Ghosts. This kid is too advanced for conventional teaching methods. rebot) ) Than I ghost flew away. Mow many ghosts are left?. ghosts...
Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

hide menu

Ghosts

This kid is too advanced for conventional teaching methods

rebot) )
Than I ghost flew away.
Mow many ghosts are left?
...
  • Recommend tagsx

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Show:   Top Rated Controversial Best Lowest Rated Newest Per page:
Order:
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#3 - mudkipfucker (12/31/2013) [+] (4 replies)
ghosts...
ghosts...
User avatar #1 - tranquilizer (12/31/2013) [+] (20 replies)
... are too
User avatar #25 - doesmyusermatter (12/31/2013) [+] (3 replies)
ghosts arent real but math IS you little ****
#31 - retepraamrod (12/31/2013) [-]
The sentence said there "were 4 ghosts," already making them exist within the question. Logic isn't bound by the physical world.
#32 - Wootpwner (12/31/2013) [-]
If ghosts are not real does that make them imaginary? In which case the answer would be 3i?
#28 - DremoraValkynaz (12/31/2013) [-]
If you have ghosts, you have everything.
User avatar #36 - ishallsmiteyou (12/31/2013) [+] (29 replies)
I personally believe in the existence of ghosts, and hear me out on this. There's more evidence proving their existence than otherwise, and what little evidence there is saying they don't exist is hardly dissuasive.
User avatar #43 to #41 - noblexfenrir (12/31/2013) [-]
"As a whole there's much more evidence proving the existence of ghosts than disproving it. Sources on either side aren't too reliable,"

Again, disproving the claim is not a "side". Maybe saying ghosts don't exist is, but we are simply saying the claim they do exist is and as a result we don't believe in them until better evidence is provided.

Considering the sources for this stance are negations of the evidence for the affirmative, they literally cannot be unreliable if they prove that the evidence for ghosts is in itself, unreliable. Understand? By being unreliable, the evidence for ghosts automatically makes the evidence for not believing the claim, a strong position.

", (again, I never said they were reliable) "
Then it isn't evidence.

"Even had a physical scratch on my back that I discovered that night, that I didn't have in the morning."
Multiple explanations ranging from the scratch already being there to something caught in fabric. Don't you think it's a little ridiculous to jump to the conclusion that ghosts exist or even this supports ghosts?
#71 - thelastelephant ONLINE (01/01/2014) [-]
But how can Halloween be real if ghosts aren't real?
User avatar #58 - ilovehue (01/01/2014) [-]
7, duh.
#56 - destroyerofcunt (12/31/2013) [-]
there are still 4 ghost but one just flew away he is still there
User avatar #50 - kjoni (12/31/2013) [-]
I thought that 0 was a real number school why have you deceived me
#29 - emmerich (12/31/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
#23 - anonymous (12/31/2013) [-]
No way a kid could write that well. My handwriting sucks ten times more than that and i'm 18
#21 - anonymous (12/31/2013) [-]
Is anyone else pissed off that kids old enough to write and reason have to answer dumbass questions like 4-1? China is proof enough that we're screwing over our kids in the education department.
User avatar #20 - infinitereaper ONLINE (12/31/2013) [-]
that's exactly what they want you to think
 Friends (0)