no it wasn't, waxing and shaving comes since prehistoric times
from obsidian blades to honey waxing, there was never a time in almost all civilizations were "hairy" was attractive, maybe just seen normal as these methods were more expensive and hard to apply. But a shaven lady/man was always the most wanted. Is part of human nature to not want a monkey looking person, and there is no signal it will change as now even men trim, shave and wax their body hair. www.elle.com/beauty/makeup-skin-care/tips/g8155/history-of-hair-removal/?slide=7 www.refinery29.com/body-grooming-history#slide
How would you know about what would be good in the future? We could be all going in for 100% bald women with no hair at all. Also, at the mean time it's not normal, sooo...
Yeah, it's okay for women to be bit hairy down there, I am myself a fan of a good Bush Not the one that led America years ago But yeah, I strongly disagree with women having hair on their arms and legs, because as the folk used to say, the first step in becoming a man is being strong, fearless, and hairy.
If you're a man and you shave down there, it's okay. But there is no reason to shave your legs as a man, shaving your arms is a whole different case, since you could be a doctor, a cook, which both of these jobs require the least hair on your arms.
Yeah I did read what you said, I was just mentioning something else.
But yeah, being a woman and not shaving your privates is okay, but not shaving your legs / arms, is not great at all.
I disapprove of a man being called a woman / dressing like a woman / acting like a woman, basically being a transsexual, but I only approve if that man had same body parts as the opposing race.
My logic is : If you were born a man, then be a man. if you were born a man with the FEATURES of a woman, then be a woman. Also yeah, corrected it in the comment below.
Why would a disagreeing person deny something for my agreeing will? That sounds like something that will never happen in an argument. If you have the features of a man and feel like you should be a woman, then you're transexual. if you have the features of a woman, then you're a woman. simple. If a man thinks hes a woman, but doesn't want to become one, then he's gay.
That is ONE of the cases of being gay. Don't you know that gay men take roles in their relationships? One's at the kitchen, the other is getting fat stacks. That guy who wants to be a girl is called Transexual. Unless of course, he makes an gender changing operation, until then, nah I disprove. They do from nature, unless they get mixed feelings about their relation with the opposing gender, which basically means being a lesbian. And no, I am not a neckbeard, since I actually shave and take care of myself. At this point I don't even care since I have work to do, if you want to argue about something clear, maybe someone else will pick up this argument.
Oh my everliving god you physically do not understand. Right, empty out all the trash in your head, let me edumacate you. And please don't argue about **** you clearly don't understand, it's just sad.
Gay people are simply to men who want to make the love at each other. There is no requirement for a "man and woman" dichotomy, both parties simply live.
Transgender people are people who are born with bodies that do not match their gender. If they decide to have surgery or hormone treatment they are transexual, however not all transgender people do so for various reasons.
Holy actual crap how can you be this dense. Being gay is when a man wants to **** a man. Being trans is when a guy wants to be a girl. Girls do not automatically want to **** guys you neckbeard idiot.