Upload
Login or register
x

Fun N#gger Facts

 
(Enlarge)
Fun N#gger Facts. All other animals on earth have different subspecies that stay in their own groups and mate within their own groups. The only place we find th

All other animals on earth have different subspecies that stay in their own groups and mate within their own groups. The only place we find this intermingling is in the different subspecies of earths most intelligent creature, the human.

****** Facts


Fun N#gger Facts. All other animals on earth have different subspecies that stay in their own groups and mate within their own groups. The only place we find th
Fun N#gger Facts. All other animals on earth have different subspecies that stay in their own groups and mate within their own groups. The only place we find th
Fun N#gger Facts. All other animals on earth have different subspecies that stay in their own groups and mate within their own groups. The only place we find th
Fun N#gger Facts. All other animals on earth have different subspecies that stay in their own groups and mate within their own groups. The only place we find th
(Enlarge)
Fun N#gger Facts. All other animals on earth have different subspecies that stay in their own groups and mate within their own groups. The only place we find th
(Enlarge)
Fun N#gger Facts. All other animals on earth have different subspecies that stay in their own groups and mate within their own groups. The only place we find th
Fun N#gger Facts. All other animals on earth have different subspecies that stay in their own groups and mate within their own groups. The only place we find th
Fun N#gger Facts. All other animals on earth have different subspecies that stay in their own groups and mate within their own groups. The only place we find th

So the rubbish ideal that nature made us evolve differently yet some how all the same is ridiculous and needs to be eliminated as a retarded argument

-1
Views: 1010
Favorited: 4
Submitted: 10/23/2015
Share On Facebook
submit to reddit +Favorite Subscribe to takebackthewest

Comments(74):

Leave a comment Refresh Comments Show GIFs
Top Rated Controversial Best Lowest Rated Newest
Anonymous comments allowed.
74 comments displayed.
Reply
+10
#3 - anon (10/23/2015) [-]
kill yourself op
Reply
+6
#1 - Sperit (10/23/2015) [-]
Dad racis
Reply
-6
User avatar #2 to #1 - takebackthewest [OP](10/23/2015) [-]
its ok im sure you'll live
Reply
+3
#5 - peezle (10/23/2015) [-]
Comment Picture
Reply
+2
#8 - seniorawesomesauce ONLINE (10/23/2015) [-]
Anyway, most of these "Facts" are from either debunked Pseudoscience or debunked Eugenics which is not something to base facts on. Here's a quick rundown:

The reason why breeding between subspecies doesn't happen in nature is because that cannot physically happen. The number of chromosomes between two subspecies are not the same, therefore they cannot mate. An African and a Mexican have the same number of chromosome, because they're the same species, so they can have a baby.

Granule Cells have no impact on the intelligence of a person, and the width of a "supragranular layer" has just as much impact.

Henry Fairfield Osborne died in 1935, and his son, of the same name, in 1969. Neither of them wrote a book about race or evolution, and certainly not in 1980.

"The Origins of Race" is a joke that has long since been debunked. Either way, the Mali, the Songhai, Egyptian, Aksum, and Moroccan kingdoms of Africa have all developed architechture beyond straw and mud.

I have high doubts that " niggermania.com " is unbiased. Either way, get that 1920's eugenics **** out of here. There is 0, zero evidence of dna being related to criminal activity.

I have no idea where you got the idea that native africans/black people eat dirt. Either way, native Africans 8,000 years ago ate cattle, goats, and sheep.

Black people may have slightly jaundiced eyes, to a heavy muddy brown tint of eyes because the concentration of melanin in their bodies, which not only effects their skins, but their eyes as well.

And idk what you're trying to insinuate with the last image. But I assume it's the autistic argument that skull size has some impact on intelligence. Dinosaurs have larger skulls than dolphins, but dolphins have a larger brain capacity and brain volume than that of a dinosaur.

Anyway, 9/10 bait, got me to reply. Get off /pol/ and try doing your own research instead of saving jpgs off of 4chan
Reply
0
User avatar #7 - platinumaltaria ONLINE (10/23/2015) [-]
Ok boy, here we go:

1) Ethnicities are not subspecies, there are far too few differences to consider them that way.
2) The brains of humans show very little variation in form, however size fluctuates quite a bit, seemingly randomly. Brain size does not indicate intelligence.
3) Just... wrong. Look at any crime statistic, you'll see that that is not the case.
4) No scientist of note would make such a claim, as it is wholely unfounded. The brain has not changed much since human have developed ethnicities, and as such it is much the same in all people. IQ is also dependent on education levels to a degree.
5) Tribesmen in Africa continue to live in simple settlements, which is apparently what they want. Elsewhere in Africa there are large cities and towns akin to the western world. Most of the lack of technology has to do with the lack of materials, and the tendency for large animals like elephants to wreck your buildings, not to mention the fact that all must be assembled with man power and almost exclusively without metal tools.
6) Genetics has nothing to do with how one behaves, only which members of a group survive to reproduce. Primitivity is dependent on resources, not intelligence. There is no noticeable difference in violence of black people versus white people, though the average white person has infrastructure in place to settle disputes.
7) White americans frequently consume alcohol, a toxic substance responsible for a large proportion of accidents. People do stupid things.
8) Yes, people look different. Most 5 year olds know that. The yellow colouring of sclera is caused by fat deposits, and is a byproduct of being elderly, not black.
9) Yes, skull shapes vary based on ethnicity, just like most physical features.
10) Nature didn't do anything, aesthetic differences are mostly sexually selected for, therefore certain cultures prefer certain features and shapes.
Reply
+1
User avatar #14 to #9 - platinumaltaria ONLINE (10/23/2015) [-]
Wow! Even though brain size is not related to intelligence?
Reply
0
User avatar #15 to #14 - takebackthewest [OP](10/23/2015) [-]
You are somewhat correct in that statement. But it has been proven that brain size when correlated to body size certainly is related to intelligence. Oh and guess what, in height Averages Negroes score highest, Orientals lowest, and Caucasoids in between.

There are many studies of this sort and many in which negroes perform better than their lighter counterparts. I implore you to read them, It is extremely interesting. And I know its not easy to except but facts cant be racist.
Reply
+1
User avatar #16 to #15 - platinumaltaria ONLINE (10/23/2015) [-]
Why on earth would size be an indicator of intelligence?

Please, show me these studies! I am waiting to see!
Reply
+1
#43 to #16 - anon (10/25/2015) [-]
basically the bigger the body the more brainpower needed to run the body. Hence less brainpower to perform other tasks. I believe that is why, but Im not OP and not studied in this area so I may be off about that.
Reply
-1
User avatar #17 to #16 - takebackthewest [OP](10/23/2015) [-]
Brain size in relation to body size. Id be more than willing to share these points with you, but I don't have a list of sources and Im not going to waste my time doing research for you that you could easily do yourself . I studied brain biology & behaviour and also evolutionary biology in college, I also dedicate a large portion of my time researching these topics as I find them amazing. Not that it matters to you, im sure, but that is how I know this.
Reply
+1
User avatar #18 to #17 - platinumaltaria ONLINE (10/23/2015) [-]
Brain size is NOT intelligence, how many times?

If you had studied, I'd like to think you'd be intelligent enough to understand that you're wrong.
Reply
-1
User avatar #19 to #18 - takebackthewest [OP](10/23/2015) [-]
You are correct as I stated before. But when brain size is measured in relation to body size correlations can be made. This is true and if you do a little research you will see that it is true. Either way if brain size, in either scenario, doesn't relate to intelligence, than why is it that on every IQ test so far conceived (even those without any language or cultural bias ) shows that American blacks score at a consistent standard deviation (15points) lower than whites and orientals consistently score about 5-6 points higher than whites? These same tests show the standard for Africa is 70 and even as low as 52 in some areas. but I guess IQ tests are racist huh?
Reply
+1
User avatar #20 to #19 - platinumaltaria ONLINE (10/23/2015) [-]
There are education disparities between rich and poor people. Since black people tend to fit into the poor column (through no fault of anyone) they are less educated overall. Thus, they may seem less intelligent. However, I guarantee a study of people in similar wealth groups would find no significant correlation.
Reply
-1
User avatar #21 to #20 - takebackthewest [OP](10/23/2015) [-]
those studies have been done and no correlation has been found- at all.
If what you're saying is the case, then white kids should be failing far more than blacks right? Because there are far more poor whites in America than there are blacks.
Reply
+1
User avatar #22 to #21 - platinumaltaria ONLINE (10/23/2015) [-]
No there really aren't. Nice try tho lol. Even a child could tell you that there are more black kids in poorer areas and more white kids in richer ones.
Reply
-1
User avatar #23 to #22 - takebackthewest [OP](10/23/2015) [-]
Yeah because we should really be getting our facts about the world from children. You're completely wrong by the way but look it up, please I'll wait. And if you come back with "those stats be racists" I'll consider that your concession.
Reply
+1
#24 to #23 - platinumaltaria ONLINE (10/23/2015) [-]
Huh, look at that! It's almost as if black people are poorer than whites!
Reply
-1
User avatar #25 to #24 - takebackthewest [OP](10/23/2015) [-]
Your graph conveniently leaves out poor whites, hmmm wonder why.
Reply
+1
User avatar #26 to #25 - platinumaltaria ONLINE (10/23/2015) [-]
You... you do know how averages work? That graph plots the average income of each group.
Reply
0
User avatar #51 to #26 - brutalviking (10/27/2015) [-]
I hope you know that median, and average is quite different from one another.
The median is used when there's a high disparity between the data, while average is used when there's low disparity in the data. Just a way of getting the most accurate measurement.

I'm not disagreeing with you. Just wanted to point that out,
Reply
-1
User avatar #27 to #26 - takebackthewest [OP](10/23/2015) [-]
How does that represent the number of poor whites when whites are approx 77% of the population and blacks are 12%. There is of course huge income disparity but more whites suffer from it than blacks, look up poor whites # vs poor blacks # in us and give me some real numbers. I took statistics too so go ahead and try and fool people with garbage like this last "proof" and ill be forced to call you out every time.
Reply
+1
#28 to #27 - platinumaltaria ONLINE (10/23/2015) [-]
The average income of the two groups has been found; that is not affected by the sample size, come on; This is basic mathematics.

< So I come out with this. Now, that looks like there are more poor whites than black, and that would be correct. However, since white people overall are in far greater numbers in america than black people, a larger portion of black people are poor than the portion of white people who are.
Reply
-1
User avatar #29 to #28 - takebackthewest [OP](10/23/2015) [-]
That's not what you said at first is it? You said there are more poor blacks than whites in Amerika. Now your saying you were speaking ratios so I guess you forgot to mention that part at first right?, its cool evreyone makes mistakes
Reply
+1
User avatar #30 to #29 - platinumaltaria ONLINE (10/23/2015) [-]
Surely it is clear that ratios were involved; I must remember to lower my level of speaking so that you can understand it.
Reply
-1
User avatar #35 to #30 - takebackthewest [OP](10/23/2015) [-]
Well platinumaltaria You have your views and I have mine, I would enjoy discussing these matters in a civil way in the future, but honestly we have talked for quite a while and I have a few things to do. so have a good day.
+1
User avatar #36 to #35 - platinumaltaria ONLINE (10/23/2015) [-]
Ok then!
Reply
-1
User avatar #33 to #30 - takebackthewest [OP](10/23/2015) [-]
this is reply to your comment #31 for some reason the reply button is not there

problem is, kids can not consent. And a large number of people (not all) in the gay community do have sex with underaged boys. Also Im not sure what you mean by thing but animals by definition can't consent either so....no

+1
User avatar #34 to #33 - platinumaltaria ONLINE (10/23/2015) [-]
You can't reply past a certain chain length, sadly.

No, gay people do not want to **** children, they want to **** men. There is no gay agenda around pedophiles, you sound like an idiot. Not to even mention the number of straight catholic priests that **** kids.

Animals can't consent, so bestiality is, in fact, wrong. I am not promoting bestiality in any way.
Reply
-1
#31 to #30 - takebackthewest [OP](10/23/2015) [-]
<--Right Im sorry its right there.....somewhere, I must have missed it somehow.


Again with the ad-hominems, from someone who doesn't know what sodomy is (yet defends it)
0
User avatar #32 to #31 - platinumaltaria ONLINE (10/23/2015) [-]
I will defend anyone's right to put their penis wherever they want, so long as that thing consents to it; and anyone's right to put anything in their vagina, so long as that thing permits it.
Reply
+1
User avatar #13 to #10 - platinumaltaria ONLINE (10/23/2015) [-]
Citation needed.
1) Diamonds are fairly useless to a tribal community, so there was no reason to go after them until europeans came, so they could sell them.
2) The animals of africa don't lend themselves well to being saddled or harnessed, hence the disparity in development.
3) Again, people don't build strong houses when that **** gets broken by elephants.
4) Actually there's a lot of evidence that africans did invent naval travel, so sucketh a dick.
Reply
0
#39 to #13 - anon (10/24/2015) [-]
yeah and they were gods in egypt too, they never even invented the fricken wheel
Reply
+1
User avatar #40 to #39 - platinumaltaria ONLINE (10/24/2015) [-]
People there were not savages, they just had a different sort of system to Europe. They lived in tribes (with the exception of Ethiopia)
Reply
-1
#42 to #13 - anon (10/25/2015) [-]
1) useless? as cutting tools there are very few materials that surpass diamonds, and they would be extremely useful for trade with other peoples.

2) there are plenty of animals in Africa that lend themselves to domestication, and as far as saddles go, ever hear of an animal called the zebra?

3)right our houses are all being trampled by elephants (cause they do that for some reason, really pisses em off seeing houses) so lets make them out of mud instead!

4) Source? And if that is so then how come the first White explorers to Africa specifically noted that the people there were completely ignorant of boats or sailing? never invented the wheel but where masters of the sea, ya ok
Reply
+1
User avatar #46 to #42 - platinumaltaria ONLINE (10/25/2015) [-]
1) Useless to a group of people who have no way of possibly cutting them.
2) Shows how little you know, zebras absolutely do not like being saddled, hence you will find no examples of that happening.
3) If something keeps getting destroyed you make it easier to rebuild.
4) Well all of the islanders around the pacific ocean are black, so... The people did not have giant ships, but they did have smaller rafts. Literally Egypt was founded on travelling up and down the Nile on barges... Wheels were less effective than boats in that regard. One does not require the other.
Reply
-1
#11 to #7 - takebackthewest [OP](10/23/2015) [-]
The skull differences between the three major anthropological groups are easily identified by fragments of bones alone. Ethnicity is pretty much to humans what subspecies is to "animals"
Reply
0
User avatar #12 to #11 - platinumaltaria ONLINE (10/23/2015) [-]
No it isn't. Humans ethnicities can mix with zero resistance, and are basically genetically identical. The only differences are morphological, and those are accounted for by climate and culture.
Reply
-2
User avatar #52 to #12 - schnizel (10/27/2015) [-]
>The only differences are morphological, and those are accounted for by climate and culture.
www.be-md.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3032687/
No.
>No it isn't. Humans ethnicities can mix with zero resistance
Ethnicity=Culture, learn the definition before you spew it.
Also, not ressistance, but genetic incompatibility causes problems in racemixing. Many health problems including depression are related with racemixing.
Reply
0
User avatar #55 to #52 - platinumaltaria ONLINE (10/27/2015) [-]
Kek. I am mixed race dummy. So nice try but shut up.
Reply
0
User avatar #57 to #55 - schnizel (10/27/2015) [-]
Never implied you aren't.
Nice damage control.
Reply
0
User avatar #58 to #57 - platinumaltaria ONLINE (10/27/2015) [-]
I DO NOT HAVE GENETIC DISORDERS, therefore you are incorrect.
Reply
0
User avatar #62 to #58 - schnizel (10/27/2015) [-]
Also, it's not a 100% chance of you getting it, but an increased chance of you getting it. It's like walking down the street in Monaco and walking down the street in Detroit.
Reply
0
#60 to #58 - schnizel (10/27/2015) [-]
You seem to be salty, maybe you have a bipolar disorder?
Reply
0
User avatar #63 to #60 - platinumaltaria ONLINE (10/27/2015) [-]
>"lol mixed race people have genetic problems"
>"but I don't"
>"WOW SO SALTY LOLOLOL"

Please shut up, you're lowering the IQ of everyone nearby.
Reply
0
#64 to #63 - schnizel (10/27/2015) [-]
Where did I say:
>lol mixed race people have genetic problems
Also, how old are you?
Reply
0
User avatar #66 to #64 - platinumaltaria ONLINE (10/27/2015) [-]
>"Many health problems including depression are related with racemixing"

You sicken me
Reply
0
User avatar #68 to #66 - schnizel (10/27/2015) [-]
And I was not wrong. If you are sick, please visit a doctor.
Reply
-1
User avatar #37 to #12 - takebackthewest [OP](10/24/2015) [-]
then explain the Duffy antigen or morphological problems with hybrids resulting from miscegenation.
Reply
+1
User avatar #38 to #37 - platinumaltaria ONLINE (10/24/2015) [-]
I happen to be a "hybrid" and have no such problems.

Explain what, how malaria works? I'm not a pathologist.
Reply
-1
#41 to #38 - takebackthewest [OP](10/25/2015) [-]
Often these problems show up in the 2nd or 3rd generation (as I explained before) and even then there are those that seem to have no problems at all, but these cases are extremely rare. Also in the case of hybrid vigor a hybrid offspring will perform exceptionally (this is one of the main talking points of pro mixers) but this "vigor" is rare and only ever lasts for one generation. But besides all that, the social stigma alone is enough to warrant mental problems, problems with identity. all in all it depends on the races of the parents, for example a White and Asiatic mixed child should have far less of these issues than say a mixed child of a Black and a White. The reasons for this is that whites are far closer genetically to Asians than they are to Blacks. Ill provide further info on the possible physical defects resulting from mixed breeding if you desire, but please keep in mind I'm not trying to offend, just telling the truth as I know it. And I'm not saying that you're a defective individual because of your mixed heritage. But out of curiosity would you mind ( obv. if it's too personal, you need not respond) telling me the ethnicities of your parents?
Reply
+1
User avatar #47 to #41 - platinumaltaria ONLINE (10/25/2015) [-]
My mother is black, and my father is white. So according to you I should be riddled with disease, right? Except the only fault in my genetic code appears to be an epic immune system.
Reply
-1
User avatar #53 to #47 - schnizel (10/27/2015) [-]
>anecdotal evidence
Reply
0
User avatar #54 to #53 - platinumaltaria ONLINE (10/27/2015) [-]
It's not anecdotal, it's personal.
Reply
0
User avatar #56 to #54 - schnizel (10/27/2015) [-]
Hence the same from this point of view.
Reply
0
User avatar #59 to #56 - platinumaltaria ONLINE (10/27/2015) [-]
Please provide a single study that suggests that "race mixing" is responsible for any form of illness. Thanks in advance.
Reply
0
User avatar #61 to #59 - schnizel (10/27/2015) [-]
A massively well-funded study of over 100,000 schoolchildren found that “Adolescents who identify themselves as mixed race are at higher health and behavior risk than those of 1 race.” Indeed, even when controlling for education, socioeconomic status, and other factors, there is an across-the board higher rate of health risks amongst mixed race adolescents than mono-racial adolescents.
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1448064/
Reply
0
User avatar #65 to #61 - platinumaltaria ONLINE (10/27/2015) [-]
I'm actually reading this and it sounds like some sort of pseudoscientific ******** .

>"can't form racial identity"
Oh waah, how does that matter?
Reply
0
User avatar #67 to #65 - schnizel (10/27/2015) [-]
That's your own subjective opinion, said with a lot of bias.
>Oh waah, how does that matter?
Because they are more likely to suffer from depression if they don't have an identity.
Reply
0
User avatar #69 to #67 - platinumaltaria ONLINE (10/27/2015) [-]
People's identity doesn't stem from their skin colour you ******* idiot. That's how we get race-warriors like you. Does it hurt you to know that white people are a worldwide minority?
Reply
0
User avatar #70 to #69 - schnizel (10/27/2015) [-]
Ones race is not just skin color, but a cluster of characteristics and abilities.
>Does it hurt you to know that white people are a worldwide minority?
No, it saddens me that I'm talking to a mutt, and a woman, as in the inferior sex.
Reply
0
User avatar #71 to #70 - platinumaltaria ONLINE (10/27/2015) [-]
Hahaa oh my **** ! Credibility out the ******* window then? That's cool with me.
Reply
0
User avatar #72 to #71 - schnizel (10/27/2015) [-]
Are you done with your mad ramblings and childish behaviour?
Reply
0
User avatar #73 to #72 - platinumaltaria ONLINE (10/27/2015) [-]
I'm done with your stormfag attitude, good luck scouring the jews from the earth!
Reply
0
User avatar #74 to #73 - schnizel (10/27/2015) [-]
k
Reply
-1
#48 to #47 - takebackthewest [OP](10/26/2015) [-]
like I said its not always a problem and its not always in the first generation. Im also not a Doctor. So no I wouldn't say you were riddled with diseases because of that it's nothing like that. I'm glad to hear you're in good health. The problem is that blacks and whites differ considerably in their physiology. Different amounts of hormones like testosterone, length of limb ratios, hair texture, etc. and in a mixed individual like this you can get a light skinned black looking guy with green eyes and white people hair or you can get a white colored person with black features and nappy air. Tending usually to look black because black genes are usually dominant. These same variations occur in every part of the body which can become a problem internally. Among other things. nobody knows this when they go out and produce a child, and by no means was I trying to insult you, but I don't condone race-mixing. Sorry, just don't think it's right.
Reply
-1
#44 to #7 - takebackthewest [OP](10/25/2015) [-]
All your points are rubbish. The FBI's crime stats are on the web for anyone to see. All interracial rapes between blacks and whites were committed by black males on white females. near or at zero% for white on black rape rate. Violent crime among black youfs (18-40 ) is something like 5000 times what it should be for their small ratio of the population. I've posted these stats before, i'm sure you can find them if determined to do so.
Evolutionary biologists have shown the numerous difference in the races and ( I'm paraphrasing darwin here because i can't seem find the quote atm ) "The differences between the races of man are so great that if they were any other animal these differences would have us classify them as completely different species."(sub-species?)
Reply
+1
User avatar #45 to #44 - platinumaltaria ONLINE (10/25/2015) [-]
1) All of them? So there are no white female rapists ever attacking black males?
2) Rates are proportional to the population, stupid.
3) I do not care what darwin said, he didn't know **** .
Reply
-1
#49 to #45 - anon (10/26/2015) [-]
and this is a just yearly stat, yet it always looks like this
Reply
+1
User avatar #50 to #49 - platinumaltaria ONLINE (10/27/2015) [-]
No it does not, do some research, jesus.
Reply
0
User avatar #6 - anonymoussarcasm (10/23/2015) [-]
Can you say the word unsubstantiated?
Reply
0
#4 - chokebee ONLINE (10/23/2015) [-]
The OP has some valid points there. He even prepared all documents to prove his thesis.
Unfortunately, OP is a faggot.
 
Leave a comment
<
>
 Friends (0)