so full of content that I didn't know what to do first, and the Mass Effect trilogy is great as well. That's just my opinion though.
Reply
+1
User avatar #158 to #149 - theoldfritz (11/21/2015) [-]
The early games were great, but Inquisition clearly is watered down compared to Origins or a prior bethesda RPG.
The problem for me is that both Fallout 4 and Inquisiton lack roleplaying.
for example, in Skyrim you start as the Dovakhiin, in oblivion as the emperors chosen one, in New vegas as the courier, but through the game your choices form your character. Will you join the imperial legion or the stormcloaks, the NCR or the imperial legion, while in Fallout 4 you are bound to be a minuteman, you are bound to be good.
even if the quest lines arent that bad, the lack of option really sticks out. if just the common raiders were more organied and joinable, all problems would be fixed
Reply
+1
User avatar #160 to #158 - chenn (11/21/2015) [-]
I agree with you on the Fallout thing, so far I'm not enjoying the fourth one at all. But then again I'm not very far in the story so maybe it'll get more immersive as I go. And yes, you're right that Inquisition is just missing something. I can't quite point out what it is that it's missing compared to Origins, but it's just there. Or rather, isn't. Maybe it's the lack of forming your character as you said. Indeed in Inquisition you are forced to be the good guy, I mean there is even a mission in which you have to appeal to snobby Orlesians or face an extremely hard boss. But then again in Origins you also have to appeal to the Landsmeet or prepare for a ********* of a battle. Anyway, I personally enjoyed Inquisition more than I'm enjoying Fallout 4 tbh, but that may be because of my nostalgia with Origins or maybe the fact that I just prefer fantasy to sci fi. Hard to say, but you do make good points.
Reply
0
#165 to #158 - arolexion (11/21/2015) [-]
Huh.. I hadn't notice they removed the bad thing. I usually play good after all.. I still tend to kill a trader if i see he has something good and i ain't got cash though :>
Reply
+2
#153 to #137 - arolexion (11/21/2015) [-]
I'm liking fallout 4 so far. Sure it ain't like 3, but you gotta accept change. Soon there will be mods that'll make it super hard. Chill, bethesda knows they got 'hardcore' fans which is usually why they leave modding options open and basically spit out the info on how to make the game harder(besides the fact that their games have an expert difficulty setting). Don't forget that today's market consists more and more on casuals. They make games to make money.. you know to eat and stuff and they gotta aim for casuals which even past hardcores have become casuals because jobs/family etc.
Just because you're a diehard foreveralone guy doesn't mean the rest of the world is.
Reply
0
User avatar #157 to #153 - theoldfritz (11/21/2015) [-]
i never said that i dontmlike fallout 4
it just that they forgot everyting that was good about new vegas and skyrim and copied another studios style.

Reply
0
#164 to #157 - arolexion (11/21/2015) [-]
Hmm... Not sure how to respond to that. It's still fun atleast, wonder how replayable it'll be though..
Reply
+3
User avatar #140 to #137 - testaburger (11/21/2015) [-]
Yeah but who wouldn't fist the Witcher?
Reply
+2
#122 - rossmendez (11/21/2015) [-]
Not only do video games perpetuate violence, but now unemployment?
Reply
0
#176 - anon (12/01/2015) [-]
fallout 4 SUCKS ASS

boring game, **** AI, **** graphics and **** voice acting.
I cannot even comprehend how a company who knew damn well they need to advance things just shat out a boring game like this.
Reply
0
#179 to #176 - anon (12/02/2015) [-]
lol ok
Reply
0
#181 to #176 - hotpiss (12/18/2015) [-]
I AM ANON AND I HAVE OPINIONS THAT I LIKE TO SCREAM AT PEOPLE
Reply
+1
#180 to #176 - anon (12/12/2015) [-]
log in and say it like a man
Reply
+1
User avatar #114 - dingdongz (11/21/2015) [-]
when does bethesda usually iron out all the bugs after a launch?

I'm seeing a lot of vertibird CTD's and people being paralyzed by computer terminals on twitch atm
Reply
0
User avatar #125 to #114 - sniffythebird ONLINE (11/21/2015) [-]
I still get the same CTD's and several gamebreaking bugs in Skyrim as I did on it's release, so I wouldn't count on it.
Reply
0
User avatar #138 to #114 - iamkagji (11/21/2015) [-]
Never, their games stay broken pretty much forever. Sometimes they manage to patch the **** that causes crashes, but a large amount of other game-breaking stuff will be permanent.
Reply
+1
User avatar #128 to #114 - unikornking ONLINE (11/21/2015) [-]
Vertibird CTDs? I've had my fair share of performance issues but haven't had a single hard crash 60 hours in
Reply
0
#154 to #128 - arolexion (11/21/2015) [-]
This. Maybe dingdongz has an ultra suckish pc?
Reply
+1
#70 - wwbcboxer (11/21/2015) [-]
**wwbcboxer used "*roll picture*"**
**wwbcboxer rolled image** fortune.com/2015/11/16/fallout4-is-quiet-best-seller/ < for all of you 12 year olds that think CoD outsold Fallout... Not even close. $750 million in a day to CoDs $550 million in 3 days time.
Reply
0
#27 - rhodg (11/20/2015) [-]
I guess Bethesda and BioWare are ******* or some **** .

Explains why they ruined the dialogue system in Fallout 4.
Reply
-1
#145 to #27 - bwiedieter (11/21/2015) [-]
www.nexusmods.com/fallout4/mods/1235/?
Will you please stop whining about the dialogue system when it has been fixed by a modder already?
Reply
0
User avatar #53 to #27 - brobafett (11/21/2015) [-]
They're really not. Bioware did the same thing with TW3. It's like when women who hate each other act all nice with compliment's in the public's eye.
Reply
0
User avatar #110 to #27 - sphincterface (11/21/2015) [-]
It's two guys just having fun and bringing up how they like each other's games.
Jesus, calm down man.
Reply
0
User avatar #126 - koolkidkonnor (11/21/2015) [-]
ahh my two favorite game companies
 
Leave a comment
<
>
 Friends (0)